Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byJulianna Montgomery Modified over 2 years ago

1
Ding-Zhu Du │ University of Texas at Dallas │ Lecture 7 Rumor Blocking 0

2
Least Cost Rumor Blocking in Social networks Lidan Fan, Zaixin Lu, Weili Wu, Bhavani Thuraisingham, Huan Ma, Yuanjun Bi. Published in ICDCS2013 5/11/2015

3
Outline Background Motivation Problem formulation Related Works Our Contribution Two influence diffusion models Least cost rumor blocking problem Conclusions Future Works 5/11/20152

4
Outline Background Motivation Problem formulation Related Works Our Contribution Two influence diffusion models Least cost rumor blocking problem Conclusions Future Works 5/11/20153

5
Social networks 5/11/20154

6
Social Network Social network is a social structure made up of individuals and relations between these individuals Social network provides a platform for influence diffusion 5/11/20155

7
Applications Single cascade Viral marketing Recommender systems Feed ranking …… Multiple cascades Political election Multiple products promotion Rumor/misinformation controlling …… 5/11/20156

8
Social network properties Small-world effect The average distance between vertices in a network is short. Power-law or exponential form There are many nodes with low degree and a small number with high degree. Clustering or network transitivity Two vertices that are both neighbors of the same third vertex have a high probability of also being neighbors of one another. Community structure The connections within the same community are dense and between communities are sparse. 5/11/20157

9
Influence spreads fast within the same community. Influence spreads slow across different communities. 5/11/20158

10
9

11
10 When misinformation or rumor spreads in social networks, what will happen?

12
A misinformation said that the president of Syria is dead, and it hit the twitter greatly and was circulated fast among the population, leading to a sharp, quick increase in the price of oil. http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/technology-blog/twitter-rumor- leads-sharp-increase-price-oil-173027289.html 5/11/201511

13
In August, 2012, thousands of people in Ghazni province left their houses in the middle of the night in panic after the rumor of earthquake. http://www.pajhwok.com/en/2012/08/20/quak e-rumour-sends-thousands-ghazni-streets 5/11/201512

14
5/11/201513

15
Outline Background Motivation Problem formulation Related Works Our Contribution Two influence diffusion models Least cost rumor blocking problem Conclusions Future Works 5/11/201514

16
Rumors generated in a community will influence the members in the network. Find protectors to reduce the influence of rumors. Real-world limitation: the overhead spent on protectors and protected members should be balanced. Rumors spread very fast within their community---too much cost Rumors spread slow across different communities---little cost Find least number of protectors to reduce rumor influence to the members in other communities. 5/11/201515

17
Our Tasks Determine influence diffusion models. Design efficient algorithms to find protectors. Obtain real world data to evaluate our algorithms. 5/11/201516

18
Outline Background Motivation Problem formulation Related Works Our Contribution Two influence diffusion models Least cost rumor blocking problem Conclusions Future Works 5/11/201517

19
5/11/201518

20
Outline Background Motivation Problem formulation Related Works Our Contribution Two influence diffusion models Least cost rumor blocking problem Conclusions Future Works 5/11/201519

21
Deterministic One Activate Many (DOAM) Opportunistic One Activate One (OPOAO) 5/11/201520

22
Common properties Two cascades: rumor and protector; Diffusion starts time: the same; Tie breaking rule: protector has priority over rumor; Status of each node: inactive, infected, protected; Monotonicity assumption: the status of infected or protected never changes. 5/11/201521

23
Deterministic One Activate Many (DOAM) 5/11/201522

24
Additional properties of the DOAM model When a node becomes active (infected or protected), it has a single chance to activate all of its currently inactive (not infected and not protected) neighbors. The activation attempts succeed with a probability 1. 5/11/201523

25
Example 1 3 4 5 2 6 1 is a rumor, 6 is a protector. Step 1: 1--2,3; 6--2,4. 2 and 4 are protected, 3 is infected. 5/11/201524

26
1 3 5 2 4 6 Step 2: 4--5. 5 is protected. Example 5/11/201525

27
Opportunistic One Activate One (OPOAO) 5/11/201526

28
Additional properties of the OPOAO model At each step, each active (infected or protected) node u can only choose one of its neighbors as its target, and each neighbor is chosen with a probability of 1/deg(u). Each active (infected or protected) node has unlimited chance to select the same node as its target. 5/11/201527

29
Example 1 3 4 5 2 6 Step 1:1--2, 6--2. 2 is protected. 1 is a rumor, 6 is a protector. 5/11/201528

30
1 3 4 5 2 6 Step 2:1--3, 6--2. 3 is infected. Example 5/11/201529

31
1 3 4 5 2 6 Step 3:1--2, 3--4, 6--4. 4 is protected. Example 5/11/201530

32
1 3 4 5 2 6 Step 4:1--3, 3--2, 6--4, 4--5. 5 is protected. Example 5/11/201531

33
Outline Background Motivation Problem formulation Related Works Our Contribution Two influence diffusion models Least cost rumor blocking problem Conclusions Future Works 5/11/201532

