Presentation on theme: "TORTS Intentional and Unintentional. Criminal Vs. Civil Law CRIME CRIME – A public wrong harming the general welfare of society. TORT TORT – A private."— Presentation transcript:
TORTS Intentional and Unintentional
Criminal Vs. Civil Law CRIME CRIME – A public wrong harming the general welfare of society. TORT TORT – A private wrong committed by one person against another. Interference with another person’s rights Leads to Civil Cases Grounds for a lawsuit
Intentional Torts Intentional Torts: a civil wrong that occurs when the wrongdoer engages in intentional conduct that results in damages to another –Ex: Striking another person in a fight is an intentional act that would be the tort of battery. Although we learned that this act is dealt with in the criminal structure (by the state to punish the individual) the injured party can also bring about a civil lawsuit.
Torts Torts – the wrongful acts 2 Categories of torts Intentional Unintentional
Intentional Torts Assault Assault – Provoking the fear of immediate bodily harm, even if the victim is never touched. Battery Battery – The unlawful touching of another person, even if it isn’t harmful. Does NOT require Criminal Intent!!
Intentional TortsDefamation Injuring another’s reputation by making false statements. 2 Categories: Libel – Written or Printed Form Includes TV, radio and newspaper Slander – Oral statement to a single third party. Albert Pujols case.pdf Albert Pujols case.pdf
Intentional Torts Invasion of Privacy Interfering with a person’s right to be left alone. Some states have made this right a Statute. Federal Privacy Act of 1974 Requires agencies to provide you with all information kept about you:Requires agencies to provide you with all information kept about you: –Records –Financial Information –Photographs
Intentional Torts Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress: intentional conduct that results in extreme emotional distress. –Erin Andrews Case.pdfErin Andrews Case.pdf
Intentional Torts False Imprisonment Making an arrest without meeting the proper requirements. Exception Exception = Shoplifting (Store Managers and Detectives may detain with reasonable grounds for suspicion for a reasonable length of time.
Intentional TortsTrespass The wrongful damage to or interference with the property of another. Property Property = anything you own (objects and possessions) Real Property Real Property = land and things built on land
Nuisance Anything that interferes with the enjoyment of life or property. Ex: Ex: Loud Noises, Horrible Odors Public Nuisance Public Nuisance = Affects many people Private Nuisance Private Nuisance = Affects only one person Intentional Torts
Note Sheet #2
TORTS Intentional and Unintentional
Learning Goal To recognize the conditions for the major types of Unintentional Torts
Unintentional Tort A type of unintended accident that leads to injury, property damage or financial loss.
Unintentional Torts 2 Major Types: 1.Negligence 1.Negligence – Injury caused by a person’s mere carelessness. o Negligence results when one person carelessly injures another. o Negligence is being less careful than a reasonable person should be in the same situation o reasonable person would have foreseen the injury and taken preventive measures
Negligence Tort that occurs most often in U.S. Elements of Negligence Elements of Negligence – To protect people from suing innocent people, the plaintiff must prove all of the following elements...
4 Elements of Negligence Duty of Care Duty of Care – The defendant owed the plaintiff some responsible action.
4 Elements of Negligence Breach of Duty Breach of Duty – The defendant failed to act as a “responsible person” to the plaintiff.
4 Elements of Negligence Proximate Cause Proximate Cause – The failure to act responsibly was the cause of the injury to the plaintiff.
4 Elements of Negligence Harm Harm – The plaintiff was actually harmed or injured.
Unintentional Torts Strict Liability
Unintentional Torts Strict Liability Strict Liability – Injury caused by an individual’s participation in hazardous or dangerous activity.
Strict Liability Extremely Dangerous Activities!! Extremely Dangerous Activities!! It DOES NOT matter how careful you were, or what your intent was.It DOES NOT matter how careful you were, or what your intent was. –Examples: Using ExplosivesUsing Explosives Keeping wild animals as a petKeeping wild animals as a pet
Strict Liability Conditions : Very hazardous activitiesVery hazardous activities Poses a great risk to people or propertyPoses a great risk to people or property Risk is so great that no amount of care will eliminate it.Risk is so great that no amount of care will eliminate it.
Note Sheet #3
Defenses to Negligence How can you defend yourself? 1.Prove that one of the 4 elements did not exist. 2.Contributory Negligence 3.Comparative Negligence 4.Assumption of Risk
Defenses to Negligence Contributory Negligence Contributory Negligence : a defense against negligence whenever the defendant can show that the victim did something that helped cause his/her own injuries
Contributory Negligence The Plaintiff can lose the lawsuit if.... The Plaintiff’s negligence helped cause their own injuries. It does not matter how slight the plaintiff’s own negligence was. Many states do not allow this defense, because they believe this is unfair to plaintiffs who were only slightly negligible.
Defenses to Negligence Comparative Negligence Comparative Negligence : a defense against negligence which is raised when the carelessness of each party is compared to the carelessness of the other party
Comparative Negligence The Plaintiff can share in the loss of the lawsuit if... The Plaintiff’s negligence helped cause their own injuries. The Plaintiff’s recovery is reduced by the percent of their negligence. 50% Rule – Plaintiff is allowed to recover part of the award, as long as their negligence was not greater than the defendant’s.
Defenses to Negligence Assumption of Risk Assumption of Risk : a defense against negligence that is raised when the plaintiff knew of the risk involved and still took the chance of being injured.
Assumption of Risk The Plaintiff can lose the lawsuit if.... The Plaintiff knew the risk involved in the activity, and still took the chance of being injured.
Defenses to Negligence Strict Liability Strict Liability : a legal doctrine that says that some activities are so dangerous that liability will always follow any injury that results from those activities.
Strict Liability Some states call strict liability absolute liability. This rule applies only to ultra hazardous activities. These activities ALWAYS involve a great risk to people and property. –Using Explosives –Wild animals as pets
Strict Liability/Product Liability Strict liability has been applied to product liability cases. When people are injured by defective products. –Reason for recalls of products –http://smotri.com/video/view/?i d=v390686cbf5http://smotri.com/video/view/?i d=v390686cbf5
Note Sheet #4
Strict Liability & Product Liability Strict Liability : person legally responsible for the damage and loss caused by his or her acts and omissions regardless of fault –Example: an individual is walking his/her dog. It is a nice summer day and the owner decides to take the dog off their leash so it can run freely. A jogger runs by and the dog attacks, and bites, the individual causing the runner to get stitches and a rabies shot. The owner of the pet is strictly liabile for the actions of their pet.
Product Liability : when individuals are harmed by an unsafe product, they may have a Cause of Action against the persons who designed, manufactured, sold, or furnished that product. –Example: an individual purchases a vehicle and for 6 months the vehicle is running very smoothly. All of a sudden one day while driving down a hill the brakes malfunction and the driver is unable to stop, running their car into a ditch causing damage to the vehicle and themselves. The company that manufactured and/or sold the vehicle could be from liabile for damages.
If the injured party in a lawsuit dies, what happens to the lawsuit? Survival Statutes: Most states now say a lawsuit can continue even if both the plaintiff and the defendant die. (Used to be if the injured died, so did the suit) Wrongful Death Statutes: Allows the relatives to bring a lawsuit even if the victim has died. (Used to be if the injured died, person’s family forfeited the right to sue)