Presentation on theme: "Forefoot Fractures Sean E. Nork, MD"— Presentation transcript:
1Forefoot Fractures Sean E. Nork, MD Created March 2004; revised March 2006 & 2011
2Foot Trauma and Outcomes Turchin et al, JOT, 199928 patients: Polytrauma +/- foot injuryAge, gender, ISS matchedResults:SF-36 5/8 components worse with foot injuryWOMAC All 3 components worse with foot injuryThese publications emphasize the importance of foot trauma as it relates to patient outcomes. After healing of all of their other complex injuries, associated foot injuries are associated with worse overall results as measured by a variety of outcomes measures. So, as tempting as it may be to minimize the attention and treatment of associated foot injuries in the multiply injured patient, don’t! While these injuries may not take priority in the initial hours or days of treatment, they should be treated aggressively and with the same attention.Jurkovich et al, JT, 1995Highest Sickness Impact Profile 6 & 12 monthsPatients with foot trauma (compared to other lower extremity injuries)
3Foot FunctionHindfoot: Shock absorption, propulsion, deceleration Midfoot: Controls relationship between hindfoot and forefoot Forefoot: Platform for standing and lever for push offThe forefoot is primarily important as a platform to allow standing; and as a lever used for push off. The exact anatomical relationships between the various osseus structures determine the stability and function of the forefoot.
4Platform for weight bearing Forefoot FunctionPlatform for weight bearingLever for propulsionThis pressure diagram demonstrates the high pressures associated with the forefoot. It is not surprising that small alterations in the anatomy of this region can translate into symptomatic foot problems for the patient.
5Anatomy First Metatarsal Lesser Metatarsals Shorter & widerBears 1/3 body weightTendon attachments: (Tibialis Anterior & Peroneus Longus)Tibialis Anterior: varus, supination, elevationPeroneus Longus: valgus, pronation, depressionLesser MetatarsalsMore mobile medial to lateralBear 1/6 weight eachIntermetatarsal ligaments (2-3, 3-4, 4-5)
6Anatomy: SesamoidsMedial (tibial) & Lateral (fibular) Within FHB tendons Articulate with 1st MT head Weight bearing through sesamoidsTibial Sesamoid: Tibial FHBAbductor HallucisFibular Sesamoid: Fibular FHBAdductor HallucisDeep Tverse MT ligament
8BiomechanicsMetatarsal heads in contact with floor 60-80% of stance phase Toes in contact with floor 75% of stance phaseOnce again emphasizing the importance of the forefoot with regards to stance phase.Cavanagh, PR, F&A, 1987Hughes, J, JBJS[Br], 1990
9Cross-sectional Geometry of the Human Forefoot Griffin & Richmond, Bone, 2005Examines the relationship between external loads during walking & running and the geometrical properties of the human forefootMetatarsals 2-4 are the weakest in most cross-sectional geometric propertiesMetatarsal 2 (and 3 to a lesser extent) experience high peak pressures; this may explain the preponderance of stress fractures in these metatarsals
10Mechanisms of Injury: Forefoot Industrial accidents MVA (airbags) Indirect (twisting injuries) OtherObviously, a variety of mechanisms are associated with forefoot injuries. Often, they are low energy injuries associated with falls or twisting injuries. However, high energy accidents associated with motor vehicle crashes, motorcycle crashes, and industrial accidents may occur. Airbags certainly protect patients and potentially decrease mortality rates. However, this may be associated with even worse foot trauma as patients survive higher and higher energy motor vehicle crashes.
12RadiographsFoot trauma series AP/lat/oblique Don’t forget oblique Sesamoid view Tangential view (MT heads) Contralateral foot films (comparison) CT Scan (occasionally)The foot trauma series consists of three views for the initial evaluation of forefoot injuries. The oblique view is particularly helpful for identifying midfoot and forefoot displacements and subtle injuries. Additional views can be obtained if there is suspicion of injury in certain locations. This can include sesamoid and tangential views. Comparison views of the contralateral foot can be quite helpful. CT scans are typically not required by may be helpful in some complex injury patterns.
