Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byTyler Harrington Modified over 2 years ago

1
Speech Recognition Frameworks Front End (Digital Signal Processing) – Resample to match the speech database sample rate – Break audio signal into overlapping frames – Perform frequency domain or linear prediction algorithms – Filter noise – Enhance speech characteristics in the signal – Transformations to match a reference signal database – Extract features removing redundancies to represent each frame Back End (Statistical Recognition Algorithms) – Compare signals – Convert signal into strings of phonemes, signals, or words – Perform tasks based on the converted signal

2
Speech Frames Breakup speech signal into overlapping frames Why? – Speech is quasi-periodic, not periodic, because vocal musculature is always changing – Within a small window of time, we can assume constancy Typical Characteristics 10-30 ms length 1/3 – 1/2 overlap Goal : Extract short-term signal features from speech signal frames Frame Frame size Frame shift

3
Speech Recognition Front End Pre-emphasis Temporal Features Enhance and Consolidate Features Spectral Analysis windowing Frequency Features Speech Frame Feature Vector Assume resampling is already done

4
Feature Extraction Definitions – Feature: An attribute of a speech signal useful for decoding – Phoneme: The smallest phonetic unit that distinguishes words – Morpheme: The smallest phonetic unit that conveys meaning – Feature Extraction: Algorithm to convert a captured audio into a useable form for decoding – Feature Vector: List of values representing a given signal frame Process – Signal Conditioning (digitizing a signal) – Signal Measurement (compute signal amplitudes) – Enhance (perform perceptual augmentations) – Conversion (Convert data into a feature vector) Challenge: Determine those features that are important? Goal: Remove redundancies by representing a frame by its feature “fingerprint”

5
Pre-emphasis Human Audio – There is an attenuation of the audio signal loudness as it travels along the cochlea, which makes humans require less amplitudes in the higher frequencies – Speech high frequencies have initial less energy than low frequencies – De-emphasizing the lower frequencies compared to is closer to the way humans hear Pre-emphasis Algorithm – Pre-emphasis recursive filter de-emphasizes lower frequencies – Formula: Y[i] = X[i] - (X[i-1] * δ) – 0.95 to 0.97 are common defaults for δ – 0.97 de-emphasizes lower frequencies more than 0.95

6
Pre-emphasis Filter Purpose: Reverse 6db/oct amplitude decay in unvoiced sounds as frequencies increase y[i] = x[i] – x[i-1] * 0.95

7
Windowing Problem: Framing a signal results in abrupt edges Impact – There is significant spectral leakage in the frequency domain – Large side lobe amplitudes Effect of Windowing – There are no abrupt edges – Minimizes side lobe amplitudes and spectral leakage How? Apply a window formula in the time domain (which is a simple for loop) Definitions Frame: A small portion (sub-array) of an audio signal Window: A frame to which a window function is applied

8
Window Types for Speech Rectangular: w k = 1 where k = 0 … N – The Naïve approach – Advantage: Easy to calculate, array elements unchanged – Disadvantage: Messes up the frequency domain Hamming: w k = 0.54 – 0.46 cos(2kπ/N-1)) – Advantage: Fast roll-off in frequency domain, popular for ASR – Disadvantage: worse attenuation in stop band Blackman: w k = 0.42 – 0.5 cos(2kπ/(N-1)) + 0.08 cos(4kπ/(N-1)) – Advantage: better attenuation, popular for ASR – Disadvantage: wider main lobe Hanning: w k = 0.5 – 0.5 cos(2kπ/N-1)) – Advantage: Useful for pitch transformation algorithms Multiply the window, point by point, to the audio frame

9
Create and Apply Hamming Window public double[] createHammingWindow(int filterSize) { double[] window = new double[filterSize]; double c = 2*Math.PI / (filterSize - 1); for (int h=0; h

