Presentation on theme: "2013 Natural Catastrophe Year in Review"— Presentation transcript:
1 2013 Natural Catastrophe Year in Review January 7, 2014
2 Agenda Welcome/Introduction Bill Fellows US/Global Natural Catastrophe Update Carl HeddeEconomic Implications of Natural Catastrophe Losses Dr. Robert HartwigSpecial Topic: Hurricanes, Typhoons and Tornados Peter HöppeQuestions and Answers2
3 Webinar Interactivity Questions and AnswersYou will have an opportunity to ask questions at the conclusion of the presentation.To ask a question, please dial 1 4 on your phone.An operator will facilitate your participation.Live Tweeting@Munichre_US @lworters @iii#NATCAT20143
4 US/Global Natural Catastrophe Update Carl Hedde, SVP, Head of Risk Accumulation Munich Reinsurance America, Inc.Source: FEMA
5 MR NatCatSERVICE The world‘s largest database on natural catastrophes The Loss Database TodayFrom 1980 until today all loss events; for USA and selected countries in Europe all loss events since 1970.Retrospectively, all great disasters since 1950.In addition, all major historical events starting from 79 AD – eruption of Mt. Vesuvio (3,000 historical data sets).Currently more than 33,000 events5
23 Market & Financial Impact of Catastrophe Losses: 2013 Summary Insurance Information InstituteJanuary 7, 2014Robert P. Hartwig, Ph.D., CPCU, President & EconomistInsurance Information Institute 110 William Street New York, NY 10038Tel: Cell:
24 WINTER STORM LOSSES: HOW BAD ARE THEY? Losses from Snow, Ice, Freezing and Related Causes Typical Cost Insurers Between $1 Billion and $2 Billion Annually2412/01/09 - 9pm
25 Tornado share of CAT losses is rising Inflation Adjusted U.S. Catastrophe Losses by Cause of Loss, 1993–20121Wind/Hail/Flood (3), $14.9Fires (4), $6.5Insured cat losses from totaled $391.7B, an average of $19.6B per year or $1.6B per monthOther (5), $0.2Geological Events, $18.4Terrorism, $24.8Winter Storms, $27.8Hurricanes & Tropical Storms, $158.2Tornado share of CAT losses is risingWinter storm losses totaled $27.8B or $1.4B/yr. on average from accounting for 7.1% of all CAT losses; 2013 losses totaled $1.895BTornadoes (2), $140.9Catastrophes are defined as events causing direct insured losses to property of $25 million or more in 2012 dollars.Excludes snow.Does not include NFIP flood lossesIncludes wildland firesIncludes civil disorders, water damage, utility disruptions and non-property losses such as those covered by workers compensation.Source: ISO’s Property Claim Services Unit.12/01/09 - 9pm
26 U.S. P/C Insurance Industry Financial Overview Industry’s Financial Strength and Overall Performance Improved During 2013 Due in Part to Materially Lower Catastrophe Losses2612/01/09 - 9pm
27 P/C Net Income After Taxes 1991–2013:Q3 ($ Millions) Net income is up substantially (+54.7%) from 2012:Q3 $27.8B2005 ROE*= 9.6%2006 ROE = 12.7%2007 ROE = 10.9%2008 ROE = 0.1%2009 ROE = 5.0%2010 ROE = 6.6%2011 ROAS1 = 3.5%2012 ROAS1 = 5.9%2013:9M ROAS1 = 9.5%2013:9M ROAS was 9.5%ROE figures are GAAP; 1Return on avg. surplus. Excluding Mortgage & Financial Guaranty insurers yields a 8.9% ROAS through 2013:Q3, 6.2% ROAS in 2012, 4.7% ROAS for 2011, 7.6% for 2010 and 7.4% for 2009.Sources: A.M. Best, ISO, Insurance Information Institute
28 History suggests next ROE peak will be in 2016-2017 Profitability Peaks & Troughs in the P/C Insurance Industry, 1975 – 2013:Q3*ROEHistory suggests next ROE peak will be in1977:19.0%1987:17.3%10 Years2006:12.7%1997:11.6%2013:Q3 8.9%10 Years9 Years2012: 5.9%1975: 2.4%1984: 1.8%1992: 4.5%2001: -1.2%*Profitability = P/C insurer ROEs figures are estimates based on ROAS data. Note: Data for exclude mortgage and financial guaranty insurers.Source: Insurance Information Institute; NAIC, ISO, A.M. Best.
29 A 100 Combined Ratio Isn’t What It Once Was: Investment Impact on ROEs A combined ratio of about 100 generates an ROE of ~7.0% in 2012, ~7.5% ROE in 2009/10, 10% in 2005 and 16% in 1979Combined Ratio / ROELower catastrophes helped pull up ROEs in 2013Combined Ratios Must Be Lower in Today’s Depressed Investment Environment to Generate Risk Appropriate ROEs* figures are return on average surplus and exclude mortgage and financial guaranty insurers combined ratio including M&FG insurers is 103.2, 2011 combined ratio including M&FG insurers is 108.1, ROAS = 3.5%.Source: Insurance Information Institute from A.M. Best and ISO data.
