Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Extern Conference 16 Aug 2007. A one-year-old boy was referred to Siriraj hospital due to an accidental ingestion of unknown liquid substance for two.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Extern Conference 16 Aug 2007. A one-year-old boy was referred to Siriraj hospital due to an accidental ingestion of unknown liquid substance for two."— Presentation transcript:

1 Extern Conference 16 Aug 2007

2 A one-year-old boy was referred to Siriraj hospital due to an accidental ingestion of unknown liquid substance for two and a half hours prior to admission.

3 3 Present history 2 ½ hours PTA, the patient was brought to his uncle’s house by his father and his step-mother. While his father and his uncle were watching the television, the step-mother found that her son was drinking some amount of liquid substance from plastic bottle which was used for battery refilling.

4 4 Present history The child was crying and sweeping his hand over his mouth. His father washed the patient’s mouth with drinking water and gave his son some milk to induce vomiting. The patient vomited the ingested milk with sputum and saliva for 4 times.

5 5 Present history Before his parents brought him to a nearby hospital, he vomited some streaks of blood with gastric contents. The parents did not notice that the patient was aspirated or not.

6 6 Present history At emergency room, the patient was given Activated charcoal 10 g orally Metoclopramide 2 mg intravenously Ranitidine intavenously Cetriaxone intravenously NPO Then the patient was referred to Siriraj hospital. The patient was admitted at AN 5 on 6/8/50

7 7 Past history He has no underlying disease. He has no previous history of unexplained injuries or poisoned. He has normal developmental milestones. He has no previous history of drugs or food allergy.

8 8 Family history The patient lived with his father, his step-mother, and his grandmother.

9 9 Physical Examination V/S: T 37 o c, PR 148/min, RR 40/min, BP 98/72 mmHg GA: A crying Thai boy, looked distress, no pallor, no jaundice, no dyspnea, no cyanosis, no evidence of trauma, Ht 87 cm (P 75 -P 90 ), Wt 11.5 kg (P 50 -P 75 )

10 10 Physical Examination HEENT: nose: no swelling turbinate, no discharge ears: normal tympanic membranes, both sides mouth & throat: mild dry lips, mild injected upper & lower lips, no injected oral mucosa, mild injected oropharynx

11 11 Physical Examination RS: no stridor, normal breath sound, no adventitious sound CVS: normal S1&S2, no murmur Abd: soft, no tenderness, active bowel sound, liver & spleen cannot palpable NS: pupil size 3 mm both RTL, otherwise unremarkable

12 12 Problem list 1.Ingestion of unknown liquid substance 2.Mild injected upper and lower lips with mild injected oropharynx

13 13 Impression Suspected caustic ingestion

14 Management in poisoned child 1. Assessment and resuscitation 2. Diagnosis of poisoning 3. Decontamination / Enhanced elimination 4. Disposition

15 15 1. Assessment and Resuscitation Airway : Maintain airway Breathing : Proper ventilation and oxygenation Circulation : Adequate perfusion Disability : Assess level of consciousness and neurological examination

16 16 2. Diagnosis of poisoning History taking : –including the containers and labels of the ingested substance Physical Examination: Focus on –Cardiopulmonary –Respiratory –Neurological –Toxidromes Proper investigation

17 How to obtain a poisoning history?

18 18 What has been ingested? Ask for containers of the substance, they may offer more details. What is the substance used for? The details of ingredients of the commercial products and medications can be obtained from the poison center.

19 19 Label น้ำกลั่น - กรด ตราปลาทอง ใช้สำหรับเติมในแบตเตอรี่เท่านั้น คำเตือน ถ้าสัมผัสถูกสารนี้ให้รีบใช้น้ำ สะอาดล้างทันที โทร : 081-xxxxxxx NOTE : Information from patient’s father The information from the manufacturer: 1.5 % Sulfuric Acid

20 20 How much has been intake? Ask the parents or the caregivers who has been in the situation. In liquid ingestion, it is noted that the amount of the ingested substance may be over reported but should not be assumed to be wrong.

