1. NDIA SLAAD FORCEnet Innovation and Experimentation Brief CAPT (sel) Rick Simon “Simo” Deputy FORCEnet NETWARCOM 29 April 2004 FORCEnet

2. Mission People Capability Agenda FORCEnet Organization and Alignment FORCEnet Experimentation Trident Warrior FORCEnet FY05/FY06 Sea Trial Priorities FORCEnet Engagement Packs

3. Mission People Capability FORCEnet Force Development Directorate

4. Mission People Capability FORCEnet FORCEnet Experimentation Division LEGEND 1 – Gov GS 15 – Contractor 7 – military FORCEnet Execution Center San Diego

5. Mission People Capability FORCEnet FORCEnet Alignment

6. Mission People Capability FORCEnet FORCEnet Organization & Process Fleet Modernization Plan Assessments Campaign Analysis Modeling PPBS Operational Views System Views Technical Views Architecture Fleet Experimentation Concept Development Science & Technology Innovation Sea Trial Requirements Near term Far Term Mid Term Assessment

7. FORCEnet Experimentation CAPT (sel) Rick Simon “Simo” Deputy FORCEnet NETWARCOM 29 April 2004 FORCEnet

8. Mission People Capability FORCEnet CD&E Path Mid and Far Term FORCEnet Prototype Path Near Term FORCEnet Campaign Plan: Two Path Strategy FY 03FY 04 FY 05 FY 03 FY 04FY 05 Block 0Block 1 FORCEnet Trident Warrior 1.Field FORCEnet Block capabilities to the Fleet including the enabling organization and processes. 2.Pursue rapid prototyping of FORCEnet capabilities to improve joint warfighting now. 1.Provide actionable recommendations from experimentation results to Navy PPBS process. Feeding Concepts to prototyping

9. Mission People Capability FORCEnet FORCEnet Concept Development Develop a draft functional-level concept for FORCEnet which describes how future joint and combined network-centric capabilities may be used to facilitate and enhance naval operations in the 2015-2020 timeframe. Supports: –FORCEnet transformational requirements development process, –FORCEnet operational architecture development –Concept development & experimentation Guided by the FORCEnet Vision FORCEnet concept will serve as a coherent unifying concept that enables Sea Strike, Sea Shield, and Sea Basing, as well as a range of supporting concepts. Foundation for FORCEnet Requirements, Architecture and CD&E

10. Mission People Capability FORCEnet FORCEnet CD&E Path Mid and Far Term FORCEnet Prototype Path Near Term FORCEnet Campaign Plan: Two Path Strategy FY 03FY 04 FY 05 FY 03 FY 04FY 05 Block 0Block 1 FORCEnet Trident Warrior 1.Field FORCEnet Block capabilities to the Fleet including the enabling organization and processes. 2.Pursue rapid prototyping of FORCEnet capabilities to improve joint warfighting now. 1.Provide actionable recommendations from experimentation results to Navy PPBS process. Feeding Concepts to prototyping

11. Mission People Capability FORCEnet What is a Trident Warrior? Trident Warrior is: The Major FORCEnet Sea Trial Experiment Annual NETWARCOM sponsored Trident Warrior Experiment Intent Provide a rapid fielding of improved warfighting capability to the Fleet, with full supportability and maintainability. Develop supporting Tactics/Techniques/Procedures (TTP) and Concept of Operations (CONOPS) on how best to use this new capability to optimize the execution of Naval operations.

12. Mission People Capability FORCEnet FORCEnet Trident Warrior Process Contributors NETWARCOM – Navy’s Operational Agent for FORCEnet Trident Warrior lead SPAWAR – FORCEnet Chief Engineer Trident Warrior CHENG Naval Postgraduate School – Analysis Lead for TW Naval War College – TW Wargame lead Navy Warfare Development Command – Sea Trial Coordinator Warfare Centers of Excellence develop CONOPS / TTPS Fleet Forces Command (FFC) – Sea Trial Lead Approval and oversight for all resources and ship installs OPNAV N61 – Resource Sponsor FORCEnet PE Line Integrate experiment results into POM assessment process