13Treatment Principles: Foot Hindfoot: Protect subtalar, ankle and talonavicular joints Midfoot: restore length and alignment of medial and lateral “columns” Forefoot: Even weight distributionSome basic overall treatment principles exist for foot injuries. With respect to the forefoot, allowing for even weight distribution during stance and push off is critical. This requires an accurate restoration of the anatomy following injury.
14TreatmentBorder Rays First metatarsal Fifth metatarsal Dislocations Multiple metatarsal shafts Intraarticular fracturesWith regards to the metatarsals, the border rays tolerate displacement and shortening much less than the central three metatarsals. Particular attention much be paid to first and fifth metatarsal injuries. Central metatarsal injuries may be partially controlled due to the intermetatarsal ligaments. However, multiple metatarsal shaft fractures may require a more aggressive approach. These injuries will be specifically discussed in the slides that follow.
15First MT Shaft Fractures NondisplacedConsider conservative treatmentImmobilization with toe plateDisplacedMost require ORIFStrong muscle forces (TA, PL)Deformity commonBears 2/6 body weightFor displaced first metatarsal shaft fractures, most require operative fixation. This is due to the strong muscular attachments, the amount of load that the first bears with walking, and the fact that it is a border ray. An accurate reduction (length, alignment, rotation) is necessary. If necessary, the first MTP joint may be crossed to enhance fixation for proximal fractures. This may be temporary.ORIFPlate and screwsAnatomically reduceMay cross first MTP joint (temp)
16First MT Base Fractures Articular injuries Frequently require ORIF Fixation: Spans TMT Doesn’t span TMT Temporarily Spans TMTMost articular fractures at the base of the first metatarsal require operative treatment. This is due to the tendency for displacement, as well as the importance of that particular articulation. The fracture location at the base of the first metatarsal determines the location and type of fixation necessary. Plates are frequently required. Small locking plates may offer some advantage for proximal fixation. It may be necessary to span the the first TMT joint onto the medial cuneiform. This may be temporary or permanent.
1736 year old male s/p MVC Active Case example of a comminuted fracture at the base of the first metatarsal. Note the displacement and the instability of the first TMT joint.Note articularcomminution
18Direct ORIF of comminuted Temporary spanning across After ORIFFixation StrategyDirect ORIF of comminutedfirst MT base fractreTemporary spanning acrossfirst TMT joint
1943 year old male injured in a MVC Observe the articular segment impaction of the base of the first. The first MT is shortened and dorsally displaced while the plantar ligaments remain attached.
20The patient underwent ORIF of the base of the first metatarsal with spanning of the first TMT, given the level of comminution observed. Additionally, temporary spanning external fixation was used.
21Radiographic appearance at 3 months after removal of the external fixator and metatarsal neck k-wire fixations.
22Non-displaced Metatarsal Fractures 2-4 Single metatarsal fractures (non-displaced) Treatment usually nonoperative Symptomatic: hard shoe vs AFO vs cast vs elastic bandage Multiple metatarsal fractures (non-displaced) Usually symptomatic treatment (as above) May require ORIF if other associated injuries
23Minimally Displaced Lesser Metatarsal Fractures Zenios et al, Injury 2005 Prospective and randomized (n=50) Case vs elastic support bandage MINIMALLY DISPLACED fractures Higher AOFAS mid-foot scores at 3 months and less pain if treated with an elastic support bandage.
24Displaced Metatarsal Shaft Fractures Sagittal plane displacement & angulation is most important.Reestablish length, rotation, & declinationDorsal deformity can produce transfer metatarsalgiaPlantar deformity can produce increased load at affected metatarsalTreatment OptionsClosed ReductionIntramedullary pinning with k-wire (0.054” or 0.062”)Pinning of distal segment to adjacent metatarsalORIF with dorsal plate fixation
25This patient sustained an open second metatarsal fracture in a crush injury. Given the soft tissue injury and continued pressure on the dorsal skin, operative fixation was elected.
26Fixation consisted of a dorsal 2 Fixation consisted of a dorsal 2.0 mm plate application after appropriate irrigation of the open fracture.
27This patient was treated with ORIF of multiple metatarsal fractures (3,4,5) through a dorsal approach. Fixation consisted of a 2.7 mm DCP on the fifth and 2.0 mm plates on the third and fourth metatarsals.