10
Rectangular Window Frequency Response Time Domain Filter

11
Blackman & Hamming Frequency Response

12
Temporal Features Examples Energy Zero-crossing rate Auto correlation and auto differences Pitch period Fractal Dimension Linear Prediction Coefficients Advantages: less processing; usually easy to understand Note: These features can directly be obtained from the raw signal

13
Signal Energy Calculate the short term frame energy Energy = ∑ k=0,N (s k ) 2 where N is the size of the frame Represent result in decibels relative to SPL db = 10 log(energy) Tradeoffs – If window is too small: too much variance – If window is too big: encompasses both voiced and unvoiced speech Useful to determine if a windowed frame contains a voiced speech Voiced speech has higher energy than unvoiced speech or silence Changes in energy can indicate stressed syllables (loudness contour)

14
Zero Crossings 1.Eliminate a possible DC component, meaning every measurement is offset by some value a)Average the absolute amplitudes ( 1/M ∑ 0,M-1 s k ) b)Subtract the average from each value 2.Count the number of times that the sign changes a)∑ 0,M-1 0.5|sign(s k )-sign(s k-1 )|; where sign(x) = 1 if x≥0, -1 otherwise b)Note: |sign(s k )-sign(s k-1 )| equals 2 if it is a zero crossing Unvoiced speech tends to have higher zero crossing than background noise

15
Signal Correlation Question: How well does a signal correlate with an offset version of itself? Apply the auto-correlation formula R = ∑ i=1,n-z x f [i]x f [i+offset]/∑ i=1,F x f [i] 2 Apply the auto-difference formula D = ∑ i=1,n-z Math.abs(x f [i] - x f [i+offset]) Either method is useful for determining the pitch of a signal. We would expect that R is maximum (and D minimum) when offset corresponds to that of the pitch period Determine self-similarity of a signal

16
Vocal Source Speaker alters vocal tension of the vocal folds – If folds are opened, speech is unvoiced resembling background noise – If folds are stretched close, speech is voiced Air pressure builds and vocal folds blow open releasing pressure and elasticity causes the vocal folds to fall back Average fundamental frequency (F0): 60 Hz to 300 Hz Speakers control vocal tension alters F0 and the perceived pitch Closed Open Pitch Period

17
Auto Correlation for pitch Remove the DC offset and apply pre-emphasis x f [i] = (s f [i] – μ f ) – α(s f [i-1] – μ f ) where f=frame, μ f = mean, α typically 0.96 Apply the auto-correlation formula to estimate pitch R f [z] = ∑ i=1,n-z x f [i]x f [i+z]/∑ i=1,F x f [i] 2 M[k] = max(r f [z]) Expectation: Voiced speech should produce a higher M[k] than unvoiced speech, silence, or noise frames Notes: – We can do the same thing with Cepstrals – Auto-correlation complexity improved by limiting the R f [z] values that we bother to compute

18
Fractal Dimension Definition: The self-similarity of a signal Comments – There are various methods to compute a signal’s self- similarity, which each lead to different results – Each method is empirical, not backed by mathematics – Some popular algorithms Box Counting Katz Higuchi – Importance: We would expect that the self-similarity of speech, because it is constrained by the larynx and vocal tract, to be different than that of background noise

19
Box Counting Algorithm delta = 1 FOR i = 0 to S delta = 2^i Cover the curve with rectangles: h = signal[i+delta] – signal[i], w = delta * t Fractal[i] = count of rectangles needed to cover the curve Perform a linear regression on the Fractal array The slope of the best fit line is the fractal dimension Assume signal[i] is an array of audio amplitudes, where each sample represents t milliseconds

20
Linear Regression Set of points: (x 1,y 1 ), (x 2,y 2 ), … (x N,y N ) Equations: Find b 0 + b 1 x 1 that minimizes errors where Y i = b 0 +b 1 x i +e i Goal: Find slope b 1 of the best fit line Assumption: the expected value (mean) of the errors is zero Note: X’ is transpose of X, -1 is inverse