13. Mission People Capability FORCEnet Trident Warrior Approach Integration Program of Record Ship Alts Program of Record Temp Alts In Theater Prototypes New Prototypes Fleet Driven TTP and Conops Results in an early delivery of FORCEnet capability with a subset of supportable leave behind capability Tailored to meet Fleet / COCOM requirements Leverage Fleet / Joint exercises and experiments New CONOPS New Tech. Impact on processes & organization

14. Sea Trial and FORCEnet Priorities CAPT (sel) Rick Simon “Simo” Deputy FORCEnet NETWARCOM 29 April 2004 FORCEnet

15. Mission People Capability Conventional Strike (Include SOF) Theater Air & Missile Defense CNO Sea Strike Sea ShieldSea BasingFORCEnet C2F/5F C3F/7FC2F/6F NETWARCOM NWDC Sea StrikeSea BasingFORCEnet NSAWC SUW Deploy and Employ Sea Trial Organization STOM C2F N702 N701 N704 N703 Sea Shield CFFC Sea Trial ESG Integrated JT Log AT / FP COP / CTP Comms & Data Networks ISR Undersea Warfare Strategic Deterrence CSF SWDG NFS SWDG CPF N00ASW SWDG FFC N9 C2F FFC N41 C2F Comm & Data Netwks. Team Lead: NETWARCOM CPF, CNE, CSF, CNSF, CNAF, NWDC, NNSOC Consulting Members: OPNAV N61, ONR, COTF SPAWAR, MCCDC NETWARCOM FFC N2 Intel. Surv. & Reccon. Team Lead: FFC N2 CPF, CNE, CSF, CNSF, CNAF, NWDC, NNWC, NSAWC, NNSOC Consulting Members: OPNAV N61, ONR COTF, ONI,SPAWAR MCCDC Comm. Op. & Tac Pict. Team Lead:NETWARCOM CPF, CNE, CSF, CNSF, CNAF, NWDC, NSAWC CUS Consulting Members: OPNAV N61, ONR, COTF SPAWAR, MCCDC PrePo JT Assets Afloat ST ESG: All OA, N7, CNR, NWDC, MCCDC Executive Agent for SEA TRIAL SEA TRIAL Coordinator Operational Agents Fleet Collaborative Teams

16. Mission People Capability FORCEnet Commander’s Intent Guidance for FORCENet FCT’s to be used to develop the FY 05/06 FORCEnet Sea Trial Execution Plan Specifics: 50% of experimental initiatives will address NCDP gaps Highest priority is network visualization and instrumentation 50% of experimental initiatives will address Numbered Fleet Priorities Top 10 IT priorities Sea Strike, Sea Shield, Sea Basing FORCEnet enabling capabilities FY 05 main Effort TW 05, theme is coalition / MN interoperability partnership with C2F, East Coast, ESG or CSG Covers the full spectrum of experimentation –Prototyping, concept development, non leave behind initiatives

17. Mission People Capability FORCEnet Commander’s Intent Top Priority, NLT Jul 2004 –Develop a FORCEnet Functional / Enabling Concept based on the NOC –Foundation for concept based experimentation in the future –Basis for FORCEnet requirements and architectures End State –FORCEnet two-year Execution Plan will directly impact PR 07 and POM 08 and have immediate and tangible results which address Fleet priorities for SP 21

18. Mission People Capability FORCEnet NETWARCOM FY 05 Priorities COMMS AND NETWORK DATABASES 1. INSUFFICIENT BANDWIDTH (BW) FOR SMALL SHIPS 2. 360 DEGREE SATCOM RECEPTION 3. MONITORING AND CONTROLLING BW USAGE 4. GLOBAL NETWORK VISUALIZTION – NETOPS COP 5. ENTERPRISE-WIDE INFORMATION ASSURANCE 6. AUTOMATED NETWORK SOFTWARE-CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT 7. UNUSED BW TO SHIPS 8. MLS IN SUPPORT OF COALITION OPERATIONS 9. DISTRIBUTED ISR FROM JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF ISR) COMMON OPERATIONAL-TACTICAL PICTURE 1. BLUE FORCE TRACKER AND SITUATIONAL AWARENESS 2. UNDERSEA COMMON OPERATIONAL-TACTICAL PICTURE 3. IMPROVED MARITIME COTP

