We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byEthan Reed
Modified about 1 year ago
-A DHPE Approach- Tiffany Cox, MPH, CPH DHPE Fellow Connecticut Department of Public Health Copyright © 2014 DHPE
Overview of tools and process ◦ Background about DHPE and suggested tools ◦ Developing impact categories and goals ◦ Selection of recommendations to analyze ◦ Impact analysis Suggested next steps ◦ Stakeholder Log ◦ Stakeholder Power Analysis ◦ Combining to identify ranking of solutions Copyright © 2014 DHPE
Directors of Health Promotion and Education (DHPE) is a professional association founded in 1946 with voting members representing the health promotion function in each state, territory, or indigenous nation Key areas include: school health, health equity, and shaping policy for health Shaping Policy for Health (SPH) Curriculum was developed through a CDC cooperative agreement with DHPE Curriculum developers are from UNC (Chapel Hill) – James Emery, MPH and Carolyn Crump, PhD Copyright © 2014 DHPE
A policy is a temporary creed liable to be changed, but while it holds good it has got to be pursued with apostolic zeal. -Mahatma Gandhi ( ) Copyright © 2014 DHPE
Problems are not just about “health” Important political core values include: ◦ Efficiency of market dynamics/allocation ◦ Liberty and freedom to choose ◦ Equity of outcomes or market distributions ◦ Security of outcomes or conditions Other goal terms could be used (i.e. social justice, accessibility, transparency, etc.) Competing values ◦ Security and equity vs. efficiency and liberty Copyright © 2014 DHPE
Not all goals are equal Which criteria are more important? ◦ Client values ◦ Powerful stakeholders’ values ◦ Level of rigor in measurement ◦ Evidence Important goals can be weighted more easily than others Weighting method: percent distribution Copyright © 2014 DHPE
Phrases that operationalize and define the goals in measurable terms Denote what will be observed/measured Similar to evaluation measures Can be quantitative or qualitative Sources to identify impact categories: ◦ Stakeholder perspectives ◦ Research literature ◦ Expert opinions ◦ Coalition members Keep devoid of direction Standardize quantities (using percentages and rates, rather than raw quantities) Copyright © 2014 DHPE
HANDOUT Copyright © 2014 DHPE
Discuss overarching impact goals and categories for your particular workgroup Refer to Handout J for example Copyright © 2014 DHPE
Identify 3-4 recommendations you’d like to further analyze, then complete the last column in Worksheet 4 Copyright © 2014 DHPE
1. Start plugging in Impact goals, goal weights, impact categories, and solutions in Worksheet 5 2. Start discussing impact scores (-1, 0, 1): higher number reflects more positive score 3. Proceed to calculate subtotal scores and then totals 4. Refer to Handout K for example Copyright © 2014 DHPE
1. Stakeholder Log a.Complete individually first, then to group leader to compile. b.Refer to the partially completed example on obesity. c.The group leader will then send a partially completed Stakeholder Power Analysis (SPA) worksheet to all workgroup members, using the information submitted in the stakeholder logs. Copyright © 2014 DHPE
Worksheet 2 Copyright © 2014 DHPE
2. Stakeholder Power Analysis a.See Handout I for example b.Individually, then discussed by workgroup members during a conference call Copyright © 2014 DHPE
HANDOUT Copyright © 2014 DHPE
3. Combining the results a. See Handout L for example b. Marijane Carey will then combine the group’s SPA and Impact Analysis, then share with workgroups. Copyright © 2014 DHPE
4. Interpreting combined results – second conference call to interpret, discuss, and agree on final rankings 5. Coalition meeting – workgroups will present final ranking decisions and recommendations with larger Coalition group. Coalition will discuss and provide input. 6. Formalize recommendations - following this meeting, volunteers from each workgroup will create a short policy brief and/or complete the final recommendation template provided by the group leader Copyright © 2014 DHPE
1. Stakeholder Log – individually, then to the group leader to compile. The group leader will then send a partially completed Stakeholder Power Analysis (SPA) worksheet to all workgroup members. 2. Stakeholder Power Analysis (see Handout I for example) – individually, then discussed by workgroup members during a conference call. 3. Combining the results (see Handout L for example) – The group leader Carey will combine the group’s SPA and Impact Analysis, then share with workgroups. 4. Interpreting combined results – second workgroup conference call to interpret, discuss, and agree on final rankings. 5. Coalition meeting – workgroups will present final ranking decisions and recommendations with larger Coalition group. Coalition will discuss and provide input. 6. Formalize recommendations - Following, this meeting volunteers from each workgroup will create a short policy brief and/or complete the final recommendation template provided by the group leader. Copyright © 2014 DHPE
Honest differences of views and honest debate are not disunity. They are the vital process of policy-making among free men. -Herbert Hoover ( ) Copyright © 2014 DHPE
Linda Kenney, MPH November 6, MATERNAL & CHILD HEALTH SERVICES BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM GENERAL INTRODUCTION REQUIREMENTS 2.
