Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Dr. Iris G. Udasin-Professor Occupational Medicine Director of Employee Health Rutgers – Robert Wood Johnson Medical School Regional Occupational Medicine.

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Dr. Iris G. Udasin-Professor Occupational Medicine Director of Employee Health Rutgers – Robert Wood Johnson Medical School Regional Occupational Medicine."— Presentation transcript:

1 Dr. Iris G. Udasin-Professor Occupational Medicine Director of Employee Health Rutgers – Robert Wood Johnson Medical School Regional Occupational Medicine Conference October 18, 2014

2 Goals and Objectives  Understand the non-infectious exposures which occur in performing health care in research institutes  Be able to design effective surveillance programs to minimize the effects of exposures  Identify and implement safe and effective cleaning products to minimize exposures  Incorporate flexibility in order to train new health professionals and stimulate new research ideas Review Question  What are the best strategies to minimize animal allergy?  What prevention and treatment is available for workers exposed to irritants, allergens, and potential carcinogens in the academic medical center?

3 Types of Hazards  Physical  Biologic  Chemical Locations of Hazards  Pharmacy  Animal Care Facility  Pathology  Environmental Services

4  Genotoxicity  Carcinogenicity  Teratogenicity of fertility impairment  Serious organ or other toxic manifestation at low doses in experimental animals or treated patients

5  Pharmacy or other preparation area Withdrawal of needles from vials Transfer using syringes Breaking open of ampules During reconstitution of powdered or lyophilized drugs  Administration of drugs to patients Injection into IV line  Disposal of drugs and contaminated materials When aerosoles generated in administration of drugs Cleaning/bedding changes after More exposure in the animal care research facility than patient care areas

6  Area should have restricted access  Prepare in ventilated cabinets  Use NIOSH certified respirators when ventilation inadequate  Use 2 pairs powder-free disposable gloves covering gown cuff  Wear disposable gowns, face shields  Use safety syringes and triple lumen catheters  Disposal as hazardous waste and decontaminate work area  Review MSDS NIOSH 2004

7 Animal care takers / technicians Scientists Veterinarians Physicians Graduate Students

8  Animal bites, scratches, kicks  Sharps  Flammable materials  Electricity  UV  Lasers  Ionizing Radiation  Housekeeping  ERGONOMICS  Noise

9 Animals may become frightened by sounds (high pitched) and smells Inappropriate handling may cause discomfort, pain and distress Restraint is an important issue with large dogs and non-human primates In general population, bites most common in dogs, rats and rodents are second and third In laboratories, rodent bites most common During their careers, approximately 2/3 veterinarians report a major animal related injury resulting in lost time or hospitalization

10 Avulsions – skin torn away from underlying tissues and bone Lacerations – tears in skin Punctures – animal teeth penetrating skin and underling structure  Dog bites most likely avulsions and lacerations  Cat bites most likely punctures  Ferret bites cause punctures  Bats unlikely to cause tissue damage  Cat bites hands most likely to cause severe injury

11  Ascertain rabies status of the laboratory animal  Update tetanus in exposed workers  Consider antibiotic therapy, especially in dog and cats Dog: P, canis, S.Aureus – Augmentin (3-18% become infected) Cat: P. multicida, S.Aureus – Augmentin (28-80% become infected) Rat: Spirillium minus, Streptobacillus maniliformis (may use Augmentin or Doxy, anti rabies not indicated, less likely infection) JAVA MA, Dec 2010

12  Lifting heavy animals, food bags, cages associated with back injuries  Cumulative trauma/repetitive motion may result in carpal tunnel syndrome, tennis elbow, bursitis

13  Cleaning agents/disinfectants  Pharmacologic agents  Anesthetic gases  Preservatives  Pesticides (control fleas, tick, insects)

14  Viral  Rickettsial  Bacterial  Fungal  Protozoans  868 of 1415 (61%) of known human pathogens are zoonotic, 50 are clinically important in US

15  B Virus Infection (cercopithecine herpes virus)  Ebola virus (mainly non-human primates)  Marburg (direct contact with tissues)  Hantavirus (wild rodents, transmitted through inhalation of infectious aerosols)  Lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus occurs naturally in mice, hamsters, guinea pigs, non-human primates, swine, dogs; transmitted by accidental inoculation, inhalation, contamination of mucous membranes  Pox virus  Orf Disease (sheeps and goats, transmitted by direct contact)  Measles - Hepatitis A, B, C, D, E, Simian Immune Deficiency Virus, Influenza, Arbovirus, rabies*  Rabies

16  10-44% of exposed workers develop allergic symptoms  10% have occupational asthma  73% of people with pre-existing allergies develop LAA  Symptoms evolves over 1-2 years usually manifested by nasal symptoms, itchy eyes, rashes  The majority of animal allergens belong to the lipocalin protein family and are small proteins  Animal allergens are produced in the liver and secretor's glands and localize in animal fluids including urine, saliva, blood, milk, and sweat. Zahradnik, Frontiers in Immunology, 2014

