Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Teaching Clinicians to Fish Library Skills for EBP Margaret (Peg) Allen, MLS-AHIP

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Teaching Clinicians to Fish Library Skills for EBP Margaret (Peg) Allen, MLS-AHIP"— Presentation transcript:

1 Teaching Clinicians to Fish Library Skills for EBP Margaret (Peg) Allen, MLS-AHIP

2 Fishing (with the Internet as rod ‘n’ reel) “Our patients, who will now have a gentler prep for the procedure, are indirectly grateful” ( from a rural WI Northwoods physician) Outcome from search based on 1997 Grateful Med workshop, reported in November/December 1997 issue of Gratefully Yours from the National Library of Medicine (NLM). 2

3 Objectives Access, appraise, and rate various forms of evidence for improving care Identify and retrieve resources relevant to clinical practice decisions, including Discovery, Summary and Translation literature Specify and acquire competencies needed in the healthcare workforce for expanded roles in evidence-based quality improvement. Propose health information literacy competencies as basis for EBP practice and shared decision making Use existing (national and local) partnerships and newly created resources to integrate evidence-based practice into health care, education, and research. Develop partnerships with library systems, publishers, and health science librarians to improve access to EBP resources 3

4 Questions Where is “the literature” today? 4

5 Questions Where is “the literature” today? Health information literacy – who needs it? 4

6 Questions Where is “the literature” today? Health information literacy – who needs it? Can we teach clinicians to efficiently search the literature supporting EBP? 4

7 Questions Where is “the literature” today? Health information literacy – who needs it? Can we teach clinicians to efficiently search the literature supporting EBP? When (and where) should we teach? 4

8 Questions Where is “the literature” today? Health information literacy – who needs it? Can we teach clinicians to efficiently search the literature supporting EBP? When (and where) should we teach? What should they learn – do they really need to be expert searchers? 4

9 Where is “the literature” today? Before going fishing, we need to know what kind of fish we’re looking for and the best fishing spots… Trends in scientific publication: Internet publication Online journals – not all free Open access movement Peer Review? Medical news; direct to consumer ads Database coverage and indexing practices 5

10 What do nurses cite? Will this change? Mapping the literature of nursing: 1996–2000. Margaret (Peg) Allen, Susan Kaplan Jacobs, and June R. Levy. J Med Libr Assoc April; 94(2): 206–220. Overview article and Online Symposium: Citation analysis 18 studies: general & specialties 53 source journals Research sponsored by Nursing and Allied Health Resources Section of the Medical Library Association, NAHRS/MLA 6

11 Citation analysis Cited references from 3 years of the selected source journals were analyzed for each of the 18 areas. Study data was combined for comparison in the overview article. We looked at: Publication years cited Cited formats Dispersion by zones of 3 equal numbers of citations 7

12 Cited Formats Journals 102,845 citations 65.5% Books 37, % 8

13 16.7 titles in Zone 1 (2%) titles in Zone 2 (11%) titles in Zone 3 (87%) Average dispersion of citations in journal titles for all 18 studies [from table 4] Imagine… almost 9 times the height of Zone 2! 9

14 Overview article Table 4 notes database coverage by area of study Table 5 lists the top 115 most highly cited “nursing,” “biomedical,” and “social science” journals and the database coverage of each journal in the years 1998 and 2002 CINAHL best coverage for nursing Science Citation Index & PubMed/ MEDLINE best for biomedical journal titles We looked at database coverage of most frequently cited titles in zones 1 & 2 10

15 Mapping conclusions (limited) Library collections should be based on needs of specialties served, including utilization as well as the relative “citedness” CINAHL and MEDLINE should be searched for all nursing questions Databases claiming coverage of nursing should increase coverage, particularly ISI Web of Science/Social Science Citation Index Database choices beyond CINAHL and MEDLINE should be based on the question topic 11

16 Peer Review: What does it mean? Publisher-defined peer review practices in CINAHL ® database: BP= Blind peer-review DP = Double-blind EB = Editorial Board review XP = Expert Peer review Allen, M. Key and electronic nursing journals, ©2006 Cinahl Information Systems Instructions to Authors in the Health Sciences 12

17 Medical news Health news is everywhere! Website news feeds: Medline Plus example Research behind the news: Health and Medicine in the News News evaluation: (Foundation for Informed Medical Decision Making) 13

