Presentation on theme: "Bioenergy: Opportunities and Challenges"— Presentation transcript:
1Bioenergy: Opportunities and Challenges Peter HazellVisiting ProfessorCentre for Environmental PolicyWye Campus
2The promise of bioenergy High cost of oil and need for cheaper alternativesGlobal demand for oil will increase 50% by 2025, mostly because of fast growing Asian economiesSeveral major oil exporters are politically unstable or failed statesGlobal climate change and need to reduce carbon emissionsGood way to rejuvenate agriculture and rural economies. In poor countries an engine of growth. In rich countries a way to reduce the need for farm support policiesUnlike oil, most countries can produce at least some bioenergy
3Bio-energy today Type Use Replaces Raw material Main users Ethanol TransportPetrolSugarMaizeBrazil and USBiodieselDieselOilseedsEU, especially Germany and FranceBiomassElectricityHome cooking and heatingCoal, gas and oilKeroseneWoody materials, crop and livestock wasteManyDeveloping countries
4Bio-energy todayBio-energy already accounts for 14% of total world energy use; 33% in developing countries (70% in Africa) but only 2-3% in industrial countriesSmall scale burning of biomass accounts for most household energy use in poor countries.Biofuels for transport still small; 40% of transport fuel in Brazil but only 3-5% in US and EU and less elsewhere.
5Top producers of biofuels in 2005 (million liters) CountryEthanolBiodieselUSA16,230290Brazil16,500China2,000EU950India300Germany1,920France511Italy227
6OutlookBy 2010 the EU plans to have doubled the share of renewable energy in its primary energy consumption to 12 %. Biofuels will increase to 5.75% of total transport fuels.The US also plans to more than double its current 2% share for biofuels by 2016 but this may accelerateBrazil plans to increase biofuels share from 37% to about 60%China and India have launched new bio-energy industries
7Are biofuels really economic? At the current oil price of nearly $100/barrel it pays to burn almost anything except oil! Prices will eventually fall again, so we need to focus on the trend price -- $60-70??Ethanol from sugar cane is economic at oil prices of $30-35 /barrel (Brazil)Ethanol from maize is economic at $55 (US)Bio-diesel from oilseeds is economic at $80 (EU)Sweet sorghum??
8Do biofuels really save fossil fuels and reduce carbon emissions? Fossil fuels are used in the production and distribution of bio-energy, hence need to look at energy ratios. This is the ratio of available energy delivered per liter of biofuel to the total fossil fuel energy used in its production – calculated over the full production cycle.What is the net carbon savings over fossil fuels measured per mile of transport -- again calculated over the full production cycle?
9Methods vary for calculating energy ratios What energy inputs to include. Should, for example, the energy used in making agricultural machines or sustaining farm workers be included or just the energy content of direct inputs like diesel and fertilizer?What energy credit to give co-products like cattle feed
10Energy balance for ethanol from maize USDA (2002) estimates for ethanol from maize place the energy ratio in the range of 1.25 to 1.5But if co-products are excluded then the ratio is around 1.05 to 1.1But controversy remains
11Net energy calculation for ethanol from maize in US (USDA, 2002) Production phaseBTU/gallonMaize production21,598Maize transport2,263Ethanol conversion51,779Ethanol distribution1,588Total energy used77,228Ethanol energy content83,960Co-product energy content14,372Energy ratio w/o co-products1.08Energy ratio with co-products1.27
12Energy balance for one gallon of ethanol produced from maize in the US (David Pimental at Cornell University)BTU×1000Farm production(machinery, fertilizers, electricity, transport, etc.)40,221Ethanol production99,119Total (not including final distribution to petrol stations)139,340Ethanol energy content77,000Energy ratio0.55
13Energy balances for other fuel types Source: Worldwatch Institute, 2006 Fuel (feedstock)Fossil energy balanceCellulosic ethanol2 to 36Biodiesel (palm oil)≈9Ethanol (sugar cane)≈8Biodiesel (soybeans)≈3Biodiesel (rapeseed)≈2.5Ethanol (wheat, sugar beets)≈2Ethanol (maize)≈1.5Petrol and diesel0.8Sweet sorghum??