19. Mission People Capability FORCEnet NETWARCOM FY 05 Priorities INTELLIGENCE, SURVEILLANCE AND RECONNAISSANCE 1. ISR Management 2. ISR sensors INFORMATION OPERATIONS 1. COMPUTER NETWORKD DEFENSE-IN-DEPTH 2. CENTRALIZED IO MISSION PLANNING CAPABILITY 3. DEPLOYABLE MULTI-MEDIA NAVAL PSYOP CAPABILITY 4. COMMUNICATIONS ELECTRONIC ATTACK CAPABILITY 5. ENHANCED SPECIFIC EMITTER IDENTIFICATION (SEI) CAPABILITY 6. NEXT GENERATION SURFACE EW SYSTEM 7. SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT TOOL 8. SHIP-BORNE COUNTER SPACE CAPABILITY 9. TACTICAL-OPERATIONAL COMPUTER NETWORK ATTACK 10. DATA LINK DECEPTION CAPABILITY

20. Mission People Capability FORCEnet NETWARCOM FY 06 Priorities COMMS and Networks –GIG-Compliant Network Monitoring & Control experimentation –On-the Move Naval Networking experimentation –Coalition information sharing (comms, COP, CIE and CDS) –Information Assurance / Computer Network Defense-in-Depth –Information Management/Knowledge Management COTP –BFT and Situational awareness –Coordinated Real-time Execution experimentation –Improved Maritime COTP and Decision Making experimentation –COP correlation and fusion –XTCF (Extensible Tactical C4I Framework) –Battle management and synchronization –USW CUP ISR –On-Demand ISR experimentation –Improved Imagery Experimentation –Horizontal fusion

21. FORCEnet Engagement Packs CAPT (sel) Rick Simon “Simo” Deputy FORCEnet NETWARCOM 29 April 2004 FORCEnet

22. Mission People Capability FORCEnet Engagement Pack (FnEP) Definition FORCEnet Engagement Packs are small scale system ensembles which demonstrate the engagement enabling power of FORCEnet by integrating Joint sensors, platforms, weapons, warriors, networks, and command & control systems with requirements to perform cross- mission enabled Network-centric Combat Reach Capabilities Combat Reach Capabilities: Integrated Fire Control Automated Battle Management Aids Composite Tracking Composite Combat Identification Common/Single Integrated Pictures FnEP Attributes: Joint e.g. Naval, AF, Army Engagement-oriented Adaptive e.g., Strike and MD Field near-term e.g., w/in 5 Years Capability Based POC: LCDR Joe McMahon, NETWARCOM, joseph.mcmahon@navy.mil

23. Mission People Capability FORCEnet Experimentation Pack Development FY2006 FY2007FY2008FY2004FY2005FY2009 Document requirements Common Reference Scenarios, Choose systems Align Combat Reach technology and acquisition efforts Initiate Pathfinder Effort JFCOM BMC2 Oversight Organization ONR NIFC Demo MD/Strike Pack Factor Integration IOC Packs SUW/USW/MCM Pack Development Experimentation M&S/HWILJDEP Field Exercises/Sea Trial Tech Demos Pack Development Fn Pathfinder: FnEP

24. Mission People Capability FORCEnet Questions? “Speed to Capability”

25. Mission People Capability FORCEnet “ FORCEnet will enable the naval service to employ a fully netted force, engage with widely distributed combat forces, and command with increased awareness and speed as an integral part of the joint team. ” We ’ ve started to FORCEnet … appreciate the reason why, get to know the language and join up! - Admiral Vern Clark 25