21 21 When was it taken? Time since ingestion This can help you to know a time for onset of symptoms consequently you can obtain proper investigations and management. Crucial for poisons that require blood level monitoring (example: paracetamol)

22 22 What symptoms or signs have been shown? These information can help to narrow down that class of ingested substance. Physical examination focused on cardiopulmonary, respiratory and neurological systems and look for secondary trauma : burned lips and oral cavity in the patient with caustic ingestion. Look for the signs and symptoms of toxidromes.

23 23 3.Decontamination/Enhanced elimination Gastric lavage Ipecac Activated charcoal Whole bowel irrigation Hemodialysis

24 24 4. Disposition Discharge from emergency department –Intensive care unit –Ward –Nonmedical facility eg. Psychiatric

25 25 Recognition of child abuse Unexplained delay in seeking treatment Parents are uninterested by an accident Is the history consistent each time? Mechanism of injury inconsistent with developmental capability Reluctance to give information or mention about previous injury. Unexplained injury on examination.

26 26 Investigations (in this patient) BUN17.0mg/dl Cr0.4mg/dl Na+135mmol/L K+4.4mmol/L Cl-99mmol/L HCO3-11mmol/L

27 27 CXR 1 st day of admission

28 28 Activated charcoal Functions of activated charcoal 1. Initial toxin absorption 2. Interruption of enterohepatic circulation of toxic metabolite 3. gastrointestinal dialysis

29 29 Activated charcoal Activated charcoal is being increasingly used in the management of childhood poisoning Adsorb toxic material in the gut by offering alternative binding site

30 30 Activated charcoal No advantage in Alkali, Boric acid, Cyanide, DDT, Ferrous sulfate, Lithium, Mineral acids, Methanol, Malathion, N- methyl carbamate

31 31 Activated charcoal Route and doses 1 gm/kg/dose (maximum, gm) oral Repeated every 2-6 hrs until charcoal is passed through the rectum

32 32 Activated charcoal Contraindications 1.People with an obstruction of the intestines 2.Person swallowed a corrosive agent, such as a strong acid or alkali

33 Accidental caustic ingestion

34 34 Accidental caustic ingestion High risk group is children younger than 5 years old. Male > Female The extent and severity of the caustic injury depends on : 1.The corrosiveness of the ingested substance 2.Quantity and concentration 3.Duration of contact time 4.Subsequence secondary infection

35 35 Caustic agents Caustics are typically classified as acids or alkalis. Zinc chloride, Phenol and button battery are capable of producing severe burns even though they have near physiologic pH. Hydrofluoric acid has not only local effects but also has fatal systemic effects eg. hypocalcemia, hypomagnesemia, hyperkalemia.

36 36 Caustic agents Acid –Coagulation necrosis of tissue that produces an “eschar” to have some protective effect on deeper tissue. Alkali –Saponification of lipids –Liquefaction necrosis which causes much deeper ulceration because of no barrier to the alkali until it is sufficiently buffered by proteins, tissue fluid, and soaps.

37 37 Complications Early complications –Local complications Upper GI Perforation Respiratory inflammation (rare) –Systemic complications Renal insufficiency, hepatic dysfunction, DIC, hemolysis

38 38 Complications Late complications –Esophagus Stricture, fistula Peptic esophagitis, hiatus hernia, Barrett’s esophagus, esophageal carcinoma –Stomach Stricture, fistula Anemia, vitamin B12 deficiency, growth retardation in case of total gastrectomy

39 39 Complications Children VS adults –In children, most such events are inadvertent. –In adults, ingestion usually is a deliberate attempt to commit suicide. –The lower mortality in series of pediatric patients might be explained by ingestion of smaller amounts of the chemical agent. –However, stricture formation in pediatric patient is relatively common.

40 40 Management in caustic ingestion Acute management –Initial assessment and stabilization should focus on airway. –Steroids : The use of corticosteroids remains controversial. There was a reduction in the number of dilatations required and the number of patients who developed stricture when using 1 mg/kg/day of dexamethasone.

41 41 Management in caustic ingestion Acute management –Antibiotics There are no control trials that identify the routine use of antibiotics after caustic ingestion Indications: –Grade 2 or greater lesion with deep ulcer –Elevated in temperature –Grade 3 lesion or perforation, antibiotics should be started immediately

42 42 Management in caustic ingestion Acute management –Acid suppression Should be used in cases of grade 2-3 esophageal injury. The refluxing acid from stomach will damage the exposed tissues of the esophageal wall and may inhibit the healing process by damaging in-growing new cells.

