Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

NATO HQ C 3 Staff 1 C3 INTEROPERABILITY AFCEA ‘INTEROPERABILITY REVISITED’ 16 June 10 Dick Whittingham Principal Technical Coordinator NATO HQ Consultation,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "NATO HQ C 3 Staff 1 C3 INTEROPERABILITY AFCEA ‘INTEROPERABILITY REVISITED’ 16 June 10 Dick Whittingham Principal Technical Coordinator NATO HQ Consultation,"— Presentation transcript:

1 NATO HQ C 3 Staff 1 C3 INTEROPERABILITY AFCEA ‘INTEROPERABILITY REVISITED’ 16 June 10 Dick Whittingham Principal Technical Coordinator NATO HQ Consultation, Command and Control Staff

2 NATO HQ C 3 Staff 2 Overview Implications of Interoperability Keys Actions and Initiatives CONTENT

3 NATO HQ C 3 Staff 3 Interoperability is a challenge! For C3, lack of interoperability means: No network enabled environment No information sharing Move to a federated networked environment makes interoperability central to National as well as NATO activity Pre-requisite for effective operations in the real world OVERVIEW

4 NATO HQ C 3 Staff 4 RELATIONSHIPS For C3, our required capabilities are always in the context of the federated (NATO, national and multinational) networked environment In NATO, required capabilities are defined and implemented via the NATO Defence Planning Process and the Operational Planning Process Interoperability is a characteristic of a capability Standardization is a tool to support interoperability

5 NATO HQ C 3 Staff 5 ACO HQ NATO JFC HQ NATIONAL FORCES NATIONAL FORCES NATIONAL FORCES NATO TASK FORCE NATIONAL AIR FORCES & BASES NATIONAL AIR FORCES & BASES NATIONAL AIR FORCES & BASES DJSE AIR CC HQ LAND CC HQ MARITIME CC HQ SOCC NATO STATIC FEDERATED ENVIRONMENT NATO DEPLOYED NATIONAL DEPLOYED INFORMATION FLOW

6 NATO HQ C 3 Staff 6 Forces come as they are Interoperability low Requirements unclear and changing Dynamic ad hoc solutions needed Work-arounds AMN OPERATIONAL REALITY Identification to Endorsement Cost estimation Authorisation Implementation Handover Bridge to the future Parallel staffing CRO PLANNING POLITICAL DIRECTION CONOPS FORCE ACTIVATION DIRECTIVE FORCE GENERATION CJSOR OPLAN OPERATIONAL PLANNING OPERATIONAL PLANNING

7 NATO HQ C 3 Staff 7 Understanding and documenting the interoperability requirement (IOR) Identifying solutions to the IOR Implementation of the solutions by all parties Test and validation of the implemented solutions INTEROPERABILITY KEYS

8 NATO HQ C 3 Staff 8 NATO DEFENCE PLANNING PROCESS (NDPP) 2 PGINTPol – Mil Analysis PS Operations Lessons Learned Future Trends Minimum Capabilities Requirements (MCR) Compare Fulfilment Exercise Surplus Capability Capabilities to be Maintained Capability Shortfalls RISK Analysis Prioritise Shortfalls Note Synopsis of MCR including Priority Shortfall Areas National / Multi-National Implementation NATO Implementation Monitor / Facilitate Support NATO Capability Survey Progress ReportAnnual Capabilities Report NATO and National Existing and Planned Capabilities 1 LoA Political Guidance 1 Requirements & Shortfalls 2 Set Targets3 Implement 4 Review5 Determine Capability Shortfall Solutions Develop Targets – apportion National Targets Multi-National Targets NATO Targets Reasonable Challenge Associated Risk Agree Targets REQUIREMENT SOLUTION IMPLEMENT PROVE

9 NATO HQ C 3 Staff 9 PROCESS RELATIONSHIPS PGINTPol – Mil Analysis PS Operations Lessons Learned Future Trends Minimum Capabilities Requirements Compare Fulfilment Exercise Surplus Capability Capabilities to be Maintained Capability Shortfalls RISK Analysis PLoCS Acknowledge PLoCS Determine Capability Shortfall Solutions Develop Targets – apportion National Targets Multi-National Targets NATO Targets Reasonable Challenge Associated Risk National / Multi-National Implementation NATO Implementation Monitor / Facilitate Support NATO Capability Survey Progress ReportAnnual Capabilities Report NATO and National Existing and Planned Capabilities Step 1 Agree Targets LoA Identification to Endorsement Cost estimation Authorisation Implementation Handover Bridge to the future Parallel staffing CRO PLANNING POLITICAL DIRECTION CONOPS FORCE ACTIVATION DIRECTIVE FORCE GENERATION CJSOR OPLAN OPERATIONAL PLANNING OPERATIONAL PLANNING DEFENCE PLANNING BALANCING REQUIREMENTS AND RESOURCES

10 NATO HQ C 3 Staff 10 PROCESS RELATIONSHIPS PGINTPol – Mil Analysis PS Operations Lessons Learned Future Trends Minimum Capabilities Requirements Compare Fulfilment Exercise Surplus Capability Capabilities to be Maintained Capability Shortfalls RISK Analysis PLoCS Acknowledge PLoCS Determine Capability Shortfall Solutions Develop Targets – apportion National Targets Multi-National Targets NATO Targets Reasonable Challenge Associated Risk National / Multi-National Implementation NATO Implementation Monitor / Facilitate Support NATO Capability Survey Progress ReportAnnual Capabilities Report NATO and National Existing and Planned Capabilities Step 1 Agree Targets LoA DEFENCE PLANNING Identification to Endorsement Cost estimation Authorisation Implementation Handover Bridge to the future Parallel staffing CRO PLANNING POLITICAL DIRECTION CONOPS FORCE ACTIVATION DIRECTIVE FORCE GENERATION CJSOR OPLAN OPERATIONAL PLANNING OPERATIONAL PLANNING INTEROPERABILITY COHERENT ARCHITECTURE MCR PSA TARGETS COHERENT PROCESS

11 NATO HQ C 3 Staff 11 ACTIONS AND INITIATIVES NATO Policies, Processes and Tools Acquisition Process Reform Common framework, ownership, funding scope, simpler Principles for C3 Testing Reference facilities: certification Information Management NIMA, information sharing environment NATO Interoperability Standards and Profiles Linkage to architecture: SIOP

12 NATO HQ C 3 Staff 12 ACTIONS AND INITIATIVES Strategic Commands Develop generic deployed ops C3 requirement Simplify capability management Industry Really adopt open standards Support establishment of distributed Reference Facilities for testing conformance to NATO agreed standards Support spiral development and delivery

13 NATO HQ C 3 Staff 13 MESSAGES Interoperability in the C3 environment is now a core attribute for NATO and Nations Processes need to be re-focussed, funds need to be re-prioritised We need to solve tomorrow’s problem as well as todays


Download ppt "NATO HQ C 3 Staff 1 C3 INTEROPERABILITY AFCEA ‘INTEROPERABILITY REVISITED’ 16 June 10 Dick Whittingham Principal Technical Coordinator NATO HQ Consultation,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google