Presentation on theme: "How Do We Make the Best Decisions for Children? Supreme Court Commission, Committee on Justice for Children Hon. Jackson Harris, Superior Court, Blue Ridge."— Presentation transcript:
How Do We Make the Best Decisions for Children? Supreme Court Commission, Committee on Justice for Children Hon. Jackson Harris, Superior Court, Blue Ridge Judicial Circuit & Michelle Barclay, Attorney and Project Director November 15, 2006
Let’s start with the basics zDoes Placement Instability cause harm to a child? Yes yScholarly article from Pediatrics Journal, “Placement Stability and Mental Health Costs for Children in Foster Care”-instability=increased costs yStability is necessary for attachment
What is the definition of a placement stability? zFederal Definition—no more than 2 moves in 12 months zIs this a Reasonable standard? zWhat about placement stability over a longer period of time?
zYes, failed federal review in 2001 zLet’s look at the numbers since then, still showing a problem zNew review coming up in 2007 Is placement stability a problem for GA’s foster care population?
Do we know what helps achieve placement stability? Yes! zA GA study of FPBP Study showed that if children were placed with their recommended placement from their assessment, they were 20% more likely to remain in that placement for one year. (that is a big effect) zA number of studies have shown that children placed with relatives are more likely to remain stable for one year.
Would greater Court role = greater placement stability? zAssessment recommendations need to made available to courts and all parties. zRelative Diligent Search information needs to aggressively sought and filed within 90 days zAttorneys representing the child need to be notified of all placement moves. zAn historical review of the child’s case needs to be read aloud at every hearing zA procedure for triggering a hearing needs to be put in place either before or after a placement move needs to be put in place.
Georgia law currently limits Court role zRecent cases: Tidwell and In re: A. N. zCases affirm statutory construction that once custody granted to DFCS, the agency has control of custodial decisionmaking. zWould you want a greater role for the Court? zNettlesome questions: Can the agency establish particular religious values to children… or no religious values? What if parents object? zThe agency usually seeks Court approval for surgery, but is this required under GA law? zConsent to marriage?
Federal Law and “Reasonable Efforts” zTo find some guidance, could look to the ACF interpretations of the law, known as the final rule. zGenerally before Tidwell, there was a line of thought that courts could not DIRECT a placement, but could reject a placement. z The Court still has an obligation to monitor placements and placement changes a factor in their ongoing review to insure that reasonable efforts are being employed to reunify the child with the parents or to otherwise achieve permanency.
How did we get here? How could we get to a better place? zLet’s explore the basic roles of the Judicial, Legislative and Executive branches of state government. yLegislative – enact laws people want yJudicial – at the trial level, apply the laws enacted by the legislature – sometimes through prism of case law yExecutive – with purse and sword – provide protection
What have other states done? zSeveral states have laws requiring a petition or a request to a court before the agency can move a child. yArkansas yOhio zSome states allow for courts to subpoena all parties to question a placement move
Arkansas Law zArkansas Law--9-28-410. Foster care placements. z(a) The policy of the State of Arkansas is that children in the custody of the Department of Health and Human Services should have stable placements. (b)(1) To reduce the number of placements of children in foster care, if a foster parent requests a foster child be removed from his or her home at any time, excluding an emergency that places the child or a family member at risk of harm, then the foster parent shall attend a staffing that shall be arranged by the Division of Children and Family Services of the Department of Health and Human Services within forty-eight (48) hours to discuss what services or assistance may be needed to stabilize the placement. z(2) The foster child, the child's attorney ad litem, and a court-appointed special advocate, if appointed, shall be notified so that they may attend and participate in the staffing and planning for the child's placement. z(3) If the placement cannot be stabilized, then the foster parent shall continue to provide for the foster child until an appropriate alternative placement is located, but this shall not be longer than five (5) business days. z(c)(1) Other changes in placement shall be made only after notification of the: z(A) Foster child; z(B) Foster parent or parents; z(C) Child's attorney ad litem; z(D) Child's birth parents; and z(E) Court having jurisdiction over the child.
Arkansas Law Cont z(2) The notices shall: z(A) Be sent in writing two (2) weeks prior to the proposed change; z(B) Specify reasons for the proposed change; z(C) Convey to the attorney ad litem the address of the proposed new foster home or placement provider; and z(D) Convey to the child the name and telephone number of his or her attorney ad litem and a statement that if the child objects to the change in placement, the attorney ad litem may be able to assist in challenging the change. z(d)(1) Exceptions to the advance notice requirement shall be made if the child's health or welfare would be endangered by delaying a change in placement. z(2) Within twenty-four (24) hours of the change in placement the department shall: z(A) Notify the birth parent of the change; z(B) Notify the child's attorney ad litem of the change; and z(C) Provide the attorney ad litem with the name, address, and telephone number of the new foster care home or placement provider. z(3) Within seventy-two (72) hours of the change in placement, the department shall provide written notice to the attorney ad litem for the specific reasons justifying the change of placement without advance notice. z(e)(1) If an agent, employee, or contractor of the department fails to comply with this section, then an action for violation of this section may be filed by any party to the action against the person who failed to comply with this section, with the assessment of punishment to be determined by the court. z(2) If the court finds that the agent, employee, or contractor of the department failed to comply with this section, then the court may order the department or the agent, employee, or contractor to pay all the costs of the proceedings brought under this section. z(f) All division caseworkers, supervisors, and area managers shall have at least six (6) hours of annual training on separation and placement issues, as well as on issues relating to the grief and loss children experience in foster care with multiple placements
Again, So now, what? zModify the current law through legislation zThe question is “Can we agree on how?” zWhen do you think courts should get involved? Before or After a placement move? zWhat would be best for children? zCan you justify most placement moves? zWhat would you recommend as next steps?
The End! zQuestions? zContact info: Michelle Barclay 404.657.9219 email@example.com gajusticeforchildren.org p.s.: know your legislators.