Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Pharmacology for the Athletic Trainer Non-Steroidial Anti-inflammatory Drugs NSAIDS David S. Knitter, MD, FCCP HTH 376 Fall 2001.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Pharmacology for the Athletic Trainer Non-Steroidial Anti-inflammatory Drugs NSAIDS David S. Knitter, MD, FCCP HTH 376 Fall 2001."— Presentation transcript:

1 Pharmacology for the Athletic Trainer Non-Steroidial Anti-inflammatory Drugs NSAIDS David S. Knitter, MD, FCCP HTH 376 Fall 2001

2 In 1997, the Nonprescription Drug Manufacturers Association (NDMA) published the report of a study conducted by Kline & Co. and subtitled "Economic Benefits of Self-Medication." “The economic analysis resulted in an estimate that OTC availability for the categories studied resulted in savings to the consumer of $20.6 billion annually when compared with the costs of treating the ailments using physicians and prescription medications. The researchers estimated that nearly two-thirds of the calculated savings could be traced to Rx-to-OTC switched products.”

3

4 Rise In OTC Sales

5

6

7 NSAID Classes

8 Current OTC NSAIDs Aspirin 325mg not to exceed 4 grams in 24 hours Ibuprofen 200mg not to exceed 1200 mg in 24 hours –Advil –Nuprin –Mortin AB Naprosyn 200mg not to exceed 600mg in 24 hours –Aleve Ketoprofen 12.5mg not to exceed 75mg in 24 hours –Orudis KT

9 Prostaglandin (PG) Synthesis Prostaglandins have been implicated in pathogenesis of inflammation and fever Aspirin-like drugs inhibit the biosynthesis and release of PGs Inhibition of the synthesizing enzyme (cyclo-oxygenase) is fairly well correlated with anti-inflammatory action  Inhibition of COX2 (inducible) may be responsible for therapeutic effects of NSAIDs  Inhibition of COX1 (constituitive) may be responsible for many adverse effects of NSAIDs

10 Prostaglandin (PG) Synthesis Pain Direct administration of PGs causes local pain evidence suggests that PGs (PGE2?)sensitizes pain receptors to bradykinin, a local mediator of pain released during inflammation Aspirin is less effective against sharp pain (direct stimulation of nerve endings - no PGs, opioids more effective) than against the dull, throbbing pain of inflammation (involves PGs)

11 Prostaglandin (PG) Synthesis Fever Infection bacterial endotoxins cause release of endogenous pyrogens from neutrophils Tissue damage or inflammation interleukin 1 released by macrophages (principal role is to activate lymphocytes) affects hypothalamus Aspirin-like drugs work by increasing heat loss (vasodilatation of peripheral blood vessels) not by reducing heat production

12 Adverse Effects Gastrointestinal Effects  nausea and vomiting stimulation of CTZ in medulla  gastric bleeding 3-8 ml/day blood loss with 4-5 g aspirin/day vs 0.6 ml in untreated subjects Blood Clotting  aspirin irreversibly inhibits platelet synthesis of thromboxane A2 (TXA2) which is required for aggregation  other NSAIDs - reversible effect on clotting  non-acetylated salicylates - no effect on clotting  terminate chronic use of aspirin 1 week prior to elective surgery (most other NSAIDs hr)

13 Adverse Effects Salicylism  characterized by tinnitus (may be related to increased labyrinthine pressure or effect on cochlear hair cells, pehaps secondary to vasoconstriction of auditory microvasculature), headache, nausea and vomiting, dizziness and dimness of vision Aspirin Hypersensitivity or ”Aspirin Intolerance"  1/4 million in USA  symptoms include rhinitis, profuse watery secretions, bronchial asthma, bronchconstriction, hypotension, vasomotor collapse, coma  non-acetylated salicylates may be used cautiously

14 Adverse Effects Reye's syndrome  rare but often fatal consequence of infection with varicella and various other viruses  salicylates are contraindicated in children and adolescents with chicken pox or influenza

15 Acetaminophen Little or no anti-inflammatory activity Mechanism of action is unknown  Very weak inhibitor of cyclo-oxygenase  Greater effect in the CNS ?? Minimal gastrointestinal irritation No effect on bleeding time