14These ratios are improving over time with advances in the technologies for processing feedstock They could also be improved by substituting more bioenergy for fossil fuels in production and transport activities, or reducing the use of N fertilizer by using N fixing crops
15Net carbon savingsWhen blended with petrol or diesel, most biofuels from grains can reduce carbon emissions by 10-30% per mile traveled, and the savings are greater the higher the fuel blendBiodiesel from soybeans can save 40%Ethanol from sugar cane can save 90%
16These carbon savings do not take an alternative land use as the counterfactual when calculating the carbon savings. They assume the same crop would have been grown anyway.The results would be much worse if, for example, forest is cleared to grow biofuel feedstock, as happens with some sugar in Brazil or oil palm in Malaysia.The results would be better if woody plantations are established on already degraded lands in India, or if perennial feedstock that sequester large amounts of carbon in the soil replace annual crops
17A forthcoming technology revolution? First generation technologies are constrained by:Bioenergy products are currently subsidiary to the more primary activities of agri-business (e.g. producing refined sugar, bread, vegetable oils) leading to sub-optimal feedstock and processing technologiesBioenergy products are fed into existing energy distribution and use systems (e.g. coal fired power stations, petrol engines).Not yet very profitable or energy efficient to process cellulose rich feedstock, only sugars, starches and vegetable oils
18Second generation technologies will be different The “Holy Grail” is the efficient conversion of cellulose rich biomass into liquid and gaseous energy forms using thermo-chemical processes rather than fermentation. This will allow: Cellulose rich biomass to be grown on marginal lands that do not compete as much with food Use of perennial feedstock crops and trees that use far less fossil fuel energy in their production and which sequester large amounts of carbon in the soilSpecialized plant breeding will increase biomass and energy production per hectare for specialized feedstock crops and plantationsProcessing costs per litre of biofuel will become much cheaperCars and power plants will be designed specifically for new bioenergy products. May eventually see hydrogen and electric cars that provide an indirect way of utilizing woody biomass processed at power stationsAll this should lead to big improvements in energy ratios and net carbon savings within years
19Should governments intervene in bio-energy markets? Help overcome high set up costs and coordination problems until sufficient scale has been achieved in production, distribution and end uses.Correct for environmental externalities in the energy marketOvercome vested interests in existing technologies (but not creating new ones!)Policy instruments include tax rebates on biofuels, carbon taxes, carbon emission caps, mandatory fuel blending, investment incentives, trade protection and public R&D.A philosophical divide arises over whether it is better to use market assisted approaches or centrally mandated solutions.For example, if the objective is to reduce carbon emissions then does one impose carbon taxes that reflect the carbon balance of different types of fuels and let markets decide on the best was to meet energy needs, or does government decide on specific solutions and use quotas and mandatory fuel blending to achieve them?
20Issues for rich countries? Will farm income supports come down as feedstock prices rise? (not so clear in EU with the switch to PES rather than price support). Could these savings pay for bio-energy subsidies?Should countries import biofuels if this is cheaper than own production? Current trade barriers are high ($10-15/liter in the US and EU) and not on Doha agendaAre rich countries building up another costly special interest group; in this case a coalition of large farms, agro-industrialists and the transport sector?
21Issues for developing countries The biggest issue is the food verses fuel tradeoff.“The amount of grain required to fill one SUV tank once with ethanol would feed one person for one year in Africa”What will happen to world food prices and how will this impact on food deficit countries and the poor?World maize and wheat prices are already reaching new highs partly as a result of the US’s biofuels program. IFPRI is projecting significant food price increases if there is a global attempt to replace 10% or more of transport fuels by The OECD and FAO are projecting more modest but sustained real price increases over the next 10 yearsPoor people will suffer and quickly, but will higher prices stimulate agricultural growth and lead to eventual net benefits for the poor? Is this possible in Africa without significant new investment in agriculture generally?
22How can developing countries reduce trade-offs between bio-energy crops and food production ? Develop biomass crops that yield higher amounts of energy per unit of land and water. Biotech could be very useful.Focus on food crops that generate by-products that can be used for bio-energy and breed for larger amounts of by-products.Develop and grow biomass in less-favored areas rather than in prime agricultural lands—an approach that would benefit some of the poorest people but which will depend on more efficient conversion of cellulose rich materials.Invest in increasing the productivity of food crops themselves, since this would free up additional land and waterRemove barriers to international trade in biofuels. The world has enough capacity to meet food needs and grow large amounts of biomass for energy use, but not in all countries and regions. Trade is a powerful way of spreading the benefits of this global capacity while enabling countries to focus on growing the kinds of food, feed, or energy crops for which they are most competitive.
23Other issues for developing countries Can bioenergy production be made pro-poor (small farmers, local small scale processing, etc.)? Probably yes to meet community and regional energy needs but more difficult for biofuels and commercial power plantsCan developing countries capture some of the potential benefits of carbon offset markets through biofuels production? There are limited opportunities with the current CDM but this could change after 2012.