30 Top Eight States for Insured Catastrophe Losses, 2013 $ MillionsSource: The Property Claim Services (PCS) unit of ISO, a Verisk Analytics company.
31 SURPLUS/CAPITAL/CAPACITY Industry Claims Paying Capital Stands at Record High in Late 2013(Re)Insurance Industry is Well Positioned to Manage Large Scale Catastrophe Losses in 20143112/01/09 - 9pm
32 Policyholder Surplus, 2006:Q4–2013:Q3 ($ Billions)Drop due to near-record 2011 CAT losses2007:Q3 Pre-Crisis PeakSurplus as of 9/30/13 stood at a record high $624.4BThe Industry now has $1 of surplus for every $0.78 of NPW, close to the strongest claims-paying status in its history.The P/C Insurance Industry Entered 2014 in Very Strong Financial Shape*Includes $22.5B of paid-in capital from a holding company parent for one insurer’s investment in a non-insurance business in early 2010.Sources: ISO, A.M .Best.3212/01/09 - 9pmeSlide – P6466 – The Financial Crisis and the Future of the P/C32
33 INVESTMENTS: THE NEW REALITY Depressed Yields Will Necessarily Influence Underwriting & Pricing3312/01/09 - 9pm
34 Property/Casualty Insurance Industry Investment Income: 2000–2013*1 ($ Billions)Investment earnings are running below their 2007 pre-crisis peakInvestment Income Fell in and is Falling in 2013 Due to Persistently Low Interest Rates, Putting Additional Pressure on (Re) Insurance Pricing1 Investment gains consist primarily of interest and stock dividends..*Estimate based on annualized actual net investment income earned through Q3:2013 of $34.338B.Sources: ISO; Insurance Information Institute.
35 Underwriting Results in 2013 Were Helped by Lower Catastrophe Losses Was 2013 Only a Respite from High Catastrophe Loss Years Like 2011/2012?3512/01/09 - 9pm
36 P/C Insurance Industry Combined Ratio, 2001–2013:Q3* Relatively Low CAT Losses, Reserve ReleasesHigher CAT Losses, Shrinking Reserve Releases, Toll of Soft MarketAs Recently as 2001, Insurers Paid Out Nearly $1.16 for Every $1 in Earned PremiumsHeavy Use of Reinsurance Lowered Net LossesRelatively Low CAT Losses, Reserve ReleasesAvg. CAT Losses, More Reserve ReleasesSandy ImpactsBest Combined Ratio Since 1949 (87.6)Cyclical DeteriorationLower CAT Losses* Excludes Mortgage & Financial Guaranty insurers Including M&FG, 2008=105.1, 2009=100.7, 2010=102.4, 2011=108.1; 2012:=103.2; 2013:Q3 = 95.8.Sources: A.M. Best, ISO.12/01/09 - 9pmeSlide – P6466 – The Financial Crisis and the Future of the P/C
37 Underwriting Gain (Loss) 1975–2013:Q3* Underwriting profit through 2013:Q3 totaled $10.5B($ Billions)Cumulative underwriting deficit from 1975 through 2012 is $510BHigh cat losses in 2011 led to the highest underwriting loss since 2002Large Underwriting Losses Are NOT Sustainable in Current Investment Environment* Includes mortgage and financial guaranty insurers in all years.Sources: A.M. Best, ISO; Insurance Information Institute.
