Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byNorah McDowell Modified over 2 years ago

1
Cocktail algorithm studies Carmen Diez Pardos Silvia Goy López CIEMAT Madrid Muon POG 07/04/2011 1C. Diez Pardos

2
Introduction: cocktail algorithm Study in detail chi2, resolution and pulls for the data and MC used in the W' analysis Not many high pt muons Also: compare with cosmics (next step) There are several tunes, the used one is “TuneP” Algorithm logic: selection based on -lnProbchi2 Picky is taken as default, if it doesnt exit -> Take TPFMS -> tracker ->global If -lnProbchi2 (Picky-Tracker) >30, chosen tracker If -lnProbchi2 (TPFMS-chosen) >0 : takes TPFMS 2C. Diez Pardos

3
Samples and Muon Selection Samples: Data: 2010RunB Nov4ReReco MC: Fall10 W samples, W’ (1500GeV) Selection on the criteria for the analysis Must be Global and Tracker Muons Combined isolation: < 0.15 in a cone R < 0.3 Quality cuts related to the track: d0 0, number of valid tracker hits >10, number of matching segments >1, valid muon hits >0 Muon matched to a L3 muon: HLT_Mu9, _Mu11, _Mu15 Note: For this selection W MC is not enough to describe data (should include other BG), but it should be fine for p T > 100 GeV. 3C. Diez Pardos

4
Cocktail choice for data and MC In general, TPFMS preferred, for data Picky in the Barrel until pt 200 4C. Diez Pardos At low pT data and MC differ in Barrel and EC: Low pt W: more TPFMS Data: more Picky (changes tendency at high pT, see next slide) TkOnly contibrutes ~1%

5
Cocktail choice for data MORE TPFMS ACORDING TO joRDAN

6
-LnProb(chi2) difference TPFMS- PICKY Negative mean! W W W' W' Mass 1500 GeV BARREL ENDCAP 6C. Diez Pardos

7
Ratio chi2 MC W over Data pt>100 GeV In this region most of the BG is W, distributions are normalised to area o 7C. Diez Pardos

8
Ratio ln chi2 tail prob MC W over Data pt>100 In this region most of the BG is W, distributions are normalised to area TPFMS 8C. Diez Pardos PICKY

9
Pt distributions ANIADIR RATIO, PT for pt<100 W 9C. Diez Pardos

10
Resolution residuals for the chosen algo Left tail: reconstructed momentum higher than generated Interested: See tails in low pt distributions and resolution core in high pt MEAN: Similar? SIGMA: Quite similar within algorithm, better for the chosen one Fit for each algorithm the resolution, for the whole region and the BARREL ONLY?? PUT a plot 10C. Diez Pardos

11
Resolution residuals for the chosen algo Left tail: reconstructed momentum higher than generated Interested: See tails in low pt distributions and resolution core in high pt MEAN: Similar? SIGMA: Quite similar within algorithm, better for the chosen one Fit for each algorithm the resolution, for the whole region and the BARREL ONLY?? PUT a plot 11C. Diez Pardos

12
Resolution residuals for the chosen algo Left tail: reconstructed momentum higher than generated Interested: See tails in low pt distributions and resolution core in high pt MEAN: Similar? SIGMA: Quite similar within algorithm, better for the chosen one Results separated by selected or rejected for Picky and TPFMS PONER % de picky y TPFMS Por ver que mejor no cogerlo nunca?? ==> Hacer el del cocktail total 12C. Diez Pardos

13
Resolution residuals as a function of pt for W' MC Tracker not shown, too little stat 13C. Diez Pardos

14
Resolution residuals as a function of pt for W (allpt!) MC 14C. Diez Pardos

15
Pulls as a function of pt for W MC 15C. Diez Pardos

16
Pulls as a function of pt for W' MC 16C. Diez Pardos

17
Conclusions - How valid a tune with data/MC is applicable to the other samples: Different behaviour in eta regions and pt Datos: falta una contribucion para pt bajo de MC - Is it the optimal cocktail? (It seems that it works fine...) - Check with cosmics (Jordan?) Many, many thanks to Jordan for all the help and pacience 17C. Diez Pardos

18
Back-up 18C. Diez Pardos

19
Chi2 between data/MC (all BG) (Plots by G. Abendi, A. fanfani) 19C. Diez Pardos

20
Barrel Choice for MC and data

21
Data: all eta regions

Similar presentations

OK

TRACK DICTIONARY (UPDATE) RESOLUTION, EFFICIENCY AND L – R AMBIGUITY SOLUTION Claudio Chiri MEG meeting, 21 Jan 2004.

TRACK DICTIONARY (UPDATE) RESOLUTION, EFFICIENCY AND L – R AMBIGUITY SOLUTION Claudio Chiri MEG meeting, 21 Jan 2004.

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on credit policy college Ppt on acc cement company Ppt on margin trading Ppt on centring sheet Free ppt on mobile number portability delhi Ppt on natural numbers list Ppt on automobile related topics Ppt on index of industrial production india Download ppt on turbo generator diagram Ppt on synthesis and degradation of purines and pyrimidines are