We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byNatalie May
Modified about 1 year ago
Baker & McKenzie Consulting LLC is a subsidiary of Baker & McKenzie LLP, a member firm of Baker & McKenzie International, a Swiss Verein of member law firms around the world. In accordance with the common terminology used in professional service organizations, reference to a "partner" means a person who is a partner, or equivalent, in such a law firm. Similarly, reference to an "office" means an office of any such law firm. © 2013 Baker & McKenzie Consulting LLC It’s Worth the Effort: Targeting Awards to Ease Compliance Burdens and Maximize Plan Effectiveness Valerie Diamond -- Partner, Baker & McKenzie LLP June Anne Burke – Partner, Baker & McKenzie LLP CT/Boston NASPP Regional Meeting July 19, 2013
© 2013 Baker & McKenzie Consulting LLC Agenda Assessing the Compliance Burden Award Structuring by Country Type of Awards Tax-Qualified Programs Recharge Arrangements Other Tax Saving Ideas Other Compliance Considerations Questions 2
© 2013 Baker & McKenzie Consulting LLC Cost/Benefit Compliance Assessment Assess by award and by country –Regulatory issues Securities Offerings – generally territorial in nature / based on size of offering & headcounts Prospectus filings/registration statements (e.g., EU, Japan) Securities notices/reports (e.g., Malaysia, Thailand) Exemption confirmations (e.g., Australia, Philippines) Show-stoppers (e.g., Indonesia, Colombia) Exchange Control Filings - for movement or holdings of foreign securities / funds Exchange control approvals (e.g., China, Vietnam) Notices (e.g., Italy) Show-stoppers (e.g., Ukraine) Other filings (e.g., Singapore MoM approval)
© 2013 Baker & McKenzie Consulting LLC Cost/Benefit Compliance Assessment (cont’d) –Employer tax issues Tax withholding/reporting Employer social tax Favorable tax treatment (i.e., avoiding / minimizing social tax vs. cost/burden to implement/maintain) Reimbursement/charge-back arrangements –Employee taxation Timing of tax / deferral of income Social tax withholding Favorable tax treatment (and cost/burden to implement/maintain) –Other issues (e.g., Danish Stock Option Act)
© 2013 Baker & McKenzie Consulting LLC Cost/Benefit Compliance Assessment (cont’d) –Prepare Summary Compliance and Tax Charts / Checklists Organize by County / Headcounts / Awards Note locations where a particular type of award will be granted due to tax or regulatory benefits Track Regulatory and Tax Considerations per Country Ask for and Note Recommendations of Counsel Consider Administrative Burden Check with stock plan broker / administrator for exchange control issues to determine how difficult to implement Balance Burdens Against Competitive Risks / Employee Demand Document Key Decisions Keep a Record of Filings & Grant Documentation Update (At Least) Once a Year The more streamlined you can be year-to-year, the more cost effective the program
© 2013 Baker & McKenzie Consulting LLC Award Structuring by Country Being Open to Grants of Different Kinds in a Country Can Save the Company (or the Employee) Money Options vs. RSUs vs. RS vs. ESPP Qualified vs. Non-Qualified Many Companies Feel One Size Should Fit All – Not willing to consider award variations Watch for Hidden Costs of Managing Different Awards with Broker / Administrator, Duplicate Systems, etc.
