Presentation on theme: "Helping Patients and Families Cope with Medical Crises, Chronic Illness, and Loss Gerald P. Koocher, Ph.D., ABPP DePaul University www.ethicsresearch.com."— Presentation transcript:
Helping Patients and Families Cope with Medical Crises, Chronic Illness, and Loss Gerald P. Koocher, Ph.D., ABPP DePaul University www.ethicsresearch.com
Are you prepared for ACOs and PCMHs? (Accountable Care Organizations and Patient Centered Medical Homes) Organizational models for primary care that will improve our health care system (?)
Integrated Inter-professional Care Understanding the culture of interprofessional health care practice and functioning as a team player. Working with patients who have medical, mental health, behavioral health, and co- morbid problems in a fast-paced primary care context. Working with a more diverse (ethnically, socially, and economically) population than ever before. Ability to document the value added by psychologists’ engagement.
Administrative and Financial Accountability and Autonomy Are you prepare to: – Seek additional credentials? Board certification –Integrate your practice? –Co-locate? –Contract? –Become an employee?
How will reimbursement systems change? Medicare Medicaid Insurance exchanges Global payment systems –Who takes the risks? –Who makes “medical necessity” decisions? New billing an diagnostic codes –Who’s codes rule? “This patient has a rare form of health insurance.”
Will the ICD Replace the DSM? New ICD-10 Codes V97.33XD: Sucked into jet engine, subsequent encounter. Y93.D: Activities involved arts and handcrafts. SW55.41XA: Bitten by pig, initial encounter . W61.62XD: Struck by duck, subsequent encounter. Z63.1: Problems in relationship with in-laws. W220.2XD: Walked into lamppost, subsequent encounter. Y93.D: V91.07XD: Burn due to water-skis on fire, subsequent encounter . W55.29XA: Other contact with cow, subsequent encounter. W22.02XD: V95.43XS: Spacecraft collision injuring occupant. W61.12XA: Struck by macaw, initial encounter. R46.1: Bizarre personal appearance.
Integrated Record Systems: The eMR, ePHI, and e-billing Do you want to share your psychotherapy records with your proctologist? How can you avoid accidentally e- mailing sensitive material? What problems have we seen most commonly documented?
Understanding Medical Crises from the Family Perspective Traditional systems of psychotherapy have not provided optimal models for dealing with critical illness and loss in family contexts. Thinking first about how we adapt to medical crises can help us better understand coping with bereavement.
Rethinking the Approach An “uncovering and interpreting” approach often runs counter to the perceived needs of patients in medical distress and their family members. When a medical crisis strikes, the psychosocial necessities are usually discernable on a conscious level.
Problems with traditional systems of psychotherapy to coping with illness Presumption of pathology Medical model –Common etiology –Common natural history –Common treatment Individual versus family as unit of treatment
What does the client need? An opportunity… …to acquire information, support, and learn about the illness and disease process. …to make personal meaning of the experience. …to talk about and focus on the trauma. …to mourn the loss of the former self- image and way of being in the world.
Time for a new strategy Consider how life activities and goals have become disrupted Conceptualize the consequences as specific threats to patient’s (or family member’s) psychological adjustment.
The therapist can begin by… Eliciting the client’s narrative –What has happened? –What are my immediate concerns? –How have family members and friends reacted? –Beginning to seek out the clients attributions and deeper concerns.
Specific Threats to Psychological Adjustment Posed by Chronic Illness Disrupted developmental trajectories School, work, or career interruptions Role changes in family life Peer relationships compromised Altered self-perceptions Uncertain outcomes –(e.g., Damocles Syndrome) Traumatic stresses (?)
Consider the dimensions of an Illness along a set of continua as a context Onset –Acute…gradual Duration –Brief … intermittent … lifelong Course –Remitting … relapsing Predictability –Known and predictable … unknown or unpredictable Prognosis –Normal life … terminal
Consider the dimensions of an Illness along a set of continua as a context Burdens of Care –None … extensive Medications, monitoring, appliances, personal assistance… Transmission –Genetic…traumatic…contagious Obviousness –Blatant…invisible Social Tolerance –Stigmatizing…acceptable
Children’s Perspectives Bibace, Schmidt, & Walsh (1994) Magical Level – Explanations based on association –Phenomenism - children describe the illness in terms of some experience they have had without a clear cause/effect relationship. “A cold is from…when your nose runs.” –Contagion – the illness description focuses on an external cause, without explanation of how the cause led to the effect. “A cold is a runny nose, like when you go outside in the winter time.”
Children’s Perspectives Bibace, Schmidt, & Walsh (1994) Concrete Level – Explanations based on sequence –Contamination - Children describe illness in terms of experienced symptoms that originated in external acts or situations. “You get a cold when you breathe in a lot of cold air and it stays in your body.” –Internalization - The child describes how a sequence of mechanical actions leads to changes in specific body parts. –“A cold happens when you get germs in your nose and they clog it up so you have to sneeze them out.”
