Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Computed Tomography II Detectors and detector arrays Details of acquisition Tomographic reconstruction.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Computed Tomography II Detectors and detector arrays Details of acquisition Tomographic reconstruction."— Presentation transcript:

1 Computed Tomography II Detectors and detector arrays Details of acquisition Tomographic reconstruction

2 Detectors Xenon detectors Solid-state detectors Multiple detector arrays

3 Xenon detectors Use high-pressure (about 25 atm) nonradioactive xenon gas, in long thin cells between two metal plates Very thick (e.g., 6 cm) to compensate in part for relatively low density Thin metal septa separating individual detectors improves geometric efficiency by reducing dead space between detectors

4

5 Xenon detectors (cont.) Long, thin plates are highly directional Must be positioned in a fixed orientation with respect to the x-ray source Cannot be used for 4 th generation scanners because those detectors must record x-rays as the source moves over a wide angle

6 Solid-state detectors Composed of a scintillator coupled tightly to a photodetector (typically a photodiode) Scintillator emits visible light when an x- ray is absorbed, similar to an x-ray intensifying screen Photodetector converts light intensity into an electrical signal proportional to the light intensity

7

8 Solid-state detectors (cont.) Detector size typically 1.0 x 15 mm (or 1.0 x 1.5 mm for multiple detector arrays) Scintillators used include CdWO 4 and yttrium and gadolinium ceramics Better absorption efficiency than gas detectors because of higher density and higher effective atomic number

9 Solid-state detectors (cont.) To reduce crosstalk between adjacent detector elements, a small gap between detector elements is necessary, reducing geometric efficiency somewhat Top surface of detector is essentially flat and therefore capable of x-ray detection over a wide range of angles Required for 4 th generation scanners and used in most high-tier 3 rd generation scanners as well

10 Multiple detector arrays Set of several linear detector arrays, tightly abutted Use solid-state detector arrays Slice width is determined by the detectors, not by the collimator (although collimator does limit the beam to the total slice thickness)

11

12 Multiple detector arrays (cont.) 3 rd generation multiple detector array with 16 detectors in the slice thickness dimension and 750 detectors along each array uses 12,000 individual detector elements 4 th generation scanner would require roughly 6 times as many detector elements; consequently currently planned systems use 3 rd generation geometry

13 Slice thickness: single detector array scanners Determined by the physical collimation of the incident x-ray beam with two lead jaws Width of the detectors places an upper limit on slice thickness For scans performed at the same kV and mAs, the number of detected x-ray photons increases linearly with slice thickness Larger slice thicknesses yield better contrast resolution (higher SNR), but the spatial resolution in the slice thickness dimension is reduced

14 Slice sensitivity profile For single detector array scanners, the shape of the slice sensitivity profile is a consequence of: –Finite width of the x-ray focal spot –Penumbra of the collimator –The fact that the image is computed from a number of projection angles encircling the patient –Other minor factors Helical scans have a slightly broader slice sensitivity profile due to translation of the patient during the scan

15

16 Slice thickness: multiple detector array scanners In axial scanning (i.e., with no table movement) where, for example, four detector arrays are used, the width of the two center detector arrays almost completely dictates the thickness of the slices For the two slices at the edges of the scan, the inner side of the slice is determined by the edge of the detector, but the outer edge is determined either by the outer edge of the detector or by the collimator penumbra, depending on collimator adjustment

17

18 Slice thickness: MDA (cont.) In helical mode, each detector array contributes to every reconstructed image –Slice sensitivity profile for each detector array needs to be similar to reduce artifacts Typical to adjust the collimation so that the focal spot – collimator blade penumbra falls outside the edge detectors –Causes radiation dose to be a bit higher (especially for small slice widths) –Reduces artifacts by equalizing the slice sensitivity profiles between the detector arrays

19 Detector pitch/collimator pitch Pitch is a parameter that comes into play when helical scan protocols are used In a helical scanner with one detector array, the pitch is determined by the collimator Collimator pitch = table movement (mm) per 360- degree rotation of gantry / collimator width (mm) at isocenter Pitch may range from 0.75 (overscanning) to 1.5 (faster scan time, possibly smaller volume of contrast agent)

20

21 Pitch (cont.) For scanners with multiple detector arrays, collimator pitch is still valid Detector pitch = table movement (mm) per 360- degree rotation of gantry / detector width (mm) For a multiple detector array scanner with N detector arrays, collimator pitch = detector pitch / N For scanners with four detector arrays, detector pitches running from 3 to 6 are used

22 Tomographic reconstruction Rays and views: the sinogram Preprocessing the data Interpolation (helical)

23 Sinogram Display of raw data acquired for one CT slice before reconstruction Rays are plotted horizontally and views are shown on the vertical axis Objects close to the edge of the FOV produce a sinusoid of high amplitude Bad detector in a 3 rd generation scanner would show up as a vertical line on the sinogram

24

25 Rays and views 1 st and 2 nd generation scanners used 28,800 and 324,000 data points, respectively State-of-the-art scanner may aquire about 800,000 data points Modern 512 x 512 circular CT image contains about 205,000 image pixels Number of rays affects the radial component of spatial resolution; number of views affects the circumferential component of the resolution

26

27 Number of rays CT images of a simulated object reconstructed with differing numbers of rays show that reducing the ray sampling results in low-resolution, blurred images

28

29 Number of views CT images of the simulated object reconstructed with differing numbers of views show the effect of using too few angular views (view aliasing) Sharp edges (high spatial frequencies) produce radiating artifacts that become more apparent near the periphery of the image

30

31 Preprocessing Calibration data determined from air scans (performed by the technologist or service engineer periodically) provide correction data that are used to adjust the electronic gain of each detector Variation in geometric efficiencies caused by imperfect detector alignments is also corrected

32

33 Interpolation CT reconstruction algorithms assume that the x- ray source has negotiated a circular, not helical, path around the patient Before the actual CT reconstruction, the helical data set is interpolated into a series of planar image sets With helical scanning, CT images can be reconstructed at any position along the length of the scan

34

35 Interpolation (cont.) Interleaved reconstruction allows the placement of additional images along the patient, so that the clinical examination is almost uniformly sensitive to subtle abnormalities Adds no additional dose to the patient, but additional time is required to reconstruct the images Actual spatial resolution along the long axis of the patient still dictated by slice thickness

36


Download ppt "Computed Tomography II Detectors and detector arrays Details of acquisition Tomographic reconstruction."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google