Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byGwendoline Fletcher Modified over 2 years ago

1
**Sharlee Climer, Alan R. Templeton, and Weixiong Zhang**

SplittingHeirs: Inferring Haplotypes by Optimizing Resultant Dense Graphs Sharlee Climer, Alan R. Templeton, and Weixiong Zhang ACM-BCB, Niagara falls August 2010

2
**Overview Introduction Definition of haplotype inference problem**

Previous approaches SplittingHeirs Experimental results

3
**Introduction Only 0.1% of human DNA has variation**

Most of this variation is due to Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) Most SNPs have only two variants, or alleles, within a population Broad definition of haplotype: A set of alleles for a given set of SNPs in relatively close proximity on a chromosome Image source:

4
**Introduction DNA is transcribed to produce RNA**

RNA is translated, ultimately producing proteins Variation in non-coding regions might have an effect on regulation SNPs throughout the genome may be of interest Image source:

5
**Introduction Humans are diploid**

Pairs of chromosomes Common sequencing produces a meld of the two haplotypes, referred to as a genotype Computational methods used to infer a pair of haplotypes from a genotype Phasing the genotype G C T T SNP1 SNP2 G C T T G T A C + C T A G ? C T A C + G T A G

6
**Importance of accuracy when inferring haplotypes from genotypes**

SNP1 SNP2 SNP1 SNP2 C C T C G C T T Importance of accuracy when inferring haplotypes from genotypes Frequently an early step in expensive and vitally important studies

7
**Introduction Possible to identify the separate haplotypes directly**

Only feasible for very small studies Useful for testing accuracy of computational methods Andres et al. [Genet. Epi. 2007] found computational methods had poor accuracy and confidence levels were error prone PHASE [Stephens et al., AJHG 2001] fastPhase [Scheet and Stephens, AJHG 2006] HAP [Halperin and Eskin, Bioinformatics 2004] GERBIL [Kimmel and Shamir, PNAS 2005] Errors in confidence levels suggest that the models might not fully capture biological properties

8
**Problem Definition G T A C C T A G 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 1 0 2**

Let ‘0’ and ‘1’ represent the two possible alleles for a given SNP Haplotype represented by a string of binary values Genotype for a pair of haplotypes ‘0’ if both alleles are ‘0’ ‘1’ if both alleles are ‘1’ ‘2’ if heterozygous G T A C C T A G

9
Problem Definition For k heterozygous sites, there are 2k-1 feasible solutions Not apparent which solution is more likely than another Population-level characteristics There tends to be relatively few unique haplotypes There tends to be clusters of haplotypes that are similar to each other Some haplotypes are relatively common

10
Problem Definition Given a set of genotypes drawn from a population: 1) Find the set of haplotypes that exist in the set 2) For each genotype, determine the pair of haplotypes that is mostly likely to exist in the given individual Image source:

11
**Example Example problem Display solutions as graphs g1: 1111 0001**

5 individuals 8 SNP sites Display solutions as graphs Each node represents a unique haplotype Edge weight Measure of difference between haplotypes Set equal to the number of sites that differ between the haplotypes Edges with smallest distances are shown g1: g2: g3: g4: g5:

12
**Example Solution found by: 5 unique haplotypes**

g1: g2: g3: g4: g5: Solution found by: Clark’s Subtraction Method [Mol. Biol. And Evol. 1990] Pure Parsimony [Gusfield, CPM’03] EM [Excoffier and Slatkin, Mol. Biol.Evol. 1995] 5 unique haplotypes Haplotypes are not very similar to each other

13
**Example No Perfect Phylogeny solution Solution found by HAP**

6 unique haplotypes Haplotypes are slightly more similar to each other

14
**Example Solution found by PHASE 9 unique haplotypes**

g1: g2: g3: g4: g5: Solution found by PHASE 9 unique haplotypes Haplotypes are more similar to each other

15
**Example PHASE favors pair-wise similarities**

g1: g2: g3: g4: g5: PHASE favors pair-wise similarities Essentially evaluating a nearest-neighbor graph

16
**SplittingHeirs where di = the weight of edge i**

SplittingHeirs favors cluster-wide similarities, as well as reduced cardinality Cast as a Mixed Integer Linear Program (MIP) Minimize: where di = the weight of edge i h = the cardinality of the haplotype set u = a weighting factor

17
SplittingHeirs Enforce cluster-wide similarities by requiring a minimum density of edges in the graph Additional constraint: where e = number of edges a is a configurable parameter Can be decreased for highly diverse sample Can be increased for sample with low diversity

18
**Example Solution found by SplittingHeirs 8 unique haplotypes**

Haplotypes are quite similar to each other

19
Results Tested on 7 sets of haplotype data for which the true phase is known n is the number of individuals m is the number of sites # Ambiguous is the number of genotypes that have more than one feasible solution

20
Results

21
Results

22
Conclusions Introduced a biologically intuitive model that optimizes cluster-wide similarities and reduced cardinality Globally optimal solutions can be computed for small regions Candidate locus studies Future work Speed up computation Use model to guide an approximation method Image source:

23
**Acknowledgments Olin Fellowship NIH grants NSF grants**

P50-GM065509 R01-GM087194A2 U01-GM063340 NSF grants IIS DBI Alzheimer’s Association grant Thanks to: Taylor Maxwell Gerold Jaeger

Similar presentations

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google