17  Case control of animal handlers and non animal handlers at two Brazilian Universities given questionnaires, spirometry, bronchial challenge test, and a skin prick tests for 11 common allergens and 5 occupational allergens (rat, mouse, guinea pig, hamster, and rabbit)  455 animal handlers and 387 controls  Sensitization to occupational and animal allergens was higher (16%) compared to (30%) in non-handlers  While 85% of employees had access to PPE, only 19% reported that they used it  Only 25% of employees report receiving orientation prior to working with animals  Individual advice to workers is an important preventive activity prior to working with animals Ferraz, Clinics (Sao Paulo), 2013

18  Cage cleaning  Disposal of filters in animal rooms  Changing of filters in animal rooms  Direct handling of animals including blood collection and weighing  Surgical procedures  Euthanasia  Working in concentrated animal operations Huerkamp 2009

19  Personal breathing zone, dust samples obtained from 7 workers to assess which activities were associated with higher levels of exposure (mice and rat allergens were studied)  Washing and cleaning cages, handling mice most important determining exposure Glueck, J. AALAS 2012

20 Risk of allergic reactions to Risk Group Historylaboratory animals___________Comments NormalNo evidence of 10% 90% of normal group will allergic disease never develop symptoms in spite of repeated animal contact AtopicPre-existing allergic Up to 73% Workers who become disease sensitized to animal proteins will eventually develop symptoms on exposure AsymptomaticImmunoglobulin E Up to 100% Risk of developing allergic symptoms of rhinitis, asthmas, or contact urticaria with continued exposure is high Symptomatic Clinical symptoms 100% 33% with chest on exposure to allergic symptoms; 10% of group animal proteins might develop occupational asthma; even minimal exposure can lead to permanent impairment

21 DisorderSymptomsSigns Contact urticaria Redness, itchiness of skin, weltsRaised, circumscribed hiveserythematous lesions Allergic conjunctivitis Sneezing, itchiness, clear Conjunctival vascular nasal dainage, nasal congestionengorgement, cheminosis, clear discharge (usually bilateral) Allergic rhinitis Sneezing, itchiness, clear nasalPale or edematous nasal drainage, nasal congestionmucosa, clear rhinorrhea Asthma Cough, wheezing, chest tightnessDecreased breath shortness of breathsounds, prolonged exirpatory phase or wheezing, reversible airflow obstruction, airway hyperresonsiveness Anaphylaxis Generalized itching, hives,Flushing, urticaria, throat tightness, eye or lip swelling,angioedemastridor, difficulty in swallowing, hoarseness, hypotension shortness of breath, dizziness, fainting, nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, diarrhea

22 Rats Mice Guinea Pigs Gerbils Rabbits Cats Dogs

23  Medical history  Physical examination  Work practices  Personal protective equipment  Allergy screening/evaluation  Zoonosis surveillance

24  Perform animal manipulation in ventilated hood/safety cabinet  Avoid wearing street clothes while working with animals  Leave work clothes at the work place to avoid potential exposure problems for family members  Keep cages and animal areas clean

25  Hood or biologic safety cabinet  Modify ventilation/filtration systems *increase ventilation and humidity in animal housing areas *ventilate animal housing/handling areas separate from rest of facility *direct airflow away from workers *install ventilated animal cage racks

26  No mouse urinary protein (MVP) detected when cleaning done in ventilated cabinet  Allergen exposure minimized if mice are housed in individually ventilated cages or when “sealed” with positive pressure Fisher J, Allergy Clin Immunol, August, 2001

27  Gloves  Lab coats  Particulate respirator with face shields

28  Occupational/medical history to identify early symptoms of LAA (sneezing, runny nose, chest tightness, wheezing cough, SOB)  Physical examination  Spirometry  Skin/RAST testing  Prevention or early diagnosis of LAA or occupational asthma

29  Family history of allergy in parents, siblings or children  Previous allergy in childhood or adulthood  Positive skin prick tests against non-animal environmental allergens (ie. dust, mites, mold)  Cat and dog allergy are important risk factors for LAA

30  Confirm diagnosis by presence of IgE antibodies to allergen in question (best done by RAST)  PFT’s to assess asthma severity  Exposure reduction/avoidance best treatment  Immunotherapy against dog and cat allergens somewhat successful  Best strategy is prevention!



33  FORMALDEHYDE  Xylene  Toluene

34 NAMECASE# % by Weight Formaldehyde50-00-036.5-38 Methyl alcohol 67-56-110-15 Water7732-18-547-53.5 Composition: Toxicology Data on Ingredients: Formaldehyde: ORAL(LD50): Acute: 100 mg/kg [Mouse]. 260 mg/kg [Guinea pig]. MIST (LC50): Acute: 454000 mg/m 4 hours [Mouse]. Methyl alcohol: ORAL (LD50): Acute: 5628 mg/kg [Rat]. DERMAL (LD50): Acute: 15800 mg/kg [Rabbit]. VAPOR (LC50): Acute: 64000 ppm 4 hours [Rat].

