Presentation on theme: "Software Engineering and Game Development Patrick McCarthy April 7, 2005."— Presentation transcript:
Software Engineering and Game Development Patrick McCarthy April 7, 2005
Overview Reasons to Look at Game Development Reasons to Consider Software Engineering for Game Development Design and Implementation of an actual game using Software Engineering Demonstration of final product
Why Games? Average gamer spends $700 a year on games (14 full-priced games) Average gamer spends 20 hours a week playing games 10% of gamers play games 40 or more hours a week That’s a full time job!
Why Games? Renting is also a major market 50% of gamers rent 11 games a month 60% of renters eventually buy games they rent
Why Games? Video Game industry was a $10 billion business in 2004 Some games cost $15 – 20 million to develop and rising Movies currently cost $80 – 100 million to film
Why Games? Sales figures for top 2004 games Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas$170,000,000 Halo 2 $160,000,000 Madden 2005$120,000,000 Spider-man 2 $43,000,000 Fable $40,000,000
Why Software Engineering? In 1980’s games were developed by 1 person In 1990’s games were developed by 7-10 people In 2000’s medium sized games are developed by 35 people Some today need 100 or more people
Why Software Engineering? Real-World example of team growth: NeverSoft 10 people developed Tony Hawk Pro Skater 1 50 people developed Tony Hawk Underground (Tony Hawk 5)
Why Software Engineering? Games are getting much bigger Jak and Daxter has almost 1 million lines of code Doom3 has 780,000 lines which is quite small
Why Software Engineering? Development times are quite long Doom3 was in development for 4 years Duke Nukem Forever had an original release date of 1998, and it is still in development today!
Why Software Engineering? Five reasons to use Game Development to teach Software Engineering : BreadthDepthExcitement Simulation Applications Career Preparation
Bringing it Together John Flynt author of Software Engineering for Game Developers Best way to show use of SE in games is through example Gathered a team of developers in order to build a game strictly using SE principles from beginning to end Designed, Implemented, and Tested a turn-based Egyptian style strategy game
Design Started by writing a Game Design Document (GDD) Lays down a foundation of how the game will be developed (37 pages) Describes the story, graphics, sound, characters, and camera the game will have
Design Sati Priest of Isis - Betrayer of Meseru - Sekhem’s repentant guide
Design Item List Name Cost (Gold) PowerEffect Golden Ankh Replenish Sun Wadjet 4004 Blinding Eye Flame Wadget 7006 Burning Eye Cloud Wadget 9008 Thundering Eye Canopic Jar 9008 Touch of Osiris
Design GDD also specifies movement and attacking
Design Five Levels are Defined Level 1 – Streets of Alexandria Level 2 – Monastery of Nebukut Level 3 – The Underworld Level 4 – Canyon Oasis Level 5 -- Temple of Uheset at Thebes
Design GDD also defines the art style and the game script Sekhem: “I’d sooner deliver up my heart to a beast such as you.” beast such as you.” Guard: “I was hoping you’d say that!”
Design Requirements Gathering The GDD is looked over for high level requirements These requirements are placed into the Software Requirements Specification (SRS)
Design A total of 64 requirements were gathered Software shall have the capability to save the game state from a menu Software shall have the capability to save the game state from a menu Software shall support a custom mouse pointer Software shall support a custom mouse pointer Software shall support MP3 playback and allow the player to select his or her own music Software shall support MP3 playback and allow the player to select his or her own music Software shall support a Map Editor Software shall support a Map Editor Units gain experience and enhance their skill through combat Units gain experience and enhance their skill through combat Software shall support a global system clock to synchronize events in the game Software shall support a global system clock to synchronize events in the game
Design Use Case Scenarios Use cases were created for each Stripe A total of 37 were made An example Use Case is shown next
Use Case Name: Player saves game state Requirement(s) Explored: #1,#4 Player (Actor) Context (Role): Player Preconditions: Game is in progress, player has brought up menu Trigger(s): Player chooses “Save Game” from menu Main Course of Action: 1)A file dialog is presented so the player can choose the filename for the save. 2)The player chooses a location and filename for their savegame and clicks OK. 3)The system dumps out the current game to the chosen location. 4)The dialog closes and the player is brought back to the menu. Alternate Course(s) of Action: 2a.) The player clicks cancel 2a1.) The dialog closes and the player is brought back to the menu. 2b.) The file already exists and the player is asked to confirm overwriting it. Exceptional Course(s) of Action: 3a.) There is an error trying to save the game (disk space, read only, etc…) 3a1.) An error message is displayed and the player is taken back to step 1
Design Task-Object-Remarks (TOR) Table is constructed and added to the SRS Provides a preliminary listing of objects TaskObjectsRemarks Req_ 1 Saving GameGameState 1.Initial Game State 2.Save changes Replay 1.Uses GameState 2.Plays Slower 3.Returns to Main Menu Action 1.Track Character interactions 2.Track interaction with Maps 3.Receive action, Update Req_ 2 Restore Game StateGameState 1.GS->Load(Populate GS) 2.Apply instant changes Req_ 64 Game ClockClockStart, Stop, Reset, GetTime, Vary Speed Req_ 3 Associate Profile with saved game Player 1.Get the saved Directory 2.Generate Directory
Design Software Design Description document was written next This is the “meat and potatoes” It contains all of the major design pieces of each Stripe It contains CRC cards, sequence diagrams, collaboration diagrams, and class diagrams
Design The Five Views used in the SDD document
CRC Card CGame 1.Keeps track of all global objects. 2.Maintains game loop. 3.Maintains the message handler. 4.Instantiates WinMain 5.Provides singleton starting place. CAI CCamera CFileMgr CHistory CGraphics CGUIManager CImageMgr CLog CMusic CPlayer CProfile CSound CSoundMgr CStateMachine
Test Planning Software Project Test Plan Divided project into 3 separate sections
Test Planning Software System Test Plan Deals mainly with the Installation of the game Specifies the testing environment needed (Visual Studio) Contains 4 separate test cases
System Test Case 1 Test Identifier: S1_STC_01 Requirements addressed: 50, 51, 53 Prerequisite conditions: Windows up and running. Test input: Player inserts CD Expected test results: Window for installation start shows. Criteria for evaluating results: User does nothing beyond inserting the CD and watching for the install window. Instructions for conducting procedure: 1. Insert the CD in the CD drive. 2. Watch for the start of the installation program. 3. Verify that all the stripes and supporting directories are shown, together with the user documentation, as options in the setup. These are as follows: 1.0, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 3.1, 3.2, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, , 10.0, 11.0, 12.0, 13.0, 14.0, 15.0, Documentation, AnkhDX, AnkhBoost, SmartDraw, Bin 5. Close the installation program without proceeding. Features to be tested. Start of the installation program. Related Requirements: 59, 60 Rational for decisions: N/A.
