Presentation on theme: "UNITED STATES PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE 2011 USPHS Scientific Consortium New Orleans, LA June 20--23, 2011 LCDR D. Fermín Argüello, MD, MPH Centers for Control."— Presentation transcript:
UNITED STATES PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE 2011 USPHS Scientific Consortium New Orleans, LA June , 2011 LCDR D. Fermín Argüello, MD, MPH Centers for Control & Prevention Increasing Health Department Epidemiological Response Capacity: The OFRD APHT Model Time allotted: 30 minutes (20 minute presentation + 10 minutes questions) Target number of substantive slides: 20 Running Time:
UNITED STATES PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE LCDR D. Fermín Argüello, MD, MPH Centers for Control & Prevention Increasing Health Department Epidemiological Response Capacity: The OFRD APHT Model
Presentation outline 1.Epidemiology Capacity in United States 2.Applied Public Health Team (APHT) Model & Structure 3.APHT & Health Department collaboration: Tennessee Example 4.Summary
1. Epidemiology Capacity in United States
United States Epidemiology Capacity National health objectives repeatedly call to increase epidemiology capacity at local, state, territorial, & tribal levels* Only 55% of state public health agencies have comprehensive epidemiology capacity to support essential public health (PH) services † Despite sizable increases in federal funding after 2001, shortfalls epidemiology personnel persist † – ~2,193 epidemiologists in 2009 ‡ 60% increase from 2001 § – 3,683 estimated need ~68% shortfall ‡ – 17% health department epidemiologists plan to retire or leave their jobs in next 5 years § * Health People 2010 & 2020 available at & † Boulton et al. J Pub Health Manage & Pract 2009;15(4):328—36. ‡ CDC. MMWR 2009; 58(49);1373—7. § CDC. MMWR 2003; 52(43);1049—51.
Enhancing Epidemiology Capacity Programs providing epidemiology workforce surge capacity enhance health departments ability to conduct key functions* Sources of epidemiology surge capacity – Council of State & Territorial Epidemiologists Applied Epidemiology Fellowship – Centers for Disease Control & Prevention Epidemic Intelligence Service – Preparedness & Emergency Response Learning Centers † Coalition of schools of public health with agreements to assist regional health departments during responses – United States Public Health Service (USPHS), Office of Force Readiness & Deployment (OFRD) Applied Public Health Teams * McDonald et al. Public Health Reports 2010;125(S5):70 †
2. APHT Model & Structure
APHT Model Scalable & deployable team of federal responders specially trained to assist health departments in rapid assessment & response to important public health problems “Public Health Department in a Box” -RADM Sven Rodenbeck * RADM Rodenbeck
APHT Tool Box Epidemiology, Surveillance, & Preventive Services – Epidemiologic data collection & analysis – Community health status profile assessments – Program effectiveness & service delivery evaluation – Illness/injury surveillance & outbreak investigation – Health information dissemination Environmental Health – Food & water safety – Temporary shelter planning & assessment – Industrial hazard assessment & intervention – Environmental/occupational health & safety – Veterinarian public health
APHT Structure 5 teams of officers under direction of USPHS OFRD Multidisciplinary – Epidemiologists – Preventive medicine physicians & nurses – Health educators – Environmental health scientists & industrial hygienists – Occupational health physicians – Veterinarians Deployable in national disaster declarations Response within 48 hours On call every 5 months
APHT Structure APHT Team Commander APHT Team Deputy Commander Blue Environmental Public Health Group (EPHG) Lead Epidemiology, Surveillance, Preventive Services Group (ESPSG) Lead Gold EPHG Lead Gold ESPSG Lead APHT Team Deputy Commander Blue EPHG teamGold EPHG team Blue ESPSG teamGold ESPSG team
Recent APHT-3 Training & Responses Hurricane Ike—Austin, TX (2008) – Shelter surveillance of illnesses & injuries – Infection control evaluations – Industrial hygiene assessments – Food establishment inspections – Community Assessment for Public Health Emergency Response (CASPER) surveys (post-disaster needs) Maryville & Chattanooga, TN (2010) – Environmental & industrial evaluations – Water safety assessments – Seasonal & H1N1 influenza vaccination coverage survey – Influenza information distribution to providers & community
Paducah, KY (2011) – Temporary emergency shelter assessments – Public health environmental evaluations – CASPER survey (disaster preparedness) Recent APHT-3 Training & Responses
