Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

KEN MAUTNER, MD EMORY SPORTS MEDICINE FEBRUARY 12, 2009 Tendon Injuries: New Treatments For an Old Problem.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "KEN MAUTNER, MD EMORY SPORTS MEDICINE FEBRUARY 12, 2009 Tendon Injuries: New Treatments For an Old Problem."— Presentation transcript:

1 KEN MAUTNER, MD EMORY SPORTS MEDICINE FEBRUARY 12, 2009 Tendon Injuries: New Treatments For an Old Problem

2 Tendon Injury – Terms Tendinitis – Implying inflammatory pathology Tendinosis – Implying degenerative pathology w/o inflammatory component Tendinopathy – No implication for pathology

3 Tendon Structure Tropocollagen Triple Helix Structure

4 Tendon Analogy

5 The Tendinopathy Cycle

6 Tendinosis Microscopic – Collagen degeneration – Fibrosis – Neovascularization – LACK of inflammation Normal Tendinosis J.D. Rees et al, Rheumatology May 2006

7 Traditional Treatments  Rest  Immobilization  NSAIDS  Physical Therapy/ biomechanics  Possible CSI  RTP when pain free/ functional  But is tissue healed? If symptoms persist  Surgery What is ideal way to treat tendinopathy? LACK OF EVIDENCE FOR TRADITIONAL TREATMENTS

8 Evolving algorithm  Pathology specific conservative treatments  NSAIDS only if inflammatory  Immobilization only if necessary  Eccentrics exercises for tendinosis  Regenerative intervention  Percutaneous needle tenotomy  PRP  PRP with adipose tissue  BMAC  Cultured stem cells What is ideal way to treat tendinopathy? TIMING OF INTERVENTION AND TYPE OF INTERVENTION NEEDS MORE EVIDENCE

9 Evolution of Regenerative Injections for treating chronic tendinopathy Proliferative therapy (prolotherapy) was first described in the 1930’s and represents first form of regenerative medicine Theory is that irritant solutions (most often dextrose) along with needling of soft tissues stimulates an inflammatory reaction which initiates a healing cascade for injured soft tissues. This technique has been employed for chronic enthesopathies and ligamentous injuries/laxity.

10 Percutaneous Tenotomy (PNT) Release of tissue by repetitive needling of a tendon insertion will induce inflammation, a release of growth factors which leads to fibroblast proliferation and ultimately healing

11 First use of PRP in US was in 1987 following open heart surgery Periodontal and wound healing were early successful clinical applications of PRP Benchwork research has clearly demonstrated proliferation of GF’s with supraphysiologic amount of platelets Prior to human use, considerable use and success in Equine (horse) racing with tendon regeneration using PRP Evolution of platelets for healing soft tissue injuries

12 Rapid growth of ultrasound use in MSK medicine Ease of obtaining and using Platelets without the need for OR/ ASC Unsuccessful traditional treatmentments of tendonopathy/chronic soft tissue injuries Motivated patient population (athletes) that will do anything to get back sooner/ stronger Early pilot studies/ case series showing remarkable success of procedure and the ability to “fix” an injury without surgery  What’s the downside? The “perfect storm” for clinical application of platelets in MSK injuries

13 Why Platelets?

14 Why do we need to concentrate platelets? Studies have shown accelerated would healing requires at least 4x- 5x platelet concentration An exponential increase in cell proliferation occurs as platelet concentration increases from 2.5x to 5x-10x baseline levels Much lower volume needed to get high levels of platelets to area

15 PRP Procedure

16 Tendon Healing

17 PRP for chronic lateral epicondylosis Allan Mishra et al, AJSM, pts evaluated for lateral epicondylosis 20 had refractory pain an avg. of 15 months later 15 in treatment group, 5 in bupivicaine control group Intervention – Injection w/ autologous PRP once into common extensor tendon followed by gradual increase in rehab program through 4 weeks after which full activity allowed Outcome – A 46%, 60% and 81% improvement in VAS pain scores at 1, 2 and 6 months respectively in tx group – 3/5 in bupivicaine group withdrew/ sought other tx – At final F/U (12-38 months) 93% pain free (<10/100 VAS) – No complications, no one got worse