35  Most accurate is to measure concentration of formaldehyde gas in air surrounding the water  8 hour time weight average (TWA) and short term exposure limit (STEL) in badges worn by workers  Because formaldehyde is rapidly metabolized, measurement in blood and urine is extremely unreliable  Some evidence that formaldehyde reacts with cell components including nucleic acids, proteins, and glutathione  Some evidence of abnormal levels of non-specific markers of damage including DNA protein cross links, adducts, and sister chromatid exchange

36  Skin  Mucous Membrane  Respiratory  Cancer  Reproductive

37  Acute skin irritation in everyone at sufficient concentration (drying, scaling, cracking)  Causes allergic contact dermatitis with cell mediated hypersensitivity in some patients (eczematous dermatitis or hives)  In 6 out of 15 patients with positive patch tests, only 2 demonstrated IgE response  Required direct skin contact (ie cosmetics) and is extremely unlikely when wearing gloves  All monitoring not useful in monitoring skin exposures Linden Allergy 1993

38  Formaldehyde known irritant of upper respiratory tract and eyes  Produces histological changes in nasal mucosa associated with loss of cilia, goblet cell hyperplasia, and squamous metaplasia based on studies of manufacturing workers  Increased micronuclei of buccal cell smears in mortuary students

39  Testing conducted in 21 health volunteers over a 10 week period  Subject exposed to varying concentrations of formaldehyde and during 4 to 10 exposure sessions, ethyl acetate used as masking agent  Measurements consisted of conjunctival redness, blinking frequency, nasal flow and resistance, pulmonary function and reaction times  No significant exposures effects on nasal flow and resistance, pulmonary function, or reaction times  Blinking frequency and conjunctival redness were significantly increased by short term exposures of 0.5-1.0 PPM  Eye and olfactory symptoms at 0.3 PPM  Nasal irritation at 0.5 PPM but when combined with ethyl acetate seen as low as 0.3 PPM  Eye irritation most sensitive indicator of exposure Long, Regul Toxicol Pharm 2008

40  Mechanism of respiratory effects is usually irritation but may cause allergy  Reversible broncho-constriction rarely occurs at levels below 3 PPM  In sufficient quantities can cause pulmonary edema  Hypothesis that low level formaldehyde exposure may increase risk of allergic sensitization NJ DOH 2009

41  Medical students were exposed to 1.1 PPM while dissecting cadavers for 2.5 hours per week  Increased nose, throat, and eye irritation  Reduced peak flow reported during time in laboratory  Effect diminished after 4 weeks of exposure Krakowiak Am J Ind Med 1998

42  Eye most sensitive organ, effects are at lower levels than odor threshold  Numerous studies demonstrate eye irritation at 0.3-0.5 PPM  Dose response relationship not seen in humans at levels lower than 1 PPM  This panel recommends an indoor air guideline of 0.1 PPM as protective against health effects Wolkoff Environ Int 2010

43  Limited evidence of reproductive toxicity in occupational cohort  Case control showed increase in spontaneous abortion in women working in Finnish laboratories but they also had significant exposure to xylene  One study of cosmetologist with excess spontaneous abortions  Numerous negative studies  Animal studies in rodents did not show adverse reproductive effects in rodents exposed to formaldehyde by inhalation, ingestion, or skin contact Baker

44  The International Agency for research on cancer has classified formaldehyde as a Group 1 human carcinogen based on sufficient evidence that formaldehyde causes nasopharyngeal cancer and leukemia Bean Lancet Oncol 2009

45  Critical health effects of formaldehyde exposure include sensory irritation and the potential to induce tumors of the nasal and respiratory tract  Review of human and animal literature indicates that the levels of formaldehyde that induce nasal tumors in experimental animals are at least an order of magnitude higher than levels known to cause irritation Arts J Regul Toxicol Pharm 2010

46  NTP, US EPA suggest irritation not most sensitive toxic endpoint  Exposure limit of oil ppm should protect a susceptible people  Engineering controls and improved work practices important in prevention Golden, Critical Review in Toxicology, 2011

47 Isopropyl Alcohol Sodium Hypochlorite Iodine Phenol Quaternary Ammonium Compounds Formaldehyde Glutaraldehyde Ethlyene Oxide 2 butoxyethanol Ethanolamines Irritant Irritant, Burns Irritant, Skin Necrosis Contact Dermatitis Irritant, Sensitizer, Mutagen, Carcinogen Irritant, Sensitizer Irritant, Chemical Burns, Reproductive Toxin, Carcinogen Bello, Environ Health 2009

48 Questions

Download ppt "Dr. Iris G. Udasin-Professor Occupational Medicine Director of Employee Health Rutgers – Robert Wood Johnson Medical School Regional Occupational Medicine."

Similar presentations

Ads by Google