Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Smokeless Tobacco’s Influence on Microbial Life Brendan Connolly PJAS Central Catholic High School Grade 9.

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Smokeless Tobacco’s Influence on Microbial Life Brendan Connolly PJAS Central Catholic High School Grade 9."— Presentation transcript:

1 Smokeless Tobacco’s Influence on Microbial Life Brendan Connolly PJAS Central Catholic High School Grade 9

2 Smokeless Tobacco There are many different kinds of smokeless tobacco. (ex. chewing, dipping, etc.) Subject: Dipping tobacco  Carcinogen  Contains nicotine, which causes addiction.  Banned in several countries. (Not the United States)

3 Previous Studies Show that smokeless tobacco affects the cardiovascular system less than smoked tobacco. Increased cancer risk.

4 Human Microbial Flora The microorganisms that reside in or on the surface of the body. (ex. gut, skin, oral, etc.) Includes bacteria, fungi, and archea. Subject bacteria: Can cause disease if growing in uncommon areas or have numbers that exceed their typical range. Most studies-ingested material effects on human cells are done of ingested materials on human cells, BUT humans are a collection of human cells and symbionts. An estimated 10% of body mass is symbionts.

5 Gut Flora Consists of microorganisms that live in the digestive tracts of humans and many animals. Have many useful functions including preventing growth of harmful pathogenic bacteria. Studied more than any other type of flora in the body. Includes Bacteroides, Escherichia, and Clostridium.

6 Escherichia coli One of the most common forms of bacteria found in many environments including the intestinal tracts of mammals. Historically utilized as the most studied prokaryote in biological research. Most strains are non-pathogenic. However, pathogenic forms can produce fatal illness in humans and other mammals.

7 Purpose To examine the effects of smokeless tobacco on human microbial flora.

8 Hypotheses Null: The smokeless tobacco will NOT have a significant effect on the survivorship of E. coli. Alternative: The smokeless tobacco WILL have a significant effect on the survivorship of E coli.

9 Materials LB plates LB Media (0.5% yeast extract, 1% tryptone, 1% sodium chloride) Micropipettes Sterile Pipette tips Vortex Sterile Dilution Fluid (100mM KH 2 PO 4, 100mM K 2 HPO 4, 10mM MgSO 4, 1mM NaCl) Sidearm Flasks (125mL) Spreading Platform, spreader bar, ethanol Escherichia coli bacteria (DH5-alpha) Skoal Fine Cut Smokeless Tobacco Ethanol Micro tubes Matches 0.22 micron sterile syringe filters

10 Procedure 1.Chewing tobacco extract was sterilized by means of 0.22 micron syringe filters. 2.Escherichia Coli B was grown overnight in sterile LB media. 3.A sample of the overnight culture was added to fresh media in a sterile sidearm flask. 4.The culture was diluted in sterile dilution fluid to a concentration of approxiamately 10 5 cells/mL. 5.The selected experimental variables were diluted with sterile dilution fluid to the chosen concentrations to a total of 9.9mL. 6.0.1 mL of cell culture was then added to the test tubes, yielding a final volume of 10mL and a cell density of approximately 10 3 cells/mL. 7.The cells were allowed to sit at room temperature for 15 minutes. 8.After vortexing to evenly suspend the cells, 0.1mL aliquots were removed from the tubes and spread on LB plates. 9.The resulting colonies were counted. Each colony is assumed to have arisen from one cell.

11 Concentration0%0.01%0.10%1% Sterile Dilution Fluid9.9 mL9.89 mL9.8 mL8.9 mL E coli0.1 mL Smoke-less tobacco0 mL0.01 mL0.1 mL1 mL Total10 mL Test Tube Ingredients

12 Liquid Exposure

13 Survivorship Curve of E. coli

14 Dunnett’s Test Interpretation t-crit = 2.47 Alpha =.05 0.01% tobacco solution  1.85 < 2.47, not significant 0.1% tobacco solution  5.78 > 2.47, significant 1% tobacco solution  12.7105 > 2.47, significant

15 Conclusions The smokeless tobacco appears to have an effect on E. Coli survivorship. The 0.1% and 1% solutions had a significant negative effect on E. coli survivorship. Reject the null hypothesis. Accept the alternative hypothesis.

16 Limits and Extensions Limits  Only E. coli was used as a model.  Only 4 different concentrations were used.  Plating could not be completely synchronized. Extensions  Using different concentrations of tobacco.  A mutagenesis experiment on the host cells.  Use a Trypan Blue Exclusion Assay.  Using various prokaryotic models (gram positive etc.)

17 References bbfd.pdf bbfd.pdf alflora_3.html alflora_3.html

Download ppt "Smokeless Tobacco’s Influence on Microbial Life Brendan Connolly PJAS Central Catholic High School Grade 9."

Similar presentations

Ads by Google