Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byIrene Gibson Modified over 2 years ago

1
SGP 2008 A Local/Global Approach to Mesh Parameterization Ligang Liu Lei Zhang Yin Xu Zhejiang University, China Craig Gotsman Technion, Israel Steven J. Gortler Harvard University, USA

2
SGP 2008 2 Mesh Parameterization Input 3D mesh Output Flattened 2D mesh

3
SGP 2008 3 Mesh Parameterization Isometric mapping –Preserves all the basic geometry properties: length, angles, area, … For non-developable surfaces, there will always be some distortion –Try to keep the distortion as small as possible

4
SGP 2008 4 Previous Work Discrete harmonic mappings –Finite element method [Pinkall and Polthier 1993; Eck et al. 1995] –Convex combination maps [Floater 1997] –Mean value coordinates [Floater 2003] Discrete conformal mappings –MIPS [Hormann and Greiner 1999] –Angle-based flattening [Sheffer and de Sturler 2001; Sheffer et al. 2005] –Linear methods [L é vy et al. 2002; Desbrun et al. 2002] –Curvature based [Yang et al. 2008, Ben-Chen et al. 2008, Springborn et al, 2008] Discrete equiareal mappings –[Maillot et al.1993; Sander et al. 2001; Degener et al. 2003]

5
SGP 2008 5 Inspiration Laplacian & Poisson-based editing [Sorkine et al. 2004, Yu et al. 2004] Deformation transfer [Sumner et al. 2004] Linear Tangent-Space Alignment [Chen et al. 2007] As-rigid-as-possible surface modeling [Sorkine and Alexa 2007] “Think globally, act locally”

6
SGP 2008 6 The Key Idea perform local transformations on triangles and stitch them all together consistently to a global solution

7
SGP 2008 7 Local/Global Approach Stitch globally Input 3D mesh Output 2D parameterization

8
SGP 2008 8 Triangle Flattening Each individual triangle is independently flattened into plane without any distortion Reference triangles Isometric

9
SGP 2008 9 Intrinsic Deformation Energy : some family of allowed linear transformations Area of 3D triangleJacobian matrix of L t (Affine) Reference triangles xParameterization u e.g. similarity or rotation Auxiliary linear (Linear)

10
SGP 2008 10 Unknown linear transformation Angles of triangle Source 2D coords Unknown Target 2D coords [Pinkall and Polthier 1993] Extrinsic Deformation Energy

11
SGP 2008 As-Similar-As-Possible (Conformality) M family of similarity transformations

12
SGP 2008 12 Conformal Mapping Similarity = Rotation + Scale Preserves angles

13
SGP 2008 13 Linear system in u, a, b As-Similar-As-Possible (ASAP) A t Similarity transformations Auxiliary variables

14
SGP 2008 14 As-Similar-As-Possible (ASAP) Equivalent to LSCM technique [Levy et al. 2002] which minimizes singular values of the Jacobian

15
SGP 2008 As-Rigid-As-Possible (Rigidity) M family of rotation transformations

16
SGP 2008 16 As-Rigid-As-Possible (ARAP) A t Rotations Non-linear system in u,a,b We will treat u and A as separate sets of variables, to enable a simple optimization process.

17
SGP 2008 17 As-Rigid-As-Possible (ARAP) A t Rotations Non-linear system in u,a,b Solve by “local/global” algorithm [Sorkine and Alexa, 2007] : Find an initial guess of u while not converged Fix u and solve locally for each A t Fix A t and solve globally for u end Poisson equation SVD

18
SGP 2008 18 Optimal Local Rotation AR

19
SGP 2008 19 Advantages Each iteration decreases the energy Matrix L of Poisson equation is fixed –Precompute Cholesky factorization –Just back-substitute in each iteration

20
SGP 2008 20 As-Rigid-As-Possible (ARAP) Equivalent to minimizing:

21
SGP 2008 21 A S AP A R AP

22
SGP 2008 22 2222 angle-preserving (conformal) area-preserving (authalic) length-preserving (isometric) A S APA R AP Most conformalMost isometric

23
SGP 2008 23 A S APA R AP

24
SGP 2008 Tradeoff Between Conformality and Rigidity A S APA R AP Preserves angles, but not preserve area ? Tradeoff Preserves areas, but damage conformality

25
SGP 2008 25 Hybrid Model Local Phase: Solve cubic equation for a t and b t Global Phase: Poisson equation = 0 ASAP = ARAP parameter Similarity transformation

26
SGP 2008 26 Results λ=0.0001 (2.05, 5.74) λ=0.001 (2.07, 2.88) λ=0.1 (2.18, 2.14) ARAP (λ= ) (2.19, 2.11) ASAP (λ=0) (2.05, 15.6) Angular distortion:Area distortion:

27
SGP 2008 27 Effect of A S AP (λ=0) A R AP (λ= ) = 0

28
SGP 2008 28 Effect of A S AP (λ=0) A R AP (λ= ) = 0

29
SGP 2008 29 Multiple Boundaries ABF++ (2.00, 2.09) ARAP (2.01, 2.01)

30
SGP 2008 30 ASAP (2.01, 30.1) ARAP (2.03, 2.03) ABF++ (2.01, 2.19) Inverse Curvature Map [Yang et al. 2008] (2.46, 2.51) Linear ABF [Zayer et al. 2007] (2.01, 2.22) Curvature Prescription [Ben-Chen et al. 2008] (2.01, 2.18)

31
SGP 2008 31 Comparison ASAPARAPABF++ [Sheffer et al. 2005] Inverse Curvature Map [Yang et al. 2008] (2.05, 2.67)(2.00, 2.64)(2.06, 2.05)(2.00, 88.1)

32
SGP 2008 32 Conclusion Simple iterative “local/global” algorithm Converges in a few iterations Low conformal and stretch distortions Generalization of stress majorization (MDS) Can be used for deformable mesh registration

33
SGP 2008 33 Thank you !

Similar presentations

OK

CSE554Extrinsic DeformationsSlide 1 CSE 554 Lecture 9: Extrinsic Deformations Fall 2012.

CSE554Extrinsic DeformationsSlide 1 CSE 554 Lecture 9: Extrinsic Deformations Fall 2012.

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on different solid figures and nets Ppt on secret of success Ppt on electronic product design Ppt on self awareness activities Ppt on poem the road not taken Ppt on urbanism as a way of life as opposed to rural ways of life Ppt on nuclear power plants in india Ppt on means of transport free download Ppt on mobile based attendance tracking system Ppt on wings of fire