Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Comprehension of Prosodic Cues in Typical & Atypical Populations Dr. Rachel Mitchell Dept. of Psychology, Durham Univ.

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Comprehension of Prosodic Cues in Typical & Atypical Populations Dr. Rachel Mitchell Dept. of Psychology, Durham Univ."— Presentation transcript:

1 Comprehension of Prosodic Cues in Typical & Atypical Populations Dr. Rachel Mitchell Dept. of Psychology, Durham Univ.

2 ∂ What is prosody? Higher order language function: Paralinguistic or pragmatic phenomenon that accompanies words & can modify or influence meaning (Suprasegmental) features of speech such as intonation, loudness, & tempo Conveyed by gradient features e.g. pitch height & range, & rhythmicity “That faculty of speech which conveys different shades of meaning by means of variations in stress + pitch – irrespective of the words + grammatical construction” (Monrad-Kohn, 1947).

3 ∂ What’s its role in language? Intrinsic prosody: dialectical and idiosyncratic differences, question vs. declarative statement Intellectual prosody: speaker attitude about info conveyed (enthusiasm, boredom etc) Emotional prosody: emotion conveyed (happiness, fear etc) Inarticulate prosody: nonlinguistic sounds (sighs, groans etc)

4 ∂ Why is it important? Crucial to understanding true communicative intent (societal integration) How something said as imp. as what’s said (sarcasm etc) Deficits impair ability to interpret others’ emotional states & behave in socially appropriate manner (Trauner et al., 1996) Ability to interpret auditory emotion cuesplays important role in maintaining successful relationships & healthy psychological fx (Carton et al., 1999).

5 ∂ What happens in the brain? Mitchell et al. (2003) Neuropsychologia, 41(10), 1410-1421. Variable lesion studies: R hem damage not always disruptive, sometimes L hem damage, multiple skills across both hem’s Solely associated with early association cortex unlikely Stimuli: H & S sentences, H, S & N intonation 1.Pure: MTG (R>L), L MFG 2.Cong v rest: R STG, R MFG, L SFG, CG 3.Cong v neutral: R MTG, R IFG, LSTG 4.Incong v rest: MTG (R>L) 5.Attend semantics: R STG, L SPL, L MFG, L ITG, L SPL 6.Attend prosody: R MTG, R MedFG

6 ∂ How do we process mixed signals? Mitchell R (2006) Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neurosci, 6(4), 298-305. Modulation of speech content by prosody. Why wouldn’t conflicting cues have similar effects to Stroop tasks? Congruence effects? Yes Relative importance of semantics & prosody. No effect Mitchell R (2006) Eur J Neurosci, 24(12), 3611-18 Activation of conflict regions? - dlPFC, ACC - See next slide Modulation of ‘prosodic emotion’ regions? - Attention influences activity in sensory cortical regions assoc with specific modality. - R lat T lobe ROI parameter estimates suggest lower activity in interference contrast than in facilitation contrast

7 ∂ Facilitation Contrast Interference Contrast IFG (vlPFC)L47-50 29 -63.92IFGL44-45 18 135.03 STGL22-62 -40 184.32IFG (vlPFC)L45-50 32 13.63 STGR2265 -20 44.11IFG (vlPFC)L47-45 26 -143.42 MTGL21-59 0 -34.72STGR3839 13 -334.05 MTGL21-53 -18 -74.86 MTGR2156 -4 -153.75 ParaHGL36-33 -10 -204.24 BGL-18 -15 -23.89

8 ∂ Why do neuroimaging and lesion studies differ? Ross & Mesulam (1979) –2 R-handed patients with frontoparietal ischemic strokes –Neither aphasic but displayed flattened affective demeanour –Ability to identify emotion portrayed in normal speech unaffected –  series papers confirmed association, while damage involving posterior T region associated with inability to comprehend affective prosody –Organisation prosodic functions in R hem mirrors propositional language functions in L? Unexpected F lobe activations in early neuroimaging studies. Schirmer & Kotz (2006) 3 stage model  Can TMS resolve this discrepancy? (LUCY ALBA-FERRARA)

