Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byJamie Hebble Modified over 2 years ago

1
Chapter 5 The Witness Reduction Technique: Feasible Closure Properties of #P Greg Goldstein Andrew Learn 18 April 2001

2
Outline Introduction Thm: Proper Subtraction and “Closure Completeness” Thm: Complexity Class Collapse Related Results Summary

3
Closure Concepts Let be an operation, N x N N Natural Numbers: –Closure under an operation defined as: ( x N) ( y N)[x y N] –Closed under addition, multiplication; not subtraction Functions: –Closure similarly defined for a class of functions: ( f 1 F) ( f 2 F)[h f 1,f 2 F] where h f 1,f 2 (n) = (f 1 (n), f 2 (n)) –e.g. Polynomials closed under addition, subtraction, etc. –We examine another class of functions: #P

4
#P -- Counting Class for Accepting Paths Defn: f is a #P function if a NPTM N, s.t. for each input x, f(x) = number of accepting paths of N(x) #P has closure properties –Addition: –Multiplication: f 1 (x) f 2 (x) + f 1 (x) f 2 (x) * N1N1 N1N1 N2N2 N2N2

5
#P Subtraction Skepticism What about subtraction? –Can’t have # paths < 0 –Consider Proper Subtraction: a b = max{0, a-b} Ponderable: Is #P closed under proper subtraction?? –Witness Reduction Technique: Reducing the number of accepting paths –If we can do this, class hierarchies come crashing down

6
Our Prove-it Roadmap “Closure Completeness” Theorem –Proper subtraction is “hardest” closure property –If #P is closed under proper subtraction, implies: #P closed under all polynomial-time operations Hierarchy collapse follows “Hierarchy Heroics” Theorem –Given one hierarchy collapse from above, prove a lot of others Related Cases –Other “hardest” closure properties –Other classes of functions

7
But first, a word from these complexity classes... UP (Unambiguous Polynomial Time): “Unique Paths” –UP = {L | NPTM N such that L=L(N) and x, N(x) has at most one accepting path} x L One accepting path x L Zero accepting paths P (Parity P): “Odd Paths” – P = {L | NPTM N such that x L #acc N (x) 0 (mod 2)} x L Odd number of accepting paths x L Even number of accepting paths

8
Complexity classes (continued) PP (Probabilistic Polynomial Time): “Probabilistic Plurality” –Probabilistic machines: NPTM with a twist Binary, fully populated computation tree Path is sequence of coin flips -- one path taken, acceptance not guaranteed –L PP if PPTM M such that x L M(x) accepts with probability 1/2 I.e. number of accepting paths 1/2 of total paths Depth = q(|x|) Total paths = 2 q(|x|), Accepting paths 2 q(|x|)-1

9
Handwritten slides here for Theorem 5.5 on Closure Completeness

10
“Hierarchy Heroics” Theorem The following statements are equivalent: –UP = PP –UP = NP = coNP = PH = P = PP PP PP PP PP PP ... Given UP = PP from previous theorem, we explore the hierarchy collapse

11
Building by Bits... UP = PP = NP = coNP = PH = P = PP PP PP PP PP PP ... –Known facts: UP = PP (from Theorem 1) UP NP PP –Proof: Trivially obvious UP = PP = NP = coNP = PH = P = PP PP PP PP PP PP ... –Known facts: PP is closed under complementation –Proof: PP = coPP Since PP = NP, then NP = coNP

12
Hierarchy Proof (continued) UP = PP = NP = coNP = PH = P = PP PP PP PP PP PP ... –Known facts: PH = i = P NP NP NP NP NP NP ... –Proof: Because NP = coNP, we can construct a single NPTM with the power of an oracle. Thus NP = NP NP, and we can collapse any size stack of NP NP NP… NANA NANA One of these must accept; thus we get an oracle-type yes/no answer in polynomial time.

13
Hierarchy Proof (continued) UP = PP = NP = coNP = PH = P = PP PP PP PP PP PP ... –Known facts: P UP PH –Proof: Since UP = PH, we get P UP UP It’s also true that UP P UP because UP oracle decides UP. P UP = UP (by double-inclusion) We know UP P PP P (1/0 acc. paths odd/even acc. paths) From Lemma 4.13, we know that PP P P PP Putting these together with what we already know, we get: UP P PP P P PP = P UP = UP UP = P = PP P

14
Hierarchy Proof (continued) UP = PP = NP = coNP = PH = P = PP PP PP PP PP PP ... –Proof: On last page we showed PP P = PP Thus we can start with a stack of two PP’s: PP PP = PP P = PP And thus can collapse any size stack of PP PP PP… !

15
Related Results Other “hardest” closure properties: Integer Division –Defn: a b = a/b Thm: The following statements are equivalent: 1. #P is closed under integer division 2. #P is closed under every polynomial-time computable operation 3. UP = PP ?

16
#P Integer Division... (continued) We’re going to prove the integer division case using the Witness Reduction Technique again, similar to proper subtraction. Conceptually, it works like this: 1. Pick an arbitrary PP language 2. Take the corresponding #P function PP 3. Make a tricky pick of another #P function 4. Using assumed closure property, generate a third #P function, for a machine... 5...That accepts the same language, but voila!--is in a different class UP L f g h Assumed closure L

17
#P Integer Division... (continued) Proof: –Part 2 trivially implies Part 1 –Part 3 implies Part 2 from previous proof –Show Part 1 implies Part 3: Let L be any PP set; we seek to show L UP Because L PP, NPTM N and integer k 1 s.t. 1. N(x) has exactly 2 |x| k computation paths, each with |x| k choices (steps) 2. x L iff N(x) has at least 2 |x| k -1 accepting paths 3. For each x, N(x) has at least one rejecting path q(|x|) |x| k

18
#P Integer Division... (continued) Let f(x) be the #P function for N. Let g(x) = 2 |x| k -1 be another #P function. By our assumption, h(x) = f(x) g(x) is a #P function. x Lx L 2 |x| k - 1 f(x) 2 |x| k -1 2 |x| k -1 f(x) h(x) = f(x)/g(x) = 1h(x) = f(x)/g(x) = 0 Thus the NPTM defined by h is a UP machine for L! L UP UP = PP max # of accepting paths min #

19
More Related Results Other complexity classes: OptP and SpanP –OptP Each path considered to have a non-negative output f is an OptP function if f(x) = max of path outputs –SpanP f is a SpanP function if f(x) = number of different path outputs For both classes: –Proper subtraction is a “hardest” closure property –If the class is closed under proper subtraction, some complexity class collapse occurs OptP: NP = coNP SpanP: PP NP = PH = NP

20
Summary Definitions –#P = functions that count accepting paths –Witness Reduction = Reducing # of accepting paths “Closure Completeness” Theorem –If #P is closed under proper subtraction: #P is closed under all polynomial-time computable operations UP = PP “Hierarchy Heroics” Theorem –If UP = PP, UP = PP = NP = coNP = PH = P = PP PP PP PP PP PP ... Related Results: –Integer division for #P, Proper subtraction for OptP, SpanP

Similar presentations

Presentation is loading. Please wait....

OK

Lecture 8 Recursively enumerable (r.e.) languages

Lecture 8 Recursively enumerable (r.e.) languages

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Convert word doc to ppt online training Free convert pdf to ppt online Download ppt on turbo generator aircraft Ppt on trial and error band Simple ppt on body language Ppt on event driven programming vs procedural programming Ppt on office automation tools Ppt on bluetooth based smart sensor networks applications Ppt on c language fundamentals grade A ppt on satellite communication