Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byGregory Walters Modified over 3 years ago

1
David Luebke5/11/2015 CS 551 / 645: Introductory Computer Graphics David Luebke cs551@cs.virginia.edu http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~cs551

2
David Luebke5/11/2015 Administrivia l Note changes on homework web page –We were always drawing the icosahedron inside out…oops

3
David Luebke5/11/2015 Recap: Visible Surface Determination l Reasons for invisible polygons: –Polygon outside the field of view –Polygon is backfacing –Polygon is occluded by object(s) nearer the viewpoint l Algorithms for determining which potions of which polygons are visible (unoccluded) are known as visible surface algorithms

4
David Luebke5/11/2015 Recap: Occlusion l For most interesting scenes, some polygons will overlap: l To render the correct image, we need to determine which polygons occlude which

5
David Luebke5/11/2015 Recap: Painter’s Algorithm l Simple approach: render the polygons from back to front, “painting over” previous polygons: l Doesn’t work in general case –Intersecting polygons –Visibility cycles:

6
David Luebke5/11/2015 Recap: Binary Space Partition (BSP) Trees l Fuchs et al, 1980 l Assumptions: –Static scene –Moving camera l Commonly used in 3-D video games (e.g., Quake), but going out of style l Still a very powerful, general idea, used in many graphics algorithms

7
David Luebke5/11/2015 Recap: BSP Trees –Preprocess: overlay a binary (BSP) tree on objects in the scene –Runtime: correctly traversing this tree enumerates objects from back to front –Idea: divide space recursively into half-spaces by choosing splitting planes n Splitting planes can be arbitrarily oriented n Notice: nodes are always convex

8
David Luebke5/11/2015 Recap: BSP Trees

9
David Luebke5/11/2015 Recap: BSP Trees

10
David Luebke5/11/2015 Recap: BSP Trees

11
David Luebke5/11/2015 Recap: BSP Trees

12
David Luebke5/11/2015 Recap: BSP Trees

13
David Luebke5/11/2015 Recap: Rendering BSP Trees renderBSP(BSPtree *T) BSPtree *near, far; if (T is a leaf node) renderObject(T) if (eye on left side of T->plane) near = T->left; far = T->right; else near = T->right; far = T->left; renderBSP(far); renderBSP(near);

14
David Luebke5/11/2015 Recap: Rendering BSP Trees

15
David Luebke5/11/2015 Recap: Rendering BSP Trees

16
David Luebke5/11/2015 Recap: BSP Tree Cons l No bunnies were harmed in my example l But what if a splitting plane passes through an object? –Split the object; give half to each node: –Worst case: can create up to O(n 3 ) objects! Ouch

17
David Luebke5/11/2015 BSP Demo l Really cool demo: http://symbolcraft.com/pjl/graphics/bsp

18
David Luebke5/11/2015 Warnock’s Algorithm (1969) l Elegant scheme based on a powerful general approach common in graphics: if the situation is too complex, subdivide –Start with a root viewport and a list of all primitives –Then recursively: n Clip objects to viewport n If number of objects incident to viewport is zero or one, visibility is trivial n Otherwise, subdivide into smaller viewports, distribute primitives among them, and recurse

19
David Luebke5/11/2015 Warnock’s Algorithm l What is the terminating condition? l How to determine the correct visible surface in this case?

20
David Luebke5/11/2015 Warnock’s Algorithm l Pros: –Very elegant scheme –Extends to any primitive type l Cons: –Hard to embed hierarchical schemes in hardware –Complex scenes usually have small polygons and high depth complexity n Thus most screen regions come down to the single-pixel case

21
David Luebke5/11/2015 The Z-Buffer Algorithm l Both BSP trees and Warnock’s algorithm were proposed when memory was expensive –Example: first 512x512 framebuffer > $50,000! l Ed Catmull (mid-70s) proposed a radical new approach called z-buffering. l The big idea: resolve visibility independently at each pixel

22
David Luebke5/11/2015 The Z-Buffer Algorithm l We know how to rasterize polygons into an image discretized into pixels:

23
David Luebke5/11/2015 The Z-Buffer Algorithm l What happens if multiple primitives occupy the same pixel on the screen? Which is allowed to paint the pixel?

24
David Luebke5/11/2015 The Z-Buffer Algorithm l Idea: retain depth (Z in eye coordinates) through projection transform –Recall canonical viewing volumes (see slide) –Can transform canonical perspective volume into canonical parallel volume with:

25
David Luebke5/11/2015 The Z-Buffer Algorithm l Augment framebuffer with Z-buffer or depth buffer which stores Z value at each pixel –At frame beginning initialize all pixel depths to –When rasterizing, interpolate depth (Z) across polygon and store in pixel of Z-buffer –Suppress writing to a pixel if its Z value is more distant than the Z value already stored there n “More distant”: greater than or less than, depending

26
David Luebke5/11/2015 Interpolating Z l Edge equations: Z is just another planar parameter: z = Ax + By + C –Look familiar? –Total cost: n 1 more parameter to increment in inner loop n 3x3 matrix multiply for setup –See interpolating color discussion from lecture 10 l Edge walking: just interpolate Z along edges and across spans

27
David Luebke5/11/2015 The Z-Buffer Algorithm l How much memory does the Z-buffer use? l Does the image rendered depend on the drawing order? l Does the time to render the image depend on the drawing order? l How much of the pipeline do occluded polgyons traverse? –What does this imply for the front of the pipeline? –How does Z-buffer load scale with visible polygons? With framebuffer resolution?

28
David Luebke5/11/2015 Z-Buffer Pros l Simple!!! l Easy to implement in hardware l Polygons can be processed in arbitrary order l Easily handles polygon interpenetration l Enables deferred shading –Rasterize shading parameters (e.g., surface normal) and only shade final visible fragments –When does this help?

29
David Luebke5/11/2015 Z-Buffer Cons l Lots of memory (e.g. 1280x1024x32 bits) l Read-Modify-Write in inner loop requires fast memory l Hard to do analytic antialiasing l Hard to simulate translucent polygons l Precision issues (scintillating, worse with perspective projection)

Similar presentations

OK

1 91.427 Computer Graphics I, Fall 2010 Implementation II.

1 91.427 Computer Graphics I, Fall 2010 Implementation II.

© 2018 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

To ensure the functioning of the site, we use **cookies**. We share information about your activities on the site with our partners and Google partners: social networks and companies engaged in advertising and web analytics. For more information, see the Privacy Policy and Google Privacy & Terms.
Your consent to our cookies if you continue to use this website.

Ads by Google

Best ppt on science and technology Ppt on cash flow statement analysis Ppt on zener diodes Maths ppt on polynomial for class 9 Ppt on access modifiers in java Ppt on famous indian entrepreneurs in the us Maths ppt on algebraic identities Ppt on blue eyes topic Ppt on grease lubrication tubing Ppt on kingdom monera pictures