The Project Cycle Management Course presented by Simon Pluess World Alliance of YMCAs.
Monitoring and Evaluating Gender-Based Violence Prevention and Mitigation Programs Anastasia J. Gage Melissa Dunn MODULE II.
Module 2: National IEA process design and organization.
Quality Tools and Techniques in the School and Classroom.
Ability-Based Education at Alverno College. Proposed Outcomes for Session 1. To introduce you to Alvernos approach to designing integrative general education.
Program Evaluation Webinar Series Part 2: “Getting Started and Engaging Your Stakeholders” Presented by: Leslie Fierro and Carlyn Orians.
EVIDENCED-BASED ADVOCACY: WHAT IT IS? STEPS TOWARDS BUILDING THE ADVOCACY PLAN From Research to Advocacy.
An Overview of Methodologies of Assessing Educational Adequacy August 20, Adequacy Bureau of Legislative Research Policy Analysis & Research.
Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Session One Linking Assessment to Functional Outcomes and Accountability Anne Brager, MS, RN Program Supervisor Frederick.
Introduction New Form Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Feedback Conversation Career Development SMART Goals Competency Framework Documents There are also links.
2. Develop Procurement Strategy 2. Develop Procurement Strategy 3. Supplier Evaluation & Selection 3. Supplier Evaluation & Selection 5. Induction & Integration.
Standards-based Grading Dr. Megan Welsh Neag School of Education Connecticut Assessment Forum 8/13/12.
Measuring Local Governance. Objectives 1.Introduce local governance and its present dynamics in terms of decentralisation and democratisation trends and.
DSS Decision Support System Tutorial: An Instructional Tool for Using the DSS.
Professional Development for School Leaders Technical Assistance Phase 1 Self-Assessment and Plan Design.
Beyond Bureaucracy Beyond Bureaucracy! Developing High-Performing Pre- Referral Intervention Teams.
Action Research Not traditional educational research often research tests theory not practical Teacher research in classrooms and/or schools/districts.
Performance Rating Distribution Guidelines Key Contributor Results and performance are outstanding % Quality Plus Contributor Results and performance.
Dr. Randall Rhodes, Assistant Dean, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences Robert Smith, Assistant VP for Planning, Assessment, and Institutional Research.
Partners in Community Health: New Tools to Bring Hospitals, Public Health, and Communities Together November 11, 2010 | Washington DC Indu Spugnardi The.
Peggy Gladden & Adia Hoag BTU Field Representatives.
Proactive Librarianship Appendices: Workshop transparencies Written by Rheina Epstein 2003 Copyright INASP and Rheina Epstein.
What is District Wide Accreditation? Ensure Desired Results Improve Teaching & Learning Foster a Culture of Improvement A powerful systems approach to.
ICAA5151B GATHER DATA TO IDENTIFY BUSINESS REQUIREMENTS.
P-16 Strategic Planning: A Texas Pilot What Was Planned and What Actually Happened Dr. R.B. (Bob) Wilkinson Director, Analysis, Planning, and Assessment.
Presentation title: 32pt Arial Regular, black Recommended maximum length: 1 line A Mandatory Management/Leadership Development Framework for Doctors Professor.
Monitoring and Evaluating the Performance and Impact of ESF Interventions Carolyn J. Heinrich University of Wisconsin-Madison Shaping the Future of the.
Professional Learning Communities A Comprehensive Guide to PLC Start-Up to Sustainability Adapted from the work of Dr. Richard Dufour Mark Cerutti – Director.
Locked Hexagon Model Implementation Toolkit HS Consultancy, 2012
© 2016 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.