Children’s Perspectives Bibace, Schmidt, & Walsh (1994) Abstract Level – Explanations based on interaction –Physiological - The child or adult describes an entire internal disease process including cause and effects on multiple body parts or organ systems. “Germs and viruses are all around us and cold symptoms are the body’s response to the infection. Coughing and sneezing are like side effects of the infection.” –Psychophysiological - The older child or adult can explain how multiple factors may contribute to the disease process, including psychological components. “People who are under a lot of stress can get run down and become more susceptible to infections like colds and flu.”
Children’s Perspectives (actual quotes) Who is Anna Sthesia? Cystic Fibrosis or… –Sixty-five roses –Sick-sick fibrosis Sickle cell anemia or… –Sick-as-hell anemia Diabetes or… –Die-a-betes
Fundamental Intervention Strategies Normalize the family’s distress. Suggest active coping strategies; providing sense of control. Engage around common fears and attributions Avoid parallel service delivery; partner with physician. Focus on family intervention whenever possible. Pay attention to symptom relief.
Known Adjustment Risk Factors in Chronic Medical Illness Pre-existing social or psychological problems in patient or nuclear family Economic/insuranc e problems Single parenthood Linguistic or cultural barriers High risk medical diagnoses Invasiveness of tx Duration of tx Toxicity of tx Residual handicaps Necessity for appliances or home care (Burden Index)
Family Risk Factor Checklist Marital stresses Extended family issues Single parent issues Sibling distress School problems Time lost from work Unreimbused medical costs Time away from home Substitute child care for siblings Transportation and parking costs
Preventive Intervention Planning Attention to symptom control Attention to nuclear and extended family Social support systems Groups and networks Long-term follow-up program Day-one interventions Integrated psychosocial and medical care Routine Quality-of- Life and psych status monitoring School/work re- integration programs
MEDICAL CRISIS COUNSELING Short-term time-limited intervention
Medical Crisis Counseling (MCC) – Eight fears common among medical patients* Control Abandonment Self-Image Anger Dependency Isolation Stigma Death *Pollin, I. S. & Kanan, S. B. (1995). Medical Crisis Counseling: Short-Term Therapy for Long-Term Illness. New York: Norton * Pollin, I. S. & Kanan, S. B. (1995). Medical Crisis Counseling: Short-Term Therapy for Long-Term Illness. New York: Norton
MCC approach differs From Traditional Psychotherapies No presumption of psychopathology Patients are assumed to have the coping potential to adjust An open ended commitment to treatment is unnecessary. Lengthy reflection or “insight” orientation may prove unnecessary or inappropriate.
The Treatment Process In Brief Initial Consult: The first session is generally a well structured interview with goal setting. Counseling Sessions: In the ensuing sessions the therapist uses a loosely structured format to identify coping strategies and issues. Final Session: Treatment is concluded when patient achieves short term goal set in the first session.
Number of Sessions Used (Koocher et al, 2001) Mean = 4.04 N = 48
Cost Offset On average, the cancer patients who did not receive MCC used an additional $570.78 in mental heath services. Koocher, G. P., Curtiss, E. K., Pollin, I. S. & Patton, K. (2001). Medical Crisis Counseling in a Health Maintenance Organization. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 32, 52-58.
Adherence vs. Non-Compliance Adherence to (or compliance with) a medication regimen is generally defined as: –The extent to which patients take medications as prescribed or otherwise follow health care providers’ recommendations. Many people prefer the word "adherence", because "compliance" suggests passively following orders, rather than a therapeutic alliance or contract.
Adherence vs. Non-Compliance Reports of adherence rates for individual patients generally cite percentages of prescribed doses of medication actually taken over a specified period. Some studies further refine the definition of adherence by focusing on dose taking (i.e., prescribed number of pills each day) and timing (taking meds within a prescribed period). Adherence rates typically run higher among patients with acute conditions Persistence among patients with chronic conditions often declines dramatically after the first six months of therapy.
Adherence vs. Non-Compliance Average rates of adherence reported in clinical trials can run misleadingly high due to attention focused on participants and selection biases. –Even so, average adherence rates in clinical trials run only 43 to 78 % among patients receiving treatment for chronic conditions. No consensual standard exists for what constitutes adequate adherence. –Some trials consider rates greater than 80% acceptable, while others consider rates of greater than 95 % mandatory for adequate adherence (e.g., treatment of HIV infection).
