Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

UNIT 7: PARTY GOALS- POLICY/IDEOLOGY Readings: Ware CH 1 and Mueller and Strom pgs. 89-111.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "UNIT 7: PARTY GOALS- POLICY/IDEOLOGY Readings: Ware CH 1 and Mueller and Strom pgs. 89-111."— Presentation transcript:

1 UNIT 7: PARTY GOALS- POLICY/IDEOLOGY Readings: Ware CH 1 and Mueller and Strom pgs

2 Guiding Questions  How do we classify political parties?  What are party families (familles spirituelles)?  How do party families compare on social and economic issues?  Can we use the concept of party families outside the European context?

3 Classifying Parties: Familles Spirituelles  A party’s ideology bases strongly shapes their policy positions.  Regardless of whether or not parties view policy goals strategically or sincerely.  Party “type” is often linked to a party’s stated ideology.  von Beyme 1985  Examines ideological roots of parties rather than position along the ideological spectrum.  Identifies party groups in order of their ideological emergence.  Identifies nine party families (familles spirituelles) in the European context.  Laver and Hunt 1992  Measures ideology on two scales: stance on public ownership (left-right) and stance on social issues.  Allows for comparison within and across party families.

4 Liberal/Radical Parties  Developed in the late 19 th century.  Formed by bourgeoisie to protect interests against landowners who controlled the state.  Wanted to remove state restrictions on means of production and promote a separation of state and society.  Often favored extension of the franchise (especially Radical parties).  Center-left on social issues (7.9), right on economics (15.3).  Electoral appeal: middle classes, business owners

5 Conservative Parties  Opposed extension of the franchise in response to Liberal/Radical parties.  Historically opposed to social change.  Focus on national honor; paternalistic view of society.  Right on economics (15.8), right on social policies (12.2).  New Right issues have changed some of these appeals particularly in terms of the market.  Many modern conservative parties take a very free market approach to the economy.  Electoral appeal: middle and upper classes.

6 Socialist/Social Democratic Parties  Formed as working classes organized.  Sought the extension of the franchise and public ownership of the means of production.  Modern variants accept the free market.  Seek a social safety net to protect those affected by globalization  Movement split after WW1 as communist parties formed.  Affirmed support for liberal democratic institutions following WWII.  Ideological placement: Economic 8.2, Social 6.3  Electoral appeals: Working and lower middle classes

7 Christian Democratic Parties  Formed by Catholic groups in response to secularism.  Organized to compete against socialist parties.  Gained momentum after WWII.  Right of center on social issues (15.5), more centrist on economics (13.9)  Favors a more active role for government in the economy than conservative parties.  Shift towards the right in recent years on economic issues.  Electoral appeal: Catholic workers, middle classes

8 Communist Parties  Took direction from Moscow until the collapse of the USSR.  Collapse of the USSR has resulted in a change in name and ideology of many of these parties.  Favored public ownership (3.1) and permissive social policy (4.8).  But also accepted democratic institutions both during and after the Cold War.  Many have transformed into credible social democratic parties  Example: PDS in Germany, PCI in Italy  Other movements associated with the far left are shifting towards anti-capitalist appeals  Example: NPA in France  Electoral appeal: youth, unemployed, working classes.

9 Agrarian Parties  Small farming and peasant based parties formed in response to industrialization.  Mainly formed in Scandinavia and Eastern European countries.  Generally right of center on both economic and social issues, but usually absorbed by other parties of the right.  Changes in political orientation make it difficult to classify them as a group.  Electoral appeals: agricultural interests, middle classes.

10 Regional/Ethnic Parties  Represent regional or ethnic minority groups within societies.  A presence since the 1960’s where movements are not absorbed by larger parties.  Many merge nationalism (generally associated with the right), with center left stances on economic and social policy.  Difficult to classify on the left-right spectrum.  Electoral appeals: nationalists.

11 Extreme Right Parties  Generally associated with anti-immigrant, extreme nationalist, anti-government and anti-tax philosophies. (Economic 18.5, Social 19)  Right of center placement on both social and economic policies.  Many have roots in fascism (authoritarian state to protect national ideals).  Although modern far right parties are generally not anti system parties (change from the interwar era);  Anti-Islamic appeals have boosted their vote totals in recent elections.  Stance typically means they are not invited to join coalitions.  Example: PVV in the Netherlands  Electoral appeals: working classes

12 Ecological/Green Parties  Newest party family.  Associated with post-materialist concerns (e.g. environment and quality of life issues).  Favor government intervention and international cooperation on ecological issues placing it on the left in terms of economic policy.  Center left on economic issues (8.0) and the most permissive on social issues (4.2).  Electoral appeals: youth, gay/lesbian voters, middle and upper middle classes

13 Party Family Positions Compared  Communists 3.1  Greens 8.0  Socialists 8.2  Christian Dem 13.9  Liberals 15.3  Conservatives 15.8  Extreme Right 18.5  Greens 4.2  Communists 4.8  Socialists 6.3  Liberals 7.9  Conservatives 12.2  Christian Dem 15.5  Extreme Right 19.0 ECONOMIC POLICYSOCIAL POLICY

14 Applicability outside of Europe: The Strange Case of the United States?  Aspects of both parties make classification difficult.  Broad tent rather than explicitly ideological parties.  Generally classified as liberal parties although they emphasize different strands of liberalism.  The terms “conservative” and “liberal” have taken on a different meaning in the US context.  US Democrats slightly outside the mainstream of European center left parties on economic issues.  US Republicans outside the mainstream of European liberal parties on social issues.

15 Conclusions: Other Developed Democracies Ware 1996 von Beyme works in some cases and not applicable in others. MIXED RESULTS: Ireland, Canada, Israel, Japan STRONG PATTERNS: Australia, New Zealand

16 Case Study: Spain  Examine:  The Socialists (PSOE) transformation from a policy- seeking to an office-seeking party What variables are used to explain the shift? How did the PSOE’s internal politics facilitate this process? What tradeoffs were made to move away from a more policy-seeking model towards an office-seeking model?

17 Next Unit  Theme: Coalition Formation  Readings Reserves: Lijphart and Laver and Schofield Dalton and Wattenberg CH 9 Case Studies: Mueller and Strom pgs OR  Game: Coalections  Game: Coalections with Portfolios


Download ppt "UNIT 7: PARTY GOALS- POLICY/IDEOLOGY Readings: Ware CH 1 and Mueller and Strom pgs. 89-111."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google