Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

The Biopharmaceutical Industry is Changing

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "The Biopharmaceutical Industry is Changing"— Presentation transcript:

0 Integrated Continuous Biomanufacturing Conference
Presentation to Engineering Conference International Integrated Continuous Biomanufacturing Conference Implementing process closure and continuous processing into the modern biopharmaceutical facility Oct 23, Castelldefels, Spain

1 The Biopharmaceutical Industry is Changing
Finally! The Safest Process is Closed, Where the Environment is a Parameter without Critical Aspect We have the Technology

2 ASME BPE, ISPE, BPOG Collaboration

3 Step 1: Defining Closed

4 Closed Process Defined
Environment does not represent a Critical Aspect (No Impact) Product is not exposed to the surrounding environment Additions and withdrawals performed in closed fashion Validated to show sufficient layers of protection against risk of contamination from the environment Risk of contamination is not mitigated by housing operation in bioburden-free or particulate-free environment Contamination of closed system = breach of integrity NOTE: Closed  Sterile (although sterile is one form) ALSO: Closed  Single Use Systems (although one form)

5 APPLYING CLOSED SYSTEM CONCEPTS: The INCREDIBLE SHRINKING Future Facility

6 1980s Traditional Multiproduct Facility
e.g. 2 products

7 1980s Traditional Facility
Many silos Highly classified (to reduce “risk” of bioburden) Redundant upstream 2 X 3 production BRX Redundant centrifuges Redundant downstream

8 1980s Traditional Facility
Shared Shared Product 1 Product 1 Product 2 Product 2 UPSTREAM CELL (+) DOWNSTREAM CELL (-)

9 Not new concept Courtesy Scott Probst , Bayer, BPOG

10 Tell QA people to close their eyes and plug their ears
Reminder: Tell QA people to close their eyes and plug their ears For the rest of us…

11 1980s Traditional Facility
Shared Multiproduct Unclassified! And regulatory agencies know about this “secret”

12 Risk Management EUROPE/ USA FDA (approx) GRADE ISO CLASS IN OPERATION
MAX # PARTICLES µ & LARGER / M3 MAX # OF VIABLE MICROORGANISMS (CFUs) / M3 A 5 3500 <1 N/A 6 35000 7 B 350000 10 C 8 100 D "9" (at rest) 200 Likelihood is the same (just a matter of time) Severity or impact is the same (destroy batch) Level of contamination is lower i.e. more difficult to detect.

13 Eureka! Bioreactors are closed!
DECLASSIFY REMOVE WALL

14 Solution for Successful Cell Culture:
Close the Bioreactor NOT cove corners! AIRLOCKS NOT REQUIRED Closed Media Containers

15 Sterile filter clarified broth = briefly exposed
0.2µ filter after CENTRIFUGATION to close Logistical segregation

16 Sterile filter clarified broth = briefly exposed
Declassified; HVAC segregation no longer required Airlocks no longer required

17 When Environment = No Critical Aspect
Product 1 is closed Product 2 is closed Physical segregation not required

18 If Environment = No Critical Aspect
Efficiency in Inoc Prep Likely: Cadence of 1 BRX every 2 days Ballroom Multipurpose Room Efficiency in Centrifugation Use Likely

19 If Environment = No Critical Aspect
Single redundancy likely sufficient

20 If Environment = No Critical Aspect
Sterile Filter all Buffers or Use < 24 hours Use Protected Powder Additions and Closed Liquid Additions

21 If Environment = No Critical Aspect
Close Systems Sanitize skids Blind runs

22 If Environment = No Critical Aspect
Use Single Use Systems

23 If Environment = No Critical Aspect
Regulatory Concern If closed

24 With Technology Improvements
If concern overcome If in line dilution used If cytocentric isolator used

25 If Environment = No Critical Aspect
Consolidated V+ / V- Smaller volumes required Note fewer staff

26 If Environment = No Critical Aspect
If all SS: UC space above

27 If Environment = No Critical Aspect
5400 m m2 buffer hold UC

28 If Environment = No Critical Aspect
500 m2 ISO 8 4000 m2 ISO 8, 1000 m2 ISO 7 How might this look?

29 How can Continuous Processing help shrink the Facility?

30 Smaller volumes & areas required
Batch  Continuous Smaller volumes & areas required

31 Batch  Continuous Mabs Model: Perfusion versus Batch Cell culture
Continuous Harvest/Clarification (ATF, centrifuge, etc Continuous Capture (SMCC Protein A) SMB/SMCC where possible in multi-chrom operation Nanofiltration UF/DF & Bulk Fill

32 Batch  Continuous Requirements:
All operations must be closed and synchronized for long term operations Cell Culture must be “bpsterile” Clarification cannot contaminate upstream (but…) Capture must be closed (but…) Any static hold steps must be “bacteriostatic” If continuous, UF/DF & Bulk Fill must be bacteriostatic

33 5000 m2 batch  3000 to 3800 m2 continuous ( -24 to -40%)
Batch  Continuous Metrics from benchmark projects and models: Assuming 5:1 lower titer in Perfusion versus Batch 15K batch BRX for 1000 kg protein 1K to 4K perfusion BRX for 1000 kg protein Harvest batch 20K in 4-6 hours after days Harvest continuous 24/7 (1-3 BRX volumes/day) 5000 m2 batch  3000 to 3800 m2 continuous ( -24 to -40%)

34 Batch  Continuous Assume no change Assume 24% reduction

35 Batch  Continuous Further 1000 m2 space savings or more achievable

36 Closed + Continuous = Low Cost
Closing #1 Less competitive Higher cost Less flexible Closed & Continuous Facility Cost Project Risk Lower cost More competitive Highly flexible

37 Thank You CRB Contributors: Kim Nelson Mark von Stwolinski
Patrick Sullivan

38


Download ppt "The Biopharmaceutical Industry is Changing"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google