34
Least Cost Rumor Blocking Problem (LCRB) Bridge ends: form a vertex set; belong to neigborhood communities of rumor community; each can be reached from the rumors before others in its own community. C0 C2 C1 Red node is a rumor; Yellow nodes are bridge ends. 5/11/201533

35
LCRB-D problem for the DOAM model Given: community structure rumors rumor community Goal: Find least number of protectors to protect all of the bridge ends. 5/11/201534

36
Set Cover Based Greedy (SCBG) Algorithm Main idea Convert to set cover problem using Breadth First Search (BFS) method. Three stages: construct Rumor Forward Search Trees (RFST)--bridge ends construct Bridge End Backward Search Trees (BEBST)-- protector candidates construct vertex sets used in set cover problem 5/11/201535

37
Construct Rumor Forward Search Trees (RFST) 67 5 1 3 4 2 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Yellow nodes are bridge ends. 5/11/201536

38
Rumor 4 Forward Search Tree 4 1 2 5 12 3 8 The minimal hops: 1 hop between 4 and 5; 2 hops between 4 and 12; 3 hops between 4 and 8. 5,8,12 are the bridge ends. 5/11/201537

39
67 5 1 3 4 2 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Blue nodes are protector candidates. 5/11/201538 Construct Bridge End Backward Search Trees (BEBST)

40
Bridge End Backward Search Trees 5 7 4 8 12 3 4 2 9 103 4 2 11 Record the protector candidate sets for each bridge end: 5: {5,7}; 8:{2,3,8,9,10,11}; 12:{2,3,12} 5/11/201539

41
Construct vertex sets in set cover problem Find the bridge ends that each candidate can protect: 2:{8,12}; 3:{8,12} ; 5:{5}; 7:{5}; 8:{8}; 9:{8}; 10:{8};11{8}; 12{12} Apply the Greedy algorithm choose 2 or 3, bridge ends 8 and 12 are protected; choose 5 or 7, bridge end 5 is protected; the output is {2,5} or {2,7} or {3,5} or {3,7}. 5/11/201540

42
Theoretical Results There is a polynomial time O(ln n)−approximation algorithm for the LCRB- D problem, where n is the number of vertices in the set of bridge ends. If the LCRB-D problem has an approximation algorithm with ratio k(n) if and only if the set cover problem has an approximation algorithm with ratio k(n). 5/11/201541

43
Set-Cover Given a collection C of subsets of a set E, find a minimum subcollection C’ of C such that every element of E appears in a subset in C’.

44
Example of Submodular Function

45
Greedy Algorithm

46
Analysis

50
Weighted Set Cover Given a collection C of subsets of a set E and a weight function w on C, find a minimum total- weight subcollection C’ of C such that every element of E appears in a subset in C’.

51
A General Problem

52
Greedy Algorithm

53
A General Theorem Remark:

54
Proof

60
12 3

61
z ek z e1 Ze2Ze2

62
Proof can be found in 61

63
Experiments Two datasets Collaboration Network ( http://snap.stanford.edu/data/cit-HepPh.html ): http://snap.stanford.edu/data/cit-HepPh.html Covers scientific collaborations between authors with papers submitted to High Energy Physics. Nodes: Papers Edge (i,j): Author i co-authored a paper with author j Email Network ( http://snap.stanford.edu/data/email-Enron.html ): http://snap.stanford.edu/data/email-Enron.html Covers all the email communications within a dataset of around half million emails. Nodes: Email addresses Edge (i, j): Address i sends at least one email to address j 5/11/201562

64
5/11/201563 DatasetsHEP-PHEnron-Email # of nodes1523336692 # of edges58891367662 Average degree7.7310 # of selected communities 12 Description of the communities chosen Size:308 Bridge end size: 387 Size: 80 Bridge end size:135 Size: 2631 Bridge end size: 2250

65
Our algorithm performs the best. The third community, which is dense and has large number of nodes, shows that our algorithm is robust and scalable. 5/11/201564 Experimental Results SCBGProximityMaxDegree Hep/15233/308 1%32.925.3140.6 5%42.174.3147.8 10%48.9133.8152.6 Email/36692/80 5%6.243.772.7 10%8.246.979.3 20%13.862.991.1 Email/36692/2631 1%20.4289.31208.8 5%50.91067.61350.2 10%68.41422.61683.8

66
5/11/201565 Experiments

67
5/11/201566 Experiments Our algorithm performs in all figures except Fig7(a). the network is sparse, when the number of rumors is small, it is possible that Proximity performs better than ours Proximity is better than MaxDegree in Fig7and Fig8. number of rumors is small and network is sparse MaxDegree is better than Proximity in Fig9. number of rumor is large and network is dense

68
Rumor Blocking problem under the OPOAO model Given: the community structure Rumor sources R rumor community number of protectors k Goal: Find k protectors such that the expected number of bridge ends protected is maximized. Influence function σ(A) of node set A: Expected number of nodes that would be infected if A is selected as the protector seeds initially. 5/11/201567

