3Background of Milgram Experiment The experiment started in July 1961, one year after death sentence of Otto Adolf Eichmann (one of the major organisers of the Holocaust). Stanley Milgram designed this experiment to test how far would the participants would go with inhuman obedience asked by authority against their conscience. Although this experiment was under ethical accusations, its psychological value to the development of modem psychology cannot be overlooked.
4Description of the study Participants: 40 men aged between 20 &50 who jobs ranged from unskilled to professionalsMethods: Methods used in the Milgram experiment included 40 men which was randomly selected. Each participant received $4.50-$5.00 to take part in this experiment. Milgram developed an intimidating shock generator, with different shock levels starting at 30 volts to 450 volts. Switches were labeled with terms including “Slight Shock”, “Moderate Shock”, and danger: “Severe Shock”. The final two switches were labeled simply with ominous “XXX”.
6Description of the study The experimenter issued a series of commands to prod the participants along:“Please continue”“The experiment requires that you continue”“It is absolutely essential that you continue”“You have no other choice, you must go on”
7Description of the study Results:65% (two-thirds) of participants (teacher) continued to highest level of 450 volts. Milgram carried out 18 variations of his study. All he did was alter the situation to see how this affected obedience. Of the 40 participants in the study, 26 delivered the maximum shocks while 14 stopped before reaching the highest levels. Many subjects became extremely agitated, distraught and angry at the experimenter, Yet, they continued to follow orders all the way to the end.
8Ethical ProblemsKnowingly practicing deception: The main ethical issue of the Milgram Experiment was participants were lied to about what they participated in.No quitting or withdraw: In the case of this experiment they were not able to stop anytime that they felt uncomfortable.No protection for participants from harm: the participants were not aware of what going on in the experiment, they were cause a lot of distress
10Effect on current research DeceptionHarmUnethical
11Effect on current research In addition, Burger screened out any potential subjects who had taken more than two psychology courses in college or who indicated familiarity with Milgram’s research. A clinical psychologist also interviewed potential subjects and eliminated anyone who might have a negative reaction to the study procedure. In Burger’s study, participants were told at least three times that they could withdraw from the study at any time and still receive the $50 payment. Also, these participants were given a lower-voltage sample shock to show the generator was real – 15 volts, as compared to 45 volts administered by Milgram. “Though direct comparisons of absolute levels of obedience cannot be made between the 150-volt maximum of Burger’s research design and Milgram’s 450-volt maximum, Burger’s ‘obedience lite’ procedures can be used to explore further some of the situational variables studied by Milgram, as well as look at additional variables".
12Effect on current research-Obedience lite Jerry Burger-Santa Clara UniversityNo psychological background or familiarity with Milgram’s researchEliminated possible negative reaction participantsInformation about withdraw from the program with full paymentMaximum:15 volts from the generatorThe results of the new experiment revealed that participants obeyed at the same rate that they did when Milgram conducted his original study more than 40 years ago.