© 2013 Baker & McKenzie Consulting LLC Award Structuring by Country Canada: consider granting stock options rather than other forms of award –50% tax exemption on spread at exercise –Primarily employee benefit, except for tax-equalized expats Brazil: consider granting stock options rather than other forms of award (where no recharge) ̶ Stock options taxed at sale of shares ̶ Taxed as capital gains rather than salary income (15% vs. 27.5%) ̶ No withholding or reporting obligation for employer
© 2013 Baker & McKenzie Consulting LLC Award Structuring by Country (cont’d) Italy –Grant stock options rather than other awards Exempt from social contributions – employee (approx. 10.49%) and employer (approx. 30%) –Don’t make broad-based grants RSUs and other awards exempt from social insurance only if not offered on a broad basis (much lesser €2,045 broad-based plan exemption applies if plan is broad-based)
© 2013 Baker & McKenzie Consulting LLC Award Structuring by Country (cont’d) Generally avoid cash-settled awards –Often subject to social contributions that don’t apply to equity awards, e.g., Brazil, Colombia, Japan, Malaysia, New Zealand, Portugal –Special tax regimes available for equity often do not apply, e.g., French-qualified RSUs, Israeli trustee plans –However, cash awards may allow for a local deduction not otherwise available, e.g., Canada, Netherlands –Note that cash awards are subject to liability accounting treatment – additional burden/volatility
© 2013 Baker & McKenzie Consulting LLC Award Structuring by Country (cont’d) Avoid restricted stock –Generally taxed at grant Some exceptions: Australia, Singapore, U.K., U.S. –Cash-flow issue with paying employer/employee social contributions and meeting tax withholding obligations at grant when amounts cannot be withheld from award –Adverse employee tax position – increased risk of non- compliance by employees in countries where no employer withholding
© 2013 Baker & McKenzie Consulting LLC Tax-Qualified Plans France –Qualified options or RSUs –Avoid employer social security (up to 46%) on exercise/vest –But employer tax savings greatly reduced as of July 11, 2012 due to increased employer social tax due at grant Generally, tax due at 7.5% of value of underlying shares for options; 30% of value of underlying shares for RSUs Tax cannot be recouped if awards forfeited If forfeitures are high, grantees are top earners and/or stock price growth is slow, non-qualified awards may be tax favorable
© 2013 Baker & McKenzie Consulting LLC Tax-Qualified Plans (cont’d) France (cont’d) –Employee tax savings also greatly reduced following 2012 year-end tax reforms - employee now subject to a maximum combined rate of approx. 61% on qualified awards - effective for grants on or after September 28, 2012 –Likely that non-qualified awards will be more favorable for employees –In all cases, any potential tax savings need to be weighed against administrative burden of implementing/maintaining qualified plan in France (e.g., RSU holding periods, special reports for options and RSUs) and new severe employer penalties for failure to file required special reports
© 2013 Baker & McKenzie Consulting LLC Tax-Qualified Plans (cont’d) Israel –Trustee plan options, RSUs or ESPP –Can avoid or reduce employer social security (5.9%, capped at approx. $11K per month) on gain at sale –Local employer qualifies for tax deduction on employee’s ordinary income – if recharge arrangement in place –Requires Israeli trustee and lock-up of shares, but trustee handles withholding at sale of shares so ensures tax compliance –New “deposit” requirements announced in July 2012 increase administrative burden
© 2013 Baker & McKenzie Consulting LLC Tax-Qualified Plans (cont’d) United Kingdom –HMRC-approved options (CSOP) –Avoid employer NICs (13.8%, uncapped) on exercise –Substantial employee benefit – avoid income tax (up to 45%) and employee NICs on spread at exercise; gain at sale taxed as capital gains (18% or 28%), subject to annual exemption (£10,900) –Rules recently adopted to simplify approved plans –Savings limited by £30,000 cap on approved options –Note: same employer saving via transfer of employer NICs to employee
© 2013 Baker & McKenzie Consulting LLC Tax-Qualified Plans (cont’d) United States –Code Section 423 ESPP and 422 Incentive Stock Options –Save employer FICA and FUTA costs –But forgo tax deduction on spread/discount unless disqualifying disposition –Overall, not the best approach for employer tax savings –Note: requires shareholder approval within 12 months, holding periods, special reporting
© 2013 Baker & McKenzie Consulting LLC Tax-Qualified Plans (cont’d) Plans that provide significant employee benefit – indirect employer savings for tax-equalized expatriates: –Canada – 50% tax exemption on option spread –Belgium – options – elect tax at grant and undertake not to exercise for 3+ years – tax on only 11.5% of FMV at grant of 10-year option –China – Tax Circulars 35 and 902 – equity income taxed separately from monthly salary, usually at lower rate –Singapore – ERIS – tax exemption up to SGD 1M (US$800K) over 10-year period (must offer awards to 25% of employees) – for grants prior to December 31, 2013 only –U.K. – CSOP/SIP – as discussed previously –U.S. – ISO/ESPP – as discussed previously
© 2013 Baker & McKenzie Consulting LLC Recharge Arrangements Where equity plans are sponsored by a non-resident parent company, tax authorities generally will not permit a local tax deduction for the employer absent a recharge agreement –Exceptions where no agreement required: U.S. and U.K. –Exceptions where no deduction permitted, even with recharge: Netherlands and Canada Other local requirements may apply, e.g., special signature or local board approval requirements, requirement to use treasury shares, tracking of cost of shares issued to employees, etc.