69
5/11/201568

70
Property of Submodularity 5/11/201569 Submodularity : PB(A): the set of nodes that can be protected by set A. PB(A+v)-PB(A): can be protected by A+v can not be protected by A A PB(v) B PB(A) PB(B) v

71
Main Results 5/11/201570

72
Proof of Submodularity Timestamp assignment of rumor diffusion x y u v wz x y vu w z x.1 x.2 x.4 x.3 y.1 y.2 y.3 y.4 y.2 y.4 y.3 x.2 x.3 x.4 y.4 x.4 x.3 y.1 y.3 x.3 x.1 x.2 y.4 x.4 y.2 x.3 5/11/2015 71 x.t: the influence spread of rumor x arrive a node at step t

73
Proof of Submodularity Prove the submodularity of cardinality function |PB(A)| The nodes in PB(A) satisfies: infected if the set of protectors is empty not infected if the set of protectors is A Create rumor(protector) random diffusion graph-Gr(Gp). Among the incoming edges of bridge end u in Gr and Gp: find the oldest timestamp in Gr and Gp respectively compare them if the oldest one in Gp is older than the one in Gr then u can be protected otherwise then u will be infected 5/11/201572

74
Example Determine whether u is protected or infected u 5/11/2015 73 p w r r.1 r.2 r.3 p.1 p.2 p.3 Graph G r: rumor p: protector u w r r.1 r.3 u p w p.1 p.3 Random protector diffusion graph Gp Random rumor diffusion graph Gr Since p.1 is older than r.3, then u is protected.

75
Submodularity of function σ(A) Fact: A non-negative linear combination of monotone and submodular functions is still monotone and submodular. Probabilities are non-negative; |PB(A)| is submodular; σ(A) is submodular. 5/11/201574

76
5/11/201575

77
5/11/201576

78
A general result on greedy algorithm With non-integer potential function Consider a monotone increasing, submodular function Consider the following problem: whereis a nonnegative cost function

79
Greedy Algorithm G

80
Theorem Suppose in Greedy Algorithm G, selected x always satisfies Then its p.r. where

81
Proof. Letbe obtained by Greedy Algorithm G. Denote Let be an optimal solution. Denote

83
Note that There exists i such that

84
Let Note that So

85
Note Hence,

86
5/11/201585

87
Experiments 5/11/201586

88
5/11/201587 Experiments In Fig4, Fig5 and Fig6, our algorithm performs the best except in several early hops. number of rumors is small Proximity is better than MaxDegree in Fig4, Fig5 and Fig6. stochastic selection mechanism The difference between Proximity and MaxDegree in Fig4 is larger than that in Fig5 and Fig6. network in Fig4 is sparse

89
Outline Background Motivation Problem formulation Related Works Our Contribution Two influence diffusion models Least cost rumor blocking problem Conclusions Future Works 5/11/201588

90
Conclusions Introduce two influence diffusion models Deterministic One Activate Many --DOAM Opportunistic One Activate One--OPOAO The least cost rumor blocking (LCRB) problem in two models LCRB-D problem under the DOAM—protect all the bridge ends Algorithm: Set Cover Based Greedy (SCBG) Data: collaboration network and email network Our algorithm: robust and scalable. LCRB-P problem under the OPOAO—protect α fraction of the bridge ends Influence function σ(A): submodularity Method: timestamp assignment Algorithm: Greedy Data: collaboration network and email network. Our algorithm: robust and scalable 5/11/201589

91
Outline Background Motivation Problem formulation Related Works Our Contribution Two influence diffusion models Least cost rumor blocking problem Conclusions Future Works 5/11/201590

92
2015-5-1191 Future Works Establish continuous time influence propagation model In real world, under most situations, influence diffuses in continuous time. Measure the diffusion time based on factors such as individual attributes, information properties, strength of relations, etc.

93
2015-5-1192 Future Works Study rumor blocking and influence diffusion under dynamic social structures Under most cases, the relations between individuals change along with time, that is, social structures change along with time, what results can we get for rumor blocking and influence diffusion in dynamic situation.

94
2015-5-11 93 Future Works Detect rumor sources Previous works in controlling rumor diffusion assume that rumor sources are known. However, in reality, it is hard to know the accurate rumor sources. Estimate rumor sources accurately using existing information.

95
5/11/201594

Similar presentations

OK

1 1 Stanford University 2 MPI for Biological Cybernetics 3 California Institute of Technology Inferring Networks of Diffusion and Influence Manuel Gomez.

1 1 Stanford University 2 MPI for Biological Cybernetics 3 California Institute of Technology Inferring Networks of Diffusion and Influence Manuel Gomez.

© 2018 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Free ppt on mobile number portability idea Ppt on linked list in c Free ppt on human circulatory system How to view ppt online Ppt on urinary catheterization Ppt on centring meditation Hrm ppt on recruitment 2016 Ppt on balanced diet Ppt on power sharing in democracy supreme Ppt on p&g products promotion