18 PRP vs Steroid Injection for Lateral Epicondylitis Peerbooms et al, AJSM, February 2010 Double blind RCT with 1 year follow up of 100 pts No Ultrasound guidance was used Success defined as >25% reduction in VAS or DASH score RESULTS  At 1 yr, 49% of CSI group and 73% in PRP group were successful (p<.001)

19 PRP lateral epicondylosis- Case #1 Long axis view Short axis view

20 BEFORE AFTER Elbow case #1– 2.5 months later

21 BEFORE AFTER Elbow case #1– 2.5 months later

22 Elbow PRP Case #2 BEFORE AFTER (3 months)

23 PRP for Achilles Tendinosis de Vos et al, JAMA, January 13, 2010  First double blind, placebo controlled, RCT on PRP  54 randomized patients age 18 to 70 with chronic (at least 2 mo) achilles tendon pain 2 to 7 cm above calcaneus  Either 6cc PRP or Saline was injected with US guidance into achilles tendon  Rehab for both groups involved rest and then after 2 weeks, started on 12 week daily (180 repetitions) eccentric exercise program  No sports for at least 4 weeks and then only if pain <=3/10  f/u qestionnaire at weeks 6,12,24

24 PRP for Achilles Tendinosis de Vos et al, JAMA, January 13, 2010  RESULTS  After 24 weeks, no statistical difference between the 2 groups  Both groups improved > 20 pts on VISA-A scores (0-100)  No adverse events in either group (ruptures/ infections)  CONCLUSIONS  Both groups improved Needle? Saline? Placebo? Eccentric Exercises?  Only 1 treatment done  Small Sample Size  Eccentric exercises may have worsened outcomes Certainly this confounded the results

25 PRP for Achilles Tendinosis  Gaweda K et all. Treatment of Achilles Tendinopathy with Platelet-Rich Plasma, International J. of Sports Medicine, 2010  14 patients (15 tendons), prospective study  Avg. 6 months symptoms (range 3-10 months)  3 cc PRP injected under US guidance  Rehab –PWB x 3 days, PROM x 2 wks, then active ROM, stretching from 2-6 wks, then >6wks, full load active exercises  Results  Tendon thickness decreased in 13/15 tendons by 6 months  Intrasubstance tears reduced from 11/15 to 1/15 at 6 mo. Initial6weeks3 months6 months18 months AOFAS VISA-A

26 Longitudinal achilles Short axis achilles Achilles Tendon Pain

27 BEFORE AFTER Achilles PRP Injection 8 months later

28 BEFORE AFTER Achilles PRP Injection 8 months later

29 Preliminary Results of PRP Survey for chronic tendinopathy DATA COLLECTION STILL ONGOING Multi-center study 146 patients sent questionnaire (as of oct. 1)  94 responded (64%)  71/ 94 (76%) were isolated treatments for tendinopathy  22/67 (33%) tendons received a 2 nd PRP injection (all within 4 months of the first injection) All retrospective data analyzed with following questions:  VAS score –pre and post  Overall improvement  Not at all, slightly, moderately, mostly, completely  Overall satisfaction

30 Distribution of tendons (responders only) Common extensor tendon at lateral epicondyle Patella Tendon 10 – Rotator cuff 6 – Gluteus medius/ minimus 6 – Achilles tendons 4 – Common flexor tendon at medial epicondyle 3 -- Hamstring

31 Pain Score pre and post PRP tendons only ➤ 68% Reduction in VAS

32 Overall Improvement 79% reported moderate to complete improvement – 50%- 100% relief of symptoms 59 % reported mostly to complete improvement % relief of symptoms