26. Mission People Capability FORCEnet Backups

27. Mission People Capability FORCEnet USN CONCEPT HIERARCHY USMC CONCEPT HIERARCHY JOINT CAPSTONE CONCEPT NATIONAL SECURITY STRATEGY NATIONAL MILITARY STRATEGY JOINT VISION 2020 NAVAL POWER 21 NAVAL TRANSFORMATION ROADMAP NAVAL OPERATING CONCEPT SEA POWER 21 MARINE CORPS STRATEGY 21 Naval Strategy Operational Concepts = Sea Shield Sea Strike Sea Basing Operational Concepts = Ship to Objective Maneuver, Exp ManueverWarfare Functional Concepts = Intel, Log, MCM, … Functional Concepts = FORCEnet The how to achieve Naval transformation Naval Vision Naval Capstone Concept to achieve Global CONOPS Joint Operating Concept National Guidance Joint Guidance Transformation Drivers for Sea Power 21 TRANSFORMATION PLANNING GUIDANCE Under development

28. Mission People Capability FORCEnet FORCEnet Taxonomy: The basis for The Concept Development & Experimentation Path 4.1.1 - Large Numbers (>10000) 4.1.2 - Low cost 4.1.3 - Distributed 4.1.4 - Autonomous 4.1.5 - Multiple Phenomena 4.1.6 - Continuous coverage 4.1.6.1 – Subsurface 4.1.6.2 – Surface 4.1.6.3 – Air 4.1.6.4 - Cyber space 4.1.7 - Standards based output 4.1.8 – Connected 4.1.9 – Remotely Operated ….. 4.2.1 - Node adressable network architecture 4.2.2Universal access 4.2.2.1-Tactical (LTNs) 4.2.2.2-Operational (LANs) 4.2.2.3-Strategic (Enterprise) 4.2.3 - Fault Tolerant 4.2.4 - LPD/LPI Comms 4.2.5 - Quality of Service 4.2.6 - Multiple, redundant comm paths 4.2.7 -Mobile/Expeditionary 4.2.8 - Scalable 4.2.9 - Trusted 4.2.10 – Highly available 4.2.11 - Standards based protocol 4.2.12 - Next generation internet like 4.2.13 – Adaptable to C2 needs 4.2.14 – Self organizing 4.2.15 – Self healing 4.2.16 – Common geo/temporal reference….. 4.3.1 – Information Management 4.3.1.1- Data mining 4.3.1.2 - Filtering 4.3.1.3 - Association 4.3.1.4 - Analysis 4.3.1.5 - Alert 4.3.1.6 - Prediction 4.3.1.7 - Decision support 4.3.1.8 – Assimilation 4.3.1.9 – Fusion 4.3.1.10 - Trust/Pedigree 4.3.2 - Common, intuitive user interface 4.3.3 - Common, intuitive info representation 4.3.4 - Real time processing 4.3.5 - Reach back 4.3.6 - Semantic data markup 4.3.7 – Agent based computing…. 4.4.1 - Distributed commanders 4.4.2 - Well understood ROE 4.4.3 - Well understood commanders intent 4.4.4 - Situation specific training 4.4.4.1 - Adversary’s Region 4.4.4.2 - Adversary’s Culture 4.4.5 - Robust team rehearsal 4.4.6 - Collaborative planning (Naval, Joint, Coalition) 4.4.7 - Access to information (Naval, Joint, Coalition) 4.4.7.1 - Based on need vice comms/computers 4.4.8 - Reduce reaction time 4.4.9 - Cognition 4.4.9.1 – Presentation 4.4.9.2 – Representation….. 4.5.1 - Defensive IO 4.5.1.1 - Strong computer network defense Hardware Software Processes Procedures 4.5.1.2 -Intrusion detection 4.5.2 Quality of Service…… 4. IKA 4.3 Adaptive / Automated decision aids and human centric engineering 4.4 Distributed, collaborative C2 and human centric engineering 4.5 Information Assurance 4.1 Expeditionary, multi tiered sensor and weapons grids 4.2 Dynamic multi- path and survivable networks 4.1 Expeditionary, multi tiered sensor and weapons grids 4.3 Adaptive / Automated decision aids and human centric engineering 4.4 Distributed, collaborative C2 and human centric engineering 4.5 Information Assurance

