Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Workplace and Employee Survey Marie Drolet WES Research Manager Business and Labour Market Analysis Division Statistics Canada

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Workplace and Employee Survey Marie Drolet WES Research Manager Business and Labour Market Analysis Division Statistics Canada"— Presentation transcript:

1 Workplace and Employee Survey Marie Drolet WES Research Manager Business and Labour Market Analysis Division Statistics Canada

2 Outline of today’s presentation n General survey overview Why a linked survey? Survey content Potential research questions Collection Methodology Data Access n Comparative Research: Can the workplace explain gender pay differentials?

3 Goals of WES n To develop an ongoing survey that will ¶ link workers and workplaces at the micro level ·provide information from both the demand and supply sides of the labour market ==> enriching research studies ¸provide longitudinal information allowing researchers to control for both individual and workplace effects that are not possible in other data sets ¹ improve survey infrastructure

4 Survey Content Employee outcomes :  Hours polarization;  Wages;  Training received; Workplace characteristics:  Technology implemented;  Operating revenues, expenditures, payroll,  Employment; hiring, vacancies  Business strategies;  Work organization  Compensation schemes;  Training provided;  Occupation mix  Organizational change;  Subjective measures of productivity, profitability  Type of competition Worker/job characteristics;  Education;  Age/gender;  Occupation, management responsibilities;  Work history, tenure;  Family characteristics;  Unionization;  Use of technology;  Participation in decision making;  Wages and fringe benefits;  Work schedule/arrangements;  Training taken Workplace outcomes ;  Employment, revenue growth;  Organizational change;  Implementation of technologies.

5 Potential research questions n Are unionized workers more actively involved in workplace decision-making and employee participation programs? n Are there industrial sectors that are replacing less skilled workers with higher skilled workers? n What are the characteristics of workers leaving their jobs, thereby creating job vacancies? n Do alternative work practices such as job rotation and participation in work groups reduce quit rates?

6 Methodology: Target Population n All business locations in Canada that have paid employees EXCEPT employers in Yukon, Northwest Territories agricultural, fishing, hunting, trapping, public administration religious organizations military n Employee content receives a T4 slip from Revenue Canada

7 Methodology: Sampling frame n Stratified 2 stage design Ê Workplace component physical location of business with paid workers frame stratified by industry, region, size size cut-offs are different for industry / region combinations ==> model based approach sampling weights assigned to each unit = the inverse probability of selection with adjustment* Ë Worker Component lists of employee made available by employers

8 Methodology: Longitudinal strategy for workplaces *** up to 6 years

9 Methodology: Longitudinal strategy for workers *** 2 years

10 Methodology: Weighting and Estimation n To produce estimates from a sample that relates to a population of interest requires the use of survey weights n Weights are adjusted for complete non-response stratum jumpers calibration or “benchmark” to known totals from the Survey of Employment, Payroll and Hours linked analysis weights adjusted for live units with no responding employees

11 Methodology: How to compute variances that take into account the complex survey design of WES? n Not done in most statistical packages n Use bootstrap weights provided (100 in total for each observation, each based on 50 iterations) idea: re-sampling technique to capture variability n To calculate the variance produce an estimate based on each set of bootstrap weights compute the variance estimate apply an adjustment to make the variance design consistent (50/100)

12 Methodology: Why is taking account of the complex survey design of WES SOOOO important? n NOT taking into account of the design effect results in an UNDERESTIMATION of the variance n Hypothesis testing and constructing confidence intervals requires accurate standard errors n May erroneously report that a statistic is significantly different from zero when it is not. n Rules of Thumb: NO

13 Response Rates

14 Data Access n Research Data Centres SSRHC application evaluated by 3 member peer committee judged on scientific merit, viability of methods, appropriateness of data deemed employees of STC research falls within the mandate of STC n Remote Access proposal sent to WES research manager dummy data set sent to researcher programs sent to Statistics Canada designed primarily for multivariate analyses

15 Important websites n Statistics Canada : n WES site General Information: – ace/workplace.htm (English) – place/workplace_f.htm ( French ) Questionnaires (1999-2002) – – Workplace Evolving Series – MIE/free.htm – MIF/free_f.htm

16 Can the workplace explain Canadian gender pay differentials? Marie Drolet Canadian Public Policy, Summer 2002 Evolving Workplace Series, No

17 Objectives n To move beyond ‘traditional’ analyses by incorporating workplace characteristics in the wage outcomes of men and women  household data = focus on worker n To determine the contribution of the workplace in ‘explaining’ the gender wage gap  linked employee-employer data = focus on gender segregation

18 Determinants of wages n Usual suspects human capital, demographic, job n New WES variables high performance workplace practices »self directed workgroups »performance pay foreign ownership non profit organizations quantity and timing of labour demanded and supplied required & actual education match training costs per employee workplace rate of part-time employment industry / occupation / firm size

19 Do wages differ by workplace characteristics? n expected robust association between wages and ‘established’ variables n impact of workplace variables (-) percent working part-time (+) training expenditures per employee (+) foreign ownership (+) self directed workgroups (+) workers receiving performance-based pay (+) quantity and timing of labour (+) undereducated (-) overeducated (NS) non-profit organizations

20 Are the workplaces of men and women different? * significantly different

21 Main Finding #1: Women are concentrated in low wage workplaces n When usual suspects are taken into account …. Pooled OLS model: women earn 15% less men when there are NO controls for the workplace Workplace fixed effects model* women earn 8% less than men when controls for the workplace are included

22 Main Finding #2: Industry measure in WES ‘explains’ more of gender pay differentials n Using ONLY Worker characteristics + industry & occupation –58% of gender wage gap ‘explained’ –industry ‘explains’ 34% of gender wage gap –significantly different from other studies Using Survey of Labour and Income Dynamics 1997: –50% is explained –industry accounts for 15%

23 Main Finding #3: The workplace accounts for more of the gap than the worker

24 Main Finding #4: The contribution of specific workplace characteristics in ‘explaining’ the gap based on Oaxaca decomposition method, base = male pay structure

25 Main Finding #5: Despite addition of new variables, a substantial portion of gap is unexplained n In most detailed specification about 40% of the gap is unexplained n Adjusted: women earn 92% of male average hourly wage rate n Differs from analyses using SLID unexplained: 51% adjusted: 89%

26 Important from a public policy perspective n Current research necessary since policies tend to address different components of the gap n Knowledge of contribution of workplace to gender pay differentials is essential since workplace contributes more to explaining differentials than the worker

Download ppt "Workplace and Employee Survey Marie Drolet WES Research Manager Business and Labour Market Analysis Division Statistics Canada"

Similar presentations

Ads by Google