16 Acetaminophen Toxicity Hepatic necrosis (acute g; >25 g usually fatal) Increased incidence of hepatotoxicity in the presence of ethanol and/or fasting (with as little as 4 g/day) Ethanol induces hepatic MFO metabolism (pathway 3) shifting reaction toward toxic metabolite (limited glutathione available)

17 Renal Tubular Necrosis Increased risk with lifetime intake Associated greater than 1000 tablets of acetaminophen Associated greater than 5000 tablets of NSAIDs ? effect of aspirin

18 Gastrointestinal toxicity from NSAIDs is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Severe complications primarily include gastrointestinal hemorrhage, ulcer perforation, and bowel obstruction. Among long-term users of NSAIDs, the mortality rate from gastrointestinal complications is 0.22% per year (1). However, with such a large population of regular users, NSAID- related gastrointestinal complications rank 15th among the most common causes of death in the United States (table 1: not shown).

19 Do the new drugs celecoxib (Celebrex) and rofecoxib (Vioxx) reduce risk for clinically relevant gastrointestinal toxicity compared with the older NSAIDs? Theoretically, there are reasons to suggest that celecoxib and rofecoxib might be safer. Both celecoxib and rofecoxib selectively inhibit cyclooxygenase- 2 (COX-2) and spare cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1). In human physiology research (23), COX-2 suppression decreased joint inflammation, pain, and fever. By sparing inhibition of COX-1, selective COX-2 inhibitors permit COX-1-mediated generation of prostaglandin E 2 and thromboxane A 2. Prostaglandin E 2 has a physiologic role to protect the gastrointestinal mucosa from ulceration. Thromboxane A 2 in platelets is important in hemostasis (23). The physiology of COX metabolism gives a theoretical rationale for development of drugs that selectively inhibit COX-2. In theory, selective COX-2 inhibitors should retain the analgesic and anti-inflammatory efficacy of older NSAIDs while demonstrating improvement in gastrointestinal toxicity

20 Table 5a. Comparison of annualized event rates for symptomatic ulcers plus ulcer complications (perforation, obstruction, bleeding) with NSAID use DoseEvent rateNNT (95% CI) Patients not taking aspirin Celecoxib400 mg bid1.4%67 (36 to 468) NSAIDIbuprofen 800 mg tid; diclofenac 75 mg bid 2.9% Patients taking aspirin* CelecoxibSame as above4.7%Not significant NSAIDSame as above6.0%

21 Table 5b. Comparison of event rates for gastrointestinal adverse effects** with NSAID use DoseEvent rateNNT (95% CI) Patients not taking aspirin Celecoxib400 mg bid8.0%47 (28 to 144) NSAIDIbuprofen 800 mg tid; diclofenac 75 mg bid 10.1% Patients taking aspirin* CelecoxibSame as above11.2%Not significant NSAIDSame as above13.1%

22 Table 6. Comparison of event rates for rofecoxib and naproxen DoseEvent rateNNT or NNH (95% CI) Complicated confirmed upper gastrointestinal events (annualized)* Rofecoxib50 mg daily0.6%125 (80 to 293) Naproxen500 mg bid1.4% Other gastrointestinal side effects (total events during trial)** Rofecoxib50 mg daily3.5%72 (44 to 200) Naproxen500 mg bid4.9% Myocardial infarction (total events during trial) Rofecoxib50 mg daily0.4%338 (186 to 1,822) Naproxen500 mg bid0.1%

23 In one cost-utility estimate (26) published before CLASS or VIGOR, the cost to treat with celecoxib or rofecoxib was $400,000 per year to prevent one complicated ulcer in rheumatoid arthritis patients at low risk of gastrointestinal complications. When one is treating patients at high risk, the costs to use these drugs may be more reasonable. The annual cost estimate was $30,000 to treat high-risk patients with celecoxib or rofecoxib to prevent one complicated ulcer. In light of the CLASS and VIGOR results, formal pharmacoeconomic analyses are needed. Because COX-2 inhibitors do not reduce gastrointestinal risks in aspirin users, future decision analyses should address the competing hazards of myocardial infarction and stroke in patients who forego aspirin prophylaxis to take a COX-2 inhibitor. The small risk of myocardial infarction is a real risk to be considered, as demonstrated by the VIGOR study


Download ppt "Pharmacology for the Athletic Trainer Non-Steroidial Anti-inflammatory Drugs NSAIDS David S. Knitter, MD, FCCP HTH 376 Fall 2001."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google