Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

TRANSFORMATION DESIGN BRIEFING TEAM 3: RESOURCES Anderson J. Lattimore Tarik Hamdan May 20, 2011.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "TRANSFORMATION DESIGN BRIEFING TEAM 3: RESOURCES Anderson J. Lattimore Tarik Hamdan May 20, 2011."— Presentation transcript:

1 TRANSFORMATION DESIGN BRIEFING TEAM 3: RESOURCES Anderson J. Lattimore Tarik Hamdan May 20, 2011

2 TEAM MISSION: “WE WILL SECURE RESOURCES TO SUPPORT LEARNING” TEAM COMPOSITION: -STUDENTS -TEACHERS -ADMINISTRATORS -PARENTS -COMMUNITY MEMBERS INTRODUCTION

3 TEAM FOCUS -TIME -MONEY -PEOPLE -OPERATING PROCESSES TEAM MET NINE (9) TIMES (FEB-MAY 2011) INITIALLY GENERATED 168 BRAINSTORMED IDEAS INITIAL IDEAS WERE DISTILLED BY INTERNAL WORK GROUPS PROCESS

4 WORK GROUPS -LEARNING ENVIRONMENT -MINDSET -CURRICULUM AND MATERIALS -TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT SYSTEMS WORK GROUPS DEVELOPED MAJOR TARGETED AREAS INDIVIDUAL WORK GROUP DEVELOPED SPECIFIC STRATEGIES WORK GROUPS CRITIQUED EACH OTHER’S WORK PROCESS (cont’d)

5 MINDSET OF THE RESOURCE TEAM - THE WORK PRODUCT SHOULD BE DYNAMIC AND CHANGE OVER TIME (LIVING DOCUMENT) - WORK PRODUCT WOULD SERVE AS THE “BEGINNING” OF A MORPHING PROCESS FOR THE DISTRICT AND NOT THE END PRODUCT - TIME AND EVER-CHANGING CONDITIONS WOULD ONLY IMPROVE THE USEFULNESS OF THE PRODUCT PROCESS (cont’d)

6 RESOURCES TEAM WOULD COORDINATE WITH ADJACENT WORK GROUPS TEAM WOULD UTILIZE TECHNOLOGY TO FACILITATE THE DISCUSSION AND DISCOVERY PROCESS (WIKI FORUM) THE SHARED PRODUCT WOULD REFLECT A CONSENSUS OPINION AND NOT BE A BYPRODUCT OF THE CO-CHAIRS VIEWPOINTS PROCESS (cont’d)

7 1.LEVERAGE TECHNOLOGY TO REDUCE OVERALL COSTS 2.FORM AND FOSTER PARTNERSHIPS AND COLLABORATIVE EFFORTS -PRIVATE SECTOR FIRMS -INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER LEARNING -NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS -FOUNDATIONS -COMMUNITY AGENCIES MAJOR STRATEGIES

8 3.ASSERTIVELY PURSUE ADDITIONAL GRANT FUNDING 4.ASSESS AND EVALUATE EXISTING RESOURCES ANNUALLY TO ENSURE MAXIMUM EFFECTIVENESS MAJOR STRATEGIES (cont’d)

9 1.USE DISTANCE LEARNING TO LEVERAGE SCARCE AND VALUABLE STAFF RESOURCES 2.LEVERAGE, RATHER THAN DISALLOW, STAFF AND STUDENT OWNED DEVICES 3.REINVEST ALL ENERGY SAVINGS FUNDS BACK INTO ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROJECTS 4.ELIMINATE THE RELIANCE ON CLASSIC TEXTBOOKS/WORKBOOKS BY MOVING TO “ON-LINE” TEXTBOOKS AND OTHER EDUCATIONALLY RELEVANT COMPUTER BASED RESOURCES LEVERAGE TECHNOLOGY TO REDUCE OVERALL COSTS

10 5.LEVERAGE “CLOUD” BASED APPLICATIONS AND DATA RATHER THAN LOCALLY INSTALLED COPIES OF SOFTWARE ON CURRENT AND FUTURE DISTRICT TECHNOLOGY ASSETS LEVERAGE TECHNOLOGY TO REDUCE OVERALL COSTS (CONT’D)