21
Best Fit Slope of x amplitudes bestFit(double[] y) {int MAX = y.length; // Compute the X’X matrix (a ij ) double a11 = MAX*(MAX+1)*(2*MAX+1)/6; // ∑ x i 2 = d (a11 of inverse matrix) double a12 = MAX * (MAX + 1) / 2; // ∑ x i = b = c double a21 = a12, a22 = MAX; // a (a22 of the inverse matrix) // Compute ∑ y i and sum ∑ x i * y i b i = X’y double sumXY=0, sumY=0; for (int i=0; i

22
Katz Fractal Dimension double katz(double[] x) {int N = x.length; if (N<=1) return 0; double L=0, diff=0, D=0; for (int i=1; i

23
Higuchi Fractal Dimension

24
Higuchi Fractal Dimension (cont) public double higuchi (double[] x) { int MAX = x.length/4; double[] L = new double[MAX]; for (int k=1; k<=MAX; k++) { L[k-1] = Lk(x, k)/k; } // Find least squares linear best fit of L double slope = bestFit(L, MAX) + 1e-6; return Math.log10(Math.abs(slope)); } double Lk(double[] x, int k) {double sum = 0; for (int m=1; m<=k; m++) { sum += LmK(x, m, k); } return sum / k; } double LmK(double[] x, int m, int k) {int N = x.length; double sum = 0; for (int i=1; i<=(N-m)/k; i++) { sum += Math.abs(x[m-1+i*k]-x[m-1+(i-1)*k]); } return sum * (N - 1) / ((N - m)/k * k); }

25
Linear Prediction Coding (LPC) Originally developed to compress (code) speech Although coding pertains to compression, LPC has much broader implications – LPC is equivalent to the tubal model of the vocal tract model – LPC can be used as a filter to reduce noise (Wiener filter) from a signal – A speech frame can be approximated with a set of LPC coefficients one coefficient per 1k of sample rate + 2 Example: For a 10k sample, 12 LPC coefficients are sufficient – LPC speech recognition is somewhat noise resilient

26
{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16} Illustration: Linear Prediction Goal: Estimate y n using the three previous values y n ≈ a 1 y n-1 + a2 y n-2 + a 3 y n-3 Three a k coefficients, Frame size of 16, 3 coefficients Thirteen equations and three unknowns Note: No solutions, but LPC finds coeffients with the smallest error

27
Solving n equations and n unknowns Gaussian Elimination – Complexity: O(n3) Successive Iteration – Complexity varies Cholesky Decomposition – More efficient, still O(n3) Levenson-Durbin – Complexity: O(n2) – Works for symmetric Toplitz matrices Definitions for any matrix, A Transpose (A T ): Replace a ij by a ji for all i and j Symmetric: A T = A Toplitz: Diagonals to the right all have equal values

28
Covariance Example Signal: {…, 3, 2, -1, -3, -5, -2, 0, 1, 2, 4, 3, 1, 0, -1, -2, -4, -1, 0, 3, 1, 0, …} Frame: {-5, -2, 0, 1, 2, 4, 3, 1}, Number of coefficients: 3 φ(1,1) = -3*-3 +-5*-5 + -2*-2 + 0*0 + 1*1 + 2*2 + 4*4 + 3*3 = 68 φ(2,1) = -1*-3 +-3*-5 + -5*-2 + -2*0 + 0*1 + 1*2 + 2*4 + 4*3 = 50 φ(3,1) = 2*-3 +-1*-5 + -3*-2 + -5*0 + -2*1 + 0*2 + 1*4 + 2*3 = 13 φ(1,2) = -3*-1 +-5*-3 + -2*-5 + 0*-2 + 1*0 + 2*1 + 4*2 + 3*4 = 50 φ(2,2) = -1*-1 +-3*-3 + -5*-5 + -2*-2 + 0*0 + 1*1 + 2*2 + 4*4 = 60 φ(3,2) = 2*-1 +-1*-3 + -3*-5 + -5*-2 + -2*0 + 0*1 + 1*2 + 2*4 = 36 φ(1,3) = -3*2 +-5*-1 + -2*-3 + 0*-5 + 1*-2 + 2*0 + 4*1 + 3*2 = 13 φ(2,3) = -1*2 +-3*-1 + -5*-3 + -2*-5 + 0*-2 + 1*0 + 2*1 + 4*2 = 36 φ(3,3) = 2*2 +-1*-1 + -3*-3 + -5*-5 + -2*-2 + 0*0 + 1*1 + 2*2 = 48 φ(1,0) = -3*-5 +-5*-2 + -2*0 + 0*1 + 1*2 + 2*4 + 4*3 + 3*1 = 50 φ(2,0) = -1*-5 +-3*-2 + -5*0 + -2*1 + 0*2 + 1*4 + 2*3 + 4*1 = 23 φ(3,0) = 2*-5 +-1*-2 + -3*0 + -5*1 + -2*2 + 0*4 + 1*3 + 2*1 = -12 Note: φ(j,k) = ∑ n=start,start+N-1 y n-k y n-j