18 Direct-to-consumer drug advertising Debated practice – drug company use suggests that it works! Only legal only in U.S. and New Zealand PubMed search results: 14

19 Health Information Literacy Health Literacy is …...the ability to read, understand, and act on health information. [Pfizer, 2002]...the degree to which individuals have the capacity to obtain, process, and understand basic health information and services needed to make appropriate health decisions. [Healthy People 2010, 2000] Information Literacy is …...a set of abilities enabling individuals to "recognize when information is needed and have the ability to locate, evaluate, and use effectively the needed information." [American Library Association, 1989] 15

20 Working Definition of Health Information Literacy Health Information Literacy is the set of abilities needed to: recognize a health information need; identify likely information sources and use them to retrieve relevant information; assess the quality of the information and its applicability to a specific situation; and analyze, understand, and use the information to make good health decisions. [Medical Library Association, July 23, 2003] 16

21 Health Information Literacy Everyone is fishing! What fish do they catch? Medical Library Association vision: “quality information for improved health” All people need to evaluate resources Professionals need to understand health literacy challenges and share information Example: Foundation for Informed Medical Decision Making Shared Decision Making – EBP value 17

22 Health Literacy Campaigns AMA Foundation Health Literacy Partnership for Clear Health Communication MLA Health Information Literacy Ask me I can help 18

23 What does this mean for clinicians? Define core health information literacy competencies Critical thinking Informatics skills Knowledge of information environment Comprehend and value research Address competencies in education and practice Example with bibliography: Nursing & Allied Health Information Literacy, Northwestern State University, LA (Susan T. Pierce, EdD, MSN, RN and others) 19

24 Diagram courtesy of: Lisa K. Traditi, MLS, AHIP Head of Education and Learning Resources Center Denison Memorial Library University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center Patient knowledge influences shared decisions! 20

25 Pravikoff, D.S. (2004). The Evidence-Based Practice Dilemma. CINAHLnews 23(1):

26 Bibliographic databases Print (books and journals) Free web Full-text databases E-J’s E-Texts E-Ref sources Interlibrary loan/document delivery Users may be familiar with just one or two lakes and streams… Potential Resources Quality fish can be found in many forms, via various lakes and streams 22

27 Can we teach clinicians to search efficiently? Despite improved bibliographic database access, most physicians first ask a colleague, consult a clinical reference database or ask a librarian when they have a clinical question. (Coumou, H. C., & Meijman, F. J. (2006). How do primary care physicians seek answers to clinical questions? A literature review. J Med Libr Assoc, 94(1), ) Nurses in the U.S. search the Internet more than any other source. Those searching MEDLINE and CINAHL are not confident in their searching ability. (Pravikoff, D. S., Tanner, A. B., & Pierce, S. T. (2005). Readiness of U.S. Nurses for Evidence-Based Practice. American Journal of Nursing, 105(9), ) 23

28 When (and where) should we teach? Search instruction needs to be related to meaningful student and work assignments. Course-integrated instruction: make literature search relevant to patient care Magnet hospital example: EBP certificate with searching module and project 24

29 When (and where) should we teach? Search instruction needs to be related to meaningful student and work assignments. Search instruction should include a hands-on component and/or be based on interactive tutorials. PubMed tutorial with videos: CINAHL tutorial including preconcepts: 25

30 When (and where) should we teach? Search instruction needs to be related to meaningful student and work assignments. Search instruction should include a hands-on component and/or be based on interactive tutorials. Searchers should be rewarded! Part of assignment/graded CE for workshops/programs CE for searching and applying results 26

31 What should they learn? Libraries Internet Consumer databases All librarians Consumers – caregivers and patients Health professionals Researchers Point-of-care databases Health science librarians Health professionals Researchers Database searching: CINAHL & MEDLINE Health science librarians Health professionals Researchers Expert Searching: Multiple databases Health science librarians Researchers 27

32 Competencies Consumers Health AND information literacy Caregivers and patients need more Clinicians Providers Care managers Technicians Researchers Research role Dissemination role 28

33 Basic health information literacy competencies Uses quality health information portals, such as Medline Plus, and libraries Searches for information in appropriate formats Evaluates health information resources regardless of format – Accuracy, Balance, Completeness Understands use of Boolean AND, OR and other search techniques for Internet search portals and databases READ THE HELP SCREENS! Observes intellectual property rights – does not plagiarize Cites sources using a standard bibliography format 29