Adherence vs. Non-Compliance Physicians have little ability to recognize non-adherence, and interventions to improve rates have had mixed results. Poor adherence to medication regimens accounts for substantial worsening of disease, death, and increased health care costs in the United States. Of all medication-related hospital admissions in the United States, 33 to 69 % follow poor medication adherence, with a resultant cost of approximately $100 billion a year.
Measurement? Direct methods –observed therapy –measurement of concentrations of a drug, its metabolite, or a chemical marker Indirect methods of measurement of adherence include –asking the patient about how easy it is for him or her to take prescribed medication, –assessing clinical response, –performing pill counts –ascertaining rates of refilling prescriptions –collecting patient questionnaires –using electronic medication monitors –measuring physiologic markers –asking the patient to keep a medication diary –asking the help of a caregiver, school nurse, or teacher.
Three Types of Medical Non-Adherence Koocher, G.P., McGrath, M.L., & Gudas, L. J. (1990). Typologies of non-adherence in cystic fibrosis. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 11, 353-358.
Medical Non-Adherence Identifying the basis for deviating from the prescribed course of treatment is the first step. “You may believe you’ve been overcharged, but remember, you’re overmedicated.”
Type 1: Inadequate Knowledge Is information available to patient and family? Is the form of information comprehensible?
Type 1: Inadequate Knowledge Is the information appropriate to age and culture? Are the rationales for components of treatment clear?
Type 2: Psychosocial Resistance Consider the practitioners’ behavior. –“Referent power” issues “Hi, my name is Kevin. I’ll be your doctor for today.”
Type 2: Psychosocial Resistance Explore social or cultural pressures. Assess environmental factors. “You’ve been fooling around with alternative medicines, haven’t you?”
Type 2: Psychosocial Resistance Assess for psychological factors –Attributions –Motivations –Defense mechanisms –Psychopathology “This is gonna hurt like hell.”
Type 3: Educated Non- Adherence “Before each of you, you will find a bitter pill and a glass of water”
Type 3: Educated Non- Adherence Does the patient have adequate reasoning capacity to consent? Can the patient articulate personal values or preferences? Have all reasonable alternatives been explored? Is the patient’s choice morally and legally defensible?
How not to inquire about Non-adherence “Well, how long do you want to live?”
Inquiring about Non-adherence What has your doctor asked you to do in order to best manage your illness (or to stay healthy)? What are the hardest pieces of medical advice to follow? Which parts to you skip or miss most often?
Improving Adherence Methods available to improve adherence can be grouped into four general categories: 1.patient education 2.improved dosing schedules 3.increased hours when the clinic is open (including evening hours), and therefore shorter wait times; and 4.improved communication between physicians and patients.
Improving Adherence “Most methods of improving adherence have involved combinations of behavioral interventions and reinforcements in addition to increasing the convenience of care, providing educational information about the patient's condition and the treatment, and other forms of supervision or attention.” Osterberg, L. & Blachke, T. (2005). New England Journal of Medicine, 353, 487 – 497.
Table 2 Major Predictors of Poor Adherence to Medication, According to Studies of Predictors
Barriers to Adherence per Osterberg & Blaschke (2005). Patient Provider Health Care System Poor provider-patient communication Pt does not understand disease Pt does not understand benefits & risks of tx Pt does not understand proper use of meds Provider prescribes overly complex regimen MD’s interaction with health care system Poor knowledge of drug costs Poor knowledge of insurance coverage Low level of job satisfaction Patient’s interaction with health care system Poor access or missed appointments Poor treatment by clinic staff Poor access to meds High cost of Rx or Tx
Conceptualizing Coping with Loss Understanding medical crises as pre-cursors to loss Recognizing how some approaches to psychotherapy may not prove particularly helpful. Identifying the key issues.
Problems with providers Personal discomforts Hasty pursuit of medication Third party barriers “I medicate first and ask questions later.”
Rethinking the Approach The “uncovering” approach often runs counter to the perceived needs of patients in medical distress and their family members. When a medical crisis strikes, the psychosocial necessities are usually discernable on a conscious level.
Family Bereavement Project Preventive Intervention Following a Child’s Death Supported by National Institute of Mental Health Grant No. R01 MH41791 Gerald P. Koocher, Ph.D. and Beth Kemler, Ph.D. Principal Investigator and Co-Principal Investigator
Typical loss of social support over time following the death of a child Time elapsed since death Perceived social support Mean social support Week 1 Week 6
Common patterns of family interaction following the death of a child External social support rises sharply after the loss event and then declines Intra-familial support can be variable Congruence Complementary Mutual Escape Distancer and Pursuer
Understanding Basic Tasks of Mourning Accepting the reality of the loss Grieving: experiencing the pain and emotion associated with the loss Adjusting to the new reality Commemoration: relocating representation of the deceased in one’s own life
Model Intervention Session I: Understanding each other’s loss experience Part I – 90 minutes –Family members tell their stories Assure that all speak for themselves –Exploration of coping Circular questioning about perceptions of self and others –Education about grief Child versus Adult patterns
To assist the telling of the story, the intervener asks specific questions pertaining to –the times of the diagnosis or accident, –the funeral, and the period following the funeral. The purpose of the questions is to provide some structure for eliciting everyone's story, as well as to make clear each person's conception (or misconception) regarding causality, blame, and cognitive understanding of the death
Session I: Understanding each other’s loss experience Part I – 90 minutes (continued) –Acknowledge pain and discomfort of discussing the loss again –Give parents reading material The Bereft Parent (Schiff) –Assign Homework for Session II Each family member to choose memory object for next session, but avoid discussing the choice at home.