29
Auto Correlation Example Signal: {…, 3, 2, -1, -3, -5, -2, 0, 1, 2, 4, 3, 1, 0, -1, -2, -4, -1, 0, 3, 1, 0, …} Frame: {-5, -2, 0, 1, 2, 4, 3, 1}, Number of coefficients: 3 R(0) = -5*-5 + -2*-2 + 0*0 + 1*1 + 2*2 + 4*4 + 3*3 + 1*1 = 60 R(1) = -5*-2 + -2*0 + 0*1 + 1*2 + 2*4 + 4*3 + 3*1 = 35 R(2) = -5*0 + -2*1 + 0*2 + 1*4 + 2*3 + 4*1 = 12 R(3) = -5*1 + -2*2 + 0*4 + 1*3 + 2*1 = -4 Note: φ(j,k)=∑ n=0,N-1-(j-k) y n y n+(j-k) =R(j-k) Assumption: all entries before and after the frame treated as zero

30
Voice Activity Detection (VAD) Problem: Determine if voice is present in an audio signal Issues: – Without VAD, ASR accuracy degrades by 70% in noisy environments. VAD has more impact on robust ASR than any other single component – Using only energy as a feature, loud noise looks like speech and unvoiced speech as noise Applications: Speech Recognition, transmission, and enhancement Goal: extract features from a signal that emphasize differences between speech and background noise Evaluation Standard: Without an objective standard, researchers cannot scientifically evaluate various algorithms H.G. Hirsch, D. Pearce, “The Aurora experimental framework for the performance evaluation of speech recognition systems under noisy conditions,” Proc. ISCA ITRW ASR2000, vol. ASSP-32, pp. 181-188, Sep. 2000

31
Samples of VAD approaches Noise – Level estimated during periods of low energy – Adaptive estimate: The noise floor estimate lowers quickly and raises slowly when encountering non-speech frames Energy : Speech energy significantly exceeds the noise level Cepstrum Analysis (Covered later in the term) – Voiced speech contains F0 plus frequency harmonics that show as peaks in the Cepstrum – Flat Cepstrums, without peaks, can imply door slams or claps Kurtosis : Linear predictive coding voiced speech residuals have a large kurtosis

32
Statistics: Moments First moment - Mean or average value: μ = ∑ i=1,N s i Second moment - Variance or spread: σ 2 = 1 / N ∑ i=1,N (s i - μ) 2 Standard deviation – square root of variance: σ 3 rd standardized moment- Skewness: γ 1 = 1 / N ∑ i=1,N (s i -μ) 3 /σ 3 – Negative tail: skew to the left – Positive tail: skew to the right 4 th standardized moment – Kurtosis: γ 2 = 1 / N ∑ i=1,N (s i -μ) 4 /σ 4 – Positive: relatively peaked – Negative: relatively flat

