Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byOswald Nelson Modified about 1 year ago

1
Stick Tossing and Confidence Intervals Asilomar - December 2006 Bruce Cohen Lowell High School, SFUSD bic@cgl.ucsf.edu http://www.cgl.ucsf.edu/home/bic David Sklar San Francisco State University dsklar@sfsu.edu Ver. 0.5

2
An Old Problem: When a thin stick of unit length is “randomly” tossed onto a grid of parallel lines spaced one unit apart what is the probability that the stick lands crossing a grid line? We would like to take a purely experimental and statistical approach to the problem of finding, or at least estimating, the desired probability. Estimating a Probability Our experiments will consist of tossing a stick some fixed number of times, keeping track of how many times the stick lands crossing a grid line (the data), and computing the percentage of times this event occurs (a statistic). Basic statistical theory will help us understand how to interpret these results.

3
Sketch of a proof of a special case of the Central Limit Theorem Where does the procedure for finding confidence intervals come from? Why does it work? A mathematical model for the data The mathematics of the model Plan Estimating a simple probability Toss sticks, gather data Estimating the probability Estimating the uncertainty in the estimate of the probability Confidence intervals and what they mean Background material The average and standard deviation of a list of numbers Histograms, what they are and what they aren’t The average and standard deviation of a histogram The normal curve Box models and histograms for the sum of the draws The Central Limit Theorem

4
Estimating the Probability: A Sample Calculation Result: 20 line crossings in 36 tosses Conclusions: Based on this data an approximate 68% confidence interval for the probability that the stick lands crossing a line is an approximate 95% confidence interval is 47.3% 63.9% 72.2% 39.0%

5
68% Confidence Intervals for 10 Experiments 47.3% 63.9% 58.8% 74.6% 44.5% 61.1% cross prob SE 20 55.6% 8.3% 24 66.7% 7.9% 19 52.8% 8.3% 70.9% 84.7% 55.9% 71.2% 28 77.8% 6.9% 23 63.9% 8.0% 61.7% 77.1% 58.8% 74.6% 55.9% 71.2% 25 69.4% 7.7% 24 66.7% 7.9% 27 75.0% 7.2% 23 63.9% 8.0% 21 58.3% 8.2% 67.8% 82.2% 50.1% 66.5% 60% 70% 80% 40% 50% estimated (36 tosses per experiment)

6
70.0% 60.0% 62.5% 67.5% Pooling the data Result: 234 line crossings in 360 (independent) tosses Conclusions: Based on this data an approximate 68% confidence interval for the probability that the stick lands crossing a line is an approximate 95% confidence interval is

7
68% Confidence Intervals for 10 Experiments 47.3% 63.9% 58.8% 74.6% 44.5% 61.1% 70.9% 84.7% 55.9% 71.2% cross prob error 20 55.6% 8.3% 24 66.7% 7.9% 19 52.8% 8.3% 28 77.8% 6.9% 23 63.9% 8.0% 61.7% 77.1% 58.8% 74.6% 67.8% 82.2% 55.9% 71.2% 25 69.4% 7.7% 24 66.7% 7.9% 27 75.0% 7.2% 23 63.9% 8.0% 60% 70% 80% 40% 50% estimated (36 tosses per experiment) 62.5% 67.5% 21 58.3% 8.2% 50.1% 66.5% 234 65.0% 2.5%

8
Some 95% Confidence Intervals

9
Where Does the Procedure for Finding Confidence Intervals Come From? As with all “real world” applications of mathematics we begin with a Mathematical Model. 1 0 ? ?? Box Model The number of line crossings in n tosses of the stick is like the Sum of values of n draws at random with replacement from a box with two kinds of numbered tickets. Those numbered 1 correspond to the stick landing crossing a line, and those numbered 0 to not crossing. The percentage of tickets numbered 1 in the box is not known. This unknown percentage corresponds to the probability that a stick lands crossing a line. The n drawn tickets are a sample, and the % of 1’s in the sample is a statistic. The set of tickets in the box is called the population, and the (unknown) % of 1’s in the population is a parameter. Note: this kind of box is called a zero–one box.

