Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byKaleb Standring Modified over 2 years ago

1
Laboratory Experiments for Studying the Emission of Nitrogen and Air Andreas Ulrich, Andrei Morozov Technische Universität München Fakultät für Physik E12 4th Air Fluorescence Workshop May 17-20, 2006, Prague - Pruhonice

2
I)Excitation of dense gases with low energy electron beams II)Shape of the excited volume III)Correlation of quenching rate constants k and p‘ values IV)Intensity ratios of N 2 emission bands (experiments in Chicago and Garching) V)Improvements

3
I) Excitation of dense gases with low energy electron beams Typical parameters: Electron energy:15 keV Beam current:10 μA average Pulses:5 ns minimum Gas pressure:0.1 – 2 bar Membrane:300 nm SiN x

4
Experimental setup

5
Motivation for using low energy electrons for N 2 emission studies: High fluorescence yield at low energy Copied from DPG-presentation 2006: Andreas Obermeier

6
II) Shape of the excited volume The shape can be modelled using the program: „casino“ ( P. Drouin, A. R. Couture, R. Gauvin, P. Hovington, P. Horny, H. Demers, Univ. de Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada (2002) ) This will be important for absolute emission measurements using low energy electron beams!

7
III) Correlation of quenching rate constants k and p‘ values R prod. τ0τ0 τcτc

8
The two approaches: time spectrapressure dependence the connection Nagano et al. astro-ph/0303193 v3 26 Aug. 2003

9
Example: N 2 2P-Band, v=0 and v=1, 337 and 316nm τ 0 = 41.7ns (for both v) k q = 1.2×10 -11 cm 3 /s and k q = 2.5×10 -11 cm 3 /s, respectively Results in p‘ = 74.6 hPa and p‘ = 35.8 hPa, respectively (10% error) Morozov et al. Eur. Phys. J. D 33, 207 (2005) In contrast to: p‘ = 151.7 hPa and p‘ = 88.3 hPa, respectively (10% error) Nagano et al. astro-ph/0303193 v3 26 Aug. 2003 ?

10
Potential reasons for the discrepancy: Systematic errors ? Collisional mixing of the vibrational levels ? See: J. M. Calo and R. C. Axtmann, J. Chem. Phys. 54, 1332 (1971) C, v=0, 1 B, v=0, 1, etc. Non radiative quenching Collisional quenching of v – levels by N 2 Radiative transition A model worked out by Andrei Morozov showed an increase of the p‘ value for the 337nm (v‘=0 to v=0) transition from 79.36 to 91.95 hPa using the data given in the publication by Calo and Axtmann. (I(p) modelled with and without coll. quenching of v levels and then fit using the regular formular.)

11
v=0 n=1 τ 0 Q 1 p τ 1 Q 1d p Q1pQ1p

12
First test of the influence of vibrational relaxation via collisions: Classical model, new model with vibrational relaxation, data from new model fit with classical model

13
Intensity ratios of nitrogen emission bands Spectral response of McPherson 218. Preliminary measurements: Black: W Strip-lamp Blue: W Strip- lamp + UG11 Red: D 2 Lamp

14
Spectral response of the „Rome“ spectrometer Measured with a calib. halogen and a Hg pen-ray lamp, respectively

15
Spectrum of air recorded using electron beam excitation, McPherson model 218 VUV monochromator and photon counting:

16
Comparison of spectra of laboratory air excited by 10 keV photons (photoelectrons) and 10 keV electrons (APS Chicago and e - beam Graching)

17
Detail:

18
Comparison of the weakest and strongest lines analysed (Garching data):

19
Relative intensities of N 2 emission bands: Comparison of Chicago and Garching data with literature values

20
Relative intensities of N 2 emission bands: Comparison of Chicago and Garching data with literature values Log – scale:

21
Analysis of the same Garching- data, two persons independently

22
Improvements: We have bought a 100 W calibrated halogen lamp (LOT / Heraeus) We will borrow a new calibrated D 2 from GSI-Darmstadt (Plasma physics group) Measurements of the absolute photon flux will be performed Pressure dependences should be measured for the ~10 keV electrons Acknowledgement ! Many thanks to Paolo Privitera, Hans Klages and all their coworkers for inviting me to participate in the Chicago experiment and KfA-Karlsruhe for paying for the trip. Thanks to Reiner Krücken and MLL for supporting my trip to this conference. I want to thank Jochen Wieser (TuiLaser/Coherent) for his help with the experiments and the apparatus, in particular the very stable power supply. Thank you for your attention

Similar presentations

OK

DARK WATER - IMPLICATIONS OF RECENT COLLISIONAL COOLING MEASUREMENTS By Brian J. Drouin, Michael J. Dick, and John C. Pearson Jet Propulsion Laboratory,

DARK WATER - IMPLICATIONS OF RECENT COLLISIONAL COOLING MEASUREMENTS By Brian J. Drouin, Michael J. Dick, and John C. Pearson Jet Propulsion Laboratory,

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on needle stick injury prevention Ppt on holographic data storage system technology Ppt on anti rigging voting system Ppt on recycling of waste fabric Ppt on viruses and anti viruses test Ppt on network file system Ppt on business development planning Ppt on inhabiting other planets that can support Ppt on soft skills free download Ppt on lcd tv