Presentation on theme: "Minnesota APA Conference- September 2011 Affordable Housing-One City’s Journey to Implementation September 30, 2011."— Presentation transcript:
Minnesota APA Conference- September 2011 Affordable Housing-One City’s Journey to Implementation September 30, 2011
Introductions Doug Borglund, Community Development Director, City of Forest Lake Jay Demma, Planner/Market Research, Bonestroo/Stantec Tina Goodroad, Planner, Bonestroo/Stantec Barbara Dacy, Executive Director, Washington County HRA
How it all started for Forest Lake… An affordable housing project was proposed on a former community hospital site Proposal for conversion to Spanish Immersion school and affordable housing development Local concerns influenced PC and CC votes City denied housing project City was sued by the developer
Former Hospital Site- now school 36 Affordable town homes (rental)
Settled the lawsuit and approved the project –waived $150,000 in project related fees, processed a Met Council grant for the project, –as a PUD gave flexibility to many of its zoning standards. –absorbed other related expense’s from the lawsuit.
The settlement of the lawsuit brought about positive change…. Results –A promise to prepare a housing chapter focused on creation of new affordable housing. –Creation of a Affordable Housing Task Force –Completed a Comprehensive Housing Study to understand the need –Prepared Goals, Polices and Implementation steps
2006 Forest Lake Housing Study
Household Growth Trends
Employment Growth Trends
Distribution of Jobs and Wages by Industry
Recent Building Trends
Lifecycle Housing Model
Growth Potential : Owned Housing
Growth Potential : Rental Housing
Comprehensive Plan and Implementation
Land Use Decisions Supports Affordable Housing New growth planned in the urbanized area of the City vs. pushing outward Raised density to units/ac for downtown and new mixed use areas (187 ac) Traditional compact development pattern
Residential mixed, medium and high residential categories supports higher densities throughout the city Designates higher density housing opportunities along major transportation and transit corridors Land Use Decisions Supports Affordable Housing
Aggressive Housing Goals …. Existing Housing Stock –Regulatory + Housing maintenance code; rental licensing; truth in housing; mixed use ordinance and accessory dwellings –Funding + City funded activities aimed at rehabilitation or acquisition of existing properties + Utilize an existing Land Trust in the creation and preservation of long-term affordable ownership housing.
Aggressive housing goals…Increase Affordable Housing: –Regulatory: + Adopt an Inclusionary Housing Policy + Increase density-land use and supportive zoning + Flexible zoning/use of PUD’s + Reduce minimums standards-garage size, setbacks, etc. –Funding: + Create an affordable housing trust + Develop City funded programs + Waive city related development fees
Aggressive housing goals …Improve Housing Maintenance –Regulatory: + Encourage maintenance and rehabilitation of older neighborhoods and identify City improvement projects for these neighborhoods –Funding: + Create property tax policies that encourage the maintenance and rehabilitation of existing housing + Create new City programs for remodeling and maintenance programs
Regulatory Response to Affordable Housing Created new mixed use zoning districts to mirror changes in land use. Used form based codes to set design standards Emphasis on compact development patterns
Regulatory Response to Affordable Housing Adopted an Inclusionary Housing Ordinance –Purpose is to encourage and provide for the development of affordable housing within Forest Lake –Ensures a continued availability of a diverse supply of home ownership and rental opportunities for low to moderate income households in all new residential development
Regulatory Response to Affordable Housing Applies to all new residential developments of 10 units or more Must include a minimum of 20% affordable rental or 20% ownership of affordable units. –Monthly rent affordable at thirty to fifty percent (30-50%) of area median income for Washington County adjusted by family size appropriate for the dwelling unit. –For all affordable housing units available for-sale, housing costs must be affordable at 50% of the area median income for Washington County –Units shall remain affordable for not less than 30 years
Regulatory Response to Affordable Housing Housing Plan Required Affordable units distributed throughout the development Incentives may be offered –Density bonus of up to 15% –Zoning code modifications- setbacks, reduce lot size and width, parking, etc –Reduction in street widths –Reimbursement/reduction in fees-planning, building, SAC/WAC and park land dedication. –Other incentives can be requested/negotiated
On the ground results… Even before the Comprehensive Plan and regulatory tools were adopted and test: –Total Units approved: 294 –Total Units under construction or completed: 234 –Total of $ 1.3 million (Met Council grants) –Other financial resources: City fee waivers $600,000 to date on multiple projects –Housing score in 2002 was 27 with the highest in 2009 of 76 and estimated to be in range for 2011.
Trailside Senior Living (71 Affordable Units) City helped project $700,000 Grant & related fee waivers.
Mill Pond (Phase 1 of 120 Affordable Workforce/Family Units) City supported the project $300,000 in fee waivers and delayed payment on other fees.
Forest Oak (Phase 1 of 72 Affordable Workforce/Family Units) City provided $600,000 in grant funds to support the project.
