Presentation on theme: "Overview of Grants Submission Process Warren Calderone Director, Foundation, Government and Corporate Relations Co-Director, Shepherd University Research."— Presentation transcript:
Overview of Grants Submission Process Warren Calderone Director, Foundation, Government and Corporate Relations Co-Director, Shepherd University Research Corporation (SURC)
External Funding Goals Faculty development Student service Student learning and research experience Budget relief/new sources of funding Student and faculty recruitment University reputation and prestige
SURC Organization President Suzanne Shipley, Atty. Alan Perdue, Deborah Judd VPs Diane Melby and Christopher Ames Co-Directors: Warren Calderone (Director, Foundation, Govt. and Corp. Relations) and Dr. Colleen Nolan (Dean, SNSM)
SURC Grant Roles – Build a “grant seeking culture” at Shepherd: encourage faculty and staff to apply for external grant or contract support – Serve as a sounding board for grant ideas and assist in getting those ideas, and eventual grant proposals, approved by executive staff – Help faculty and staff find grant opportunities and assist with the preparation and submission of grant proposals, including budgets – Assist the PI/PD, and the Finance office, in post-award activities (e.g., report submission tracking)
Tools Pre-Proposal Form and Concept Paper Grant policies and procedures SURC website McAllister and Quinn resources Proposal development and submission Budget development/justification Proposal review and approval
Timeline Funding Announcement Grant Due Date Proposal Development Internal Review: SURC and Executive Staff 2 WEEKS PRIOR!
First Grant Writer
In the beginning: Concept Two general tracks: IdeaSearch for funders RFP/FOAAlign concept/idea
Concept Paper One to two page description of idea Briefly explain: – Need – Objectives – Activities and timeframe – Personnel involved – Funding amount with any cost sharing – If applicable, grant criteria (e.g., NSF)
Funding Sources Public and Private Public: Federal (grants.gov); State; local Private: Corporate, family, and other foundations (Foundation Center search engine: free access at library)
Exploring the Fit – Organizational– mission, vision, values – Organizational readiness – Partner requirements – Competitive – Regulations or “strings attached” – Source of cash or in-kind match, if applicable – Eligibility: lead applicant or partner – Deadline(s)
Pre-proposal form “Early warning system” Faculty or staff member describes a potential project where external funding is needed Alerts Administration to potential grant submission and any support (e.g., matching funds, space, in-kind or other University commitments) that may be needed.
Pre-proposal form (cont.) Time-sensitive form: need as much advance notice as possible to secure approval from Executive Staff. Submit form at least 45 days before the grant due date. Form is processed electronically Executive approval of pre-proposal form is no guarantee of final approval of proposal. The proposal still has to go through internal review and approval before submission.
Key Proposal Items Needs Assessment or Problem Statement Goals and Objectives Plan of Action/Activities to Address Need Program Evaluation or Outcomes Assessment
Proposal Development Proposed Program Be prescriptive about who you will serve, what and how you will serve them, who will conduct activities, where and when activities will occur Establish a realistic timeline Literature review to support project
Proposal Development Sustainability What will happen after the funding ends? List matching funds, in-kind, revenue, etc. Dissemination How will you distribute results? Think usual (papers, posters, web, etc.) and innovative. Funders like to be acknowledged!
Proposal Review and Processing-- Federal Preliminary Review Reviewers Selected Peer Review Panel (ad hoc, internal) Program Officer Recommendation Division Director Review Business Review Award Finalized
Post-Award Celebrate! Budget negotiation sometimes involved PI/institution sign grant award Hold a post-award meeting with team: key staff, Finance, and evaluator Be cognizant of reporting dates
If you do not win
1.Don’t be discouraged. Success rates are low. Take a comprehensive approach to win. 2.Read the reviews carefully, if provided, and ask colleagues to do the same. 3.Discuss reviews with program officer. 4.Address reviews within resubmission.
MOUs Proposals where Shepherd is not the lead applicant or fiscal agent Partnering with another organization that has received a grant award Need to develop a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between Shepherd and that organization, describing exactly the obligations and responsibilities of all parties Developed by our legal counsel
Grant Myths I don’t need to worry about the grant deadline
Grant Myths I don’t need to be involved—we have a grant writer
Grant Myths Cost sharing is not a problem We don’t have to be that careful about in-kind cost sharing—no one is going to check
Grant Myths We don’t have to respond to everything in the RFP
Grant Myths Fonts, margins, page limits, etc. are not that important Who cares about a few typoes!
Grant Myths After we get the award, we’re on easy street It doesn’t matter if I don’t submit grant reports
Summary SURC is here to help The earlier you start the process, the better: allow sufficient time for executive staff review and approval