33
Statistical Calculations (Excel Formulas) for (int frame=0; frame< N; frame++) // Total a given feature over all frames {totals[MEAN][feature] += features[frame][offsets[feature]]; } totals[MEAN][feature]/= N; } // Compute mean double delta, factor, stdev; for (int frame=0; frame < N; frame++) {delta = (features[frame][offsets[feature]] - totals[MEAN][feature]); totals[VARIANCE][feature] += delta * delta; totals[SKEW][feature] += Math.pow(delta, 3); totals[KIRTOSIS][feature] += Math.pow(delta, 4); } totals[VARIANCE][feature] = totals[VARIANCE][feature] /= N - 1; totals[STD][feature] = stdev = Math.sqrt(totals[VARIANCE][feature]); factor = 1.0 * N / ((N-1)*(N-2)); totals[SKEW][feature] = factor * totals[SKEW][feature] / Math.pow(stdev, 3); factor = 1.0 * N * (N+1) / ((N-1)*(N-2)*(N-3)); totals[KIRTOSIS][feature] = factor*totals[KIRTOSIS][feature] / Math.pow(stdev,4); factor = 3.0 * (N-1)*(N-1) / ((N-2)*(N-3)); totals[KIRTOSIS][feature] -= factor;

34
Rabiner’s Algorithm Uses energy and zero crossings Reasonably efficient Calculated in the time domain Calculates energy/zero crossing thresholds on the first quarter second of the audio signal (assumed to be noise frames without speech) Is reasonable accurate when the signal to noise ratio is 30 db or higher Assumes high energy frames contain speech, and a significant number of surrounding frames with high zero crossing counts represent unvoiced consonants

35
Rabiner’sEnd point Detection Algorithm

36
Rabiner Algorithm Performance

37
Entropy is a possible VAD feature Entropy: B its needed to store information Formula: Computing the entropy for possible values: Entropy(p 1, p 2, …, p n ) = - p 1 lg p 1 – p 2 lg p 2 … - p n lg p n Where p i is the probability of the i th value log 2 x is logarithm base 2 of x Examples: – A coin toss requires one bit (head=1, tail=0) – A question with 30 equally likely answers requires ∑ i=1,30 -(1/30)lg(1/30) = - lg(1/30) = 4.907

38
Use of Entropy as VAD Metric FOR each frame Apply an array of band pass frequency filters to the signal FOR each band pass frequency filter output energy[filterNo] = ∑ i=b start,b end x[i] 2 IF this is an initial frame, noise[filterNo] = energy[filterNo] ELSE speech[filterNo] = energy[filterNo] – noise[filterNo] Sort speech array and use subset of MAX filters with max speech[filterNo] values FOR i = 0 to MAX DO total += speech[i] FOR i = 0 to MAX DO entropy += speech[i]/total * log(speech[i]/total) IF entropy > threshold THEN return SPEECH ELSE return NOISE Notes: We expect higher entropy in noise; speech frames should be structured Adaptive enhancement: adjust noise estimates whenever encountering a frame deemed to be noise. noise[filterNo] = noise[filterNo] * α + energy[filterNo] * (1 -α) where 0<=α<=1

39
Unvoiced Speech Detector Filter Bank Decomposition E L,0 = sum of all level five energy bands E L,1 = sum of first four level 4 energy bands E L,2 = sum of last five level 4 energy bands + first level 3 energy band IF E L,2 > E L,1 > E L,0 and E L,0 /E L,2 < 0.99, THEN frame is unvoiced speech

40
G 729 VAD Algorithm Importance: An industry standard and a reference to compare new proposed algorithms Overview – A VAD decision is made every 10 ms – Features: full band energy, the low band energy, the zero- crossing rate, and a spectral frequency measure. – A long term average of frames judged to not contain voice – VAD decision: compute differences between a frame and noise estimate. Adjust difference using average values from predecessor frames to prevent eliminating non-voiced speech IF differences > threshold, return true; ELSE return false

