Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byDonald Casey Modified over 3 years ago

1
Educated Spray A Geometry Thomas Furlong Prof. Caroline Genzale August 2012

2
2 Notes for geometry use: The following presentation outlines the method utilized to smooth the STL file created from x-ray tomography measurements of nozzles 210675 and 210677 Due to the low resolution of the x-ray tomography measurements (~4 microns), there is still uncertainty in the ability to capture real features and asymmetry –Nozzle 210675 has a convergence near the outlet on the order of the measurement resolution and is not captured in the smoothed geometry –Nozzle 210677 features a more significant convergence, which is captured in the smoothed geometry This presentation is intended to be the first step towards the ultimate goal of fully understanding the geometry of Spray A and Spray B nozzles and the implications of these geometries

3
3 The Starting STL File The STL file is oriented such that the Z-axis is oriented along the orifice center and centered at the (0,0) X and Y coordinates

4
4 The STL file is cut into discrete theta regions of size π /150 to stipulate 300 splines to define the geometry –The x-ray tomography STL file contains a limited number of data points –A larger discrete theta region of size π /10 is then necessary to produce each spline fit –A vertical spline curve is created at each one of these locations with ~12 nodes per 0.1 micron Step 1- Theta Slices Y X

5
5 All STL points within the bounds are utilized in obtaining the spline fit Step 1- Theta Slices Lower Bound Spline Location Upper Bound Y X

6
6 Step 1- Theta Slices Additional splines utilize partially overlapping regions The rotation between the two upper bounds is equivalent to the rotation between the spline points ( π /150) Y X Neighboring Spline Overlapping region Non-overlapping region

7
7 For each theta slice, the minimum diameter in the outlet region is found and defined as the local outlet location –The local outlet locations do not occur at a consistent vertical location (Z-axis) Step 2 – Outlet Identification Outlet Vertical Location (mm) Min=0.0857 Mean=0.101 Max=0.175

8
8 Step 2 – Outlet Identification The global outlet location is defined as the mean local outlet location (along the Z-axis) Z X Minimum Mean Maximum

9
9 Vertical spline creation via theta slices Nozzle, orifice, and sac splines are generated separately using the function spap2 Knots are first defined utilizing the matlab splinetool and hardcoded The knot locations are iterated using the ‘newknt’ function to minimize spline fit errors with the current theta slice Step 3 – Spline Fit knots=augknt([min(R_orf(:,2)),0.7966,1.0702,1.1137,1.1495],3); f1_orf=spap2(knots,3,R_orf(:,2),R_orf(:,1)); for k=1:10 f1_orf=spap2(newknt(f1_orf),3,R_orf(:,2),R_orf(:,1)); end

10
10 The outlet region Step 3 – Spline Fit Note: No convergence trend in tomography points for 675

11
11 The turning region Step 3 – Spline Fit

12
12 Turning Angle Calculation The turning angle is defined from Kastengren et al. (2012) using two lines, one within the sac and one within the orifice

13
13 The inlet turning angles derived from the first spline smoothed are not significantly altered –The inlet turning angle is determined utilizing the inletTurn675.m matlab code provided by Dr. Pickett Resulting STL File

14
14 Resulting STL File However it is insufficient for meshing without connectivity between the splines Figure shows the interior of the STL file near the sac/orifice turning junction Inconsistencies

15
15 Step 4 – Establish Connectivity Between Splines The second geometry fit is done utilizing vertical slices (instead of theta slices) to generate connectivity points at consistent Z locations ΔZΔZ Select a region of data of size ΔZ (0.1 micron) Create a spline fit around the data (200 nodes) –Utilizes two splines, one on the top and a second on the bottom (see next slide) Each ΔZ contains ~12 nodes as stated before (defined via first spline)

16
16 Step 4 – Establish Connectivity Between Splines Consistent connectivity is established without altering geometry significantly

17
17 Step 4 – Establish Connectivity Between Splines Turning angle retains trends seen from original data

18
18 A semisphere is added to the outlet to enable proper meshing Step 5 – Add an Outlet Semisphere

19
19 Step 5 – Resulting STL The resulting STL file is smooth, capable of being meshed well, and represents the outlet diameter and turning angle of the tomography measurements

20
20 Outlet Diameter Comparison Using a circle fit function (assumes circular orifice) we can compare the representative outlet diameters* *Utilizes the mean z location as the outlet Optical microscopy –89.4 μm Tomography –86.74 μm Smoothed geometry –89.11 μm

21
21 Axial Diameter Comparison The axial diameter of the smoothed geometry predominately captures the tomography data Utilizing the mean z location as the outlet This 2-dimensional representation assumes a circular orifice Z-axis

22
22 The current method does not capture an outlet convergence due to the inability of the splines to capture some fluctuations and not others 3 μm Discussion of Outlet Convergence The spline method cannot distinguish between: –Fluctuations due to noise –Real fluctuations of the same magnitude

23
23 Nominal Mesh Comparison Spray A Mesh on ECN website

24
24 210675 Conclusions The STL file generated utilizing x-ray tomagraphy was smoothed while retaining the inlet turning angle trends The outlet diameter produced matches well with the optical microscopy measurements The outlet region does not capture the convergence effects seen in phase contrast since the convergence is on the order of the tomography resolution (Kastengren et al. (2012))

25
25 210677 Smoothing A similar process was implemented for nozzle 210677 A more distinct convergence section allowed for the nozzle to be split into 3 sections to create a spline (sac, orifice, and outlet)

26
26 210677 Outlet Diameter The outlet diameter provides a reasonable comparison to the optical microscopy Optical microscopy –83.61 μm Tomography –83 μm Phase contrast –84.13 μm Smoothed geometry –84.53 μm

27
27 210677 Axial Diameter The axial diameter matches well with respect to the original STL file with some offsets with experiments

28
28 210677 Turning Angle The smoothing process maintains the original turning angle well

29
29 Axial Diameter 675/677 Comparison

30
30 Turning Angle 675/677 Comparison

Similar presentations

OK

1 AN EFFICIENT SNOW PLOW MODEL TO DEDUCE PLASMA FOCUS MACROSCALE PARAMETERS Brian L. Bures and Mahadevan Krishnan Alameda Applied Sciences Corporation.

1 AN EFFICIENT SNOW PLOW MODEL TO DEDUCE PLASMA FOCUS MACROSCALE PARAMETERS Brian L. Bures and Mahadevan Krishnan Alameda Applied Sciences Corporation.

© 2018 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

To ensure the functioning of the site, we use **cookies**. We share information about your activities on the site with our partners and Google partners: social networks and companies engaged in advertising and web analytics. For more information, see the Privacy Policy and Google Privacy & Terms.
Your consent to our cookies if you continue to use this website.

Ads by Google

Ppt on area of trapezium shape Ppt on tamper resistant labels Ppt on types of rocks Ppt on ancient egyptian civilization Ppt on applied operational research notes Ppt on brand management process Ppt on any one mathematician rene Ppt on molecular biology of head neck cancer Ppt on applied operational research techniques Cns anatomy and physiology ppt on cells