© 2013 Baker & McKenzie Consulting LLC Recharge Arrangements (cont’d) How does a recharge save taxes? –Foreign subsidiary may claim a corporate tax deduction not otherwise available (most countries allow deduction): Reduces foreign taxes paid by subsidiary on its earnings Thus, reduces global effective tax rate
© 2013 Baker & McKenzie Consulting LLC Recharge Arrangements (cont’d) How does a recharge save taxes for a U.S. issuer? –Tax-free repatriation of cash from foreign sub to U.S. parent under IRC § 1032: 1032(a) – U.S. parent not required to recognize gain or loss upon receipt of money for its stock Need to ensure amount reimbursed by foreign sub does not exceed cost to U.S. parent, i.e., FMV of share less amount paid by employee (“employee benefit”) Foreign subsidiary’s reimbursement to parent for employee benefit is thus not treated as dividend for U.S. tax purposes
© 2013 Baker & McKenzie Consulting LLC Recharge Arrangements (cont’d) Key implementation considerations: –Foreign exchange controls may prevent recharge Argentina – Central bank prohibits transfer and conversion of funds Brazil – Local bank approval required for recharge China – SAFE approval generally required for recharge South Africa – Reserve Bank approval required and not likely to be granted Intercompany book transfer of funds not permitted in these countries
© 2013 Baker & McKenzie Consulting LLC Recharge Arrangements (cont’d) Collateral issues to watch –Recharge/local tax deduction may trigger withholding/reporting obligations and/or social contributions Employer social insurance triggered in several countries, mainly in Eastern Europe and Latin America, e.g., Brazil, Chile, Czech Republic, Mexico, Poland Thus, need to make sure recharge produces overall tax saving Note – Belgium – recharge triggers 35% uncapped employer social tax – likely negates tax savings of recharge
© 2013 Baker & McKenzie Consulting LLC Recharge Arrangements (cont’d) Collateral issues to watch –Recharge/local tax deduction may increase labor law risk Increased risk that awards included in “salary” for determination of severance payments, etc. (e.g., Argentina, Brazil) May increase acquired rights/entitlement risk (e.g., France, Italy, Spain) May trigger possible need to consult with works council (e.g., Czech Republic, Germany)
© 2013 Baker & McKenzie Consulting LLC Other Tax Saving Ideas Reduce, limit or cap grants in high employer tax countries, e.g., –Argentina – employer social contributions 23% or 27% uncapped –Estonia – employer-paid FBT due at total rate of 68.4% (limited exception if options not exercised/RSUs don’t vest for three years from grant) –Sweden – employer social contributions 31.42% uncapped
© 2013 Baker & McKenzie Consulting LLC Other Tax Saving Ideas Transfer employer social charges to employee –U.K. – transfer employer NICs at 13.8% to employee Need HMRC-approved joint election signed by employee prior to taxable event (transfers liability) Can also accomplish via unapproved agreement with employee (but no transfer of liability) Employee can deduct employer NICs paid from tax liability –Israel – transfer of employer social charges (5.9% capped) likely permitted if included in award agreement/initial terms
© 2013 Baker & McKenzie Consulting LLC Other Tax Saving Ideas (cont’d) Transfer employer social charges to employee (cont’d) –Romania – potentially transfer all income tax and employer/employee social contributions to employee via agreement with the employee –Saves employer social contributions applicable to “payor” of income (approx. 6.8% is uncapped) –Need to register the agreement –Often not permitted in other countries, e.g., Sweden
© 2013 Baker & McKenzie Consulting LLC Other Tax Saving Ideas (cont’d) Avoid tax penalties through strong ongoing compliance –Determine country employer withholding/reporting and social insurance requirements when implementing equity awards and update annually –Identify countries with special year-end equity award reports and set up compliance systems, e.g., Australia, France (qualified plans), Ireland, U.K.