9 ∂ What happens when we age? Mitchell R (2007) Cogn Emot, 21(7), 1435 – 54 Ageing affects facial emotion recognition Brosgole & Weisman (1995) asymptote age 12, maintain until mid age (mid 40s), then ↓ age 65+ - resembles 3-to-6 yr olds Theoretical doubts: lifetime of practice Mediators and mechanisms: –Frontal Lobe Load (N-back task) –Hearing sensitivity (Pure Tone Average) –IQ (NART) – only covariate –Depression (Beck Depression Iventory) –Verbal Working Memory (Daneman & Carpenter) –Aged 61 to 83  chronological age covariate

10 ∂ How specific is this? Are prosodic emotion decoding deficits caused by inability to generally decode prosodic cues? Compare emotional prosody with non-emotional prosody (e.g. changes in stress that distinguish bet declarative & question) Which constituents of emotional prosody do older adults have particular difficulty processing? Are prosodic emotion decoding deficits caused by inaccurate processing of elemental constituents?

11 ∂ What are the Consequences? Little explicit investigation in normal populations Aim = determine which aspects social well-being decline in tandem with age-related decline Study A. –Which aspects social well-being associated with norm variations in ability to decode prosodic emotion? –Which aspects decline in tandem with age-related decline? Study B. –Does depressed mood in older adults leads to prosodic emotion comprehension dysfunction or v.v.? –Depressed mood may be means by which poor comprehension exerts effects on social function. –Low social function often correlated with depressed mood in older adults

12 ∂ What happens in schizophrenia?

13 ∂ Experiment 1 Filtered emotional prosody vs. rest Healthy controls L: Z=4.25, 188 voxels R: Z=4.42, 362 voxels Schizophrenia L: Z=3.76, 455 voxels R: Z=3.17, 10 voxels Z=3.95, 329 voxels Bipolar Disorder L: Z=5.20, 1090 voxels R: Z=3.47, 27 voxels Z=5.03, 665 voxels

14 ∂ Experiment 2 Unfiltered emotional prosody vs. rest Healthy controls L: Z=4.52, 819 voxels R: Z=5.39, 599 voxels Schizophrenia L: Z=3.46, 293 voxels Z=3.88, 51 voxels R: Z=3.64, 61 voxels Z=3.54, 153 voxels Bipolar Disorder L: Z=4.43, 792 voxels R: Z=4.13, 569 voxels

15 ∂ Experiment 3 Attention to semantics: –HC activated large network L hemisphere regions, S did not –BP didn’t activate any regions in within-group analyses but not abnormal in between-group analyses Attention to emotional prosody: –S activated large network R hemisphere regions, HC did not –BP didn’t activate any regions in within-group analyses but not abnormal in between-group analyses

16 ∂ What happens in Parkinson’s disease? Patients with PD may find it more difficult to ‘read’ emotion signals transmitted via tone of voice. PD neuropathology suggests altered basal ganglia function may explain this, but it could be explained by altered frontal lobe function instead. Patients with PD performed 4 tasks: 1.A standard task of working (‘online’) memory 2.An emotion version of task 1 3.A standard attention task 4.An emotion version of task 3 Patients not worse on emotion tasks than older adults, even when tasks demanding  only when frontal lobe pathology above a threshold? But, PD patients didn’t perform standard tasks as well  more prominent?

17 ∂ Laterality and intensity issues Lateralisation Motor symptoms usually worse on one side of body. Tone of voice findings inconsistent – a subgroup only? Word content mediated by L half brain, emotional tone of voice by R half. Would expect different patterns behaviour depending whether pathology in L or R half brain. e.g. visuo-spatial problems in patients whose L side body affected Compare comprehension word content with comprehension tone of voice. Patients studied initially in on and off state medication

18 ∂ Intensity 1.Sensitivity to emotional tone of voice in sentences 2.Sensitivity to non-emotional tone of voice in sentences 3.Sensitivity to emotional prosody in words 4.Sensitivity to facial emotions 5.Sensitivity to varying degrees of facial emotion. We will adjust the data for changes in response speed. Explore Medication level, Chronicity of disease, Severity motor symptoms

19 ∂ New directions ?

Download ppt "Comprehension of Prosodic Cues in Typical & Atypical Populations Dr. Rachel Mitchell Dept. of Psychology, Durham Univ."

Similar presentations

Ads by Google