28Medullary K-wires in Lesser MTs Exit wire distally through the proximal phalanx Plantar wire exit may produce a hyperextension deformity of the MTPIdeally, when “pinning” a lesser metatarsal neck fracture, the K-wire should exit though the base of the proximal phalanx. This maintains the relationship between the metatarsal and the proximal phalanx. If the k-wire exits plantar to the proximal phalanx, a hyperextension deformity can be produced as demonstrated.ST Hansen, Skeletal Trauma
29Compliments: Daphne Beingessner, MD This patient sustained multiple metatarsal neck fractures (2, 3, 4) and a dislocation of the fifth MTP joint. Note the lateral translation, lateral angulation, and the displacement on the lateral radiograph.Compliments: Daphne Beingessner, MD
30Compliments: Daphne Beingessner, MD Stabilization consisted of closed reduction and percutaneous pin fixation of the multiple metatarsal fractures and closed reduction of the fifth MTP dislocation. Note the location and trajectory of the K-wires.Compliments: Daphne Beingessner, MD
31Compliments: Daphne Beingessner, MD Following healing and removal of the pins, good alignment of the forefoot is demonstrated on the multiple radiographic views.Compliments: Daphne Beingessner, MD
32Stress Fractures of Metatarsals 2 - 4 Identify CauseFirst ray hypermobilityShort first rayTight gastrocnemiusLong metatarsalTreatmentTreat cause if identifiableIf overuse, activity restrictionReserve ORIF for displaced fractures
33Metatarsal Neck Fractures Usually displace plantarlyMay require reduction and fixation:Closed reduction and pinningOpen reduction and pinningORIF (dorsal plate)
34This patient sustained multiple metatarsal neck fractures after an MVA This patient sustained multiple metatarsal neck fractures after an MVA. Note additional fractures at the first and fifth metatarsals
35Medullary wire fixation of metatarsal neck fractures 2, 3, 4 Compliments of S.K. Benirschke
36Metatarsal Head Fractures Unusual Articular injuries May require ORIF (especially if first MT)This is an unusual injury. In the example shown, the patient sustained an injury due to a circular saw cut of the distal aspect of the first metatarsal. Following reduction and healing, the avascular changes of the articular segment are obvious. However, collapse did not occur.Circular saw injury to thearticular surface of the first MT head
38Proximal Fifth Metatarsal Fractures Dameron, TB, JAAOS, 1995 Zone 1 cancellous tuberosityinsertion of PB & plantar fasciainvolves metatarsocuboid jointZone 2 distal to tuberosityextends to 4/5 articulationZone 3 distal to proximal ligamentsusually stress fracturesextends to diaphysis for 1.5 cm
43Zone 1 Fractures: Tuberosity Weiner, et al, F & A Int, 1997 60 patients Randomized to short leg cast vs soft dressing only Weight bearing in hard shoe in all Healing in 44(average) - 65(all) days Soft dressing only: shorter recuperation (33 vs 46 days) and similar foot score (92 vs 86) Conclusions: Faster return to function without compromising radiographic union or clinical outcome in patients treated without casting.
44Zone 1 Fractures: Tuberosity Egol et al, F & A Int, 2007 50 fractures in 49 patients Prospective outcomes study of fifth metatarsal base avulsion fractures Protocol: hard shoe, weight bearing as tolerated Average of 22 days lost from work 86% to pre-injury status at 6 months (only 20% at 3 months) Conclusions: Fifth metatarsal base fractures associated with loss of work productivity. Return is expected but takes significant time, with recovery of 6 months or longer in some patients
49Zone 2 Fractures: Metadiaphyseal Operative TreatmentBiomechanical Comparison of Screws(Sides et al, Foot & Ankle Int, 2006)Compared 6.5 mm cancellous screw and variable pitch, tapered screwCONCLUSIONS: Headless, tapered, variable pitch compression screws of the size tested are not entirely comparable to 6.5-mm lag screws in this application. They are effective in resisting bending but do not offer equivalent resistance to thread pull-out.
