Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byAlexus Flanagan Modified over 2 years ago

1
Spatiotemporal Multicast in Sensor Networks Presenter: Lingxuan Hu Sep 22, 2003 Qingfeng Huang, Chenyang Lu and Gruia-Catalin Roman

2
Outline Problem Statement Background Parameter Analysis Optimization Discussion

3
Introduction Methods of disseminating information: Unicast Broadcast Multicast Geocast Mobicast

4
Scenario Thousands of sensor nodes communicating wirelessly to track a vehicle Sleeping nodes Awaken nodes

5
Scenario Wake up just in time Sleeping nodes Awaken nodes

6
Introduction (cont.) Examples

7
Introduction (cont.) Geocasting GeocastRe-geocast L-W slack time

8
Introduction (cont.)

9
Design Concerns Reliable delivery Make the initialization time as short as possible Reduce the slack time Reduce the retransmission overhead

10
Simple Mobicast Hold-and-forward strategy In current delivery zone: deliver and forward Will be in delivery zone soon: hold and forward at the time the delivery zone reaches the node Other cases: Ignore the message Has minimal delivery overhead and has good slack time characteristics Not reliable In Current delivery zone Will be in delivery zone soon Other nodes

11
Problem of Simple Mobicast There is a hole between X and other nodes in the delivery zone. The protocol fails to deliver the mobicast message to node X To deliver reliably, some nodes that are not in the delivery zone have to participate in message forwarding. Delivery zone Hole How to determine who should participate?

12
Delivery ZoneFuture Delivery Zone Forwarding Zone Headway Distance Hold & Forward Zone Mobicast Framework

13
Two phases Initialization phase: Cruising phase:

14
What is the size and shape of forwarding zone? What is the headway distance? What is the initialization time? Undetermined Parameters

15
∆-Compactness G(V, E): geometric graph d(i, j): Euclidean distance between node i and j M(i, j): Set of shortest hop network paths between node i and j đ(i, j): The minimum Euclidean length of all paths in M(i, j), also called S2 distance ∆-compactness of two nodes: δ(i, j) = d(i, j) / đ (i, j) ∆-compactness of network: δ = MIN i,j δ(i, j) ∆-dilation: The inverse of ∆-compactness ADEB, 3 hops d(A, B) ACB, 2 hopsđ(A, B) M(A, B)

16
Delivery Guarantee

17
An example ∆-compactness δ = MIN i,j d(i, j) / đ (i, j) For any two nodes A and B in the network, there must exist a shortest network path that is inside the ellipse which has A and B as its foci with eccentricity δ 10 6 8 5 5 5 d(A, B)=10, d(A, D)=8, d(B, C)=6, d(A, C)=d(C, D)= d(D, B)=5 δ(A,B)=10/15δ(A,D)=8/10δ(B,C)=6/10δ(A,C)=5/5δ(C,D)=5/5δ(D,B)=5/5 For A, B. c = 10/2 = 5, c/a = e = & = 0.6, so a=25/3, b=20/3 δ = MIN (10/15, 8/10, 6/10, 5/5, 5/5, 5/5) = 0.6 x 2 /(25/3) 2 + y 2 /(20/3) 2 = 1

18
Γ -Compactness If a network’s Γ-compactness value is γ, then any two nodes in the network separated by a distance d must have a shortest path no greater than d/γ hops h(i, j): The minimum number of network hops between nodes i and j d(i, j): The Euclidean distance between node i and j Γ-Compactness: γ = min d(i, j) / h(i, j) 10 6 8 5 5 5 d(A, B)=10, d(A, D)=8, d(B, C)=6, d(A, C)=d(C, D)= d(D, B)=5 γ(A,B)=10/3γ(A,D)=8/2γ(B,C)=6/2γ(A,C)=5/1γ(C,D)=5/1γ(D,B)=5/1 A, B has path no more than d/γ= 10/3 = 3.3 hopsγ = MIN (10/3, 8/2, 6/2, 5/1, 5/1, 5/1) = 3

19
Definition Τ 1 : the max one-hop latency of the network Sd: the diagonal length of a delivery zone v: the traveling speed γ: Γ-Compactness value. γ = min d(i, j) / h(i, j) d s : headway distance Headway Distance d Diagonal length Sd v V d s = vΤ1[Sd/γ] Headway Distance

20
Simulation -Environment NS-2 simulator 800 sensor nodes 1000x400m area Circular delivery zone

21
Mobicast - Protocol 1. if ( ˜m ) is new and t < T 2. cache this message 3. if the value of the delta field is zero 4. use local delta value for computation 5. else 6. use the value in the packet for computation 7. end if 8. if (I am in current forwarding zone F[t]) 9. broadcast ˜m immediately ; // fast forward 10. if (I am in current delivery zone Z[t]) 11. deliver data D to the application; 12. else 13. compute my td[in]; 14.if td[in] exists and td[in] < T 15. schedule delivery of data D to the application layer at td[in]; 16. end if 17. end if 18. else 19. compute my tf[in]; 20. if tf [in] exists 21.if t0≤tf [in] ≤ t 22. broadcast ˜m immediately ; // catch-up! 23. else if t < tf[in] < T 24. schedule a broadcast of ˜m at tf[in]; //hold and forward 25. end if 26. end if 27. end if 28. end if

22
Simulation result

23
Linear

24
Simulation Result (cont) The delivery ratio increases when node density or forwarding size increases The slack time of just-in-time delivery is much better than that of ASAP delivery Density Forwarding Zone Size

25
Conclusions Propose a new and interesting application The assumptions are expensive The math result can’t be directly applied to real application The adaptive mobicast need to be further explored

Similar presentations

OK

Advisor : Prof. Yu-Chee Tseng Student : Yi-Chen Lu 12009/06/26.

Advisor : Prof. Yu-Chee Tseng Student : Yi-Chen Lu 12009/06/26.

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on c language arrays Ppt on total internal reflection animation Open ppt on ipad Ppt on disk formatting types Seminar ppt on data mining Ppt on business entrepreneurship Ppt on bluetooth security system Free download ppt on green revolution Ppt on biotechnology in agriculture Ppt on environmental chemistry class 11