34 Boolean = Combining Concepts AND narrows OR broadens Others: NOT NEAR Phrasing Truncation Wildcards 30

35 Clinician competencies Point-of-care databases Recognize ratings of strength of evidence when reading literature, including web resources (Undergraduate, Star Point 1, #4) Evaluate and use resources for quick reference, including PDA tools  Evidence-base – references?  Relevance to clinical needs  Ease of use  Currency Goal: Synthesis of credible evidence

36 Point-of-care examples DynaMed Alper, B. S., White, D. S., & Ge, B. (2005). Physicians answer more clinical questions and change clinical decisions more often with synthesized evidence: a randomized trial in primary care. Ann Fam Med, 3(6), CINAHL Plus Evidence Based Care Sheets Journal articles? Example: Evidence based clinical updates in anesthesia

37 Clinician database competencies Develop a searchable question The question is just as important as the answer. The answer you get out is only as good as the question you put Search CINAHL & NLM/AHRQ databases using subject headings, EBP filters and limits It's not your father's literature search… Unless I know the clinician wants to see *everything,* or is doing research rather than addressing an actual patient issue, I Evaluate citations for potential relevance Expense of retrieval, including copying or ILL, is not comments from Marcy Brown, MLS, West Penn Hospital - Forbes Campus, Monroeville PA, May 1,

38 Searchable question PICO P – Patient or problem I – Intervention C – Comparison O – Outcome What is the effect of ____________________________ Intervention (Predictor Variable) On ___________________________ Given Characteristic (Outcome) For ___________________________ Specific group of patients (Patient Characteristics) Alternate Template for Searching 34

39 Search Strategy Planning Develop searchable question Select search tools Design search strategy that optimizes value of selected databases & their features Select subject headings Select limits Review results; modify Find and appraise literature 35

40 Bibliographic Databases: Value Added Resources Bibliographic databases include: Citation: author, title, source Indexing – the human factor Subject headings and subheadings Checktags Publication Types Subsets and language Abstract, when available Cited references, with permission 36

41 MEDLINE & CINAHL Indexing Practices MEDLINECINAHL Journal titles4,800+1,800+ Other formatsSearch NLM gateway Many, including web Subject HeadingsMeSH - biomedical MeSH based - 4,987 unique 7,427 same SubheadingsYes; as many as needed Yes; up to 3 per heading Publication typesFormat/type of article Adds features included in item Cited referencesNoYes,

42 Indexing increases retrieval options Indexing based on what the authors write Subject headings selected for major (focus) and minor concepts CINAHL adds headings describing research methodology and instruments, as well as theories and models CINAHL and MeSH terms arranged in hierarchies, referred to as trees “Exploding” subject headings adds terms below the selected term in the hierarchy PubMed automatically explodes subject headings and subheadings, unless user changes References: Allen, M. (1998). "Selecting keywords: helping others find your article." Nurse Author & Editor 8(1): 4, 7-9. Allen, M. (1997). Teaching the importance of nursing subject headings. CINAHLnews, 16(1), 1-4. Branching out: the MeSH vocabulary. (2006) 38

43 Explode - a Giant OR All MeSH Categories Diseases Category Neoplasms Neoplasms by Site Breast Neoplasms Breast Neoplasms, Male Mammary Neoplasms Mammary Neoplasms, Experimental 39

44 Focusing searches for EBP Primary Research Individual studies Abstracts and commentaries Need to evaluate and synthesize findings Evidence Summaries – Synthesis Systematic Reviews: Integrative Reviews; Meta-Analysis Critical Appraisal with implications for practice Translation Literature 40

45 Translation Literature = Best Practices Practice guidelines Care plans Critical paths Protocols Standards Clinical innovations Others in your organization? 41

46 Start with the quality-filtered resources! 1.Translation Literature – Practice guidelines Are they evidence-based? 2.Look for: systematic reviews; meta-analysis; critical appraisal 3.What’s new? Primary Research Research Abstracts Research in progress Propose new research? 42

47 EBP search demonstration Subject Headings EBP Filters Other limits? Question: What should we do to prevent pressure ulcers in our elderly patients? 43

48 EBP Search Strategy What is the effect of Nursing care/interventions Intervention (Predictor Variable) On Preventing pressure ulcers Given Characteristic (Outcome) For Elderly________________ Specific group of patients (Patient Characteristics) 44

