# Misconceptions and Fallacies Concerning Probability Assessments.

## Presentation on theme: "Misconceptions and Fallacies Concerning Probability Assessments."— Presentation transcript:

Misconceptions and Fallacies Concerning Probability Assessments

Law of Averages Toss coin many times. What happens as number of tosses increases? Law of Averages Says: n The percentage of heads should become very close to 50%.

John Kerrich’s Coin-tossing Experiment Number of Tosses Proportion Heads

Law of Averages IN GENERAL Law of Averages says: Averages and proportions vary less from the “expected” as sample size increases

Two Misconceptions

1. Question: A coin is tossed either 2 times or 100 times. You win \$2 if # of heads = # of tails. Which has a better chance of winning ? n 2 times OR n 100 times

In fact: As # of tosses increases, the chance of “exactly 50% Heads” decreases

John Kerrich’s Coin-tossing Experiment (Text, p.274) Number of Number of Difference from Tosses Heads Expected 10 4 -1 20 10 0 30 17 2 40 21 1 50 25 0 8,000 4,034 34 9,000 4,538 38 10,000 5,067 67 :::: :::: ::::

John Kerrich’s Coin-tossing Experiment : Number of Tosses # Heads - Half the # of Tosses

# of Tosses Probability of between 49.9% and 50.1% HEADS 100.08 10,000.17 1,000,000.95 So - as the number of tosses increases, the chance that the % of HEADS is close to 50% INCREASES

Exercise 4, page 277 (a) there are more than 60% Heads. In each of the following situations, you will toss a coin 10 times or 100 times. Which is better if you win whenever: (b) there are more than 40% Heads. (c) there are between 40% and 60% Heads. (d) there are exactly 50% Heads. (c’) there are between 60% and 80% Heads.

2. How Does the Law of Averages Work? n By “compensation” or “adjustment” ? NO! Kerrich example:  130 instances of “HHHH”  next toss: 69 H’s 61 T’s (no adjustment) –gambler’s fallacy !

2. How Does the Law of Averages Work? Actually, the Law of Averages works by swamping. –isolated discrepancies become unimportant as number of tosses increases

1. The Availability Heuristic -- probability assessment is based on instances that you can remember Example: deaths by homicide or from a stroke -- Which happen more often? (strokes cause about 11 times as many deaths as homicides) Distortion of Subjective Probabilities

2. Representative Heuristic -- assignment of higher probabilities than are realistic based on how one imagines things will happen Example: Bank Teller Linda is 31 yrs old, single, and outspoken. As a student she was involved with issues of discrimination and social justice, and she also participated in the anti-nuclear demonstrations. Which is more likely? (a) Linda is a bank teller (b) Linda is a bank teller who is active in the feminist movement.

Conjunction Fallacy -- when chance of 2 or more events both occurring is given a higher chance than the individual events.

3. Anchoring –risk perception can be distorted by providing an “anchor” or reference point Example: chance of nuclear war Questionnaire: (a) Do you think the chance of a nuclear war is higher or lower than 1% (b) Do you think the chance of a nuclear war is higher or lower than 90% Problem: conservatism in probability revision

4. Forgotten Base Rates –ignoring information concerning likelihood of an event Example: Physicians and Rare Diseases Situation: -- a patient may have a rare disease -- diagnostic test is positive -- what is chance the patient has the disease? Doctors often over-estimate the chance that the patient has the disease - in one such study the doctors’ estimates were 10 times too high

5. Overconfidence/Optimism –psychologists have found that people tend to have subjective probabilities about themselves that are unrealistically optimistic Example: “It’ll never happen to me” -- leads to foolish risk taking

6. Gambler’s Fallacy -- “I’m due”