© 2013 Baker & McKenzie Consulting LLC Other Compliance Considerations Create a Global Form of Agreement to Address Mobile Employee Risks and Ease Administration –One form given to employees regardless of location with a country-specific appendix –Easier to update and administer because clear what country-specific terms apply –If employee moves from country A to country B over the life of the award, it is clear that terms of country B apply –Establish a tracking and compliance system for globally mobile employees – many countries currently stepping up enforcement in this area, e.g., Australia, Canada, Sweden, U.K., U.S.
© 2013 Baker & McKenzie Consulting LLC Other Compliance Considerations Keep Equity Awards Out of Employment Agreements and Offer Letters –If employee work for separate subsidiary, then grant by issuer is not a benefit offered by the employer –Document new hire equity offerings through equity side letter on parent company letterhead –Keep to a consistent policy of separating employment benefits and equity compensation to minimize exposure to entitlement claims and termination indemnities
© 2013 Baker & McKenzie Consulting LLC Questions?
© 2013 Baker & McKenzie Consulting LLC Contact Information Valerie H. Diamond 415.576.3086 email@example.com June Anne Burke 212.626.4371 firstname.lastname@example.org@bakermckenzie.com
© 2013 Baker & McKenzie Consulting LLC Disclaimers This presentation was prepared for general information purposes for clients and friends of Baker & McKenzie LLP and should not be considered or relied on as legal advice or an opinion on specific facts. This presentation is not intended to create, and receipt of this presentation does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship. IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: Pursuant to requirements related to practice before the Internal Revenue Service, any tax advice contained in this presentation (including any attachments) is not intended to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties imposed under the United States Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another person any tax-related matter, including, without limitation, any transaction or matter that is contained in this presentation.
Baker & McKenzie International is a Swiss Verein with member law firms around the world. In accordance with the common terminology used in professional.
1 International Legal and Tax Updates/Issues for Global Employee Stock Programs Presented by: Jennifer George, Partner, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe,
Bus 225D – International Transactions II Instructor: Carol Rutlen, CPA
Baker & McKenzie LLP is a member firm of Baker & McKenzie International, a Swiss Verein with member law firms around the world. In accordance with the.
PNW Chapter GEO Meeting February 15, 2001 Linda Steffen Marlene Zobayan Deloitte & Touche, LLC.
Global Rewards Update Sandy Shurin Deloitte Tax LLP.
Long Term Incentive Alternatives. Page 2 Disclaimer The general accounting treatment as described is based on FAS 123(R). This is a general summary of.
Lesson 10 GST on Import & Export Business Li, Jialong
Valerie Diamond - Barbara Klementz -
McGraw-Hill© 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright (c) 2003 by the McGraw-Hill Companies Inc Principles of Taxation: Advanced Strategies Chapter 3 Employee Compensation Strategies.
Global Stock Plan Design and Redesign: Issues Relating to Broad-Based Plans 2001 Global Equity Compensation Forum San Francisco, California November 5,
Stock Option Backdating and Practices Conference Presented by: Joseph T. Gulant, Esquire September 21, 2006.
YOUR 403(B) TAX SHELTERED ACCOUNT PROGRAM 1 Prepared for the Employees of Riverview Intermediate Unit #6.
Global ESPP Rollouts: Design Pitfalls and Compliance Strategies SF NASPP October 7, 2009 Valerie H. Diamond.
CORPORATE STRUCTURING AND BASIC TAX CONSIDERATIONS.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright (c) 2002 by the McGraw-Hill Companies Inc Principles of Taxation: Advanced Strategies Chapter 3 Chapter 3 Employee Compensation.