33 Overall Improvement 95% moderate to complete improvement Percentage 60% moderate to complete improvement 90% moderate to complete improvement

34 Overall satisfaction with PRP procedure DATA COLLECTION STILL ONGOING

35 Conclusion Tendon injuries have had poor clinical success with traditional treatments Some will improve on there own, but will the tendon regain its normal architecture/ strength? Biological agents such as PRP may offer a way to cure chronic tendon pain  Techniques will be refined over next several years Open Surgery Arthroscopy US-guided Regenerative Procedures

36

37 # of patients cc’s + Conc. Of PRP Acti- vator buffering agent/ Anesthetic US guid- ance Rehab / RTP De Vos Achilles 54 (27 in tx group) 4ccnoneSodium Bicarb/ Marcaine yes7 days protected activity, 7 days stretching ;12 weeks eccentrics RTP after 4 wks if pain <3 Gaweda Achilles 14 (15 tendons) 3ccnoneNone Unsure yesPWB 3d, PROMx2wks, AROM, stretching wks 2-6, then full load active exercise Peerbooms Lat Epic. 100 (51 in tx group) 3ccnoneSodium Bicarb/ Marcaine with epi No24 hrs limited mobility, 2 wks stretching, then eccentrics RTP after 4 wks as symptoms allow Mishra Lat. Epi 20 (15 in tx group) 5cc 539% noneSodium Bicarb/ Marcaine NoSame as above Kon Patella Tendon 2020cc/ 3tx 600% 10% CaCl None Unsure No24 hrs limited mobility, rest btwn injection 1 st and 2 nd, stretching between 2 nd and 3 rd and after 3 rd RTP allowed 1 month after 3 rd injection (2 months after 1 st ) Filardo Patella Tendon 1520cc/ 3tx 600% 10% CaCl None Unsure NoSame as above

38 Rehabilitation after PRP Days 0- 3  Ice allowed for first 24 hrs only as needed (20 min at a time)  Protected weight bearing for lower extremity procedures (walking boot)  Rest from all use of affected extremity beyond necessary daily activities  Take tylenol or hydrocodone as needed (avoid anti-inflammatory (NSAID’S) medications, e.g. ibuprofen, aspirin) Days 4-14  Wean out of boot/ splint  Light biking or pool work allowed (stay below pain)  Take Tylenol as needed (avoid NSAID’S) Weeks 2-4  Continue bike/pool work  Resume formal physical therapy/ rehabilitation to include:  Light stretching  Soft tissue work (including CFM, ASTYM, Graston, ART)  Heating/ ultrasound modalities  Core work/ strengthen adjacent body parts Shoulder and scapulo-thoracic work for elbow procedures Hip/ core work for knee and foot/ankle procedure  May walk lightly for exercise on treadmill/ flat ground if no increase in pain

39 Rehabilitation after PRP Weeks 4-8  Advance formal physical therapy/ rehabilitation:  Eccentric exercises – start with light weight  Re- Introduce strengthening exercise  Lower extremity closed kinetic chain exercises allowed with light weights/body weight  Continue light aerobic/ weight bearing exercise (if little to no pain present)  Start slow and do no more than every other day initially with small increases each time if no increase symptoms. Months 2-6  Advance formal physical therapy/ rehabilitation:  Increase strengthening activities (esp. eccentrics)  introduce dynamic stabilization and integrated musculoskeletal activities  Increase aerobic activities slowly  May start to resume sport specific activities ONLY IF PAIN IS MINIMAL with these activities  Start out with no more than every other day and increase amount of activity slowly each time if activity does not cause pain and no increase pain after activity is done  Progress sporting activities as tolerated to full return to play!!  If additional procedures are done, the rehabilitation starts over with the additional procedure


Download ppt "KEN MAUTNER, MD EMORY SPORTS MEDICINE FEBRUARY 12, 2009 Tendon Injuries: New Treatments For an Old Problem."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google