Presentation on theme: "Crystal Binding (Bonding) Continued: More on Ionic Bonding."— Presentation transcript:
Crystal Binding (Bonding) Continued: More on Ionic Bonding
Ionic Crystals As we’ve already said, these consist of atoms with Large Electronegativity Differences. Most naturally occurring minerals are ionic crystals. Further, many of these minerals are oxides. As a first approximation, these oxides can be thought of as an array of oxygen atoms in a close packed arrangement, with metallic ions fitting into interstitial sites between the oxygens. Most of these crystals are not very useful to physicists. But, some Geoscience friends are experts on these kinds of crystals. In ionic crystals, the ions are in close packed arrangements to maximize the attractions & to minimize the repulsions between the ions.
Ionic Bonding This bonding occurs between atoms with Large Electronegativity Differences. This means that the two atoms are usually far removed from each other in the periodic table. This also means that they can easily exchange electrons & stabilize their outer electron shells (which become more inert gas-like). So, electronically neutral bonds between cations (positive ions) & anions (negative ions) are created. Example: NaCl Na (1s 2 2s 2 2p 6 3s 1 ) Na + (1s 2 2s 2 2p 6 ) + e - Cl (1s 2 2s 2 2p 6 3s 2 3p 5 ) + e - Cl - (1s 2 2s 2 2p 6 3s 2 3p 6 )
In general, Ionic Materials: Are harder than metals or molecular solids, but softer than covalently bonded materials. Have greater densities than metals or molecular solids, but are less dense than covalently bonded solids. Have low electrical & thermal conductivities in comparison with most other materials. These & other physical properties are caused by the ionic bond strength, which is related to 1. The spacing between the ions. 2. The ionic charge. Physical Properties of Ionic Materials
Melting Points of Ionic Materials Decrease with Increasing Interionic Distance +1 cations +2 cations Sodium with various anions 12 20 38 56 3 11 19 37 9 17 35 53
4 12 20 38 56 22 21 12 11 Mechanical Hardness of Ionic Materials Decreases with Increasing Interionic Distance
Atomic & Ionic Radii In Quantum Mechanics, the concepts “Atomic Radius” & “Ionic Radius” ARE NOT WELL-DEFINED! Electrons are waves & are spread out over the atomic volume with no rigid “boundary” that is the “atomic radius”. However, sometimes in crystalline solids, these concepts can be useful to obtain a qualitative (sometimes even close to quantitative!) understanding of interatomic (inter-ionic) distances (bond lengths), as well as certain other material properties. How these radii are defined is certainly not rigorous & varies from one bond type to another, sometimes from one material to another & sometimes from one application to another.
The Atomic Radius of a neutral atom can be crudely thought of as the Mean Quantum Mechanical Radius of the orbital of the outer valence electron for that atom. Similarly, the Ionic Radius of an ion can be crudely thought of as the Mean Quantum Mechanical Radius of the orbital of the outer valence electron for that ion. In quantum mechanics, could be calculated using the wavefunction (solution to Schrödinger’s Equation) of the relevant valence electron. However, this quantum mechanical calculation is almost never done. Instead, these radii are most often treated as parameters which are obtained from crystal structure data.
For example, a means to find an Ionic Radius for a metallic ion is to obtain it from data on the crystalline solid for that metal. In this case, the Ionic Radius would be half the ion-ion bond length: r I = (½)d (d = bond length or nearest neighbor distance) As a specific example, take the copper ion Cu +. The lattice structure of Cu metal is FCC. See figure. X-ray data gives d 100 = a = 3.61 Å. From the figure, nearest neighbor distance = (½)(2a 2 ) ½ a a Cu + Ionic Radius = (¼)(2a 2 ) ½ = 1.28 Å. Note: The Cu + ionic radius is different than the radius of the Cu ++ ion. It is also different in the covalently bonded material CuO 2, etc., etc.
The Atomic (or Ionic) Radius of a given atom (or ion) can be different, depending on the material of interest. For example, for atom X, this radius depends on: 1. The crystal structure of the material that X is in. 2. The coordination number (# nearest-neighbors) for X in that material. 3. The bond type. 4. The % of ionic or covalent character of that bond. 5......
Variation of Atomic Radii with Position in the Periodic Table It increases from top to bottom down a column. Why? Going down a column, the energies of valence electrons increases, so their binding energy with the nucleus gets weaker moving down the column. They are not bound as tightly to the nucleus as the electrons in the filled shells because they are screened or shielded ( pushed away) by other electrons in inner levels. It decreases from left to right in a row. Why? The number of protons in the nucleus increases to the right. This pulls electrons closer to the nucleus going from left to right.
Summary Shielding is constant Atomic Radius decreases Ionization energy increases Electronegativity increases Nuclear charge increases Shielding increasesAtomic radius increasesIonic size increasesIonization energy decreasesElectronegativity decreases
Atomic Radius The overall trend in atomic radius looks like this.
Ionic Radii Metallic Elements easily lose electrons. Non-Metals more readily gain electrons. How does losing or gaining an electron effect the radius of the atom (ion)?
Positive Ions Positive ions are always smaller than the neutral atom, due to their loss of outer shell electrons.
Negative Ions Negative ions are always larger than the neutral atom due to the fact that they’ve gained electrons.