Test Planning Software Component Test Plan Tests the “meat and potatoes” of the game Contains 58 separate test cases
Component Test Case 1 Test Identifier: R1_CTC_01 Requirements addressed: 1 Prerequisite conditions: Game is in progress, you have brought up menu Test input: choose “Save Game” from menu Expected test results: system exists successfully. No defects encountered. Criteria for evaluating results: System responds as prompted and allows user to complete use case actions without defects. Instructions for conducting procedure: 1.A file dialog is presented so the player can choose the filename for the save. 2.Choose a location and filename for their savegame and clicks OK. 3.The system dumps out the current game to the chosen location. 4.The dialog closes and you see the menu. Alternate Course(s) of Action: 2a.) Cclicks cancel 2a1.) The dialog closes and the player is brought back to the menu. 2b.) The file already exists and the player is asked to confirm overwriting it. Features to be tested. Player saves game state Requirements traceability: Stripe 13 Rational for decisions: N/A.
Test Planning Software Integration Test Plan Tests how each of the 14 Stripes come together to work as one game Consists of 14 separate test cases (obviously)
Integration Test Case 1 Test Identifier: S1_ITC_01 Requirements addressed: 8, 16, 18, 38, 46, 14, 15, 17, 23, 28, 46, 57 Prerequisite conditions: Game up and running. Test input: Player clicks start icons. Expected test results: system exists successfully. No defects encountered. Criteria for evaluating results: System responds as prompted and allows user to complete use case actions without defects. Instructions for conducting procedure: 1. This test case is triggered by the closing of the splash screen. 2. Check for the basic game window. 3. Check for the main play options for the game. 4. View the options: New Game, Load Game, Continue, Change Profile, Options, Exit. 5.Choose one option, Exit. 6.The system acknowledges the choice. 7.The system requests the user to confirm the choice. 8.Confirm the choice. 9.The system exits. 10.This test case ends when the system exists. Features to be tested. Select Exit at the Game's Start Requirements traceability: See use cases for individual requirements. Rational for decisions: N/A.
General Test Report Test report Identifier: RN_CTC_01_Report Summary: Say how many faults were found and how many revision were necessary before the stripe passed all tests. Say how the stripe was tested: use. Variances: Describe any way that the test case made use of conditions that differed from those implied by the use case in the software design specification. Comprehensive assessment: If you have additional documentation, make reference to it here. Attach it to the document with a reference to this report. Summary of results: Say what the problems were that caused the failures. Evaluation: Say whether the stripe passed or failed. If you have further information, add it. Further information may be “acceptable” problems. Summary of activities: For each time, list how much time was required. If not applicable, indicate “n/a.” Units: h – hour(s). Do not record in other units. Example: 0.5 for half an hour. Test design: Driver development: Execution: Stripe Revision: Reporting: Approval Initials of tester.
Implementation Software Configuration Plan Defines the basics for implementation Describes how files and folders are to be named and organized Specifies the version control tool that is to be used (TortoiseCVS) Explains default documentation
Implementation Software Configuration Plan (continued) States policies to follow: 1. Code check in should be performed after each work session. 2. Additions of external library resources are to be approved by the team and formally added to the shared configuration before they are incorporated into local code. 3. Files are to be cleared of test code before being checked in. 4. Files are not to be renamed and checked in. 5. Development using the server configuration of the software is to be each developer’s responsibility. (Try not to develop for days on end without submitted code for mergers.) 6. Conflicts are to be reconciled as soon as they are detected. 7. After a stripe has been baselined, development work on it is to be discontinued. Work should commence on the next version of the stripe or the next stripe in the development schedule. States the Revision numbering system States coding standards and naming convention for variable (Hungarian)
Demonstration The game The level editor The character editor
Conclusion SE and Game Development do work together well. However, use what works. Mick West of NeverSoft stated “Do what is appropriate…There is no silver bullet, you have to use a rich mixture of techniques that suit the problems at hand. And more importantly, that suit the people at hand. UML is fine, but practically nobody at Neversoft has even heard of it, let alone could be comfortable using it. UML does NOT communicate if you don't know UML.”