Presentation on theme: "What Engineers Know and How They Know It"— Presentation transcript:
1 What Engineers Know and How They Know It Summary by David E. GoldbergUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
2 TextVincenti, W. G. (1990). What engineers know and how they know it: Analytical studies from aeronautical history. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
3 Engineering is Just Applied Science 1922: “Aeroplanes are not designed by science, but by art in spite of some pretence and humbug to the contrary.”Historians of technology have split off from historians of scienceView science and technology as two categories, related but distinguishable.
4 Goal of Engineering: Design Normal design (by analogy to Kuhn’s normal science).Versus radical design.Design of artifacts as social activity
5 Design and Growth of Knowledge B-24 airfoil designPlanform and airfoilConsolidated Aircraft Corp.Inventor David R. Davis.Adopted and credited with B-24 long range.Not in the main stream of airfoil thought.
6 Air Foil Evolution of Knowledge Separation of planform and section.Geometry firstLaminar v. turbulent boundary layerProlong laminar BLPressure distribution firstAnalytical calculations based on conformal mapping.
7 Drivers of Knowledge Decrease uncertainty Increased performance: presumptive anomaly, when science indicates better result is possibleFunctional failure: subjected to ever greater demands, applied in new situations.Process: Selection and variation.
8 Establishment of Design Requirements Problem: Flying quality specification.Longitudinal stabilityWhat stability and control characteristics needed?How proportion aircraft to obtain?Early schools of thought:Chauffeurs vs. airmenInherent stability vs. active control.
9 Early AircraftSopwith Camel, Curtis JN-4, Thomas Morse S-4C, longitudinally unstable.Qualitative description of early aircraft followed in end by detailed specs.
10 7 Elements Familiarization with artifact and recognition of problem. ID of basic variables & derivation of concepts and criteria.Development of instruments and technique.Growth of opinion regarding desirable qualitities.Development of practical scheme for research.Measurement of characteristics for cross section of artifacts.Assessment of results.
11 Theoretical Tool for Design Example: Control volume models.Bernoulli as forerunner.Karman & Prandtl: Modern usage.Useful to engineers not physicists.Creation of artifacts dictates different choice of tools.
12 Engineering Science v. Science Similarities:Conform to same natural laws.Diffuse by same mechanisms.Cumulative: facts build on facts.DifferencesES: create artifacts. S: understand natureSkolimowski: technological progress = pursuit of effectiveness in producing objects of given kind.
13 Data for Design Case: Durand propeller tests at Stanford, 1916-26. History:Smeaton: Waterwheel studies of 1759, systematic experiment + scale models.Froude: testing of ship hullsReynolds: 1883.Dimensional analysis: Fourier (early 1800s), Rayleigh (late 1800s)
14 Parameter Variation Via experimental or theoretical means. Via experimental means is not peculiar to engineering.Immediate interest in data for design, longer term interest in establishing a theory.Produce data in absence of theory.Indispensable for creation of such data.Absence of theory a number of causes.Scale models not necessary.Optimization often part of the experimentation.
15 Design and Production Case: Invention of flush riveting. Innovation driven by aerodynamics.Caused changes in production.Bigger gains first (retractable gear, flaps).160,000 to 400,000 rivets per plane.
16 Dimpled Riveting Science played no role in the story. Each company pursued own program.Different types of knowledge:ExplicitTacit
17 Problems Within Technology Internal logic of technology:Physical lawsPractical requirements dictate solution of problems.Internal needs of design: e.g. quality specs.& design theory.Need for decreased uncertainty.
18 Categorization of Engineering Design Knowledge Fundamental design concepts.Criteria and specifications.Theoretical tools.Quantitative data.Practical considerations.Design instrumentalities.
19 Knowledge Generating Activities Transfer from science.InventionTheoretical engineering researchExperimental engineering researchDesign practiceProductionDirect trial
20 Evolutionary Model of Knowledge Growth Variation-SelectionConsistent with GAsNot as detailed in its mechanisms.
Your consent to our cookies if you continue to use this website.