Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byRudolf Strickland Modified over 2 years ago

1
Theoretical community models: Incorporating dispersal

2
Community consequences of dispersal Dispersal brings new species Dispersal allows persistence in unsuitable habitat (“sinks”) Dispersal can counteract (or reinforce) local selection Dispersal can counteract drift (flipside: limited dispersal allows communities to drift apart) If dispersal ability is negatively correlated with competitive ability (i.e., there is a tradeoff) across species, stable coexistence can be maintained

3
The Theory of Island Biogeography (MacArthur & Wilson 1967) Near Far log Area log S Colonization = dispersal Extinction = drift Dispersal brings new species

4
Dispersal allows populations to occur/persist in unsuitable habitat, elevating local diversity + - Fitness dif (A-B) + - A winsB wins no dispersal Freq(A) 0 1 0 1

5
Dispersal allows populations to occur/persist in unsuitable habitat, elevating local diversity + - Fitness dif (A-B) + - A winsB wins dispersal (per capita)

6
Dispersal interacts with selection: Can allow an inferior competitor to overcome a selective disadvantage + - Fitness dif (A-B) + - A winsB wins dispersal (per capita)

7
Dispersal interacts with selection: A difference in dispersal balanced by a difference in selective advantage + - Fitness dif (A-B) + - A winsB wins Small competitive advantage for A Big competitive advantage for B dispersal (per capita)

8
Dispersal interacts with selection: A local advantage can translate into regional dominance + - Fitness dif (A-B) + - A winsB wins Big competitive advantage for A Small competitive advantage for B dispersal (per capita)

9
(1) A bunch of “patches” (2) A single (and different) species has selective advantage in each patch (3) Small differences among species in “fitness” (# propagules contributed to regional “pool”) no difference in degree of local selection variants of (3)

10
# Set initial communities (e.g., 25 individuals of sp. 1 + 25 of sp. 2; J = 50) J <- 50 # must be an even number COMa <- vector(length=J) COMa[1:J/2] <- 1 COMa[(J/2+1):J] <- 2 COMb <- vector(length=J) COMb[1:J/2] <- 1 COMb[(J/2+1):J] <- 2 # dispersal rate m <- 0.2 # set number of “years” to run simulations & empty matrix for data num_years <- 50 prop_1 <- matrix(0,nrow=J*num_years,ncol=2) # run model for (i in 1:(J*num_years)) { # chose cell for death death_cell <- ceiling(J*runif(1)) # pick randomly between two sites for a death; chose replacer from # other site with probability m; from same site with probability (1-m) if (runif(1) > 0.5) { if (runif(1) > m) COMa[death_cell] <- COMa[ceiling(J*runif(1))] else COMa[death_cell] <- COMb[ceiling(J*runif(1))] } else { if (runif(1) > m) COMb[death_cell] <- COMb[ceiling(J*runif(1))] else COMb[death_cell] <- COMa[ceiling(J*runif(1))] } prop_1[i,1] <- sum(COMa==1)/J prop_1[i,2] <- sum(COMb==1)/J } Limited dispersal allows drift to create differences between communities

11
Mean local richness = 1 Regional richness = 2 Mean local richness = 1.5 Regional richness = 2 Limited dispersal allows drift to create differences between communities (and vice versa) 2 simulations of 2 communities with 2 species (A & B) J local = 50, m = 0 High beta diversity; Regional richness will eventually be 1 or 2

12
Limited dispersal allows drift to create differences between communities (and vice versa) 2 simulations of 2 communities with 2 species (A & B) J local = 50, m = 0.2 Mean local richness = 2 Regional richness = 2 Mean local richness = 2 Regional richness = 2 Low beta diversity; Regional richness will eventually be 1

13
Stable coexistence can be maintained if there is a trade-off among species between competitive ability and colonization ability Pseudo-code for 2 species A is a good disperser & poor competitor; B is the opposite for loop Kill a bunch of individuals Each species sends out a bunch of dispersers (A > B, per capita) If A lands in an empty cell, it occupies it If A lands in a B cell, it dies If A lands in an A cell, non-event If B lands in an empty cell, it dies (or has low prob of occupying it) If B lands in an A cell, it kicks out A and occupies the cell If B lands in a B cell, non-event stop for loop

14
If A (good disperser) gets too common, then B will kick it out almost anywhere B lands If B (good competitor) gets too common, it will have few places to colonize, and empty cells will accumulate for A to colonize. + - Negative frequency-dependence Fitness dif (A-B) Freq(A) 0 1 (This type of dynamic is probably quite common in nature: r-K species)

15
Good colonizer Good competitor Succession 2 species many species

16
- Predators cause prey to go locally extinct, which in turn causes predator to go extinct - Prey better at getting to empty sites - Predators “chase” prey through space, but prey stay one step ahead = stable coexistence

17
Is the effect of dispersal on communities stochastic? The trajectory of community dynamics (abundances of multiple species) can be greatly changed colonization order or by the presence/absence of particular species We don’t know who’s coming next (i.e., arriving via dispersal) Therefore, the effect of dispersal on communities is (partly) stochastic

18
+ - Complex frequency- dependence Fitness dif. (A-B) Freq(A) 0 1 sp. A colonizes first and dominates before sp. B gets there sp. B colonizes first and dominates before sp. A gets there Expected equilibrium if… ( priority effects & multiple stables states)

19
A framework for incorporating dispersal into community ecology Leibold et al. (2004, Ecology Letters)

20
Patch dynamics (showing competition- colonization tradeoff) Leibold et al. (2004, Ecology Letters) Species sorting Mass effects Neutral Dispersal + Selection (freq. dependent locally) Dispersal + Selection (constant locally, spatially heterogeneous) As in (b) but with higher dispersal Dispersal + drift The metacommunity framework (examples with 2 competing species, 3 patches)

21
Key questions for determining community consequences of dispersal: (1) The composition of the dispersers (2) The selection/drift regime where the dispersers arrive

Similar presentations

OK

1 Geographic Ecology Chapter 22. 2 3 4 Outline Introduction Island Area, Isolation, and Species Richness Terrestrial Aquatic Equilibrium Model of.

1 Geographic Ecology Chapter 22. 2 3 4 Outline Introduction Island Area, Isolation, and Species Richness Terrestrial Aquatic Equilibrium Model of.

© 2018 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on producers consumers and decomposers as forest Ppt on trade related intellectual property rights Ppt on bullet train Ppt on brushless dc motor Ppt on rc coupled amplifier circuit Ppt on asian continental divide Download ppt on evaporation Ppt on area of circle Ppt on index in oracle Ppt on free cash flow