29. Mission People Capability FORCEnet Assistant Secretary of the Navy Research, Development, Acquisition Acquisition NAVSEA NAVAIR Chief of Naval Operations Operations & Requirements CFFC Commander Fleet Forces Command NETWARCOM Naval Network Warfare Command SPAWAR as FORCEnet Chief Engineer Additional Duty Additional Duty Additional Duty SPAWAR SPAWAR as FORCEnet Chief Assessor FORCEnet Alignment

30. Mission People Capability FORCEnet Status of FORCEnet Requirements/ Architectures/ Standards Implementation BAMS DDX CVN21 LCS CLIP CNO and ASN(RD&A) Endorsed FORCEnet Pilot Programs

31. Mission People Capability FORCEnet Definition of Enterprise FORCEnet Requirements/Architectures/Standards FY 2003 Appropriations Conference Report (107- 732): “While a solid organizational structure for the development of FORCEnet requirements has been established … conferees direct that the Secretary of the Navy submit, by May 1, 2003, a detailed report on the FORCEnet program …define requirements.” FY 2004 Senate Appropriations Committee Report (108-87): “ The Committee is supportive of the goals of this integration program. … The Committee directs that the FORCEnet program establish these requirements, test them within the Navy Warfighting Experiments and Demonstration line, and release the approved requirements to those affected programs as quickly as possible in FY 2004.”

32. Mission People Capability FORCEnet Operational Implementation, Refinement, and Update: FORCEnet Innovation Continuum Trident Warrior “Speed to Capability” Operational Implementation, Refinement, and Update: FORCEnet Innovation Continuum Trident Warrior “Speed to Capability” Acquisition Implementation, Refinement, and Update: JRAE FIOP/JBMC2/Other FORCEnet Pilot Programs Acquisition Implementation, Refinement, and Update: JRAE FIOP/JBMC2/Other FORCEnet Pilot Programs Enterprise Instantiation: FORCEnet Compliance Process/ Checklist Enterprise Instantiation: FORCEnet Compliance Process/ Checklist Working Baseline FORCEnet Requirements: 2003 FORCEnet Campaign Plan Spiral Development and Implementation of FORCEnet Requirements/Architecture/ Standards SECNAV Report to Congress on FORCEnet Congressional Direction FY2003/2004 Operational Requirements System/Tech Requirements Support/Policy Requirements Implementation Requirements FY03 FY04 Updated FORCEnet Requirements: 2004 FORCEnet Campaign Plan

33. Mission People Capability FORCEnet Joint / Allied Interoperability

34. Mission People Capability FORCEnet Process for Iterative Transformation Experimentation & Assessment Implementation Concept Development CFFC, Fleets, NETWARCOM, OPNAV, ONR, NWDC, MCCDC, COEs, NPS Fleets, NETWARCOM, CFFC, NWC, NWDC, MCCDC, TYCOMs, SYSCOMs, COEs, JFCOM, ONR CFFC, OPNAV, NETWARCOM, SYSCOMs Doctrine Exp & Assess Strategy/ Warfare Challenges Concept Generation Enabling Technologies Operational Architecture Capability Increment Concept Development Basic Research Exp & Assess Exp & Assess Exp & Assess Capability Increment Organization Training Material Leadership Personnel Facilities Fast Track - Sea Enterprise Wargaming CONOPS DoD Joint SSG Fleet CCI Liaison w/ Sea Warrior S&T POM Input to OPNAV assessment Disciplined Speed to Capability

35. Mission People Capability FORCEnet Requirements Current Future Joint Fleet Acquisition and SYSCOMS ONRDARPA DOD Industry Private Sector Academia Service LABS Fleet NWDC COEs Architectures “AS IS” “TO BE Analysis And Assessments Experimentation Experiment Venues Exercise Venues Prototype Evaluations Technology and Concepts Gaps/Required Warfighting Capabilities Technology Concepts Capabilities Immediate Needs and Issues POR Fit & Shortfalls