41
Non-Stationary Click Detection Compute the standard deviation (σ) of a frame’s LPC residue Algorithm FOR each frame (f) Perform the Linear prediction with C coefficents (c[i]) lpc = Convolution of the frame using the c[i] as a filter residue energy residue[i] = |lpc[i] – f[i] 2 Compute the standard deviation of the residue (σ) IF K σ > threshold, where K is an empirically set gain factor Approach 1: Throw away frames determined to contain clicks Approach 2: Use interpolation to smooth the residue signal of clicks Stationary noise has a relatively constant noise spectrum, like a background fan Definition: Residue – difference between the signal and the LPC generated signal

42
Experiment Approach 1: Throw away click frames Approach 2: Interpolate click frames Missing [%]False alarm [%] 0.814.1 Missing [%]False alarm [%] 1.97.3 Music without clicksMusic clicks

43
LPC Features as a front end Assumptions –LPC models the vocal tract as a P order all-pole IIR filter –Future discrete signal samples are functions of the previous ones –The speech signal is purely linear Coefficients: Generally eight to fourteen LPC coefficients are sufficient to represent a particular block of sound samples Disadvantage: Linear prediction coefficients tend to be less stable other methods (ex: Cepstral analysis) Enhancement: Perceptual Linear Prediction uses bot frequency and time domain data. The result is comparable to Cepstral analys.

44
The LPC Spectrum 1.Perform a LPC analysis 2.Find the poles 3.Plot the spectrum around the z-Plane unit circle What do we find concerning the LPC spectrum? 1.Adding poles better matches speech up to about 18 for a 16k sampling rate 2.The peaks tend to be overly sharp (“spiky”) because small radius changes greatly alters pole skirt widths in the z-plane

45
Filter Bank Front End The bank consists of twenty to thirty overlapping band pass filters spread along the warped frequency axis Represent spectrum with log-energy output from filter bank Each frequency bank F handles frequencies from f-i to f+i or individual ranges of frequencies that models the rows of hair bands in the cochlea The feature data is an array of energy values obtained from each filter Result: Good idea, but it has not proven to be as effective as other methods

46
Warped band pass filter set Mel frequency warping

47
Time Domain Filtering Band Pass – Filter frequencies below the minimum fundamental frequency (F0) – Filter frequencies above the speech range (≈4kHz) Linear smoother and median of five filters – Used in combination to smooth the pitch contour Derivative (slope) filter – Measure changes in a given feature from one frame to another – Tends to reduce the effects of noise in ASR Noise Removal: Separate set of slides

48
Band Pass Filters Butterworth – Advantages: IIR filter, which is fast minimal ripple – Disadvantage: slow transition Window Sync – Advantage: quick transition – Disadvantages FIR filter, which is slow Ripples in the pass band Many other filters with various advantages and disadvantages. Open source code for these exist. ACORNS uses Butterworth and Window Sync filters

49
Median of Five private void medianOfFive(int feature) {double median, save, middle, out[] = new double[features.length]; for (int frame=2; frame

50
Linear Smoother private void linearSmoother(int feature) {if (features==null) return; double[] out = new double[features.length]; for (int frame = 2; frame

51
private void calculateDynamicFeatures(int featureOffset) {int start, end; double numerator, denominator; for (int frame=0; frame

Similar presentations

OK

Warped Linear Prediction Concept: Warp the spectrum to emulate human perception; then perform linear prediction on the result Approaches to warp the spectrum:

Warped Linear Prediction Concept: Warp the spectrum to emulate human perception; then perform linear prediction on the result Approaches to warp the spectrum:

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

What does appt only means in spanish Ppt on tamper resistant outlet Ppt on types of clothes Ppt on asian continent countries Ppt on network theory Ppt on network switching Ppt on formal non-formal and informal education Ppt on yahoo search engine Ppt on ozone layer depletion Ppt on preposition of time