Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byLeonard Watson Modified over 2 years ago

1
Small Area Prediction under Alternative Model Specifications By Wayne A. Fuller and Andreea L. Erciulescu Department of Statistics, Iowa State University Small Area Estimation 2014 Poznan, Poland, September, 2014

2
Outline I.Motivating example II.Models: auxiliary information III.Bootstrap for prediction MSE IV.Simulation 2

3
Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP): Natural Resources Conservation Service Impacts of conservation practices Sample of fields Subsample: National Resources Inventory(NRI) Hydrologic Units 3

4
4

5
Unit Level Model 5

6
Auxiliary Data 6

7
Parameters 7

8
Parametric Bootstrap 8

9
Double Bootstrap Estimation 9

10
Fast Double Bootstrap 10

11
Telescoping Double Bootstrap 11

12
CEAP Simulation Model 12

13
Alternative Specifications for x Some external information Area means known Estimated random means No external information Area means fixed Area means random 13

14
Simulation Parameters 14

15
Estimation and Prediction 15

16
16 Size 21.761.431.16 101.201.121.05 401.091.041.02

17
17 2Rel Bias-14.6-9.4 Rel Sd38.945.144.7 10Rel Bias-13.2-6.8 Rel Sd30.736.535.9 40Rel Bias-7.5-1.9 Rel Sd20.123.325.1

18
Equal Efficiency Bootstrap Samples 18 BootstrapLevel OneTotal Telescoping (100, 1) 100 200 Classic (100, 1) 150 300 Classic (44, 50) 442244

19
Summary Fast double bootstrap improves bootstrap efficiency Double bootstrap reduces bias (about 50%) Double bootstrap increases variance (15 to 30 %) Random x model has potential to reduce MSE 19

20
Future Work Confidence Intervals Triple Bootstrap Regression with Bootstrap Nonparametric Bootstrap Predictions for CEAP 20

21
Thank You 21

Similar presentations

OK

Psychology 202b Advanced Psychological Statistics, II February 8, 2011.

Psychology 202b Advanced Psychological Statistics, II February 8, 2011.

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google