11 1.EXPAND PARTNERSHIPS WITH AREA MUSEUMS AND EDUCATIONAL POINTS OF INTEREST 2.EXPLORE VIRTUAL FIELD TRIPS TO REDUCE TRANSPORTATION COSTS 3.COLLABORATE WITH LOCAL EXPERTS (CAREER-SPECIFIC PATHWAYS) 4.PURSUE “EDUCATION REWARDS” CREDITS AT THE INSTITUTIONAL LEVEL FORM AND FOSTER PARTNERSHIPS AND COLLABORATIVE EFFORTS

12 5.GARNER SPONSORSHIPS FOR KUSD EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES 6.ESTABLISH A COLLABORATIVE DISTRICT AND COMMUNITY EDUCATIONAL FUNDING “THINK TANK” -REVISIT CURRENT STRATEGIES -PILOT NEW STRATEGIES FORM AND FOSTER PARTNERSHIPS AND COLLABORATIVE EFFORTS (CONT’D)

13 1.PURSUE AN INCENTIVE BASED GRANT WRITER WITH AN APPROPRIATE COMPENSATION STRUCTURE 2.ENERGETICALLY PURSUE FUNDS THROUGH FOUNDATIONS, TRUSTS, ALUMNI AND DONATIONS THROUGH STUDENT CLUBS AND MARKETING CLASSES ASSERTIVELY PURSUE ADDITIONAL GRANT FUNDING

14 1.EXPAND THE USE OF “ZERO-BASED” BUDGETING TO ANNUALLY EVALUATE PROGRAMS AND STAFF UTILIZATION 2.IMPLEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE SY FINANCIAL ASSESSMENT 3.CHANGE THE TRADITIONAL CLASSROOM SETUP ASSESS AND EVALUATE EXISTING RESOURCES ANNUALLY

15 4.LOOK FOR NEW OPPORTUNITIES TO SHARE SPACE AND CONSOLIDATE/CLOSE BUILDINGS WHENEVER APPROPRIATE 5.CONVERT IDLE KUSD PROPERTIES TO PRODUCTIVE GREEN SPACES THRU SERVICE LEARNING PROJECTS ASSESS AND EVALUATE EXISTING RESOURCES ANNUALLY (CONT’D)

16 1.THE PROCESS WAS A JOURNEY AND NOT A DESTINATION… OTHERS WILL BUILD UPON THE GROUP’S WORK - “MOVE INLAND FROM THE BEACH” 2.THE RESOURCES TEAM DID NOT DEVELOP THE IDEAL OR PERFECT SOLUTION TO THE DISTRICT’S CONCERN ABOUT RESOURCES 3.THE TEAM VALUED THE VARIOUS PERSPECTIVES AS A STRENGTH AND NOT A WEAKNESS AS WE DISCOVERED AND DISCUSSED TOGETHER 4.SET THE FOUNDATION FOR FUTURE ACTION TEAMS TO IMPROVE UPON OUR RUDIMENTARY AND PIONEERING WORK REFLECTIONS (What We Learned)

17 THE TEAM EMMA PATTON (LEADER) EARLENE GIRMAN HOLLY MAHONEY MARY SALANI PAM BLACK (LEADER) CORTESIA ROBINSON COURTNEY ROBINSON DR. ROBERT WELLS RECOGNITION

18 THE TEAM TESS STEPLYK (LEADER) CARMEN CARRERA KAREN BROOKS MICHAEL SHROEDER TAMARA WETHERSBY DAVID BUGGS (LEADER) KARYN REGET … ALSO MRS. BISHOP (GUEST APPEARANCES) RECOGNITION (Cont’d)

19 GO TEAM… WE DID IT!! Back Row: Anderson Lattimore, Carmen Carrera, Cortesia Robinson, David Buggs, Emma Patton, Holly Mahoney Front Row: Tess Steplyk, Karyn Reget, Tarik Hamdan, Pam Black, Courtney Robinson, Mary Salani Not Shown: Earlene Girman, Robert Wells, Karen Brooks, Michael Shroeder, Tamara Wethersby, Candace Bishop

20 RESOURCES TEAM Questions and Answers


Download ppt "TRANSFORMATION DESIGN BRIEFING TEAM 3: RESOURCES Anderson J. Lattimore Tarik Hamdan May 20, 2011."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google