10
The Mathematics of the Model The goal for the rest of the talk is to develop the mathematics of the box model. We first review some basic background material which we then use to understand the behavior of the sum of the draws from a box of known composition. Finally we use this understanding to see why the confidence levels come from areas under the normal curve.

11
The Average and Standard Deviation of a List of Numbers Example List: 21, 28, 30, 30, 34, 37 The SD measures the spread of the list about the mean. It has the same units as the values in the list. It is a natural scale for the list: we are often more interested in how many SD’s a value is from the mean than in the value itself. 25 35 The average is the balance point. The SD measures the spread. The mean measures the “center” of the list.

12
The Average and Standard Deviation of a List of Numbers For a list consisting of just 0’s and 1’s we have: and with some algebra we can show that We can now re-interpret the procedure for estimating our probability

13
Properties of The Average and Standard Deviation 1.If we add a constant, B, to each element of a list the average of the new list is the old average + B. 2.If we multiply each element of a list by a constant, A, the average of the new list is A times the old average. 3.If we add a constant, B, to each element of a list the SD of the new list is the old SD. 4.If we multiply each element of a list by a constant, A, the SD of the new list is |A| times the old SD.

14
Standard Units A list in standard units will have mean 0 and SD 1. We are often more interested in how many SD’s a value is from the mean than in the value itself. For example: 37 is 1.4 SD’s above the average or 28 is 0.4 SD’s below the average. The value of an element in Standard Units is the the number of SD’s it is above (positive), or below (negative) the mean. To convert a value to standard units use List: 21, 28, 30, 30, 34, 37 with average 30 and SD 5 Example In Standard Units: -1.8, -0.4, 0, 0, 0.8, 1.4 For many lists roughly 68% of the values lie within 1 SD of the mean and 95% lie within 2 SD’s. value in standard units Adding a constant to each element of a list or multiplying each element by a constant will not change the values of the elements in standard units.

15
From Lists to Histograms 23, 29, 30, 31, 35, 38, 40, 41, 42, 45, 46, 51, 52, 54, 55, 55, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 63, 69, 70, 70, 71, 71, 74, 75, 75, 82, 85, 86, 91, 91, 93. Note: Example: 36 Exam Scores 20 - 38 38 - 50 50 - 74 74 - 90 90 - 100 class intervals 6 5 # 16.7 13.9 % 1.4 1644.41.9 6 3 16.7 8.3 1.1 0.8 density (% /point) A Histogram represents the percentages by areas (not by heights). A histogram is not a bar chart. Av = 59.1, SD = 18.9 Endpoint convention: class intervals contain left endpoints, but not right endpoints Density (% per point) 0.0 0.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 scores 20406080100 13.9% 16.7% 44.4% 16.7% 8.3% (0.8) (1.0) (1.9) (1.4) (0.8)

16
A Histogram is Not A Bar Chart A Histogram represents the percentages by areas (not by heights). A histogram is not a bar chart. Density (% per point) 0.0 0.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 scores 20406080100 13.9% 16.7% 44.4% 16.7% 8.3% (0.8) (1.0) (1.9) (1.4) (0.8) Histogram of Scores 2038507490100 scores 13.9% 16.7% 44.4% 16.7% % of total papers 0 10 40 30 20 Bar Chart of Scores 8.3%

17
Density (% per point) 0.0 0.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 scores 13.9% 16.7% 44.4% 16.7% 8.3% (0.8) (1.0) (1.9) (1.4) (0.8) 20406080100 The Average and Standard Deviation of a Histogram To find the mean or average of a histogram first list the center of each class interval then multiply each by the area of the block above it and finally sum. Class intervals: 20 to 38, 38 to 50, 50 to 74, 74 to 90, 90 to 100 To find the standard deviation of a histogram find the squared deviations of the center of each class interval, then multiply each by the area of its corresponding block, then sum, and finally take the square root. SD = 19 Av = 60.5 For many histograms roughly 68% of the area lies within 1 SD of the mean and 95% lies within 2 SD’s. [Note for the original data: Av = 59.1, SD = 18.9] List of midpoints: 29, 44, 62, 82, 95

