3. AIF was born out of relief efforts following the Gujarat earthquake of 2001 Beginning with fundraisers in Silicon Valley, New York and Chicago, AIF found an outpouring of support from Americans concerned about India's development

8. Pillars of AIF LivelihoodsPublic HealthEducation

10. AIF has five signature programs that feature scale, uniqueness and impact. In addition, AIF has Innovation programs that are pilot efforts to introduce new ideas with the potential to achieve scale and impact. AIF directs most of its resources to its signature programs

12. The Executive Director of AIF in 2002 was Mr Pradeep Kashyap The Executive Director, India was Mr Shankar

14. Chair person is Smt Lata Krishnan Vice Chair person is Mr Pradeep Kashyap

16. CEO is Mr Ravi Kumar Country Director is Dr Hemanth Paul

18. Learning Links Foundation was an organization from where AIF outsourced trainers before having its own pool of trainers and facilitators. (2003 - 2005)

20. Till 2006, the role of DE was confined to monitoring the technological intervention that was carried out DE expanded its reach and came up with a Large Scale Model in 2 states viz Punjab and Rajasthan

23. ILTM encompasses concepts of pedagogy, project based learning as well technology so that all of them together go hand in hand. It consists of 85 hours of material

25. MI CT BBM CL CT

26. Infrastructure and training provided by AIF Full Service Demonstration Centers( FSDC) Infrastructure provided by government On -site Training and support by AIF Large Scale program (LSP) Under LSP, it focuses on Training teachers High end computers Center Of Excellence (COE) Teachers trained at a centralized level Centralized 1/5 th of resources used in LSP Post DE, the withdrawal stage is the DE lite mode.Hands off-eyes on approach District based approach DE Lite

28. Thick server thin client – In this model, a computer acts as a server and other dummy computers work with the help of this server. It is cost efficient

33. There were studies conducted by external agencies to measure the effectiveness of the DE program Which were these 2 agencies and in which states were these conducted. What was the inference of these studies?

36. Ongoing (2011-2014) StateFSC/LSPDistrictsSchoolsTeachersStudentsStart YearEnd year Andhra PradeshFSC1659122120122013 LSP211310223662620102013 LSP 1346701900020122013 KarnatakaFSC115138175120092013 LSP11200140941755 OdishaLSP6104674269792010Ongoing DelhiFSC11182811856320122013 DIET 2200(pre service) 20122014 LSP37437029600 TNLSP2529002080020122013 FSC PunjabLSP920024656132420102013 LSP1505591488420122014 HaryanaDIET11400(pre service) LSP12512510000 Total FSC 132451,17851,135 Total LSP 297447,1241,91,568 429898,3022,42,703

38. A pilot initiative, at its experimental stage in Delhi (2) and Sirsa (1), Haryana