50Recent Review: Zwitser and Breederveld, Injury, 2009 Fracture of the fifth metatarsal: Diagnosis and TreatmentTuberosity fractures:Non-displaced treated non-operativelyIf displaced >2mm or with >30% of the cubometatarsal joint, operative treatmentShaft fractures:If displaced >3 or 4mm or >10 degrees angulation, consider operative treatment
51Recent Review: Zwitser and Breederveld, Injury, 2009 Fracture of the fifth metatarsal: Diagnosis and Treatment“Jones Fractures”Torg classification based on radiographic appearance and healing potentialType I: narrow fracture line and no intramedullary sclerosisType II: widening of the fracture line with evidence of intramedullary sclerosisType III: complete obliteration of the medullary canal with sclerotic bone
52Recent Review: Zwitser and Breederveld, Injury, 2009 Fracture of the fifth metatarsal: Diagnosis and Treatment“Jones Fractures”Torg classification based on radiographic appearance and healing potentialType I: non-operative treatmentType II: treatment dependent on activity level (op vs non-op)Type III: operative treatment indicated
53Comminuted fracture of the base of the fifth metatarsal
55“Turf Toe”: hyperextension with injury to thee plantar plate MTP Joint InjuriesSprains“Turf Toe”: hyperextension with injury to thee plantar plateHyperflexion sprainsDislocations
56First MTP Dislocations Jahss, F&A, 1980 Type I: Hallux dislocation without disrupting sesamoidIrreducible closed!MT incarcerated by conjoined tendons and intact sesamoidOpen reduction required (dorsal, plantar, or medial approach)Type II: Disruption of intersesamoid ligament (type A)Transverse fracture of one of the sesamoids (type B)Usually stable after reductionTreatment usually conservative and symptomatic (hard shoe for 4-6 weeks)
57Lesser MTP Dislocations Uncommon Dorsal vs Lateral Usually stable post reduction Rarely require open reduction If unstable post reduction, consider k-wire fixation
58Fractures of the Great Toe Proximal Phalanx FracturesORIF for transverse & displaced (?)ORIF intraarticular fractures (?)Interphalangeal Joint FracturesNonoperative treatment usuallyDistal Phalanx FracturesTaping usually adequateHard shoe
59Sesamoiditis Acute fractures Stress fractures in dancers and runners Sesamoid InjuriesSesamoiditis Acute fractures Stress fractures in dancers and runnersTreatmentAcute: paddingstrap neutral or slight flexionimmobilization in cast/shoeChronic: consider bone graftingsesamoidectomy: not a simple procedure, assoc with hallux drift and transfer lesions, requires tendon (FHB) repair.
60Fractures of the LesserToes Correct alignment & rotation Attempt taping to adjacent toe May require open reduction and pinning if adequate reduction not obtainedST Hansen, Skeletal Trauma
61Newer ImplantsLocking plates May be useful in patients with osteoporosis or comminuted fractures that require spanning fixation from the metatarsals to the midfoot. Not needed in routine fractures of the foot.Anatomic platesCuboid specific platesNavicular specific platesboth may be useful for complex fractures of these bones
62Compliments: Steve Benirschke, MD This patient sustained a complex constellation of injuries to the midfoot and the metatarsals. Additionally, there are associated fractures of the cuboid. This has resulted in lateral translation of the forefoot.Compliments: Steve Benirschke, MD
63Compliments: Steve Benirschke, MD Stabilization consisted of fixation of all components of the injury including the cuboid fracture, the multiple LisFranc joint dislocations, and fixation of the third metatarsal base fracture. Because of the comminution at the base of the third metatarsal, a locking implant was used.Compliments: Steve Benirschke, MD
64Compliments: Steve Benirschke, MD This patient was referred after temporary stabilization of a comminuted first metatarsal base fractureCompliments: Steve Benirschke, MD
65Compliments: Steve Benirschke, MD Because of the significant intraarticular involvement of the base of the first, fixation consisted of a direct reduction of the articular surface combined with spanning of the first TMT joint. A locking plate was used to ensure maintenance of length of the medial column given the limited fixation possibilities in the medial cuneiformCompliments: Steve Benirschke, MD
66The Crushed Foot Soft Tissue Evaluation Assess whether salvageable sensate, perfused, adequate plantar tissueWash open woundsReposition bone deformity that threatens the skinReduce dislocationsRelease compartments as neededThis is an example of a crushed foot that could not be salvaged. Treatment consisted of primary amputation.