18
Histograms and Standard Units Density (% per point) scores 0.0 0.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 Av = 60.5 SD = 19 Standard Units 0 123-2-3

19
The Normal Curve From: Freedman, Pisani, and Purves, Statistics, 3 rd Ed. The normal curve was discovered by Abraham De Moivre around 1720. Around 1870 Adolph Quetelet had the idea of using it as an ideal histogram to which histograms for data could be compared. Many histograms follow the normal curve and many do not. Height (% per Std.U.) Area (percent)

20
Density (% per point) scores 0.0 0.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 Av = 60.5 SD = 19 Standard Units 0 123-2-3 Histograms, Standard Units, and the Normal curve

21
Data Histograms and Probability Histograms Discrete data convention From: Freedman, Pisani, and Purves, Statistics, 3 rd ed.

22
Data Histograms and Probability Histograms for the Sum of the Draws

23
The Central Limit Theorem There are many Central Limit Theorems. We state two in terms of box models. The second is a special case of the first and it covers the model we are dealing with in our stick tossing problem. It goes back to the early eighteenth century. When drawing at random with replacement from a box of numbered tickets (with bounded range), the probability histogram for the sum of the draws will follow the standard normal curve, even if the the contents of the box do not. The histogram must be put into standard units, and the number of draws must be reasonably large. De Moivre – La Place version: When drawing at random with replacement from a zero-one box, the probability histogram for the sum of the draws will follow the standard normal curve, even if the the contents of the box do not. The histogram must be put into standard units, and the number of draws must be reasonably large.

24
The Normal Curve and Probability Histograms for the Sum of the Draws 100 50 0 01 Histogram for the box From: Freedman, Pisani, and Purves 10 provides a box model for counting the number of heads in n tosses of a fair coin.

25
The Normal Curve and Probability Histograms for the Sum of the Draws From: Freedman, …

26
The Normal Curve and Probability Histograms for the Sum of the Draws From: Freedman, … Histogram for the box 129

27
The Central Limit Theorems When drawing at random with replacement from a box of numbered tickets (with bounded range), the probability histogram for the sum (and average) of the draws will follow the standard normal curve, even if the the contents of the box do not. The histogram must be put into standard units, and the number of draws must be reasonably large. De Moivre – La Place version: When drawing at random with replacement from a zero-one box, the probability histogram for the sum (and average) of the draws will follow the standard normal curve, even if the the contents of the box do not. The histogram must be put into standard units, and the number of draws must be reasonably large. The probability histogram for the average of the draws, when put in standard units is the same as for the sum because multiplying each value of the sum by 1/(# of draws) won’t change the corresponding values in standard units.

28
Where Does the 68% Confidence Level Come From? Sample Average True Population Average True SE for the average of the draws Estimated SE for the average Standard units 1 Since the estimated SE for the average computed from sample is, on average, about equal to the true SE a 68% confidence interval will cover the true population mean whenever the sample mean is within 1 SE of the true mean. The probability of this happening is, by the central limit theorem, the area within 1 standard unit of 0 under the normal curve, and this area is about 68%.

29
How to Prove The De Moivre – La Place Version of The Central Limit Theorem Show that the probability that the sum of n draws at random with replacement from a zero-one box is exactly k given by the binomial formula Then using “Stirling’s Formula”

30
How to Prove The De Moivre – La Place Version of The Central Limit Theorem -- continued Which implies Use the series for the log to show that, The limiting processes in these steps require some care. Both k and n must go to infinity together in a fixed relationship to each other, and we need to understand why values of x for which |x|>npq are unimportant.

31
Bibliography 1.Freedman, Pisani, & Purves, Statistics, 3 rd Ed., W.W. Norton, New York, 1998 2.W. Feller, An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, Volume I, 2 nd Ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, London, Sydney, 1957 3. F. Mosteller, Fifty Challenging Problems in Probability with Solutions, Addison-Wesley, Palo Alto, 1965. 4. http://www-history.mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk/Biographies/De_Moivre.html 5. R Development Core Team, R: A language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2006,

Similar presentations

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google