49 Primary databases CINAHL and CINAHL Plus About: EBSCOhost: MEDLINE & NLM/AHRQ resources TRIP database SUMsearch PubMed National Guideline Clearinghouse 45

50 Accessing core databases MEDLINE PubMed EBSCO host CINAHL direct Ovid ProQuest Aries with MEDLINE CINAHL EBSCO host Libraries Only source for CINAHL Plus CINAHL direct Individual subscriptions Member benefit: ANA, AACN, others Ovid through 2008; others Many ponds 46

51 Summary: EBP Search strategy SubjectsLimits CINAHL Pressure Ulcer Pressure Ulcer/ nursing; prevention & control Evidence Based Practice (Specific Interest Category) TR group Systematic Review Research Aged MEDLINE Pressure Ulcer/ nursing; prevention & control Nursing subset? Aged Systematic Reviews (subset) Practice Guidelines Clinical Queries 47

52 Useful Limits for Evidence-Based Searching CINAHLPubMed/MEDLINE Translation Literature Care Plan [PT] OR Clinical Innovations [PT] OR Critical Path [PT] OR Practice Guidelines [PT] OR Protocol [PT] OR Standards [PT] OR Algorithm [PT] OR Evidence Based Care Sheet [PT; C+ only] Optional: CEU [PT] Practice Guideline [PT] OR Guideline [PT] Clinical Protocols [MH] OR Critical Pathways [MH] OR Decision Trees [MH] OR Standards [subheading] Systematic [sb] NOT (Clinical Trial OR Review [PT] OR Meta-Analysis [PT]) Evidence Summaries Systematic Review [PT] Commentary [PT] with Research or Review Systematic [sb] AND (Review [PT]) OR Meta-Analysis [PT]) Primary ResearchResearch [PT]Clinical Trials [PT] OR RCT [PT] Validation Studies [PT] Has abstract PubMed Clinical queries OR SUMsearch Clinical queries 48

53 Expert Searching Required for developing: Systematic reviews Evidence summaries Practice guidelines & other translation Research competencies: Construct searches for locating primary research studies (and other EBP literature) in multiple databases. (Star Point 1, #4) Assemble evidence resources (primary research and evidence summaries) from multiple sources on selected topics into reference management software. (Star Point 2, #10) 49

54 THINKING ABOUT A FISHING GUIDE? Consider collaborative searching Working side-by-side with a librarian is best way to learn about comprehensive searching Researchers need to know when librarian search is needed Example of author guidelines suggesting working with librarian: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia Evidence-Based Clinical Updates (EBCU’s) in Anesthesia Standards for systematic reviews should include expert searchers, preferably experienced librarians

55 Librarian roles Expert searching Patient-focused clinical questions Selecting point-of-care information resources STAT searches Guidelines development – “best practices” Systematic review searches Resources for client education Research support Collaborative searches Research team member Management and education issues Comprehensive searches for practice improvement – multiple databases Teaching Search skills for users Partnership with faculty and staff educators Support for patients, families, and consumers 51

56 Recommendations Provide library resources Professional librarian: MLS AHIP preferred (MLA Academy of Health Information Professionals) Include in EBP initiatives Collection developed with user input Access from point-of-care Work collaboratively with state and national organizations to improve access to health information and standards for health information literacy MLA/NAHRS and ICIRN collaboration: Allen, M. P., Jacobs, S. K., Levy, J., Pierce, S., Pravikoff, D. S., & Tanner, A. (2005). Continuing education as a catalyst for inter-professional collaboration. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 24(3),

57 Comments from a colleague… It's too difficult to keep up with the best research evidence all alone. Librarians can help by doing what we do best. If you don't have a librarian near you, ask for one to come provide searching training to your staff, department, team, etc. Good literature searching takes practice, then more practice. Once you've learned to find the evidence, stay current with your searching skills in all the databases from which you've gotten the highest yield on your topic-- then rely on your librarian to search the rest of the resources. ( comments from Lisa Traditi, MLS, AHIP, University of Colorado) 53

58 Questions? Read more about it: Presentations page NAHRS website 54

Download ppt "Teaching Clinicians to Fish Library Skills for EBP Margaret (Peg) Allen, MLS-AHIP"

Similar presentations

Ads by Google