38 Combined Ratio Points Associated with Catastrophe Losses: 1960 – 2013* Avg. CAT Loss Component of the Combined Ratio by Decade1960s: s: s: s: s: s: 6.1E*Combined Ratio PointsCatastrophe losses as a share of all losses reached a record high in 2012The Catastrophe Loss Component of Private Insurer Losses Has Increased Sharply in Recent Decades*2010s representNotes: Private carrier losses only. Excludes loss adjustment expenses and reinsurance reinstatement premiums. Figures are adjusted for losses ultimately paid by foreign insurers and reinsurers.Source: ISO ( ); A.M. Best (2012E) Insurance Information Institute.12/01/09 - 9pm
40 Net Premium Growth: Annual Change, 1971—2013:Q3 (Percent)Net Written Premiums Fell 0.7% in 2007 (First Decline Since 1943) by 2.0% in 2008, and 4.2% in 2009, the First 3-Year Decline Since2013:Q3 growth was +4.2%Shaded areas denote “hard market” periodsSources: A.M. Best (historical and forecast), ISO, Insurance Information Institute.12/01/09 - 9pmeSlide – P6466 – The Financial Crisis and the Future of the P/C
41 P/C Net Premiums Written: % Change, Quarter vs. Year-Prior Quarter Premium growth in Q was up 4.2% over Q3 2012, marking the 14th consecutive quarter of growthSustained Growth in Written Premiums (vs. the same quarter, prior year) Should Continue through 2014Sources: ISO, Insurance Information Institute.4112/01/09 - 9pmeSlide – P6466 – The Financial Crisis and the Future of the P/C41
42 Earthquakes: Jan. 17, 2014 is the 20th Anniversary of the Northridge Earthquake Northridge Remains the Most Costly Earthquake in Terms of Insured Losses in US History4212/01/09 - 9pm42
43 10 Most Costly Earthquakes in U.S. History (Insured Claims) Millions of 2013 Dollars*These insured claims arose from exposures that existed at the time of the quake. If the same earthquake occurred today it would cause greater insured claims both because of increased exposures and increased insurance coverage.Many of these earthquakes caused extensive damage that wasn’t insured (and so doesn’t show in this chart)*inflation adjustments to 2013 dollars using the CPI; adjustment for 1906 is based on CPI in 1913—earliest available.Sources: MunichRe; Insurance Information Institute.12/01/09 - 9pm
44 Estimated Insured Losses from the Top 10 Historical Earthquakes in U.S. Based in Current (2011) Exposures$ Billions*Potential insured losses are much higher today due development and higher property values. Few property owners have earthquake coverage in most areas.While the Majority of Costly Earthquakes Are Likely to Occur in California, the New Madrid and Charleston, SC, Areas Have Significant Exposure As Well.*Analysis conducted in 2012 based on exposures as of 12/31/2011.Sources: AIR Worldwide; Insurance Information Institute.12/01/09 - 9pm
45 Earthquake Insurance: Direct Premiums Written,1994–2012 ($ Billions) Earthquake premium volume increased by 35.8% by 1996, but then fell.Earthquake premium volume is well of its 2010 peakNorthridge earthquake occurred on Jan. 17, 1994, resulting in $24.1 billion in insured losses in 2013 dollarsSources: A.M. Best; Insurance Information Institute
46 Flood Risk and Public Opinion Most Americans Believe Flood Premiums Should Reflect Risk Yet They Are Reluctant to Eliminate Subsidies4612/01/09 - 9pm46
47 I.I.I. Poll: Flood Insurance Q. Do you think it is fair that flood insurance premium increases are higher if people who live in high flood risk areas and rebuild their homes do not elevate them?Don’t knowNoYesAlmost two-thirds of Americans think that it is fair that flood insurance premiums be raised for people who live in high flood risk areas and rebuild their homes after a flood but do not elevate them.Source: Insurance Information Institute Annual Pulse Survey, November 2013.12/01/09 - 9pmeSlide – P6466 – The Financial Crisis and the Future of the P/C
48 I.I.I. Poll: Flood Insurance Q. Do you think flood insurance premiums should reflect the risk of flooding no matter what the cost or do you think the government should subsidize the cost of flood insurance with taxpayers’ dollars?Don’t knowGovernment should subsidize cost with taxpayers’ dollarsPremiums should reflect flood riskAlmost two-thirds of Americans think flood insurance premiums should be raised to reflect the risk of flooding.Source: Insurance Information Institute Annual Pulse Survey, November 2013.12/01/09 - 9pmeSlide – P6466 – The Financial Crisis and the Future of the P/C
49 I.I.I. Poll: Flood Insurance Q. The federal government provides insurance coverage at taxpayer-subsidized rates for damage from floods through the National Flood Insurance Plan. A new law eliminates the subsidy and raises rates. Do you think the rate increase should be repealed?Don’t knowNoYesMore than half of Americans polled for the November 2013 Pulse thought that hikes in National Flood Insurance premiums should be repealed.Source: Insurance Information Institute Annual Pulse Survey, November 2013.12/01/09 - 9pmeSlide – P6466 – The Financial Crisis and the Future of the P/C
50 I.I.I. Poll: Flood Insurance Q. If the costs were similar, would you prefer to buy flood insurance from a private insurance company or from the federal government through the National Flood Insurance Program?Don’t knowThe federal government through the NFIPPrivate insurance companySix out of ten Americans would prefer to buy flood insurance from a private insurance company as opposed to the federal government, if costs were similar.Source: Insurance Information Institute Annual Pulse Survey, November 2013.12/01/09 - 9pmeSlide – P6466 – The Financial Crisis and the Future of the P/C
51 www.iii.org Thank you for your time and your attention! Insurance Information Institute Online:Thank you for your time and your attention!Twitter: twitter.com/bob_hartwig12/01/09 - 9pm
52 2013 – A Special Year in Several Respects Record Hailstorm in Europe – Weak Tornado Season in the US Less Hurricanes – More Typhoons Peter Hoeppe Munich ReSource: FEMA