Presentation on theme: "Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel"— Presentation transcript:
1Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel Gideon and Strickland
2Leading Up to Gideon Betts v. Brady (1942) “Special Circumstances Rule” No one has a right to counsel unless there are special circumstances which would make it impossible to have a fair trial without counselE.g., illiteracy; disabilityThus, right to counsel (6A) not absorbed until Gideon
3Gideon (1963) Right to counsel is absorbed. This case says that in all felony cases, one has a right to have a lawyer.Counsel must be provided to indigent defendant- - - or no imprisonment.Why is counsel absorbed? Fair Trial, Fundamental Fairness
4Right to Counsel attaches when the accused is formally charged with a crime. 6A: Note that this is the Sixth Amendment right to a lawyer.5A: Later on, in Miranda v. Arizona, we will see the Court create a new right to counsel based on the Fifth Amendment, and we will refer to that as the Fifth Amendment right to a lawyer. The significance of the 5A right to a lawyer is that it attaches much, much earlier in the criminal process in the investigative stages at custodial interrogation , and that is usually long before a person is formally charged.
5So, during all the time (usually some months) between being charged and trial, the accused does not have a right to have a lawyer with him 24/7; the right applies during Critical Stages onlyAnd does not apply to non-critical stages
6The Critical Stages Doctrine Critical stages: Rt. To Counsel ExistsCustodial Interrogation [Miranda]Post-indictment LineupsInitial Appearance (Charges are identified, bail set)Preliminary HearingArraignmentFelony Trials [Gideon]Misdemeanor Trials where imprisonment actual imposedSentencingFirst Appeal
7Critical Stages Doctrine, continued Non-Critical Stages: No Rt. To CounselPreliminary I D procedures, like blood sample, handwriting sample, fingerprint etc.Lineups before indictmentGrand jury proceedingsDiscretionary appeals (those appeals after the first appeal)Most revocation of probation hearingsMost revocation of parole hearings
8Effective Counsel Strickland Rt. To counsel is designed to insure a fair trial; therefore, counsel has to be at least minimally effective.Presumption: Counsel’s performance is reasonable.Strickland Two-part testWas counsel’s performance deficient as judged by the “reasonable attorney” standard?Were counsel’s errors so serious that the verdict was prejudiced (would likely have been different had the errors not been made)?If both answers are “yes,” conviction reversed.
9OK under StricklandTrial strategies, even though they might be outlandish and do not workFailure to make an objection in trial even though if made it would have prevented the death penaltyFalling asleep during the trialAttorney smoking mj during trial!Lots of other examples!
10Not OK per StricklandConflict of interestJudge’s not allowing attorney to consult with clientA few other things but not manyThe Bottom Line: Defense attorney is presumed competent, and it is very hard to prove incompetence.