Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byBrenda Miller Modified about 1 year ago

1
Who will save the tokamak – Harry Potter, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Shaquille O’Neal or Donald Trump? J. P. Freidberg, F. Mangiarotti, J. Minervini MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center PPPL Jan. 20, 2015 1

2
Why does the tokamak need saving? Standard tokamak does not scale to a reactor Design determined almost entirely by nuclear physics and engineering constraints One piece of plasma physics enters the design – empirical The plasma physics is not up to the task 2

3
How can I prove this? Design a tokamak reactor from an engineering view Use only plasma physics Obtain reasonable values for all engineering parameters Obtain reasonable values for all plasma parameters More important – give a non-plasma physics reason for choosing each parameter Test design against known tokamak operational limits The design FAILS 3

4
The approach Use simple models No pretense of high precision Show there is one possible show stopper Discuss 4 strategies to solve the problem Many of you are aware of the key results How we get there is what is interesting Let the design begin 4

5
ARIES Tokamak Reactor 5

6
Theoretical approximation 6

7
Goals of the design 7 QuantitySymbol Minor radius of the plasma Major radius of the plasma Elongation Thickness of the blanket region Thickness of the TF magnets Average plasma temperature Average plasma pressure Average plasma density Energy confinement time Magnetic field at Normalized plasma pressure Plasma current Bootstrap fraction

8
Nuclear Physics Constraints Neutron slowing down: Tritium breeding: D-T Fusion: 8

9
Engineering constraints 1 Steady state ignited reactor Electric power out: Neutron wall loading: Recirculating power fraction: Thermal conversion efficiency: 9

10
Engineering constraints 2 Superconducting niobium-tin magnets Maximum field at the coil: Maximum mechanical stress: Maximum current density: Wall to RF conversion efficiency: 10

11
Analysis strategy Use the constraints to express all parameters in terms of Define a reference case: No justification for reference case – just an example Examine design as a function of Show no value of works: identify show-stopper Examine 4 possible solutions 11

12
Ellipticity Not very controversial Good for plasma physics: increased and Good for engineering: lower But there are limits Plasma limit – vertical instabilities Engineering limit – feedback control design We choose 12

13
First wall, Blanket, Shield, Vac. Ch. 13 First wallBlanketShield Plasma b Vac. Ch.

14
Focus on the Blanket Blanket thickness from nuclear physics constraints Use conservation of mass and energy 14

15
Blanket (cont.) Calculate to reduce neutron flux to Add some shield, first wall, and vacuum chamber, improve optimization We choose 15

16
Neutron Wall Loading Relation between R 0 and a Wall loading relation 16

17
Solve for R 0 Solution Reference case: Then 17

18
Magnetic field at R = R 0 A good approximation: Then For the reference case 18

19
TF Coil Design Relation between c and a Coil thickness = structure + superconductor Structure - Magnet forces Tensile forces Centering forces Overturning forces Overturning forces small - neglect 19

20
Tensile force balance Tensile forces Solve for the tensile stress 20

21
Centering force balance Centering forces Solve for the compression stress 21

22
Stress thickness Tresca Stress = Maximum stress Solve for stress thickness 22

23
SC current density thickness How much SC is needed to carry TF current? Solve for 23

24
Total coil thickness Total = sum of tensile plus centering For the reference case 24

25
Plasma temperature Assume Fusion power density Choose to maximize 25

26
Plasma pressure Thermal power must produce desired output power Simple “vanilla” profiles 26

27
Plasma Pressure (cont.) Cross section Volume element Solve for For the reference case 27

28
Plasma beta From the definition For the reference case 28

29
Plasma density Density from For the reference case 29

30
Energy confinement time Ignited operation: alpha power = thermal conduction losses Solve for For the reference case 30

31
The plasma current Here is where plasma physics enters Empirical ELMy H-mode scaling Solve for the current For the reference case 31

32
The kink safety factor From the definition For the reference case 32

33
Bootstrap fraction From recirculating power fraction and CD efficiency Assume Lower Hybrid current drive – outside launch Recirculating power fraction Electrical conversion efficiency 33

34
Bootstrap fraction (cont.) Current drive For the reference case The bootstrap fraction 34

35
Two additional figures of merit Cost: Reference case Heat flux: Reference case 35

36
How well does the plasma shape up? Test the plasma against 4 plasma limits Greenwald density limit Troyon beta limit Kink safety factor limit Achievable bootstrap fraction 36

37
Greenwald density limit Density limit Reference case 37

38
Troyon beta limit Beta limit Reference case 38

39
Kink safety factor limit Safety factor limit Reference case 39

40
Bootstrap fraction limit The maximum bootstrap fraction: Model for the total 40

41
Total current density profile 41

42
Bootstrap fraction limit (cont.) The neoclassical bootstrap fraction The bootstrap limit For the reference case 42

43
The basic problem Too much current is needed for ignition Yes but we assumed that Maybe there is a better value for ? Let’s see! Plot All must simultaneously be less than 1 for success 43

44
No value of works!! 44

45
What’s the consequence? Without steady-state the tokamak is on the path to nowhere 45

46
What should we do about it? Four possible solutions The Harry Potter solution The Arnold Schwarzenegger solution The Shaquille O’Neal solution The Donald Trump solution 46

47
The Harry Potter Solution Advanced Plasma Physics Raise, set to fix Lowers the required I Lowers the achievable n Lowers the achievable Still violates limit Success requires 47

48
Plasma Physics Strategy - Magic

49
The Arnold Schwarzenegger Solution Advanced Magnet Technology Raise, set to fix Improves plasma physics Raises Success requires 49

50
Engineering Strategy – Strong B 50

51
The Shaquille O’Neal Solution Economy of Scale Raise, set to fix Keep standard Economy of scale benefits Leads to a larger plant About the same Success requires 51

52
Utility Risk – Large Power Plant 52

53
The Donald Trump Solution Easier Engineering Lower, set to fix Keep standard Eases engineering A large, expensive plant Much larger Success requires 53

54
Economic Risk – Large $/W 54

55
What if the tokamak doesn’t work? There is always the stellarator 55

56
Our opinion Donald Trump: Not attractive economically Shaquille O’Neal: Not attractive utility-wise Harry Potter: May work, but risky if only option Arnold Schwarzenegger: Best new hope because of game changing technology 56

57
Some observations Some say plasma physics is done – we should focus on engineering We do not agree! Do not know how to make a steady state tokamak at high No solution yet for heat load problem – not primarily a materials problem, but a divertor problem Designs tend towards larger Plasma performance improves at high 57

58
The US Fusion Program What elements should be included? How well are they supported on a scale of 10? Advanced tokamak physics8 Steady state high performance plasma6 Stellarator research3 Advanced magnet technology1 Fusion-fission hybrids1 58

59
Can we improve the US Program? We have a chance Community input mandated by Congress Charge and procedures very important Don’t need a charge by Machiavelli and Madoff They can’t be trusted! Do need a charge by Maxwell and Newton They can’t be fooled! 59

Similar presentations

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google