36. Mission People Capability FORCEnet FORCEnet FY 04 / FY 05 Experiment Plan FY 2004 J F M A M J J A S O N D FY 2005 J F M A M J J A S O N D O N D FY 2003 A M J J A S Joint/Service CD&E Wargaming PI 03 JFCOM MN LOE 3 Silent Hammer Trident Warrior 04/ Sea Viking 04 Fleet LOEs Fn LOE 03-1 Fn LOE 03-3 Fn LOE 04-2 Prototype Path JFMCC WG UC 04 Title 10WG JFTI RAP 1 / WARNET Demo (CG04) FBE K Spiral 4 /Sea Viking AWE Part 2 Fleet Battle Experiments Trident Warrior 05 Fn LOE 04-1 Fn LOE 05-2 Fn LOE 05-1 Spiral 2 ESG LOE WG Fn Title X WG Trident Warrior 04 WG Trident Warrior 05 WG Spiral 3 JFTI / JNTC RAP 2 Global Engagement VII JFCOM JCD WG JEFX 04 APTX 05 ATEX 05CIE LOE (Trident Warrior 03) FORCEnet Enabling FORCEnet Sea Trial JCD&E FORGER LOE

37. Mission People Capability FORCEnet FnEP Concept

38. Mission People Capability FORCEnet FnEP Strategy Aligning Programs Using the Fn Services and Contribution to Capability 4. Analysis Gap / Overlap Analysis Dynamic Models 1.Establish the Architecture (FORCEnet) FORCEnet Services 2. Group Systems & Solutions 5. Portfolio of Solutions & Requirements System Programs $$$$$ Integrated Joint / FORCEnet $$ 3. Decompose into SF/IE categories Transformation Process GEMINII & Associated Tools Sensor CT CCID CTP ABMA IFC WPN COP MP PNT Fn IG

39. Mission People Capability FORCEnet What You should Know about Fn Engagement Packs ForceNet is Network Centric Warfighting –FnEP Focuses on Engagement Capabilities, Consists of Operational Activities and CRC’s desired to yield Engagement Capability –FnEP Requirements: Adaptable – Multi-mision focus (e.g. TAMD/STRIKE) Compose-able Distributed Sensor- Weapon Target Pairing (no longer platform constrained) –CRC’s Defined: Composite Tracking – “Sensor Management and Control” –Distributed sensors – access to multiple sensor data Composite Combat Identification (CCID) – ID Management and Control –Common Shared Combat ID (red, blue, and orange) Common Picture – Track Control –Tactical level Common shared Management and Track Level Operational Pictures w/ Integrated Track Management Automated Battle Management Aids (ABMA) – Battle Space Management –Composeable, Adaptable, Redundant, Distributed Command & Control Integrated Fire Control – Weapons Management and Control –Distributed Weapons management & Control – Compose weapon – C2 combinations

40. Mission People Capability FORCEnet POM Process Functions Warfighting (Campaign) Analysis N6/N7 SPP Transformation Roadmap ISCP Investment Priorities Capability Balance 4 NCP Strategic Guidance S & T Assessment Force Structure & Munitions (NNOR) Analyses Force Capability Metrics Program Guidance Unclassified Investment Strategy SYSCOM Assessments MCP Mission Area Analysis SEA ENTERPRISE FORCEnet Concept & Operational Architecture

41. Mission People Capability FORCEnet Framework & Principals Architecture Vision (Viewpoint) Capability Metrics Reference Implementation Architecture Assessments Portfolio Of Solutions Migration Strategy Implementation Governance Requirements Architecture Maintenance Capability Metrics, Illustrating Issues Architecture views (OV’s. SV’s. TV’s) Dependencies Static: Functionality / Interoperability Dynamic: Capability Metrics Costs / Value/Benefit/Utility/ETE Functionality Bundles/ Engagement Packs, and Portfolios of Systems in To-Be architecture FnEP Solution Sets # consumers, Program Viability, Volatility Prioritization, Sequencing of system Deployment (CED?) How Much And When? Planning, Procurement, Acquisition, and Deployment Governance Timeframe, Scope, Boundary, and Context FnEP Definition & Development Process: GEMINII WARFARE DEVELOPMEN T Tech push Capabilities pull S&T PPBS