43 43 Management in caustic ingestion Decontamination, dilution, neutralization –Dilutional therapy is of limited benefit beyond the first few moments following ingestion but should be avoid in patient with nausea, drooling, stridor or abdominal distension as it may induce vomiting.

44 44 Management in caustic ingestion Decontamination, dilution, neutralization –GI decontamination is usually limited in the patient with caustic ingestion. –Induce emesis is contraindicated. –Caustic agents are poorly absorbed by activated charcoal.

45 45 Management in caustic ingestion Decontamination, dilution, neutralization –Neutralization of caustics should be avoided because of potentially tissue damaging by forming gas and generating heat.

46 46 Management in caustic ingestion Surgical management : –Evidence of perforation either by endoscopic or diagnostic imaging –Severe abdominal rigidity –Persistent hypotension –Severe extensive burns

47 47 Management in caustic ingestion Subacute management – Early endoscopy should be performed in every patients to assess Extent of lesions Severity Further management.

48 Classification of Caustic injury

49 49 GradeVisible effectClinical Significance Grade 0History of ingestion, no visible damage or symptoms. Able to take fluid immediately. Grade 1Edema, loss of normal vascular pattern, hyperemia. No transmucosal injury. Temporary dysphagia, able to swallow within 0-2 days. No long-term sequalae. Grade 2aTrans-mucosal injury with fragility, hemorrhage,blistering, exudates, scattered superficial ulceration. Scarring, no circumferential damage = no stenosis. No long term sequelae.

50 50 GradeVisible effectClinical Significance Grade 2bPlus deep discrete ulceration and/or circumferential. Small risk of perforation. Scarring which may result in later stenosis. Grade 3aScattered deep ulceration with necrosis of tissue. Risk of perforation. High risk of later stenosis. Grade 3bExtensive necrotic tissue.High risk of perforation and death. High risk of stenosis. Note : Grade 4 may be used to indicate perforation

51 Progression

52 52

53 53 Progress Ranitidine Cefotaxime Dexamethasone NPO TPN EGD

54 54 Pictures

55 55 Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

56 56 Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

57 57 EG junction: White membrane at junction Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

58 58 Body: Erythema, bleeding, necrotic, friability, ulcer Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

59 59 Body: Erythema, bleeding, necrotic, friability, ulcer Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

60 60 Body: Erythema, bleeding, necrotic, friability, ulcer Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

61 61 Body: Erythema, bleeding, necrotic, friability, ulcer Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

62 62 Antrum: Erythema, bleeding, necrotic, friability, ulcer Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

63 63 Bulb: Some erythema, white lesion, desquamation of mucosa Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

64 64 Bulb: Some erythema, white lesion, desquamation of mucosa Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

65 65 2nd portion of duodenum: Marked edema, necrotic Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

66 66 3rd portion of duodenum: Marked edema,necrotic Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

67 67 3rd portion of duodenum: Marked edema,necrotic Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

68 68 Summary of EGD Report Procedure: none Complication: no immediate complication Diagnosis: caustic ingestion CLO test: not done Recommendation: - Specimens: - Plan: Re-EGD 17/8/50

69 69 Preventing childhood poisoning 1. Insist on packages with safety closures and learn how to use properly

70 70 Preventing childhood poisoning 2. Keep household cleaning supplies, medicines, garage products, and insecticides out of the reach and sight of your child 3. Never store food and cleaning products together. Store medicine and chemicals in original containers and never in food or beverage containers

71 71 Preventing childhood poisoning 4. Avoid taking medicine in your child’s presence. Children love to imitate. Never suggest that medicine is candy. 5. Never use medicine from an unlabeled or unreadable container 6. If you are interrupt while using a product take it with you.

72 72 Preventing childhood poisoning 7. Know what your child can do physically. For example, if you have a crawling infant, keep household product stored above floor level. 8. Keep the phone numbers of your doctor, poison center,hospital,police department, and emergency medical system near the phone

73 73 Toxic center Siriraj Poison Center –Tel

74 Thank you for your attention


Download ppt "Extern Conference 16 Aug 2007. A one-year-old boy was referred to Siriraj hospital due to an accidental ingestion of unknown liquid substance for two."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google