Creating Affordable Housing in Forest Lake, Minnesota
Presentation Outline HRA Service Areas Role in Forest Lake Financing Model Descriptions Outcomes
HRA SERVICE AREAS What does the HRA do?
Mission Through innovation, the Washington County Housing and Redevelopment Authority promotes community and economic development, and provides and maintains affordable, decent and safe housing opportunities in Washington County
Four Service Areas Affordable Senior and Family Housing Rental Assistance Programs Community Development Foreclosure Prevention and Home Buyer Education
Households Served $17,078,071 Budget Highlights 1,030 affordable housing units – 395 senior units – 635 family units 522 households with rental assistance 2,152 households counseled since 2008; 1,012 foreclosures averted
ROLE IN FOREST LAKE What has been done?
Existing Housing Data Total UnitsOwnerRentalAffordable Rental* HRA Owned Forest Lake7,5085,6321, %24%29%25% County87,85972,71815,1413,3411,030 83%17%22%31% *Estimate of units affordable at <60% AMI
Affordable Housing Programs Preservation of existing affordable housing –Facilitate private or non profit investment –HRA owned developments New Construction –Facilitate private or non-profit investment –HRA owned developments
FINANCING MODELS How is affordable housing created?
Affordable Housing “Affordable” typically means no more than 30% of HH income spent on housing costs (inc. utilities) Affordable housing can be provided by private, non- profit, or public sector programs or combination of partners
Affordable Housing Dilemma Challenges Gap between affordable rents versus typical expenses Finding land Zoning issues Long term affordability Operating subsidy scarce Owner credibility Lengthy pre-development process Solutions Construction – Maximize low cost loans and/or grants to pay for: + Land + Improvements Operating – Minimize debt – Obtain ongoing operating “subsidy” to pay for: + Debt + Gap
Affordable Rental Financing Models Low Income Housing Tax Credit Program Minnesota Housing Programs Housing Revenue Tax Exempt Bonds –Governmental purpose –501 (c)3 –Private activity bonds Recovery Zone Bonds (now expired) Federal Section 202 Program
Additional Tools Tax Increment Financing Metropolitan Council LCDA Greater Minnesota Housing Fund CDBG/HOME Local HRA levies
Rent and Income AMIINCOMERENT 30%$24,810$558 50%$41,350$931 60%$49,620$1,117 Most programs require rent and/or income restrictions at 30% AMI, 50% AMI, 60% AMI or 80% AMI (e.g. 4 person HH and 2 BR)
Financing Affordable Rental Housing Family Low Income Housing Tax Credit Program (9% primary program) Gap funding – Minnesota Housing Super RFP (Family Housing Fund, Met Council, and other partners) – Local contributions Senior Locally financed: – Lower private sector involvement – Minimal federal resources – State priority on family development – Requires local financial resources and/or credit enhancement
TrailSide Senior Living Case study example
Photo does not show current construction Library TrailSide Forest Oak Apartments Future Private Sector Senior Living Facilities TrailSide Senior Living Transit Center
Washington County Library and Transit Center
Project Financing USES $ 885,000 Land $ 7,256,039 Construction $ 1,243,055 Soft costs $ 150,000 Furnishings $ 450,000 Financing $ 520,641 Reserves $ 10,700,398 Total SOURCES $ 8,455,000 Bonds* $ 200,012 HOME $ 112,646 City of Forest Lake $ 700,000 Met Council $ 928,393 HRA “GROW” Loan $ 303,347 CDBG Grant $10,700,398 Total *Wash. Co. GO Tax Exempt and Taxable Recovery Zone Economic Development Bonds
Operating pro forma ItemAmount Net Rent Revenues$566,600 Operating Expenses($328,000) Net Operating Income$238,600 HRA Levy/Tax increment$210,000 Debt Service($311,072) Cash Flow after financing$132,528
OUTCOMES What is the impact?
Positive Impacts Tangible –Citizens served! + Met Council affordable unit goals –Real estate valuation and investment –Implement objectives of comprehensive plan Intangible –Leverages additional investment –Formed successful partnerships
Livable Community Goals 25% of goal accomplished –551 Affordable Unit Goal –Met Council Allocation of Affordable Housing Need by City/Township, September 2010 New construction since 9/2010: –TrailSide (70 units) –Forest Oaks Apartments (36 units; phase 1; total project 72) –Mill Pond (120 units)
Real Estate Valuation New construction (excludes TrailSide): –$10,000,000 Preservation –$7,000,000 –Preserve federal assistance contracts + Prevent properties becoming market rate
Community Development Goals 30% AMI households served Provides option for local seniors to stay in community, or for seniors to be near families that live in city Housing diversity Minimize cost burden Transit access: bus and trail
Success Factors City adopted vision for specific areas City understanding of the necessity to participate in the cost of providing affordable housing County Board and HRA Board understanding of the necessity for levy Flexible administrative procedures