The 2 nd part of the 1 st session involves meeting with the parents apart from the child(ren) The parental subsystem is the critical one in grief work, for it is here that difficulties most likely to affect the entire family system will arise. One source of stress between the parents may be different ideas of how to handle the issue of death within the family, especially with the surviving siblings. Another frequent source of tension may result from asynchrony in the style and/or timing of parental grieving. Parents may disagree on how to deal with the surviving children. Differences may have to do with questions of how open and direct to be around the topic of death, how much autonomy to allow, how strict should limits be, etc.
Session I: Understanding each other’s loss experience Part II: parents only- additional 30 minutes –Explore dyadic issues Sources of tension in the relationship (e.g., sexual disruption, replacement child, etc.) –Discuss losses in family of origin context How were you taught to deal with loss? –Review personal loss histories What important losses have you suffered previously?
Session II: Making contact with the emotional loss Part I: parents only - first 30 minutes –Explore interval since first session –Address any recent concerns –Normalize the distress of reawakening grief –Provide encouragement for coping efforts made to date
Session II: Making contact with the emotional loss Part II: family meeting- 90 minutes –Two Exercises: Remembering the deceased child Family letter writing
Session II: Making contact with the emotional loss Remembering the deceased child –What reminder has each person brought? Discuss the meaning of the item. –How is the child remembered. Where are the reminders at home? –Assess idealization. Are negative memories tolerated? What has been done with the child’s room and belongings? Explore cemetery visits. –Discuss how the family has changed.
Session II: Making contact with the emotional loss Family letter writing –May be literal or figurative, written or taped. –Young siblings can draw pictures. –Goal: create emotional object to take home. –Content: Things left unsaid Memories shared Unanswered questions
Session III: Moving on with our lives Anticipating anniversary phenomena. –Which will be most difficult for whom? Review normal grief and “warning signs.” Discuss re-involvement in the world for each person.
Session III: Moving on with our lives Explore meaning-making for each person. –Philosophy of life –Hope for the future Plan family activity outside the home. Dealing with relatives and friends. Dealing with PIGs (people in general) and their helpful or NOT comments
Warning Signs: When is professional help needed? Staying withdrawn from family and friends Persistent blame or guilt Feelings of wanting to die Persistent anxiety; especially when separating from parents or surviving children Unusual and persistent performance problems at work or school New patterns of aggressive behavior Accident proneness Acting as though nothing happened, or happier than normal Persistent physical complaints Extended use of Rx or non- Rx drugs and alcohol
Burnout Five aspects –Physical –Emotional –Behavioral –Interpersonal –Attitudinal
Symptoms of Burnout Anger/Hostility Chronic Frustration Depression Apathy Exhaustion –Emotional and physical Malice and aversion toward patients Reduced productivity and effectiveness at work
Pre-Disposing Factors in the Workplace Role ambiguity –Vague or inconsistent expectations/demands Conflicts Discrepancy between real/ideal work functions Unrealistic pre-employment expectations Lack of support at work
Pre-Disposing Factors in the Workplace The Asshole Factor –(temporary and certified status) –Demeaning, bullying, hypercritical…all too common in medicine Example- medical error reporting –Reference: The No Asshole Rule: Building a Civilized Workplace and Surviving One That Isn't -- by Robert I. Sutton
Insulating Factors in the Workplace Role clarity Positive feedback and recognition Enhanced staff autonomy Providing for stress recovery at work Social support at work
Predisposing Personal Attributes Perfectionistic personality Losses in the family Chronic helplessness Permeable boundaries Substance abuse Expectations –The Savior Complex –External control orientation (I-E Scale)
Insulating Personal Attributes Sense of personal accomplishment Realistic criteria –Including patient outcome expectations Accurate awareness of personal strengths and weaknesses Internal control orientation (I-E Scale)
References Christina Maslach –Burnout: the Cost of Caring (2003) –Preventing Burnout and Building Engagement: A Complete Program for Organizational Renewal (2000). –Banishing Burnout: Six Strategies for Improving Your Relationship with Work (2005)