Presentation on theme: "PLACE – Public Libraries – Arenas for Citizenship"— Presentation transcript:
1PLACE – Public Libraries – Arenas for Citizenship Professor dr. polit. Ragnar Audunson, Oslo University College – Shanghai International Library Forum 2006
2Background and research objectives Citizenship implies a feeling of communityCommunity is dependent upon a degree of shared identity and shared values (social capital)Securing welfare presupposes living communities as a level between market and stateIn today’s multicultural and digital society creating arenas forstering community is not a trivial taskCan libraries fulfill that role
3Research questionsHow and to what extent do people take public libraries into use as a public space, e.g. As a social meeting place or as a sphere for publicd discourseHigh intensive versus low intensive arenas – the library as a low intensive arenaStudy the interplay between the library as a virtual and physical meeting placeBarriers to community participation might vary in different communities according to degree of multiculturalism, education etc. Study undertaken in 3 communities in Oslo varying along such dimensions
4Theoretical background and basic concepts: social capital Social capital: That glue of trust, common values, standards and norms, stable social relations that bind a communigty together.Is social capital eroding?
5Basic concepts: Community The growth of multiculturalism creates a multitute of communities based on age, interests, ethnicity etc.We need a community between this multitude of communities.Their cultural expressions of all these communities are to be found in the libraryCan the library be the community of communities?
6Basic concepts: Citizenship Partly it denotes formal rights, privileges and obligations of being citizen in a given country.Partly it denotes a person who is a concerned and informed participantIn many languages – German and the Scandinavian – the concept has a collective dimension. You are citizen together with someone (Mitbürger, medborger)Citizenship presupposes social capital
7Basic concepts: high intensive versus low intensive meeting places High intensive meeting places: meeting places where you live out your primary interestsLow intensive meeting places: Meeting places where you are exposed to other interests and values than those dominating at your high intensive meeting placeDemocracy and tolerance presupposes low-intensive meeting placesLow intesive meeting places have to be designes
8The project’s initial survey A survey was unertaken in three communities in Oslo to measure:Social participation, integration and social capitalTrust in different institutions, among them the public libraryThe use of the local library as a meeting placesOpinions as to what the library should do to develop meeting places in the community
9Caharcteristics of the three communities One is a suburb with a high percentage of immigrants – more than 30 per cent and a lower educational level than the Oslo averageOne is a former inner city working class districts, now being gentrifiedOne is a typical middle class districts
10Is the local community important in people’s lives? It is more important for the inhabitants in the low status community thsn in the gentrified and bourgeois communityIt is more important for those with low than for those with high educationMore important for old people than for young peopleThe effect of education is higher in the gentrified community than in the two other.
11How is the library used as a meeting placd As a public square?As a place that directs you to other arenas and meeting placesAs a public sphere in its own rightAs an arena where you qualify as a citizen – acquires knowledge and informationAs an anera where you live out joint ionvolvements with friends and colleaguesAs an arena for virtual meetings on the webAs an arena where you are exposed to the unknown ”other”
12He library as a meeting place: the results The library is heavily used as a meeting place along all these dimensionsEncounters with people belonging to a different culture than oneself has the highest scoreTwo striking differences between the communities: a. Virtual meetings most important in the gentrified community. B. Multicultural encounters most important in the low status communityThe effect of education differs between the communities:- The library is most important as a virtual meeting place and as an arena for meeting friends in order to work on common projects for the low educated in the gentrified community
13Some preliminary conclusions The local community is important in the personal lives of citizens in a metropolitan city. That is an important premise for planning the library structureThe library is a complex meeting place where a multitude of meetings take placeThe concept of low intensive meeting places seems to be fruitful