Overview of tax reimbursement plans and related payroll reporting requirements Rajiv Thadani Principal, Tax KPMG LLP (408) California.
Chapter 38 Employee Benefit & Retirement Planning Restricted Stock Plan Copyright 2009, The National Underwriter Company1 An arrangement to compensate.
Minimizing the Administrative Nightmare of Global Equity Plans Karen Needham – E*TRADE Financial Business Solutions Group Joty Paparello – AOL Time Warner.
NASPP Regional Conference: What the FICA? Sandy Shurin Deloitte Tax LLP Amy Reina Deloitte Tax LLP.
Central and South American Legal Issues for Employee Stock Plans Presented by: Valerie H. Diamond & Alyce Werdel
Executive Compensation and 409A Refressher Cynthia Boyle Lande BrownWinick 666 Grand Avenue, Suite 2000 Des Moines, IA Telephone:
Tax Smart Financial Strategies for Our Employees Provided by: Riverview Intermediate Unit 6 Presented by: Kades-Margolis Corporation.
H NCEO 2001 Global Equity Compensation Forum Global Employee Stock Purchase Plan Issues for New or Future Plans Lorraine E. Cohen, San Francisco November.
2 International Hot Topics New Laws and Opportunities Around the World Janet Cooper Partner Linklaters & Alliance San Francisco, CA 5/6 November 2001.
Global Equity Crystal Gronau & Marlene Zobayan Rutlen Associates LLC California Payroll Conference September 11 and 12,
FROM PRINCIPLES TO PLANNING Recent Developments in International Tax - Mexico FROM PRINCIPLES TO PLANNING.
H © 2001 Arthur Andersen All rights reserved. Global Executive Share Plans Rachel E. Lie October 29, 2001.
Mike Johnston Senior Manager, Tax Sandra Peters Manager tax KPMG LLP
Investing in the UAE CH 10. Investing in the UAE Introduction Why Investing in Global Markets? 1. Additional investment opportunities 2. Growth potential.
Four tips to mitigate Mobile fraud in the future.
Getting Your Accounting World in Shape Scott B. Kaplowitch Partner, Edelstein
Online banking security best practices Access via ‘transaction devices’
New 403(b) Regulations Pete Gautreau, CPA Partner Danielle Witten, CPA Senior Manager.
Choice of Business Entity Jack Cohen, CPA Asset Protection IncSmart.biz Inc.
Employee Stock Option Analysis Champaign group #1 Dan BeckerBrian MacDonald Cristina BeldicaJamey Maxwell Jawahar KalianiMike Perry.
ESOPs: It’s More Than a Matter of Trust Presented by: Dan Reser President; Fiduciary Services, Inc
Phoenix FamilyShield Annuity SM A Single Premium Immediate Annuity designed for Medicaid planning For Producer training purposes only. Not for use with.
May 7, 2013 Amy Reina Deloitte Tax LLP GEO Boston Chapter Presents: Update on France-Recent Tax Law Changes.
9-1 Non-Corporate Forms of Business Sole Proprietorship Partnership LLC S corporation.
C-342/10 Commission v. Finland Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Free movement of capital – Article 63 TFEU – EEA Agreement – Article 40.
Crystal Gronau & Marlene Zobayan Rutlen Associates LLC October 9, 2015, Session 5.
Chapter 16 Corporations. Learning Objectives Determine the types of entities that can be classified as a corporation for federal income tax purposes Calculate.
Primary Uses of Deferred Compensation Advisor name, title(s), Firm RVP Name, Title, the Principal Financial Group Date NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION.
Shares of Oppenheimer funds are not deposits or obligations of any bank, are not guaranteed by any bank, are not insured by the FDIC or any other agency.
Accounting and Tax for the Small Business NOVEMBER 8, 2012.
U.S. Tax Risks Trends James Wall J. H. Cohn LLP. 2 Circular 230 Notice Any tax advice given herein is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be.
Borrie & Co Tax Lawyers The Netherlands Maurice Kruidenier Firm facts: Located in Rotterdam, Amsterdam, Hilversum 120 staff, 10 partners.
© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.