Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byIsabel Berry Modified over 2 years ago

1
Weak Lensing Tomography Sarah Bridle University College London

2
3d vs 2d (tomography) Non-Gaussian -> higher order statistics Low redshift -> dark energy versus

3
Weak Lensing Tomography 1.In principle (perfect zs) Hu 1999 astro-ph/9904153 2.Photometric redshifts Csabai et al. astro-ph/0211080 3.Effect of photometric redshift uncertainties Ma, Hu & Huterer astro-ph/0506614 4.Intrinsic alignments 5.Shear calibration

4
1. In principle (perfect zs) Qualitative overview Lensing efficiency and power spectrum –Dependence on cosmology Power spectrum uncertainties Cosmological parameter constraints

5
1. In principle (perfect zs) Core reference Hu 1999 astro-ph/9904153 See also Refregier et al astro-ph/0304419 Takada & Jain astro-ph/0310125

6
Cosmic shear two point tomography

7

8

9

10
(Hu 1999)

12
Lensing efficiency (Hu 1999) Equivalently: g i (z l ) = ∫ z l n i (z s ) D l D ls / D s dz s i.e. g is just the weighted D l D ls / D s

13
Can you sketch g 1 (z) and g 2 (z)? (Hu 1999) g i (z) = ∫ z s n i (z s ) D l D ls / D s dz s

14
Lensing efficiency for source plane?

16
(Hu 1999)

17
Sensitivity in each z bin

18
NOT

19
(Hu 1999) Why is g for bin 2 higher? A. More structure along line of sight B. Distances are larger g i (z d ) = ∫ z s 1 n i (z s ) D d D ds / D s dz s

21
* *

22
Lensing power spectrum (Hu 1999)

23
Lensing power spectrum Equivalently: P ii (l) = ∫ g i (z l ) 2 P(l/D l,z) dD l /D l 2 i.e. matter power spectrum at each z, weighted by square of lensing efficiency (Hu 1999)

25
Measurement uncertainties 1/2 = rms shear (intrinsic + photon noise) n i = number of galaxies per steradian in bin i (Hu 1999) Cosmic Variance Observational noise

26
(Hu 1999)

27
Sensitivity in each z bin

28
NOT

29
(Hu 1999)

30
Dependence on cosmology Refregier et al SNAP3 ?? A. m = 0.35 w=-1 B. m = 0.30 w=-0.7

31
Approximate dependence Increase 8 → A. P ↓ B. P ↑ Increase z s → A. P ↓ B. P ↑ Increase m → A. P ↓ B. P ↑ Increase DE ( K =0) → A. P ↓ B. P ↑ Increase w → A. P ↓ B. P ↑ Huterer et al

32
Effect of increasing w on P Distance to z –A. Decreases B. Increases

33
Perlmutter et al.1998 Fainter Further away Decelerating Accelerating m =1, no DE m =1, DE =0) == ( m = 0.3, DE = 0.7, w DE =0)

34
Perlmutter et al.1998 EdS OR w=0 w=-1 Fainter, further Brighter, closer

35
Effect of increasing w on P Distance to z –A. Decreases B. Increases –When decrease distance, lensing effect decreases Dark energy dominates –A. Earlier B. Later

38
Effect of increasing w on P Distance to z –A. Decreases B. Increases –When decrease distance, lensing decreases Dark energy dominates –A. Earlier B. Later Growth of structure –A. Suppressed B. Increased –Lensing A. Increases B. Decreases Net effects: –Partial cancellation decreased sensitivity –Distance wins

39
Approximate dependence Increase 8 → A. P ↓ B. P ↑ Increase z s → A. P ↓ B. P ↑ Increase m → A. P ↓ B. P ↑ Increase DE ( K =0) → A. P ↓ B. P ↑ Increase w → A. P ↓ B. P ↑ Huterer et al

40
Approximate dependence Increase 8 → A. P ↓ B. P ↑ Increase z s → A. P ↓ B. P ↑ Increase m → A. P ↓ B. P ↑ Increase DE ( K =0) → A. P ↓ B. P ↑ Increase w → A. P ↓ B. P ↑ Huterer et al Note modulus

41
Which is more important? Distance or growth? Simpson & Bridle

42
Dependence on cosmology Refregier et al SNAP3 ?? A. m = 0.35 w=-1 B. m = 0.30 w=-0.7

43
(Hu 1999)

44
See Heavens astro-ph/0304151 for full 3D treatment (~infinite # bins)

45
(Hu 1999)

46
Parameter estimation for z~2 (Hu 1999)

47
Predict the direction of degeneracy in w versus m plane

48
Refregier et al SNAP3

49
(Hu 1999)

50
Takada & Jain

51
(Hu 1999)

52
Covariance matrix P 12 is correlated with P 11 and P 22 (ignoring trispectrum contributions) Takada & Jain

54
How many redshift bins to use? Ma, Hu & Huterer 5 is enough Modified from

55
Higher order statistics

56
Takada & Jain

58
Geometric information Jain & Taylor; Kitching et al. Slide stolen from Tom Kitching www.astro.dur.ac.uk/Cosmology/SISCO/edin_talks/Kitching.PPT

59
Slide stolen from presentation by Andy Taylor www.shef.ac.uk/physics/idm2004/talks/monday/originals/taylor_andy.ppt

60
Slide stolen from presentation by Andy Taylor www.shef.ac.uk/physics/idm2004/talks/monday/originals/taylor_andy.ppt

61
Slide stolen from presentation by Andy Taylor www.shef.ac.uk/physics/idm2004/talks/monday/originals/taylor_andy.ppt

62
Slide stolen from presentation by Andy Taylor www.shef.ac.uk/physics/idm2004/talks/monday/originals/taylor_andy.ppt

63
Some additional tomographic methods Cross-correlation cosmography –Bernstein & Jain astro-ph/0309332 Galaxy-lensing cross correlation –Hu & Jain astro-ph/0312395 Reconstruction of distance and growth –Song; Knox & Song

Similar presentations

OK

Cosmic shear and intrinsic alignments Rachel Mandelbaum April 2, 2007 Collaborators: Christopher Hirata (IAS), Mustapha Ishak (UT Dallas), Uros Seljak.

Cosmic shear and intrinsic alignments Rachel Mandelbaum April 2, 2007 Collaborators: Christopher Hirata (IAS), Mustapha Ishak (UT Dallas), Uros Seljak.

© 2018 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on ozymandias download Jit ppt on manufacturing engineer Ppt on dowry system in india-free download Ppt on council of ministers saudi Ppt on hard work is the key to success Ppt on cnc lathe machine Ppt on coordinate geometry for class 9 download Ppt on carl friedrich gauss formula Ppt on body language during presentation Ppt on brand marketing quotes