Ion size Trends in Rows. Going from left to right there is a decrease in size of positive ions. Starting with group 5, there is sharp increase followed by a decrease in the size of the anion as you move from left to right.
Ion size Trends in Columns Ion size increases going down a column for both positive and negative ions
Covalent Radii. Obviously, applies to atoms in a covalently bonded material. In a pure elemental solid, the Covalent Radius is simply half of the bond length. Once that is found for a given atom, then the covalent radius of that atom is assumed to be the same in any material in which that atom participates in a covalent bond.
22 Charged Systems How can charged systems be handled? The Coulomb potential is long-ranged! To do calculations, people often treat the Coulomb potential as if it were a short- ranged potential: Cutoff the potential at r > (½)L. Problem: –The effect of the discontinuity never disappears: (1/r) (r 2 ) gets bigger as r gets bigger! An Image Potential solves this: V I = Σ n v(r i -r j +nL) –But this summation diverges!
1-D Madelung Sum: The value of α depends on whether it is defined in terms of the lattice constant R. Start on a negative ion, summing (left and right) R - + - – + - – + - – + … … This sum is conditionally convergent! This means the order of the terms in the sum matters! Consider a Model Ionic Lattice in 1 Dimension, as in the figure: –
The value of α depends on whether it is defined in terms of the lattice constant R. Start on a negative ion, summing (left & right) R - + - – + - – + - – + … … Model Ionic Lattice in 1 Dimension – This sum is conditionally convergent! This means the order of the terms in the sum matters!
25 3-D Madelung Sum In 3D this series presents greater difficulty. The series will not converge unless successive terms in the series are arranged so that + and - terms nearly cancel. Powerful methods were developed by Ewald (Ann. Physik 64, 253 (1921), Evjen (Phys. Rev. 39, 675 (1932) and Frank (Phil. Mag. 41, 1287 (1950). Results for some Lattices: V electrostatic ~ α/R Lattice NaCl 1.747565 CsCl 1.762675 ZnS 1.6381
26 Long-Ranged Potentials Why make the potential long ranged? –Consider a cubic lattice with +1 charges, and its Coulomb potential. Approximate integral diverges! –Correct! Non-neutral system with infinite charge has infinite potential. Consider a cubic lattice with charge neutrality, i.e. with ±1 charges. Again need convergent lattice sum. –Energy is finite in charge neutral cell
27 What is a Long-Ranged Potential? A potential is long-ranged if the real-space lattice sum does not (naively) converge. –In 3D, a potential is long-ranges if converges at rate < r –3. –In 2D, a potential is long-ranges if converges at rate < r –2. –In practice, we often use techniques for potentials that are not strictly long-ranged. MOTIVATION for bothersome math: Most interesting systems contain charge: –Any atomic system at the level of electrons and nuclei. –Any system with charged defects (e.g., Frenkel defects) –Any system with dissolved ions (e.g. biological cases) –Any system with partial charges (e.g. chemical systems)
Total Lattice Energy = Ion-pair energy x Madelung constant M (or α) Crystal Structure Madelung constant NaCl 1.748 CsCl 1.763 Zinc blende 1.638 Wurtzite 1.641 Fluorite 2.519 Rutile 2.408
A Concentric Cube Calculation Does Converge: The Madelung Series does not converge:
Ionic Solids are thought of as anion structures with cations filling cavities (holes) between the anions. Bonding is strongest with the most cation-anion interactions that do not crowd the anions into each other (which is the same as leaving gaps between anions and the cation. At the “stability limit” the cation is touching all the anions and the anions are just touching at their edges. Beyond this stability limit the compound will be stable. What decides which shape an ionic lattice takes?
Ionic charge has a huge effect on lattice energy.
Lattice Energy Attempts to predict lattice energies are generally based on Coulomb’s law: V AB = (Z a e)(Z b e) 4πε o r AB Z a and Z b = charge on cation and anion e = charge of an electron (1.602 x 10 -19 C) 4πε o = permittivity of vacuum (1.1127 x 10 -10 J -1 C 2 m -1 ) r AB = distance between nuclei
The Madelung constant is derived for each type of ionic crystal structure. It is the sum of a series of numbers representing the number of nearest neighbors and their relative distance from a given ion. The constant is specific to the crystal type (unit cell), but independent of interionic distances or ionic charges. Since ionic crystals involve more than 2 ions, the attractive and repulsive forces between neighboring ions, next nearest neighbors, etc., must be considered.
Madelung Constants Crystal Madelung Crystal Madelung Structure Constant Cesium chloride1.763 Fluorite2.519 Rock salt (NaCl)1.748 Sphalerite1.638 Wurtzite1.641
Estimating The Lattice Energy E c = NM(Z + )( Z - ) e 2 4πε o r where N is Avogadro’s number, and M is the Madelung constant (sometimes represented by A) This estimate is based on coulombic forces, and assumes 100% ionic bonding. A further modification, the Born-Mayer equation corrects for complex repulsion within the crystal. E c = NM(Z + )( Z - ) e 2 (1-ρ/r) 4πε o r for simple compounds, ρ = 30pm
If we consider electrostatic and Born forces, we arrive at the Born-Mayer equation (evaluated at equilibrium internuclear separation, d o ) corrects for repulsions at short distances. Typically, a value of 30 pm is used for . Correction for Born forces This equation will enable us to predict lattice energies (called the calculated lattice energy