Presentation on theme: "1 1 5/8/2015 3:22 AM UNCLASSIFIED Joint Basing Impact to Navy Joint Basing Impact to Navy W. RICK McKUTCHIN CNIC, HQ N80 Regional Support Joaella Lane,"— Presentation transcript:
1 1 5/8/2015 3:22 AM UNCLASSIFIED Joint Basing Impact to Navy Joint Basing Impact to Navy W. RICK McKUTCHIN CNIC, HQ N80 Regional Support Joaella Lane, NDW JUNE 2010 Released on 7 May 2010 by VADM Vitale
2 2 5/8/2015 3:22 AM Joint Basing (JB) Impact - BLUF BRAC 2005 includes 12 JB sites – 7 involve Navy installations - Navy designated as “Lead” at 4 sites Overall Navy Impact - Net gain of 2,745 bldgs (17.8M SF valued at $8.3B) - Net gain of 1,559 civilian employees - Net gain of $265M in work requirements; $20.7M unfunded (see below) OSD mandated COLS for JBs higher than Navy COLs - OSD directed that JBs be “fully funded” to meet OSD COLS - $20.7M/yr above program-of-record required meet COLS (Navy share) 5 to 8% increase over program-of-record - FMB directed CNIC to absorb shortfalls in FY10/11 & readdress in POM-12 OSD requires Joint Bases to report quarterly performance on COLS - Performance against 274 COLS assessed using the Cost and Performance Visibility Framework (CPVF) tool - Joint Bases must report COLS performance data quarterly and financial data annually
3 3 5/8/2015 3:22 AM CNIC JB Region Overview CJR MARIANAS Guam – Andersen AFB CNR HAWAII Pearl Harbor – Hickam CNR SOUTHEAST NAVWPNSTA Charleston Navy as Supporting Command is the BOS Provider (e.g. Host) Navy as Supported Command receives BOS Services (e.g. Tenant) CNR MID-ATLANTIC NAVAIRENGSTA Lakehurst JEB Little Creek/Ft Story, VA CNR NDW Anacostia /Bolling AFB NAF Wash./Andrews AFB
4 4 5/8/2015 3:22 AM 4 Joint Base (JB) – Navy Lead or Installation Equity Square Footage Plant Replacement Value (PRV) No. of buildingsNo. of PersonnelTOA Shortfall to meet Joint COLs BeforeAfterNETBeforeAfterNETBeforeAfterNETBeforeAfter *NETBeforeAfterNet Joint Region Marianas – Andersen (Navy Lead) 8.2M14.9M6.7M$10.3B$15.8B$5.5B1,7233,4141.691 285 Navy Mil 425 Civ 285 Navv Mil 742 Oth Svc Mil 1,066 Civ641 Civ $170M$315M$149M$4.1M JEB Little Creek – Fort Story (Navy Lead) 6.3M7.5M1.2M$2.01B$2.33B$320M8751,159284 8 Navy Mil 666 Civ 8 Navy Mil 10 Oth Svc Mil 732 Civ66 Civ $80M$101M$23M$1.5M JB Pearl Harbor – Hickam (Navy Lead) 39.6M44.7M5.1M$15.3B$19.4B$4.1B3,1763,934758 361 Navy Mil 2,069 Civ 361 Navy Mil 606 Oth Svc Mil 3,252 Civ1,183 Civ $384M$525M$146M$5.2M JB Anacostia – Bolling (Navy Lead) 15.3M28.5M13.2M$441M$2.5B$2.06B2621,004742 22 Navy Mil 420 Civ 22 Navy Mil 285 Oth Svc Mil 1,087 Civ667 Civ $46M$104M$62M$4.0M JB Andrews – Naval Air Facility Wash (Air Force Lead) 680K0-680K$228M0-$228M240-24 5 Navy Mil 15 Civ 5 Navy Mil 1,209 Oth Svc Mil 0 Civ-15 Civ $8M$0-$8M$0 JB McGuire – Ft Dix – NAS Lakehurst (Air Force Lead) 2.9M0-2.9M$1.32B0-$1.32B2330-233 127 Navy Mil 370 Civ 127 Navy Mil 1,020 Oth Svc Mil 0 Civ-370 Civ $31M-$2.4M-$33M$2.4M JB Charleston – NWS Charleston (Air Force Lead) 4.8M0-4.8M$2.1B0-$2.1B4730-473 55 Navy Mil 613 Civ 55 Navy Mil 845 Oth Svc Mil 0 Civ -613 Civ $76M-$3.5M-$80M$3.5M TOTAL 77.8M95.6M17.8M$31.7B$40.03B$8.3B6,7669,5112,745 863 Navy Mil 4,578 Civ 863 Navy Mil 6,137 Civ1,559 Civ $795M$1.04B$244M$20.7M Joint Basing Impact to Navy * MILPERS performing installation management (IM) do not “ transfer ” ; they become embedded IM workforce
5 5 5/8/2015 3:22 AM Navy Challenges Breaking the Regionalization model for Navy Installations - PSD Model different from other services - Financial Management models different (region vice installation) NSPS Conversions NMCI conversion with Navy CAC cards
6 6 5/8/2015 3:22 AM Future of Joint Basing Up front costs to implement with potential future savings - Cost savings anticipated not realized to date - Efficiencies should be realized over time as contracts are combined, work force in “overhead” functions are optimized and right-sized Transparency and uniformity of base operating support.
7 7 5/8/2015 3:22 AM 7 JB - Summary Joint Basing = a priority for DUSD(I&E) - Stepping stone to CDIS (Common Delivery of Installation Support) and joint installation management Additional Navy BOS FY10/11 Impact: +$20M - FMB: CNIC must absorb in FY10/11, readdress in POM 12 We have to make adjustments as JB’s are different - JBs “immune” from Service - directed budget cuts or efficiencies - Joint Bases must report COLS performance data quarterly and financial data annually No Joint Base is standard – each unique with Service ‘equities’