Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Evidence Based Medicine Introduction to Critical Appraisal Jeffrey P Schaefer MSc MD FRCP FACP October 21, 2010.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Evidence Based Medicine Introduction to Critical Appraisal Jeffrey P Schaefer MSc MD FRCP FACP October 21, 2010."— Presentation transcript:

1 Evidence Based Medicine Introduction to Critical Appraisal Jeffrey P Schaefer MSc MD FRCP FACP October 21, 2010

2 Objectives You will: –define evidence based medicine –know where critical appraisal fits into EBM –list 5 important clinical questions –describe best research designs –know the basic approach to critical appraisal –be exposed to CA for each clinical question

3 What is Evidence Based Medicine?

4 What is Evidence Based Medicine Application of the best evidence to health problems within the context of the expertise and values of the patient, physician, and society. JP Schaefer

5 EBM Process Formulate a focused clinical question. Search for evidence. Critically appraise the evidence. Apply the evidence to your practice. Learnings are stored for future reference. Outcomes are reviewed.

6 The Essence of Critical Appraisal Three Questions –Are the results valid? –What are the results? –Do the results apply to my patient?

7 What Critical Appraisal is Not... It’s not about trashing an article –something can be learned from every article, even if it’s how to design a better trial! It’s not about black and white answers –most studies have strengths and weaknesses –some studies are highly edited It’s not the only reason to embark on a course of action –other factors (harm, cost, patient values)

8 Five Clinical Questions Harm Diagnosis Therapy Prognosis Prevention Also… –systematic reviews (e.g. meta-analyses) –econominc analyses –others

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20 + malignancyGold Std +Gold Std - Histology +411152 Histology -7346353 48357405 SENS41 / 48 = 0.854 = 85% SPEC346 / 357 = 0.969= 97% PPV41 / 52 =0.788 = 79% NPN346 / 353 = 0.980= 98% http://faculty.vassar.edu/lowry/clin1.html

21

22

23

24

25

26 Not sure: issue here is the false negatives.

27

28 General Issues multiple strange questions in same article why differentiate lipoma from IM lipoma? how did 600 cases get to 405 cases? why exclude ‘rare forms’? how did molecular studies get to be gold-std? initial surgical tx was / is independent of pathology failure to provide CI for test characteristics accuracy is not very useful

29


Download ppt "Evidence Based Medicine Introduction to Critical Appraisal Jeffrey P Schaefer MSc MD FRCP FACP October 21, 2010."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google