3. APHT & Health Department Collaboration: Tennessee Example
APHT Annual Training 2010—Tennessee March 14 (Sunday): APHT-3 arrives in Knoxville to train with Tennessee Department of Health – 10 person APHT-3 Epidemiology & Surveillance Group deployed to collaborate with Chattanooga-Hamilton Country Health Department (CHCHD) March 15: APHT-3 Epidemiology & Surveillance Group meet with CHCHD leaders to decide on focus/scope of investigation March 16-18: CHCHD epidemiologist & APHT-3 Epidemiology & Surveillance Group conducts investigation & develops health information for county March 19 (Friday): Presented findings to county health policy makers
Investigation Problem – After 2009 H1N1 education & vaccine campaign in Hamilton County, CHCHD discovered substantially low rates of CHDHD administered vaccinations in: year olds (6.7%) African Americans (1.6%) Residents in 13 zip codes ( %) Objectives – Confirm vaccination acceptance rates in key communities – Identify barriers to H1N1 vaccine acceptance – Develop strategies & materials to “market” future vaccine coverage in the county Method – Cohort telephone survey of low vaccine uptake zip codes – In person & -based surveys of students in 3 local colleges
Telephone Survey March Hypotheses & survey instrument developed by CHCHD/APHT epidemiologists 11 contractors & 5 APHT members trained & conducted 1,537 telephone interviews
On-site Survey at Colleges March APHT members conducted 658 in-person interviews 2 APHT members programmed surveys that were sent to 12,000 students & faculty
Survey, Data Entry & Analysis March Data collection, entry, cleaning, & analysis
Health Education March H1N1/seasonal influenza information for providers & community
Key findings: Telephone Survey of Selected Zip Codes 22% H1N1, 47% seasonal influenza vaccine uptake overall –16% H1N1, 29% seasonal vaccine uptake among year olds –21% H1N1, 46% seasonal vaccine uptake among African - Americans No difference H1N1 or seasonal influenza vaccination on race H1N1 influenza vaccination increased with increasing age Reason for H1N1 & seasonal influenza vaccination: “Protect myself & family” Reason for influenza vaccine refusal: H1N1 “Fear of adverse effects”; Seasonal “Vaccine not needed” Most common location for influenza vaccination: Doctors’ office (42% for H1N1, 49% for seasonal)
(HIDDEN SLIDE) Key findings: Telephone Survey of Selected Zip Codes 22% (18.6% USA [18%↑]; 0.15—3.3% [500%↑] CHCHD for included zip codes) received H1N1 & 47% (39.6% [19%↑] USA; 41.5% [13%↑] TN) received seasonal influenza vaccine –16 (6.7% [130%↑] CHCHD administered vax) & 29% 19—24 year olds, respectively –21 (1.6% [1200%↑] CHCHD administered vax) & 46% (32.2% [43%↑] USA; 31.5% [46%↑]TN) African Americans, respectively No difference H1N1 or seasonal influenza vaccination on race H1N1 influenza vaccination increased with increasing age Respondents who received seasonal influenza vaccine were likely to also receive H1N1 influenza vaccine Most frequently cited reason for H1N1 & seasonal influenza vaccination – “Protect myself & family” Most frequently cited reason for H1N1 & seasonal influenza vaccine refusal: “Fear of adverse effects” & “Vaccine was not needed”, respectively Doctors’ office was most common (42%) location for H1N1 influenza vaccination, followed by CHCHD clinics (18%) Doctors’ office was most common (49%) location for seasonal influenza vaccination, followed by hospitals (11%), private clinics (9%), & then CHCHD clinics (8%)
Outcomes Findings used to help develop 2010 seasonal/H1N1 influenza vaccine campaign strategy Target year-olds at appropriate venues Vaccine coverage for African-Americans similar to that for general population Intensify efforts to link with “doctors’ offices” Develop education materials that align with reasons for vaccine acceptance & refusal
Summary Incorporated real-time & impactful investigation into force readiness training Negotiated, conducted, & presented findings of a sizeable study, & developed appropriate health education materials in 4 days Findings used to guide seasonal/H1N1 influenza vaccination & education campaign in following year Demonstrates utility of specially trained federal responders augmenting local health department epidemiology capacity Through this example, we demonstrate an example of local, state, & federal collaborations that impact community
“As the scope of the public health enterprise increases, new partnerships must be forged to increase collaboration in communities and at the national and state levels” Baker & Koplan Baker & Koplan. Health Affairs 2002;21(6):15—27.