67Compliments: Steve Benirschke, MD This patient’s multiple and complex fractures of the midfoot (and calcaneus; and pilon) were sequentiallly fixed. Because of the significant comminution of the fourth metatarsal, a locking plate was used.Compliments: Steve Benirschke, MD
68Recommended ReadingsCavanaugh, PR, et al. Pressure Distribution Patterns under Symptom-free Feet during barefoot standing. Foot Ankle, 7: , 1987 Dameron, TB, Fractures of the Proximal Fifth Metatarsal: Selecting the Best Treatment Option. J Acad Orthop Surg, 3(2): , Holmes, James. AAOS Monograph “The Traumatized Foot”, pages 55-75, Lawrence, SJ, and Botte, MJ. Foot Fellow’s Review: Jones’ Fractures and Related Fractures of the Proximal Fifth Metatarsal. Foot & Ankle, 14(6), , Smith, JW, et al. The Intraosseus Blood Supply of the Fifth Metatarsal: Implications for Proximal Fracture Healing. Foot & Ankle, 13(3), , 1992
69Recommended ReadingsAdelaar, RS: Complications of forefoot and midfoot fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res, (391): 26-32, Armagan, OE, and Shereff, MJ: Injuries to the toes and metatarsals. Orthop Clin North Am, 32(1): 1-10, Griffin, NL, and Richmond, BG: Cross-sectional geometry of the human forefoot. Bone, 37(2): , Mittlmeier, T, and Haar, P: Sesamoid and toe fractures. Injury, 35 Suppl 2: SB87-97, Zenios, M; Kim, WY; Sampath, J et al.: Functional treatment of acute metatarsal fractures: a prospective randomised comparison of management in a cast versus elasticated support bandage. Injury, 36(7): 832-5, 2005.
70Recent Literature1. Blundell, C. M.; Nicholson, P.; and Blackney, M. W.: Percutaneous screw fixation for fractures of the sesamoid bones of the hallux. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 84(8): , Dalal, R., and Mahajan, R. H.: Single transverse, dorsal incision for lesser metatarsophalangeal exposure. Foot Ankle Int, 30(3): 226-8, Den Hartog, B. D.: Fracture of the proximal fifth metatarsal. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 17(7): , Egol, K.; Walsh, M.; Rosenblatt, K.; Capla, E.; and Koval, K. J.: Avulsion fractures of the fifth metatarsal base: a prospective outcome study. Foot Ankle Int, 28(5): 581-3, Leumann, A.; Pagenstert, G.; Fuhr, P.; Hintermann, B.; and Valderrabano, V.: Intramedullary screw fixation in proximal fifth-metatarsal fractures in sports: clinical and biomechanical analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 128(12): , Raikin, S. M.; Slenker, N.; and Ratigan, B.: The association of a varus hindfoot and fracture of the fifth metatarsal metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction: the Jones fracture. Am J Sports Med, 36(7): , Sides, S. D.; Fetter, N. L.; Glisson, R.; and Nunley, J. A.: Bending stiffness and pull-out strength of tapered, variable pitch screws, and 6.5-mm cancellous screws in acute Jones fractures. Foot Ankle Int, 27(10): 821-5, Zwitser, E. W., and Breederveld, R. S.: Fractures of the fifth metatarsal; diagnosis and treatment. Injury, 2009.
71Harborview Medical Center University of Washington Sean E. Nork, MDHarborview Medical CenterUniversity of WashingtonHMC FacultyBarei, Beingessner, Bellabarba, Benirschke, Chapman, Dunbar, Hanel, Hanson, Henley, Krieg, Routt, Sangeorzan, Smith, Taitsman
72Thank YouQuestions?If you would like to volunteer as an author for the Resident Slide Project or recommend updates to any of the following slides, please send an toOTAaboutQuestions/CommentsReturn toLower ExtremityIndex