UNITED STATES PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE OFRD CAPT Beck, Acting & Deputy Director CAPT Elenberg, Medical Readiness Training Manager APHT-3 CAPT Rapp, Team Commander RADM Rodenbeck, former team commander CAPT Kim, Team Deputy-Commander CDR Chang, Blue Epidemiology, Surveillance & Prevention Services Group Lead CDR Hausman, Gold Epidemiology, Surveillance & Prevention Services Group Lead APHT-3 Epidemiology, Surveillance & Prevention Services Group members Chattanooga-Hamilton County Health Department Dawn Ford, Emergency Response Coordinator Sarah Stuart Sloan, MPH, Epidemiologist Margaret Zylstra, BSN, Epidemiology Manager Valerie Boaz, MD, County Health Officer Telephone survey workers Tennessee Department of Health Susan R. Cooper, MSN, RN, State Health Commissioner Tim F. Jones, MD, State Epidemiologist University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Chattanooga Community College Southern Adventist University Study participants Acknowledgements
CAPT Nancy Bill CAPT David Kim CDR Jodee Dennison CDR Leslie Hausman CDR Soju Chang CDR Angela Shen LCDR Eleanor Morin LCDR Lee Ann Johnson LCDR Fermin Arguello LT Terrance Jones Sarah Sloan Dawn Ford
Abstract submission Short title (limit 90 characters): Increasing health department epidemiological response capacity--The OFRD APHT model Knowledge/competency gap (with evidence): A six-year study by the Council of State & Territorial Epidemiologists found substantial shortfalls in epidemiologist staffing (Boulton et al. J Public Health Management Practice 2009:15(4):328). Not surprisingly, programs that provide epidemiology workforce surge capacity to health department have been shown to enhance the ability of health departments to conduct epidemiologic investigations, respond to public health emergencies, & perform community health assessments, among other essential public health services (McDonald et al. Public Health Reports 2010;125(S5):70). The U.S. Public Health Service Applied Public Health Team (APHT) was created in 2006 to provide expert consultation & workforce surge capacity in epidemiologic investigation & surveillance, preventive medical services delivery, & environmental public health for health departments requesting assistance (OFRD. APHT Concept of Operations, 2008). In March 2010, the Chattanooga-Hamilton County Health Department (CHCHD) requested federal assistance in estimating total H1N1 vaccination coverage & assessing factors influencing vaccination in zip codes with low health department- administered H1N1 vaccine acceptance rates. Over the one week investigation period, the CHCHD-APHT team designed a survey, administered telephone interviews of a cohort of over 900 residents, completed data analysis, & presented findings & recommendations to health department policy makers. This collaboration is an example of the utility of specially trained federal responders augmenting a local health department to conduct important investigations that might otherwise not be performed. Though this example, we demonstrate a model through which local-federal collaborations make an impact on public health.
Abstract submission Long title: A model for increasing local & state health department capacity to rapidly assess important public health problems--The Office of Force Readiness & Deployment (OFRD) Applied Public Health Team (APHT) model. Topic description (limit 350 words): In the setting of health department epidemiologist staffing shortfalls affecting essential public health services across the United States, USPHS OFRD created the scalable & deployable Applied Public Health Team (APHT) to assist Health Departments in rapid assessment & response to important public health problems. This symposium will describe workforce shortage in epidemiology in health departments across the United States, strategies in addressing this shortfall, & the USPHS OFRD APHT model for addressing this important public health issue. To describe the utility of specially trained federal responders assisting in conducting important investigations that might not otherwise be performed, the symposium will focus on describing the joint Chattanooga- Hamilton County Health Department (CHCHD)-APHT collaboration to conduct a rapid estimation of the total 2009 H1N1 vaccination coverage & assess the factors influencing vaccination in zip codes with low health department-administered H1N1 vaccine acceptance rates. Learning objectives (at least 3): 1.) At the end of this session attendees will be able to describe public health epidemiology workforce shortages in the United States. 2.) At the end of this session attendees will be able to describe the role of APHT in enhancing local public health epidemiology capacity. 3.) At the end of this session attendees will be able to describe the benefits of APHT augmentation of CHCHD in the investigation on H1N1 & seasonal influenza vaccination coverage & factors influencing acceptance of vaccination.